OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The median citation count of Law and Philosophy is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-06-01 to 2025-06-01.)

Article	Citations
Book Review	10
Book Review	8
Cultural Injustice and Refugee Discrimination	6
Ideology in the adjudication of the ECJ	5
Dissent-Sensitive Permissions	4
When Legal Reform Wrongs Rights-Holders	3
Retributivism and Over-Punishment	3
In the Region of Middle Axioms: Judicial Dialogue as Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Mid-level Principles	3
Why Busing Voters to the Polling Station is Paying People to Vote	3
Lawful, but not Really: The Dual Character of the Concept of Law	3
Criminal Theory and Critical Theory: Husak in the Age of Abolition	2
The Sources of Authoritative Exclusion	2
‘But You Could Have Hurt Me!’: Risk and Harm	2
Are Tort Remedies ‘Civil Recourse’?	2
Harms, Relationships, and the Contours of Liability for Emotional Distress	2
Proportionality and Its Discontents	2
An Analogie model based on IBE	2
Exhortative Legal Influence	2
Is there a duty not to compound injustice?	1
Ambiguous Sovereignty: Political Judgment and the Limits of Law in Kant’s Doctrine of Right	1
Rights and Rules: Revisionism, Contractarianism, and the Laws of War	1
Book Review	1
Kotzen, Conditional Relevancy, and the Difficulties of Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue	1
The Unilateral Authority Theory of Punishment	1
The Lesser Evil Argument for (and Against) Political Obligation	1

Morality and Institutional Detail in the Law of Torts: Reflections on Goldberg’s and Zipursky’s Recognizing Wrongs	1
The conceptual structure of perjury	1
Ethics, Force, and Power: On the Political Preconditions of Just War	1
In Defense of Patient-Centered Theories of Deontology: A Response to Liao and Barry	1
Digital Power and Law’s Rule	1
When Do Unequal Results Amount to Wrongful Indirect Discrimination?	1
How Resilient is the War Contract?	1
Book Review	0
The Internal Point of View	0
Book Review	0
Bentham on Laws in principem, Judicial Review, and the Public Opinion Tribunal: A Critique of Hart’s and Postema’s Criticisms	0
On Blame and Punishment: Self-blame, Other-Blame, and Normative Negligence	0
Liberty, Secrecy, and the Right of Assessment	0
Mala Prohibita, the Wrongfulness Constraint, and the Problem of Overcriminalization	0
Revisiting the “But Everybody Does That!” Defense	0
Metalinguistic Negotiation in Legal Speech	0
Coercion in Social Accounts of Law: Can Coerciveness Undermine Legality?	0
Relational and Distributive Discrimination	0
On Normative Redundancies and Conflicts: A Material Approach	0
Book Review	0
BOOK REVIEW	0
Rights and Demands: A Response to Kamm	0
The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-making	0
What a Home Does	0
Critical Mercy in Criminal Law	0
What Makes a Home: A Reply	0
Stability, Autonomy, and the Foundations of Political Liberalism	0
Recourse, Litigation, and the Rule of Law	0
Legislative Intent and the Hard Problem of Content	0
What it means for an event to harm: a historical baseline variant of the causal account of harming	0
Innate right, indeterminacy, and official discretion: A puzzle for Kantians	0
The Law of Negligence, Blameworthy Action and the Relationality Thesis: A Dilemma for Goldberg and Zipursky’s Civil Recourse Theory of Tort Law	0
Harmless Discrimination, Wrongs, and Rules	0
Paternalistic Discrimination	0
Redress and Reparations for Injurious Wrongs	0
Are Parents Fiduciaries?	0
Should Criminal Law Mirror Moral Blameworthiness or Criminal Culpability? A Reply to Husak	0
Is Disability a Tort and Why?	0
Public Ownership	0
Introduction to the Symposium on War By Agreement by Yitzhak Benbaji and Daniel Statman	0
What Legislation Is (Not): Comparing Legislation And Legal Rulings	0
Strong Political Liberalism	0
Coercion Without Incapacitation	0
Conditional Relevance and Conditional Admissibility	0
Finding Leviathan in Hegel: The Private Rule of Law and its Limits	0
Lesser-Evil Justifications: A Reply to Frowe	0
Rights, Wronging, and Equality of Status	0
Property, Authority, and Unavoidable Unilateralism	0
Keeping Hohfeld Simple	0
Tort Law and Contractualism	0

The Institutionalisation of the Basic Validity Rule	0
Book Review	0
Legal Positivism and Naturalistic Explanation of Action	0
Kinship, Justice, and Inheritance: The Case of ‘Rest’ in Ethiopia	0
Correction to: Response Retributivism: Defending The Duty To Punish	0
Correction to: The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-Making	0
Disagreement by War	0
Reply to Allen	0
Maximilian Kiener: Voluntary Consent Theory and Practice (Routledge, 2023), 120 Pounds cloth, 35.09 Ebook	0
Book Review	0
The moral permissibility of banishment	0
Tempering Power and its Tensions	0
On the State’s Exclusive Right to Punish	0
Proportionality in the Liability to Compensate	0
Religious Reasons in Politics: Some Problems for the Free Marketplace Model	0
Arbitrary Power: Caricature and Concept	0
If You Care About a Rule, Why Weaken Its Enforcement Dimension? On a Tension in the War Convention	0
Introduction	0
Hart as an Inferentialist: The Methodological Pragmatist Insight in Hart’s Inaugural Lecture	0
Authority, Democracy, and Legislative Intent	0
Delegation and the Continuity Thesis	0
The Personality of Public Authorities	0
Aim or preference? Reflections on the commitment to the truth in the criminal process	0
Hate-Speech Bans are at Odds with Central Principles of Liberalism	0
Accidentally Killing on Purpose: Transferred Malice and Missing Victims	0
Challenging the State’s Claim to Authority	0
A Consequentialist Framework for Prevention	0
THE CONTOURS OF CORPORATE MORAL AGENCY	0
Book Review	0
BOOK REVIEW	0
Correction to: What is it to Apply the Law?	0
The Circumstances of Civil Recourse	0
Abetting a Crime: A New Approach	0
Paternalism at a Distance	0
From form and procedure to substance	0
Enough Spurious Distinctions: Refugees are Just People in Need of Refuge	0
The Phenomenology and Ethics of P-Centricity in Mental Capacity Law	0
Against Public Reason’s Alleged Self-Defeat	0
Varieties of Consequentialism and Deontology in Theories of Tort Law	0
‘De Minimis’ and the Structure of the Criminal Trial	0
Book Review	0
Now It’s Personal: From Me to Mine to Property Rights	0
Climate Refugees and the Limits of Reparative Obligations to Offer Asylum	0
Why Metaphysics Matters: The Case of Property Law	0
Stare Decisis and Equitable Power	0
Algorithmic and Non-Algorithmic Fairness: Should We Revise our View of the Latter Given Our View of the Former?	0
Replies to Commentators	0
Moves & Rules: Addressing the Puzzle of Social Rule-Following	0
Response to Five Critics	0
The Death of the Legal Author: Authority, Intention, and Law-Creation in the Advent of GenAI	0
Liability for Emissions without Laws or Political Institutions	0