Law and Philosophy

Papers
(The median citation count of Law and Philosophy is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-04-01 to 2025-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Book Review9
Dissent-Sensitive Permissions8
Maximilian Kiener: Voluntary Consent Theory and Practice (Routledge, 2023), 120 Pounds cloth, 35.09 Ebook7
Hart as an Inferentialist: The Methodological Pragmatist Insight in Hart’s Inaugural Lecture6
Redress and Reparations for Injurious Wrongs5
Retributivism and Over-Punishment4
Arbitrary Power: Caricature and Concept3
The Personality of Public Authorities3
Why Busing Voters to the Polling Station is Paying People to Vote3
Reply to Allen3
The conceptual structure of perjury3
Are Parents Fiduciaries?3
Ideology in the adjudication of the ECJ2
Book Review2
Algorithmic and Non-Algorithmic Fairness: Should We Revise our View of the Latter Given Our View of the Former?2
THE CONTOURS OF CORPORATE MORAL AGENCY2
Moves & Rules: Addressing the Puzzle of Social Rule-Following2
What Is It to Apply the Law?2
Metalinguistic Negotiation in Legal Speech2
Cultural Injustice and Refugee Discrimination2
Keeping Hohfeld Simple2
Introduction1
On Normative Redundancies and Conflicts: A Material Approach1
In the Region of Middle Axioms: Judicial Dialogue as Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Mid-level Principles1
Book Review1
Autonomy for Contract, Refined1
Correction to: What is it to Apply the Law?1
How Resilient is the War Contract?1
Deflating Parental Rights1
If You Care About a Rule, Why Weaken Its Enforcement Dimension? On a Tension in the War Convention1
Coercion Without Incapacitation1
The Institutionalisation of the Basic Validity Rule0
Stability, Autonomy, and the Foundations of Political Liberalism0
‘But You Could Have Hurt Me!’: Risk and Harm0
Book Review0
Liberty, Secrecy, and the Right of Assessment0
Book Review0
Digital Power and Law’s Rule0
Ethics, Force, and Power: On the Political Preconditions of Just War0
BOOK REVIEW0
Revisiting the “But Everybody Does That!” Defense0
Proportionality and Its Discontents0
What Legislation Is (Not): Comparing Legislation And Legal Rulings0
Book Review0
Relational and Distributive Discrimination0
Are Tort Remedies ‘Civil Recourse’?0
Ambiguous Sovereignty: Political Judgment and the Limits of Law in Kant’s Doctrine of Right0
Should Criminal Law Mirror Moral Blameworthiness or Criminal Culpability? A Reply to Husak0
Book Review0
Disagreement by War0
Why Metaphysics Matters: The Case of Property Law0
An Analogie model based on IBE0
Enough Spurious Distinctions: Refugees are Just People in Need of Refuge0
Rights and Rules: Revisionism, Contractarianism, and the Laws of War0
Respectful Paternalism0
Rights, Wronging, and Equality of Status0
Varieties of Consequentialism and Deontology in Theories of Tort Law0
In Defense of Patient-Centered Theories of Deontology: A Response to Liao and Barry0
Authority, Democracy, and Legislative Intent0
Correction to: The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-Making0
The Law of Negligence, Blameworthy Action and the Relationality Thesis: A Dilemma for Goldberg and Zipursky’s Civil Recourse Theory of Tort Law0
Recourse, Litigation, and the Rule of Law0
Morality and Institutional Detail in the Law of Torts: Reflections on Goldberg’s and Zipursky’s Recognizing Wrongs0
The Phenomenology and Ethics of P-Centricity in Mental Capacity Law0
Introduction to the Symposium on War By Agreement by Yitzhak Benbaji and Daniel Statman0
Accidentally Killing on Purpose: Transferred Malice and Missing Victims0
The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-making0
Coercion in Social Accounts of Law: Can Coerciveness Undermine Legality?0
The Internal Point of View0
What Makes a Home: A Reply0
BOOK REVIEW0
Tort Law and Contractualism0
Book Review0
Liability for Emissions without Laws or Political Institutions0
Rights and Demands: A Response to Kamm0
Hate-Speech Bans are at Odds with Central Principles of Liberalism0
‘De Minimis’ and the Structure of the Criminal Trial0
The Lesser Evil Argument for (and Against) Political Obligation0
Lawful, but not Really: The Dual Character of the Concept of Law0
What a Home Does0
Aim or preference? Reflections on the commitment to the truth in the criminal process0
Book Review0
Kinship, Justice, and Inheritance: The Case of ‘Rest’ in Ethiopia0
Harmless Discrimination, Wrongs, and Rules0
A Consequentialist Framework for Prevention0
BOOK REVIEW0
Tempering Power and its Tensions0
Stare Decisis and Equitable Power0
Abetting a Crime: A New Approach0
Replies to Commentators0
Finding Leviathan in Hegel: The Private Rule of Law and its Limits0
Is there a duty not to compound injustice?0
Criminal Theory and Critical Theory: Husak in the Age of Abolition0
The Circumstances of Civil Recourse0
Public Ownership0
Critical Mercy in Criminal Law0
Proportionality in the Liability to Compensate0
Response to Five Critics0
Legal Positivism and Naturalistic Explanation of Action0
Delegation and the Continuity Thesis0
Paternalism at a Distance0
The Sources of Authoritative Exclusion0
Mala Prohibita, the Wrongfulness Constraint, and the Problem of Overcriminalization0
Strong Political Liberalism0
Exhortative Legal Influence0
The Unilateral Authority Theory of Punishment0
On Blame and Punishment: Self-blame, Other-Blame, and Normative Negligence0
Kotzen, Conditional Relevancy, and the Difficulties of Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue0
What it means for an event to harm: a historical baseline variant of the causal account of harming0
Paternalistic Discrimination0
Conditional Relevance and Conditional Admissibility0
Book Review0
Religious Reasons in Politics: Some Problems for the Free Marketplace Model0
Lesser-Evil Justifications: A Reply to Frowe0
Now It’s Personal: From Me to Mine to Property Rights0
The moral permissibility of banishment0
From form and procedure to substance0
On the State’s Exclusive Right to Punish0
Correction to: Response Retributivism: Defending The Duty To Punish0
Innate right, indeterminacy, and official discretion: A puzzle for Kantians0
Against Public Reason’s Alleged Self-Defeat0
Climate Refugees and the Limits of Reparative Obligations to Offer Asylum0
0.055814027786255