Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Papers
(The median citation count of Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-06-01 to 2025-06-01.)
ArticleCitations
Improvement in the quality of feedback as an indication of the development of evaluative judgement94
Feedback engagement as a multidimensional construct: a validation study80
Processes and outcomes in a curriculum-level student self-assessment intervention: a case study54
Beyond the grade: the planning, formative and summative (PFS) model of self-assessment for higher education51
Students’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback: implications for student feedback literacy in the context of generative artificial intelligence51
Disclosing own reasoning while appraising the students’ reasoning: implications for developments in formative assessment in science-engineering education48
Feedback literacy-as-event: relationality, space and temporality in feedback encounters48
Development and evaluation of two interventions to improve students’ reflection on feedback48
A dual-cycle peer evaluation model to enhance student feedback literacy: a three-round empirical educational study45
Supporting peer evaluation of student-generated content: a study of three approaches44
Empowering agency through learner-orchestrated self-generated feedback44
Enhancing the structure of feedback forms increases trustworthiness and usefulness of peer feedback44
Alternative grading systems and student outcomes: a comparative analysis of motivation, enjoyment, engagement, stress, and perceptions of final grades43
The effects of gender and training on peer feedback characteristics36
The final examination of the UK PhD: fit for purpose?35
A strategic framework for delivering ongoing feedback at scale34
‘I don’t know if people realize the impact of their words’: how does feedback during internship impact nursing student learning?34
Learner-generated podcasts: an authentic and enjoyable assessment for students working in pairs31
Towards an ecological understanding of student emotions in feedback: a scoping review28
Evolution of feedback ecology: reshaping students’ conceptions and practices in feedback literacy27
Perceptions of graduate attribute development and application in PhD graduates from US and NZ universities27
Learning as a peer assessor: evaluating peer-assessment strategies26
The Impact of Timely Formative Feedback on University Student Motivation26
Interacting with ChatGPT for internal feedback and factors affecting feedback quality26
Enabling feedback seeking, agency and uptake through dialogic screencast feedback26
The focus, function and framing of feedback information: linguistic and content analysis of in-text feedback comments25
Designing assessment in a digital world: an organising framework25
Approaches to feedback on examination performance: research, policy, and practice24
Interventions and facilitators of oral assessment performance in higher education: a systematic review24
Is continuous assessment inclusive? An analysis of factors influencing student grades24
Developing assessment literacy among trainee translators: scaffolding self and peer assessment as an intervention23
Noncognitive skills and critical thinking predict undergraduate academic performance23
Exploring students’ feedback seeking behavior in the context of programmatic assessment22
Enhancing feedback practices within PhD supervision: a qualitative framework synthesis of the literature22
How does motivation influence students’ feedback seeking processes?21
Effect of regulation scripts for dialogic peer assessment on feedback quality, critical thinking and climate of trust20
Approaches to written assignments -how students write, and instructors read20
Assessment purposes and theoretical foundations in university mathematics assessment practices: a comprehensive scoping review20
Cheating as a prosocial act? Helping others with academic cheating is related to social goals and cooperative norms20
The end of the line? A quantitative analysis of two decades of competitive assessment and research funding in UK higher education19
Are men and women really different? The effects of gender and training on peer scoring and perceptions of peer assessment19
Reciprocity in college teaching: a big data study based on online student evaluation of 919,750 professors19
Physiotherapy student perceptions of the feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of continuous adaptive assessment18
Faculty’s perception of peer observation of teaching: the case of a higher education institution in Malta18
‘This form could give me the courage to address otherwise undiscussed topics’: student reasons for (not) impacting their feedback environment18
Two sides of the same coin: a taxonomy of academic integrity and impropriety using intellectual virtues and vices18
Student partnership in assessment in higher education: a systematic review17
Developing a college student feedback literacy scale for the GenAI context17
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. On the limited use of regression discontinuity analysis in higher education16
Procedures, criteria and decision-making in doctoral admissions: the case of China’s leading research universities16
The Westerveld framework for interprofessional feedback dialogues in health professions education16
Rubrics in higher education: an exploration of undergraduate students’ understanding and perspectives16
What makes students contribute more peer feedback? The role of within-course experience with peer feedback16
The language of assessment: identifying challenging terminology for students and exploring implications for practice16
Developing and validating a student feedback literacy scale15
In search of learning-focused feedback practices: a linguistic analysis of higher education feedback policy15
Humanising feedback encounters: a qualitative study of relational literacies for teachers engaging in technology-enhanced feedback15
Cultivating learners’ technology-mediated dialogue of feedback in writing: processes, potentials and limitations15
A systematic review on peer assessment: intrapersonal and interpersonal factors15
A mixed blessing: student engagement in emergency online learning during COVID-19 in China15
Feedback format preferences of international post-graduate students in Australia: an exploratory mixed methods study13
Connecting teacher and student assessment literacy with self-evaluation and peer feedback13
Design review dialogues: a study of reviewer-student verbal interaction in a signature feedback method13
Addressing the shortcomings of the closed-door viva for PhD and doctoral candidates in the UK: a voice for academic examiners13
Playing the SET game: how teachers view the impact of student evaluation on the experience of teaching and learning13
Unpacking teacher beliefs on feedback: shaping multifaceted teacher feedback literacy13
Insights into how academics reframed their assessment during a pandemic: disciplinary variation and assessment as afterthought13
Discrimination against academics and career implications of student evaluations: university policy versus legal compliance13
Student perspectives on assessment: connections between self and society13
Authentic assessment: from panacea to criticality12
An empirical study of peer feedback in translation didactics: quality, response and student perceptions12
Re-conceptualising learner feedback agency: a situational, deliberative and entangled perspective12
Cross-border higher education in Europe and the role of quality assurance agencies12
Understanding the place and value of GenAI feedback: a recognition-based framework12
Towards a framework for designing and evaluating online assessments in business education12
Assessment cultures in higher education: reducing barriers and enabling change11
Generative AI vs. instructor vs. peer assessments: a comparison of grading and feedback in higher education11
A critical review of the quality of research on quality culture in higher education 111
Developing the relational in teacher feedback literacy: exploring feedback talk11
Using concept maps as an assessment task for international taught postgraduate students: Is it a ‘helpful bridge’ or ‘blunt instrument’?11
Self-assessment design in a digital world: centring student agency11
More enjoyable to give or to receive? Exploring students’ emotional status in their peer feedback of academic writing11
Masked ball for all: how anonymity affects students’ perceived comfort levels in peer feedback11
Collaboration, collusion, and barter-cheating: an analysis of academic help-seeking behaviors11
Flexible assessment: some benefits and costs for students and instructors11
Addressing cheating in virtual proctored examinations: toward a framework of relevant mitigation strategies10
Making internal feedback explicit: exploiting the multiple comparisons that occur during peer review10
Balancing pedagogical innovation with psychological safety?10
More pain, more gain? Extricating the effect of student involvement in rubric co-construction10
Student experiences of the ‘closed-door’ PhD and doctorate level viva voce: a systematic review of the literature10
The role of language on assessment outcomes: an analysis of calculation and explanation questions in science classrooms10
We cannot agree to disagree: ensuring consistency, transparency and fairness across bachelor thesis writing, supervision and evaluation10
Dialogism in feedback literacies: a critical review9
Assessment planning at the program-level: a higher education policy review in Australia9
Can ChatGPT effectively complement teacher assessment of undergraduate students’ academic writing?9
Engaging in a collaborative space: exploring the substance and impact of peer review conversations9
What do examiners look for in a PhD thesis? Explicit and implicit criteria used by examiners across disciplines9
Does perception mean learning? Insights from an online peer feedback setting9
Playing by the many rules: taught masters and their assessment regulations9
Assessment professional development courses for university teachers: a nationwide analysis exploring length, evaluation and content9
Proactive receiver roles in peer feedback dialogue: Facilitating receivers’ self-regulation and co-regulating providers’ learning8
Exploring Chinese EFL undergraduates’ academic emotions in giving and receiving peer feedback on writing8
Connecting students’ descriptions of classroom assessment in higher education with wellness8
Assessing the sequencing of learning objectives in a study program using evidence-based practice8
Quantifying halo effects in students’ evaluation of teaching: a response to Michela8
Identifying opportunities and gaps in current evaluation frameworks – the knowns and unknowns in determining effective student engagement activity8
Understanding students’ perceptions of fairness in group work assessment: key conditions and implications8
Feedback encounters in doctoral supervision: the role of generative AI chatbots8
Self-assessment is about more than self: the enabling role of feedback literacy8
Inculcating curiosity: pilot results of an online module to enhance undergraduate intellectual virtue8
Recognition of Prior Learning Translation and Transfer (RPLTT): using Actor-Network-Theory to develop a specialised pedagogy8
Assessment design decisions in practice: Profile identification in approaches to assessment design7
‘We lose a lot of value’: feedback on English for academic purposes speaking skills in online teaching in a UK-China joint-venture university7
Student contributions to quality assurance in higher education: a systematic literature review7
Switching on the creativity gene: a co-creation assessment initiative in a large first year genetics course7
Online learning and assessment during the Covid-19 pandemic: exploring the impact on undergraduate student well-being7
Are assessment accommodations cheating? A critical policy analysis7
Does student agency benefit student learning? A systematic review of higher education research7
Feedback practices in journal peer-review: a systematic literature review6
The student feedback literacy instrument (SFLI): multilingual validation and introduction of a short-form version6
How can learners practice evaluative judgement using qualitative self-assessment?6
Exploring students’ strategy-related beliefs and their mediation on strategies to act on feedback in L2 writing6
A community of practice approach to understanding how students develop feedback literacy enabling the processing and enactment of feedback6
Developing digital creativity through authentic assessment6
Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligence6
Re-examining our feedback model: strategies for enhancing student learning and cultivating feedback literacy through formative assessments6
Measuring what learners do in feedback: the feedback literacy behaviour scale6
Learner experience in artificial intelligence-scaffolded argumentation6
How much is too much? Medical students’ perceptions of evaluation and research requests, and suggestions for practice6
A review of the changes in higher education assessment and grading policy during covid-196
Using a self-reflective ePortfolio and feedback dialogue to understand and address problematic feedback expectations6
Bounded innovation or agency drift? Developments in European higher education quality assurance6
Motivated reasoning and faculty interpretation of student evaluation research6
Does a classroom-based curriculum offer authentic assessments? A strategy to uncover their prevalence and incorporate opportunities for authenticity6
Higher education quality assurance in Central Europe – Beyond accreditation towards divergence6
Collusion is still a tricky topic: student perspectives of academic integrity using assessment-specific examples in a science subject6
Feedback literacy matters: unlocking the potential of learning analytics-based feedback5
What does it take to provide effective peer feedback?5
A national student survey for the Italian higher education system5
Rubric co-creation to promote quality, interactivity and uptake of peer feedback5
Navigating success in higher education: engagement as a mediator between learning strategies and performance in mathematics5
Assessing engineering students’ perspectives of entrepreneurship education within higher education: a comparative study in Hong Kong5
Ten years of editing Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education5
Self-Positions in student teachers’ perceptions of assessment5
Summarise, elaborate, try again: exploring the effect of feedback literacy on AI-enhanced essay writing5
Are students barking up the wrong tree? A causal model of factors driving effective student–faculty interactions5
Student satisfaction with use of an online peer feedback system5
Mathematics self-concept and response pattern in higher education examinations: differences between genders5
Influence of individual versus collaborative peer assessment on score accuracy and learning outcomes in higher education: an empirical study5
Feedback providers’ contributions of and benefits from engaging in online peer micro-teaching feedback practices5
Are satisfied students simply happy people in the first place? The role of trait affect in student satisfaction5
‘Who knows what will come next to interrupt our assessments’: the adaptability of assessments across face-to-face and online instructional environments5
Investigating student preparedness for holistic competency assessment: insights from the Hong Kong context5
A four-dimensional framework for teacher assessment literacy in holistic competencies5
A practical approach to overcoming biases in comparing student performance in higher education5
Performing teacher feedback literacy in peer mentoring meetings5
Soft skills unveiled: a comprehensive exploration of employer preferences and employability essentials4
‘What you mean versus what you say’ – exploring the role of language and culture in European students’ interpretation of feedback4
Supervisory feedback to postgraduate research students: a literature review4
Factors associated with online examination cheating4
A systematic review on the learning outcomes in entrepreneurship education within higher education settings4
Animated process-transparency in student evaluation of teaching: effects on the quality and quantity of student feedback4
Exploring internal structure of a performance-based critical thinking assessment for new students in higher education4
‘Where’s the line? It’s an absurd line’: towards a framework for acceptable uses of AI in assessment4
Measurement of higher education students’ and teachers’ experiences in learning management systems: a scoping review4
Improving study admission through entry diagnostics using a validated subject-specific test4
First-year university students’ authentic experiences with evaluation anxiety and their attitudes toward assessment4
The impact of rubrics and scripts on self-regulation, self-efficacy and performance in collaborative problem-solving tasks4
Setting out SET: a situational mapping of student evaluation of teaching in Australian higher education4
Contract cheating: To legislate or not to legislate - is that the question?4
From authentic assessment to authenticity in assessment: broadening perspectives4
Behind the grades: co-constructing fairness to reach agreement in evaluative judgement4
Exploring intercultural dialogic interactions between individuals with diverse feedback literacies4
How does grade inflation affect student evaluation of teaching?4
0.056656122207642