Applied Psychological Measurement

Papers
(The TQCC of Applied Psychological Measurement is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-05-01 to 2024-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
Estimating Cognitive Diagnosis Models in Small Samples: Bayes Modal Estimation and Monotonic Constraints15
Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Multiple-Group Cognitive Diagnosis Models15
Improving Accuracy and Usage by Correctly Selecting: The Effects of Model Selection in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing12
Investigating the Impact of Noneffortful Responses on Individual-Level Scores: Can the Effort-Moderated IRT Model Serve as a Solution?11
Factor Retention Using Machine Learning With Ordinal Data11
PROsetta: An R Package for Linking Patient-Reported Outcome Measures9
A Multivariate Probit Model for Learning Trajectories: A Fine-Grained Evaluation of an Educational Intervention9
SPSS Syntax for Combining Results of Principal Component Analysis of Multiply Imputed Data Sets using Generalized Procrustes Analysis8
glca: An R Package for Multiple-Group Latent Class Analysis8
Partial Measurement Invariance: Extending and Evaluating the Cluster Approach for Identifying Anchor Items7
A Signal Detection Model for Multiple-Choice Exams7
irtplay: An R Package for Online Item Calibration, Scoring, Evaluation of Model Fit, and Useful Functions for Unidimensional IRT6
autoFC: An R Package for Automatic Item Pairing in Forced-Choice Test Construction6
Is Measurement Noninvariance a Threat to Inferences Drawn from Randomized Control Trials? Evidence From Empirical and Simulation Studies6
Bridging Models of Biometric and Psychometric Assessment: A Three-Way Joint Modeling Approach of Item Responses, Response Times, and Gaze Fixation Counts5
Assessment of Differential Statement Functioning in Ipsative Tests With Multidimensional Forced-Choice Items5
Graph Theory Approach to Detect Examinees Involved in Test Collusion5
Bayesian Item Response Theory Models With Flexible Generalized Logit Links5
Optimal Hierarchical Learning Path Design With Reinforcement Learning5
On the Speed Sensitivity Parameter in the Lognormal Model for Response Times and Implications for High-Stakes Measurement Practice5
bmggum: An R Package for Bayesian Estimation of the Multidimensional Generalized Graded Unfolding Model With Covariates5
Using Machine Learning Methods to Develop a Short Tree-Based Adaptive Classification Test: Case Study With a High-Dimensional Item Pool and Imbalanced Data4
Uncertainty in Latent Trait Models4
Attenuation-Corrected Estimators of Reliability4
On the Practical Consequences of Misfit in Mokken Scaling4
An Iterative Parametric Bootstrap Approach to Evaluating Rater Fit3
Flexible Computerized Adaptive Tests to Detect Misconceptions and Estimate Ability Simultaneously3
Two New Models for Item Preknowledge3
Answer Similarity Analysis at the Group Level3
On Guessing: An Alternative Adjusted Positive Learning Estimator and Comparing Probability Misspecification With Monte Carlo Simulations3
A New Approach to Desirable Responding: Multidimensional Item Response Model of Overclaiming Data3
Modeling Rapid Guessing Behaviors in Computer-Based Testlet Items3
An Exploratory Strategy to Identify and Define Sources of Differential Item Functioning3
IRTGUI: An R Package for Unidimensional Item Response Theory Analysis With a Graphical User Interface3
The Explanatory Generalized Graded Unfolding Model: Incorporating Collateral Information to Improve the Latent Trait Estimation Accuracy3
Measurement of Ability in Adaptive Learning and Assessment Systems when Learners Use On-Demand Hints3
Anchor Point Selection: Scale Alignment Based on an Inequality Criterion3
The Optimal Design of Bifactor Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing with Mixed-format Items3
Quantifying the Distorting Effect of Rapid Guessing on Estimates of Coefficient Αlpha3
How Important is the Choice of Bandwidth in Kernel Equating?3
A Comparison of Robust Likelihood Estimators to Mitigate Bias From Rapid Guessing3
0.019676923751831