Law and Human Behavior

Papers
(The TQCC of Law and Human Behavior is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-06-01 to 2026-06-01.)
ArticleCitations
Supplemental Material for Emotion Regulation Reduces Victim Blaming of Vulnerable Sex Trafficking Survivors29
Supplemental Material for Moral Appraisals Guide Intuitive Legal Determinations27
Supplemental Material for Implicit Bias Training for Police: Evaluating Impacts on Enforcement Disparities24
Supplemental Material for Do Risk Measure Scores and Diagnoses Predict Evaluator Opinions in Sexually Violent Predator Cases? It Depends on the Evaluator22
Adapting assessment processes to consider cultural mistrust in forensic practices: An example with the MMPI instruments.20
Counterintuitive race effects in legal and nonlegal contexts.18
The cross-cultural fairness of the LS/RNR: An Australian analysis.18
What risk assessment tools can be used with men convicted of child sexual exploitation material offenses? Recommendations from a review of current research.17
Supplemental Material for An Offer You Cannot Refuse: Plea Offer Size Affects Innocent but Not Guilty Defendants’ Perceptions of Voluntariness16
Supplemental Material for The Psychological Allure of Alford: Does Wanting to Appear Innocent Put Innocents at Risk?15
Supplemental Material for Quick and Dirty: An Evaluation of Plea Colloquy Validity in the Virtual Courtroom15
Taking the next step in Miranda evaluations: Considering racial trauma and the impact of prior police contact.14
Field reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised among life-sentenced prisoners in Sweden: A follow-up study.14
A call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal systems.13
Criminal legal involvement among recently separated veterans: Findings from the LIMBIC study.13
Racial, ethnic, and sex differences in psychiatric diagnosis, mental health sequelae, and VHA service utilization among justice-involved veterans.13
Risk assessment of child-pornography-exclusive offenders.13
An uncomfortable tension: Reconciling the principles of forensic psychology and cultural competency.12
Supplemental Material for What’s Risk Got to Do With It: Judges’ and Probation Officers’ Understanding and Use of Juvenile Risk Assessments in Making Residential Placement Decisions11
Supplemental Material for What Risk Assessment Tools Can Be Used With Men Convicted of Child Sexual Exploitation Material Offenses? Recommendations From a Review of Current Research11
Supplemental Material for Comparing Perceptions of Individuals Who Sexually Offend Against Children Versus Adults11
Supplemental Material for A Test for Implicit Bias in Discretionary Criminal Justice Decisions11
Supplemental Material for Counterintuitive Race Effects in Legal and Nonlegal Contexts10
Autistic juvenile defendants: How defendant race and offense type affect juror decisions.10
Supplemental Material for Intent, Harm, and the Law: Examining the Intersection of Varied Intent and Outcome Severity on Legal Judgments10
Reexamining predictors of trial outcomes in New York State’s sex offender civil management process.9
How chatbot communication styles impact citizen reports to police: Testing procedural justice and overaccommodation approaches in a survey experiment.8
Cognitive-behavioral reciprocity: Testing the bidirectional relationship between antisocial cognition and delinquency.8
Does the affirmative consent standard increase the accuracy of sexual assault perceptions? It depends on how you learn about the standard.8
Community crime, poverty, and proportion of Black residents influence police descriptions of adolescents.8
Supplemental Material for When We Do Not Care About What Happens to “Criminals”: How Character Judgments Influence Indifference to Incidental Suffering in the Criminal Justice System7
Are forensic evaluators more likely to conclude that Black or White defendants are malingering?7
Developing a model of guilty plea decision-making: Fuzzy-trace theory, gist, and categorical boundaries.7
Supplemental Material for Almost No One Feels Free to Leave an Interrogation Room: Findings From a Virtual Reality Study of Custody Perceptions in Police Interrogations7
Advancing the Shift-of-Strategy approach: Shifting suspects' strategies in extended interviews.6
Statistical reporting practices within forensic psychology: Is anything changing?6
Improving juror assessments of forensic testimony and its effects on decision-making and evidence evaluation.6
A taxometric approach to base-rate estimation and idiographic classification in psycholegal research.6
Supplemental Material for Using Large Language Model–Based Artificial Intelligence (AI) Suspects to Train Strategic Use of Evidence: Preliminary Evidence of Transfer to Mock Suspect Interviews6
Differential impacts of investigation and witness delays on layperson perceptions of witness credibility.6
Supplemental Material for From Culture Blind to Culturally Informed: Coverage of Sociocultural Identities in U.S.-Based Forensic Psychology Journals, 2016–20206
Supplemental Material for Interrogation Tactics May Have Downstream Consequences on Innocent and Guilty Defendants’ Plea Decisions6
Supplemental Material for The Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth Demonstrates Measurement Invariance Between Black and White Justice-Referred Youths6
Supplemental Material for Cool Under Fire: Psychopathic Personality Traits and Decision Making in Law-Enforcement-Oriented Populations6
Supplemental Material for What Do People Want From Algorithms? Public Perceptions of Algorithms in Government5
Supplemental Material for The Eye of the Beholder: Increased Likelihood of Prison Sentences for People Perceived to Have Hispanic Ethnicity5
Scientific impact, diversity, and open science at Law and human behavior (2012–2017).5
From whose perspective? Differences between actors and observers in determining the voluntariness of guilty pleas.5
The legal intersection of psychosis and substance use: A mixed methods investigation of settled insanity.5
Supplemental Material for Confirmatory Information Seeking Is Robust in Psychologists’ Diagnostic Reasoning5
“I do not have an opinion about that yet”: Qualitative research on perceived procedural justice of self-represented litigants in early stages of small claims procedures in the Netherlands.5
Does engaging in reason elaboration mitigate bias in mock jurors’ evaluations of confession evidence?5
Potential causes of racial disparities in wrongful convictions based on mistaken identifications: Own-race bias and differences in evidence-based suspicion.5
Interrogation tactics may have downstream consequences on innocent and guilty defendants’ plea decisions.5
Supplemental Material for The Trial Tax and the Intersection of Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Age in Criminal Court Sentencing4
The prevalence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) among people impacted by the criminal legal system: An updated meta-analysis and subgroup analyses.4
Predictive bias in pretrial risk assessment: Application of the Public Safety Assessment in a Native American population.4
Homelessness and pretrial detention predict unfavorable outcomes in the plea bargaining process.4
Estimation of eyewitness error rates in fair and biased lineups.4
The role of social desirability and establishing nonracist credentials on mock juror decisions about Black defendants.4
Supplemental Material for Justice Involvement Prediction as Individuals Age: An Age-Graded Evaluation of the Public Safety Assessment4
Comparing witness performance in the field versus the lab: How real-world conditions affect eyewitness decision-making.4
Supplemental Material for A Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR)-Informed Systematic Review of Needs During the Pretrial Period4
Effect of juvenile justice financial sanctions on youths’ recidivism.4
Supplemental Material for In-Court Identifications Affect Juror Decisions Despite Being Unreliable4
The Miranda penalty: Inferring guilt from suspects’ silence.3
Supplemental Material for The Effect of Confession Evidence on Jurors’ Verdict Decisions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis3
When we do not care about what happens to “criminals”: How character judgments influence indifference to incidental suffering in the criminal justice system.3
Who questions the legitimacy of law? A latent profile analysis using national data in China.3
Using large language model–based artificial intelligence (AI) suspects to train strategic use of evidence: Preliminary evidence of transfer to mock suspect interviews.3
Supplemental Material for The Miranda Penalty: Inferring Guilt From Suspects’ Silence3
Bias in the justice and legal systems: Cumulative disadvantage as a framework for understanding.3
The reasonable officer standard: Perceptions of reasonableness and legal decision making.3
Supplemental Material for The Relationship Between Victim Impact Statements and Judicial Decision Making: An Archival Analysis of Sentencing Outcomes3
Guilty plea hearings in juvenile and criminal court.3
ACUTE-2007 and STABLE-2007 predict recidivism for men adjudicated for child sexual exploitation material offending.3
Supplemental Material for The Justice Motive: Retributive and Restorative Factors Affect Public Evaluations of Child Protection3
An audit study of barriers to mental health treatment for wrongly incarcerated people.3
The American Psychology–Law Society scientific review paper on police-induced confessions (2.0).3
Supplemental Material for Do Gender Prototypes Influence Attorney Willingness to Represent Sexual Harassment Victims?3
Virtually the same? A comparison between in-person and virtual mock jury deliberations.3
0.12299299240112