Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Papers
(The H4-Index of Journal of Personality and Social Psychology is 38. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-05-01 to 2026-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
Supplemental Material for My Partner Really Gets Me: Affective Reactivity to Partner Stress Predicts Greater Relationship Quality in New Couples235
Supplemental Material for The Effect of Configural Processing on Mentalization179
Supplemental Material for Gheirat as a Complex Emotional Reaction to Relational Boundary Violations: A Mixed-Methods Investigation145
Supplemental Material for Instrumental Goal Activation Increases Online Petition Support Across Languages140
Reactions to undesired outcomes: Evidence for the opposer’s loss effect.120
Supplemental Material for Achievement Goal Perception: An Interpersonal Approach to Achievement Goals110
Supplemental Material for Learning Too Much From Too Little: False Face Stereotypes Emerge From a Few Exemplars and Persist via Insufficient Sampling109
The role of awareness and demand in evaluative learning.108
Supplemental Material for Behavioral Variability as a Function of People, Situations, and Their Interaction85
When the specter of the past haunts current groups: Psychological antecedents of historical blame.78
Supplemental Material for Politically Extreme Individuals Exhibit Similar Neural Processing Despite Ideological Differences68
Measuring the belief system of a person.66
What social lives do single people want? A person-centered approach to identifying profiles of social motives among singles.62
Snapshots of daily life: Situations investigated through the lens of smartphone sensing.61
When alterations are violations: Moral outrage and punishment in response to (even minor) alterations to rituals.60
Self-control signals and affords power.59
Belief in a diversity–meritocracy trade-off.59
Divergent effects of warmth and competence social rejection: An explanation based on the need-threat model.58
Fact or artifact? Demand characteristics and participants’ beliefs can moderate, but do not fully account for, the effects of facial feedback on emotional experience.54
Actor and partner power are distinct and have differential effects on social behavior.49
Partisan-motivated sampling: Re-examining politically motivated reasoning across the information processing stream.49
Supplemental Material for Social Distancing From Innocent Victims by Spatial Distality49
Probing connections between social connectedness, mortality risk, and brain age: A preregistered study.49
You get us, so you like us: Feeling understood by an outgroup predicts more positive intergroup relations via perceived positive regard.48
Dynamics of narcissistic grandiosity and vulnerability in naturalistic and experimental settings.48
Face the difference: Metacontrast as an affordance to spontaneous social categorization.46
The psychology of asymmetric zero-sum beliefs.45
Asymmetric polarization: The perception that Republicans pose harm to disadvantaged groups drives Democrats’ greater dislike of Republicans in social contexts.45
Supplemental Material for How Relationship Satisfaction Changes Within and Across Romantic Relationships: Evidence From a Large Longitudinal Study45
Supplemental Material for Why Is There No Negativity Bias in Evaluative Conditioning? A Cognitive-Ecological Answer44
Supplemental Material for The Civilian’s Dilemma: Civilians Exhibit Automatic Defensive Responses to the Police44
Acknowledgment44
Supplemental Material for Unraveling Values and Well-Being—Disentangling Within- and Between-Person Dynamics via a Psychometric Network Perspective42
Values and stress: Examining the relations between values and general and domain-specific stress in two longitudinal studies.42
Pursuing safety in social connection regulates the risk-regulation, social-safety, and behavioral-immune systems.41
Deconstructing the gender-equality paradox.39
Knowing yourself and your partner: Accuracy of personality judgment in recently cohabiting couples.38
Rejecting an intergroup apology attenuates perceived differences between victim and perpetrator groups in morality and power.38
Supplemental Material for Feedback Receptivity From People in Power Reduces Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Disability Bias Concerns38
0.20700597763062