Law and Philosophy

Papers
(The median citation count of Law and Philosophy is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-06-01 to 2026-06-01.)
ArticleCitations
Book Review6
Why Busing Voters to the Polling Station is Paying People to Vote4
Cultural Injustice and Refugee Discrimination4
Book Review4
An Analogie model based on IBE3
Remove or Reduce: Demotion, Content Moderation, and Human Rights3
Lawful, but not Really: The Dual Character of the Concept of Law3
Ideology in the adjudication of the ECJ3
When Legal Reform Wrongs Rights-Holders3
Exhortative Legal Influence2
The Sources of Authoritative Exclusion2
Property Rights and Natural Resources2
Harms, Relationships, and the Contours of Liability for Emotional Distress2
Now It’s Personal: From Me to Mine to Property Rights1
Theorizing Private Law Beyond the State1
Relational Justice and the Value of Private Law1
When Do Unequal Results Amount to Wrongful Indirect Discrimination?1
From form and procedure to substance1
Ethics, Force, and Power: On the Political Preconditions of Just War1
Separating Law and Liberty1
The conceptual structure of perjury1
The Lesser Evil Argument for (and Against) Political Obligation1
Digital Power and Law’s Rule1
Ambiguous Sovereignty: Political Judgment and the Limits of Law in Kant’s Doctrine of Right1
Rights and Rules: Revisionism, Contractarianism, and the Laws of War1
The Independence of Tort Law1
Book Review1
Innate right, indeterminacy, and official discretion: A puzzle for Kantians1
Is there a duty not to compound injustice?1
The Unilateral Authority Theory of Punishment1
Value Pluralism and Blind Compromise: Obstacles to Reciprocity in Religion and Law1
Book Review1
Kotzen, Conditional Relevancy, and the Difficulties of Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue1
Recourse, Litigation, and the Rule of Law1
Making Sense of Evil Law0
The Libertarian Case Against Property0
Institutional Inconsistency0
Algorithmic and Non-Algorithmic Fairness: Should We Revise our View of the Latter Given Our View of the Former?0
Proportionality in the Liability to Compensate0
Gregory Keating’s Framework for Understanding Tort Law0
Liberty, Secrecy, and the Right of Assessment0
Book Review0
Book Review0
Mass Incarceration and Public Authority0
Justifying Harm-Based Strict Liability: Reflections on Keating’s Reasonableness and Risk0
Public Ownership0
The Phenomenology and Ethics of P-Centricity in Mental Capacity Law0
Introduction to the Symposium on War By Agreement by Yitzhak Benbaji and Daniel Statman0
What it means for an event to harm: a historical baseline variant of the causal account of harming0
Metalinguistic Negotiation in Legal Speech0
Strong Political Liberalism0
Book Review0
Finding Leviathan in Hegel: The Private Rule of Law and its Limits0
Religious Reasons in Politics: Some Problems for the Free Marketplace Model0
Violations of the rule of law: A typology to guide decision-makers0
Book Review0
The Personality of Public Authorities0
Keeping Hohfeld Simple0
Are Parents Fiduciaries?0
Stare Decisis and Equitable Power0
Two Models of ‘Disapplication’ in UK Public Law0
The Legal Concept of Care0
The moral permissibility of banishment0
Moves & Rules: Addressing the Puzzle of Social Rule-Following0
Hate-Speech Bans are at Odds with Central Principles of Liberalism0
Property, Authority, and Unavoidable Unilateralism0
Book Review0
If You Care About a Rule, Why Weaken Its Enforcement Dimension? On a Tension in the War Convention0
Book Review0
BOOK REVIEW0
Conditional Relevance and Conditional Admissibility0
Is Disability a Tort and Why?0
Paternalism at a Distance0
Enough Spurious Distinctions: Refugees are Just People in Need of Refuge0
Self-Cancellation and Universalization: Diagnosing Practice Failure0
Legal Positivism and Naturalistic Explanation of Action0
Critical Mercy in Criminal Law0
Disagreement by War0
Normative Positions: Against the Dual View0
Hart as an Inferentialist: The Methodological Pragmatist Insight in Hart’s Inaugural Lecture0
The Internal Point of View0
‘De Minimis’ and the Structure of the Criminal Trial0
Book Review0
Tempering Power and its Tensions0
Rights, Wronging, and Equality of Status0
Harmless Discrimination, Wrongs, and Rules0
Bentham on Laws in principem, Judicial Review, and the Public Opinion Tribunal: A Critique of Hart’s and Postema’s Criticisms0
Book Review0
Liability and Fault in Reasonableness and Risk0
Reply to Allen0
Climate Refugees and the Limits of Reparative Obligations to Offer Asylum0
Book Review0
Aim or preference? Reflections on the commitment to the truth in the criminal process0
What Legislation Is (Not): Comparing Legislation And Legal Rulings0
Social rules: normative attitudes or shared policies?0
Arbitrary Power: Caricature and Concept0
Coercion Without Incapacitation0
Lesser-Evil Justifications: A Reply to Frowe0
Book Review0
Response to Five Critics0
The Legal Status of Combatants as a Moral Compromise0
The Institutionalisation of the Basic Validity Rule0
The Death of the Legal Author: Authority, Intention, and Law-Creation in the Advent of GenAI0
Authority, Democracy, and Legislative Intent0
Rights and Demands: A Response to Kamm0
How Liberal is Relational Justice?0
Tort Law and Contractualism0
Are Lying and Perjury Dual Character Concepts?0
Re-Imagining Conceptual Analysis0
Varieties of Consequentialism and Deontology in Theories of Tort Law0
Liability for Emissions without Laws or Political Institutions0
Kinship, Justice, and Inheritance: The Case of ‘Rest’ in Ethiopia0
Book Review0
Book Review0
Challenging the State’s Claim to Authority0
Legislative Intent and the Hard Problem of Content0
Relational Justice and Family Agreements0
Why Metaphysics Matters: The Case of Property Law0
Maximilian Kiener: Voluntary Consent Theory and Practice (Routledge, 2023), 120 Pounds cloth, 35.09 Ebook0
Revising the Right to Do Wrong0
Seven Critics0
Who are the Bearers of Tort Law’s Duties?0
Informative Jury Disagreement0
Book Review0
The Epistemological Dilemma of Algorithmic Justice: What is Lost When Law Becomes ‘Computable’?0
Paternalistic Discrimination0
THE CONTOURS OF CORPORATE MORAL AGENCY0
Relational and Distributive Discrimination0
0.2590479850769