Scientometrics

Papers
(The H4-Index of Scientometrics is 30. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-04-01 to 2025-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Scholarly book publishers as publicity agents for SSH titles on Twitter195
The relationship between citations and the linguistic traits of specific academic discourse communities identified by using social network analysis129
Impact measures: What are they?97
Assigning different document types by Scopus for similar contents: an exploratory analysis93
A large-scale semi-automated approach for assessing document-type classification errors in bibliometric databases76
Novelty and interdisciplinarity in criminology: how data-drivenness connects both61
Concentration versus excellence: lessons learned of European R&D &I framework programs53
Ukrainian universities in QS World University Rankings: when the means become ends52
Combining referenced publication year spectroscopy and topic clustering to identify key knowledge foundations in scientometrics: an analysis of recipients of the Price Award50
Predicting the time to first citation for medical articles using survival analysis and the association between this time and citation counts49
GAN-CITE: leveraging semi-supervised generative adversarial networks for citation function classification with limited data44
Understanding researchers’ Twitter uptake, activity and popularity—an analysis of applied research in Germany42
The effect of urban capacity in knowledge recombination on digital economy development41
How is public discussion as reflected in WeChat articles different from scholarly research in China? An empirical study of metaverse41
Making the impact of publications within a field comparable by improving the field-weighted citation impact (FWCI): the case of sport management40
Impact of the number and rank of coauthors on h-index and π-index. The part-impact method39
Impact of author characteristics on outcomes of single- versus double-blind peer review: a systematic review of comparative studies in scientific abstracts and publications38
Choosing the right collaboration partner for innovation: a framework based on topic analysis and link prediction35
Constructing a high-quality dataset for automated creation of summaries of fundamental contributions of research articles35
Using text mining and forest plots to identify similarities and differences between two spine-related journals based on medical subject headings (MeSH terms) and author-specified keywords in 100 top-c34
The incidence of 11 movie titles in the titles of Scopus-indexed papers34
Embedding models for supervised automatic extraction and classification of named entities in scientific acknowledgements34
Questions to the article: demonstrating the ascendancy of COVID-19 research using acronyms33
Automated taxonomy alignment via large language models: bridging the gap between knowledge domains33
The impact of Jürgen Habermas’s scientific production: a scientometric review32
Data sharing platforms: instruments to inform and shape science policy on data sharing?32
Does the Financial Times FT50 journal list select the best management and economics journals?32
More diversity, more complexity, but more flexibility: research article titles in TESOL Quarterly, 1967–202231
Community broker effects: evidence from Japanese research networks31
Prolific non-research authors in high impact scientific journals: meta-research study30
Enhancing citation recommendation using citation network embedding30
Reflections on the institutionalization process of scientific research in Latin America: the case of Cinvestav30
Hildrun Kretschmer (1947–2024)30
0.11878490447998