Law and Philosophy

Papers
(The median citation count of Law and Philosophy is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-04-01 to 2024-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Methodologies of Rule of Law Research: Why Legal Philosophy Needs Empirical and Doctrinal Scholarship10
Deflating Parental Rights5
What a Home Does5
Respectful Paternalism5
Retributivism and Over-Punishment4
Response Retributivism: Defending the Duty to Punish4
Rethinking the Use of Statistical Evidence to Prove Causation in Criminal Cases: A Tale of (Im)Probability and Free Will3
Hart, Radbruch and the Necessary Connection Between Law and Morals3
Is there a duty not to compound injustice?3
Mala Prohibita, the Wrongfulness Constraint, and the Problem of Overcriminalization3
On Normative Redundancies and Conflicts: A Material Approach3
The Morality of Treason3
The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-making3
Liability for Emissions without Laws or Political Institutions2
Lesser-Evil Justifications: A Reply to Frowe2
What Makes Disability Discrimination Wrong?2
What Makes a Home: A Reply2
Opportunity Costs Pacifism2
‘De Minimis’ and the Structure of the Criminal Trial2
‘But You Could Have Hurt Me!’: Risk and Harm2
From Angels to Humans: Law, Coercion, and the Society of Angels Thought Experiment2
Book Review1
Should Criminal Law Mirror Moral Blameworthiness or Criminal Culpability? A Reply to Husak1
On Blame and Punishment: Self-blame, Other-Blame, and Normative Negligence1
Correction to: The Opacity of Law: On the Hidden Impact of Experts’ Opinion on Legal Decision-Making1
Proportionality and Its Discontents1
The Priority of Liberty: An Argument from Social Equality1
The Law of Negligence, Blameworthy Action and the Relationality Thesis: A Dilemma for Goldberg and Zipursky’s Civil Recourse Theory of Tort Law1
Stability, Autonomy, and the Foundations of Political Liberalism1
The Institutionalisation of the Basic Validity Rule1
Against Public Reason’s Alleged Self-Defeat1
Dissent-Sensitive Permissions1
Must Penal Law Be Insulated from Public Influence?1
The One-System View and Dworkin’s Anti-Archimedean Eliminativism1
Abetting a Crime: A New Approach1
Relational and Distributive Discrimination1
Are Parents Fiduciaries?1
Criminal Theory and Critical Theory: Husak in the Age of Abolition0
What’s the Party Like? The Status of the Political Party in Anti-Defection Jurisdictions0
The Circumstances of Civil Recourse0
Setting Precedents Without Making Norms?0
Redress and Reparations for Injurious Wrongs0
Delegation and the Continuity Thesis0
Innate right, indeterminacy, and official discretion: A puzzle for Kantians0
Strong Political Liberalism0
Now It’s Personal: From Me to Mine to Property Rights0
Kotzen, Conditional Relevancy, and the Difficulties of Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue0
Kinship, Justice, and Inheritance: The Case of ‘Rest’ in Ethiopia0
A Consequentialist Framework for Prevention0
Ethics, Force, and Power: On the Political Preconditions of Just War0
If You Care About a Rule, Why Weaken Its Enforcement Dimension? On a Tension in the War Convention0
Book Review0
Autonomy for Contract, Refined0
Religious Reasons in Politics: Some Problems for the Free Marketplace Model0
Legal Positivism and Naturalistic Explanation of Action0
Introduction0
Rights and Rules: Revisionism, Contractarianism, and the Laws of War0
What Legislation Is (Not): Comparing Legislation And Legal Rulings0
Book Review0
Critical Mercy in Criminal Law0
Ideology in the adjudication of the ECJ0
The moral permissibility of banishment0
The Phenomenology and Ethics of P-Centricity in Mental Capacity Law0
Family Law: Values Beyond Choice and Autonomy?0
Harmless Discrimination, Wrongs, and Rules0
Book Review0
Metalinguistic Negotiation in Legal Speech0
BOOK REVIEW0
Ambiguous Sovereignty: Political Judgment and the Limits of Law in Kant’s Doctrine of Right0
Public Ownership0
On the State’s Exclusive Right to Punish0
Book Review0
Accidentally Killing on Purpose: Transferred Malice and Missing Victims0
Response to Five Critics0
Conditional Consent0
How Resilient is the War Contract?0
A Note on Margaret Gilbert’s Rights and Demands0
In the Region of Middle Axioms: Judicial Dialogue as Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Mid-level Principles0
Disagreement by War0
Authority, Democracy, and Legislative Intent0
Conditional Relevance and Conditional Admissibility0
Coercion in Social Accounts of Law: Can Coerciveness Undermine Legality?0
The Contracting Theory of Choices0
Reply to Allen0
Correction to: Book Review0
Book Review0
Morality and Institutional Detail in the Law of Torts: Reflections on Goldberg’s and Zipursky’s Recognizing Wrongs0
Are Tort Remedies ‘Civil Recourse’?0
What Is It to Apply the Law?0
Replies to Commentators0
Why Busing Voters to the Polling Station is Paying People to Vote0
The Unilateral Authority Theory of Punishment0
Correction to: Response Retributivism: Defending The Duty To Punish0
Stare Decisis and Equitable Power0
Paternalism at a Distance0
BOOK REVIEW0
Is There Moral Magic in the Word “Right”? Cruft on Rights and the Elusive “Deontically Infused Good”0
The Internal Point of View0
Book Review0
In Defense of Patient-Centered Theories of Deontology: A Response to Liao and Barry0
Correction to: What is it to Apply the Law?0
Proportionality in the Liability to Compensate0
Exhortative Legal Influence0
Coercion Without Incapacitation0
Introduction to the Symposium on War By Agreement by Yitzhak Benbaji and Daniel Statman0
BOOK REVIEW0
Hart as an Inferentialist: The Methodological Pragmatist Insight in Hart’s Inaugural Lecture0
Revisiting the “But Everybody Does That!” Defense0
Book Review0
THE CONTOURS OF CORPORATE MORAL AGENCY0
0.021914958953857