Justice System Journal

Papers
(The median citation count of Justice System Journal is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-11-01 to 2025-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Estimating the “Legislators in Robes”: Measuring Judges' Political Preferences6
Letter from the Editor—Volume 43, Issue 35
Foreword4
Letter from the Editor4
Felon-Jurors’ Impact on Deliberation Satisfaction: Do They Really “Infect” the Process?3
Justice for All: A Collection of New Empirical Research on Indigent Defense3
Client Perspectives of Holistic Defense: Strengthening Procedural Justice through Enhanced Client Trust3
The Interaction between Legal Representation and Extralegal Factors on Nonviolent Misdemeanor Case Outcomes3
“Satan’s Minions” and “True Believers”: How Criminal Defense Attorneys Employ Quasi-Religious Rhetoric and What It Suggests about Lawyering Culture2
Ready for Their Close-Up? Ideological Cues and Strategic Televising in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals2
Time to Bail out: Examining Gender Differences in the Length of Pretrial Detention Using Survival Analysis2
Emerging Hardball Confirmation Tactics and Public Support for the U.S. Supreme Court2
President Trump and the Politics of Judicial Nominations2
Federal Appeals Court Responses to Supreme Court Precedent1
Collateral Consequences of Conviction in South Carolina Courts: A Study of South Carolina Defense Lawyers1
Reshaping Court Systems: Issue Environments and the Establishment of Drug Courts1
Estimating the Ideal Points of Organized Interests in Legal Policy Space1
Letter from the Editor – Volume 43, Issue 21
Prosecutorial Gatekeeping and Its Effects on Criminal Accountability: The Roman Prosecutor’s Office and Corruption Investigations in Italy, 1975–19941
Assessing the Influence of Supreme Court’s Shadow Docket in the Judicial Hierarchy1
Partisanship and Polarization in State Court Vacancies1
Bridging the Gap between Clients and Public Defenders: Introducing a Structured Shadow Method to Examine Attorney Communication1
0.069676876068115