Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Papers
(The H4-Index of Journal of Personality and Social Psychology is 38. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-01-01 to 2026-01-01.)
ArticleCitations
Probing connections between social connectedness, mortality risk, and brain age: A preregistered study.191
Supplemental Material for My Partner Really Gets Me: Affective Reactivity to Partner Stress Predicts Greater Relationship Quality in New Couples186
Supplemental Material for The Effect of Configural Processing on Mentalization149
Supplemental Material for Gheirat as a Complex Emotional Reaction to Relational Boundary Violations: A Mixed-Methods Investigation123
Supplemental Material for Instrumental Goal Activation Increases Online Petition Support Across Languages122
Reactions to undesired outcomes: Evidence for the opposer’s loss effect.98
Supplemental Material for Achievement Goal Perception: An Interpersonal Approach to Achievement Goals97
Editorial.95
Supplemental Material for Learning Too Much From Too Little: False Face Stereotypes Emerge From a Few Exemplars and Persist via Insufficient Sampling88
Supplemental Material for Politically Extreme Individuals Exhibit Similar Neural Processing Despite Ideological Differences88
Partisan-motivated sampling: Re-examining politically motivated reasoning across the information processing stream.70
Self-control signals and affords power.69
Fact or artifact? Demand characteristics and participants’ beliefs can moderate, but do not fully account for, the effects of facial feedback on emotional experience.66
The role of awareness and demand in evaluative learning.61
Lay theories of financial well-being predict political and policy message preferences.60
Supplemental Material for Behavioral Variability as a Function of People, Situations, and Their Interaction55
The articulatory in-out effect: Driven by consonant preferences?53
When alterations are violations: Moral outrage and punishment in response to (even minor) alterations to rituals.53
You get us, so you like us: Feeling understood by an outgroup predicts more positive intergroup relations via perceived positive regard.53
The psychology of asymmetric zero-sum beliefs.51
Actor and partner power are distinct and have differential effects on social behavior.51
When the specter of the past haunts current groups: Psychological antecedents of historical blame.51
Measuring the belief system of a person.48
Asymmetric polarization: The perception that Republicans pose harm to disadvantaged groups drives Democrats’ greater dislike of Republicans in social contexts.47
Divergent effects of warmth and competence social rejection: An explanation based on the need-threat model.43
What social lives do single people want? A person-centered approach to identifying profiles of social motives among singles.43
Snapshots of daily life: Situations investigated through the lens of smartphone sensing.42
Supplemental Material for How Relationship Satisfaction Changes Within and Across Romantic Relationships: Evidence From a Large Longitudinal Study41
Supplemental Material for The Civilian’s Dilemma: Civilians Exhibit Automatic Defensive Responses to the Police41
Dynamics of narcissistic grandiosity and vulnerability in naturalistic and experimental settings.41
Values and stress: Examining the relations between values and general and domain-specific stress in two longitudinal studies.40
Supplemental Material for Understanding Responses to an Organizational Takeover: Introducing the Social Identity Model of Organizational Change40
Supplemental Material for Unraveling Values and Well-Being—Disentangling Within- and Between-Person Dynamics via a Psychometric Network Perspective40
Supplemental Material for Why Is There No Negativity Bias in Evaluative Conditioning? A Cognitive-Ecological Answer40
Acknowledgment40
Are multiracial faces perceptually distinct?39
Supplemental Material for Feedback Receptivity From People in Power Reduces Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Disability Bias Concerns39
Rejecting an intergroup apology attenuates perceived differences between victim and perpetrator groups in morality and power.39
"Gain- but not loss-related self-perceptions of aging predict mortality over a period of 23 years: A multidimensional approach": Correction.38
Correction to “Tell it like it is: When politically incorrect language promotes authenticity” by Rosenblum et al. (2020).38
0.4927020072937