Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Papers
(The median citation count of Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-11-01 to 2025-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Development and evaluation of two interventions to improve students’ reflection on feedback122
Students’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback: implications for student feedback literacy in the context of generative artificial intelligence113
Processes and outcomes in a curriculum-level student self-assessment intervention: a case study100
Feedback literacy-as-event: relationality, space and temporality in feedback encounters66
Disclosing own reasoning while appraising the students’ reasoning: implications for developments in formative assessment in science-engineering education64
Improvement in the quality of feedback as an indication of the development of evaluative judgement58
Supporting peer evaluation of student-generated content: a study of three approaches56
Feedback engagement as a multidimensional construct: a validation study56
Exploring the practical feasibility of adaptive comparative judgment as a summative assessment method51
Enhancing the structure of feedback forms increases trustworthiness and usefulness of peer feedback50
A dual-cycle peer evaluation model to enhance student feedback literacy: a three-round empirical educational study46
Empowering agency through learner-orchestrated self-generated feedback45
Learner-generated podcasts: an authentic and enjoyable assessment for students working in pairs44
The final examination of the UK PhD: fit for purpose?44
Alternative grading systems and student outcomes: a comparative analysis of motivation, enjoyment, engagement, stress, and perceptions of final grades44
The effects of gender and training on peer feedback characteristics39
‘I don’t know if people realize the impact of their words’: how does feedback during internship impact nursing student learning?36
How vulnerable are UK universities to cheating with new GenAI tools? A pragmatic risk assessment34
The reliability of student evaluations of teaching34
Rethinking bias in student evaluations: a multivariate analysis of observable instructional behaviors32
The Impact of Timely Formative Feedback on University Student Motivation31
Perceptions of graduate attribute development and application in PhD graduates from US and NZ universities30
Learning as a peer assessor: evaluating peer-assessment strategies29
Evolution of feedback ecology: reshaping students’ conceptions and practices in feedback literacy28
Towards an ecological understanding of student emotions in feedback: a scoping review27
Designing assessment in a digital world: an organising framework27
Enabling feedback seeking, agency and uptake through dialogic screencast feedback27
Interventions and facilitators of oral assessment performance in higher education: a systematic review26
Enhancing feedback practices within PhD supervision: a qualitative framework synthesis of the literature25
Approaches to feedback on examination performance: research, policy, and practice25
Interacting with ChatGPT for internal feedback and factors affecting feedback quality25
Noncognitive skills and critical thinking predict undergraduate academic performance24
Effect of regulation scripts for dialogic peer assessment on feedback quality, critical thinking and climate of trust23
Is continuous assessment inclusive? An analysis of factors influencing student grades23
Exploring students’ feedback seeking behavior in the context of programmatic assessment22
How does motivation influence students’ feedback seeking processes?22
Assessment purposes and theoretical foundations in university mathematics assessment practices: a comprehensive scoping review22
Approaches to written assignments -how students write, and instructors read21
Physiotherapy student perceptions of the feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of continuous adaptive assessment21
Developing assessment literacy among trainee translators: scaffolding self and peer assessment as an intervention21
Faculty’s perception of peer observation of teaching: the case of a higher education institution in Malta20
Reciprocity in college teaching: a big data study based on online student evaluation of 919,750 professors20
Promoting learner self-regulation: is it better to give students exemplars before or after producing work?19
Using AI to generate formative feedback in doctoral education19
Assessing engagement with Indigenous perspectives via virtual reality and concepts of ungrading18
Are men and women really different? The effects of gender and training on peer scoring and perceptions of peer assessment18
Programmatic assessment: a literature review of challenges, opportunities and useful tools to support student transition to the workplace18
Two sides of the same coin: a taxonomy of academic integrity and impropriety using intellectual virtues and vices17
‘This form could give me the courage to address otherwise undiscussed topics’: student reasons for (not) impacting their feedback environment16
What to assess when assessing collaborative assignments: the practitioner perspective16
Cheating as a prosocial act? Helping others with academic cheating is related to social goals and cooperative norms16
The end of the line? A quantitative analysis of two decades of competitive assessment and research funding in UK higher education16
Developing a college student feedback literacy scale for the GenAI context15
Interplay between student and teacher feedback literacies within pre-service teachers: a mixed-methods study15
The language of assessment: identifying challenging terminology for students and exploring implications for practice15
Student partnership in assessment in higher education: a systematic review15
Rubrics in higher education: an exploration of undergraduate students’ understanding and perspectives15
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. On the limited use of regression discontinuity analysis in higher education15
Procedures, criteria and decision-making in doctoral admissions: the case of China’s leading research universities14
How to close the learning circle? Students’ perspectives on how programmatic assessment influences self-regulated learning in a global online programme14
A mixed blessing: student engagement in emergency online learning during COVID-19 in China14
In search of learning-focused feedback practices: a linguistic analysis of higher education feedback policy14
Developing and validating a student feedback literacy scale13
Beyond penalties: a proactive approach to developing student understanding of academic integrity13
Playing the SET game: how teachers view the impact of student evaluation on the experience of teaching and learning13
From collaboration to contract cheating: exploring staff and student perceptions of the grey areas of academic outsourcing13
Humanising feedback encounters: a qualitative study of relational literacies for teachers engaging in technology-enhanced feedback13
Feedback format preferences of international post-graduate students in Australia: an exploratory mixed methods study13
A systematic review on peer assessment: intrapersonal and interpersonal factors13
Design review dialogues: a study of reviewer-student verbal interaction in a signature feedback method13
Discrimination against academics and career implications of student evaluations: university policy versus legal compliance13
Unpacking teacher beliefs on feedback: shaping multifaceted teacher feedback literacy12
Masked ball for all: how anonymity affects students’ perceived comfort levels in peer feedback12
Towards a framework for designing and evaluating online assessments in business education12
Cross-border higher education in Europe and the role of quality assurance agencies12
Addressing the shortcomings of the closed-door viva for PhD and doctoral candidates in the UK: a voice for academic examiners12
Re-conceptualising learner feedback agency: a situational, deliberative and entangled perspective12
Understanding the place and value of GenAI feedback: a recognition-based framework12
An empirical study of peer feedback in translation didactics: quality, response and student perceptions11
Who cares about grade inflation? The role of institutional policy in regulating course grades in higher education11
A critical review of the quality of research on quality culture in higher education 111
Authentic assessment: from panacea to criticality11
Collaboration, collusion, and barter-cheating: an analysis of academic help-seeking behaviors10
More pain, more gain? Extricating the effect of student involvement in rubric co-construction10
Using concept maps as an assessment task for international taught postgraduate students: Is it a ‘helpful bridge’ or ‘blunt instrument’?10
Self-assessment design in a digital world: centring student agency10
More enjoyable to give or to receive? Exploring students’ emotional status in their peer feedback of academic writing10
Generative AI vs. instructor vs. peer assessments: a comparison of grading and feedback in higher education10
Student experiences of the ‘closed-door’ PhD and doctorate level viva voce: a systematic review of the literature10
Flexible assessment: some benefits and costs for students and instructors10
Playing by the many rules: taught masters and their assessment regulations9
Balancing pedagogical innovation with psychological safety?9
Addressing cheating in virtual proctored examinations: toward a framework of relevant mitigation strategies9
Engaging in a collaborative space: exploring the substance and impact of peer review conversations9
We cannot agree to disagree: ensuring consistency, transparency and fairness across bachelor thesis writing, supervision and evaluation9
Assessment professional development courses for university teachers: a nationwide analysis exploring length, evaluation and content9
Predicting the changing relationship between students’ self-concepts and task perceptions in peer feedback9
Integrating peer assessment into experiential learning: the validity and learning benefits of peer assessment in reading circle discussions8
Can ChatGPT effectively complement teacher assessment of undergraduate students’ academic writing?8
What do examiners look for in a PhD thesis? Explicit and implicit criteria used by examiners across disciplines8
Does perception mean learning? Insights from an online peer feedback setting8
Dialogism in feedback literacies: a critical review8
Ordered or scrambled: how the forward sequencing of multiple choice questions affects test item scores8
Correction8
Assessment planning at the program-level: a higher education policy review in Australia8
A systematic-narrative review of performance-based assessments of critical thinking in higher education8
The role of language on assessment outcomes: an analysis of calculation and explanation questions in science classrooms8
Feedback encounters in doctoral supervision: the role of generative AI chatbots7
How university students work on assessment tasks with generative artificial intelligence: matters of judgement7
Effects of teacher, peer and self-feedback on student improvement in online assessment: the role of individuals’ presumptions and feedback literacy7
Proactive receiver roles in peer feedback dialogue: Facilitating receivers’ self-regulation and co-regulating providers’ learning7
Assessing the sequencing of learning objectives in a study program using evidence-based practice7
Quantifying halo effects in students’ evaluation of teaching: a response to Michela7
Self-assessment is about more than self: the enabling role of feedback literacy7
Recognition of Prior Learning Translation and Transfer (RPLTT): using Actor-Network-Theory to develop a specialised pedagogy7
Bridging AI and pedagogy: how AI-adaptive feedback shapes Chinese EFL students’ writing engagement, metacognitive writing strategies, and writing performance7
Exploring Chinese EFL undergraduates’ academic emotions in giving and receiving peer feedback on writing7
Connecting students’ descriptions of classroom assessment in higher education with wellness7
Consistency in providing peer feedback: the role of individual and situational factors7
Feedback, reflection and psychological safety: rethinking assessment for student well-being in higher education6
The role of digital technology in authentic assessment: perspectives of university educators6
Using a self-reflective ePortfolio and feedback dialogue to understand and address problematic feedback expectations6
The student feedback literacy instrument (SFLI): multilingual validation and introduction of a short-form version6
Development and validation of a scale to assess students’ perceptions of team feedback in collaborative tasks6
Switching on the creativity gene: a co-creation assessment initiative in a large first year genetics course6
Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligence6
Feedback practices in journal peer-review: a systematic literature review6
How can learners practice evaluative judgement using qualitative self-assessment?6
Does a classroom-based curriculum offer authentic assessments? A strategy to uncover their prevalence and incorporate opportunities for authenticity6
Understanding students’ perceptions of fairness in group work assessment: key conditions and implications6
Are assessment accommodations cheating? A critical policy analysis6
Student contributions to quality assurance in higher education: a systematic literature review6
Perceptions of feedback: the use of self-reflection to improve student satisfaction6
Enhancing statistics education through student-generated data and authentic assessment6
Re-examining our feedback model: strategies for enhancing student learning and cultivating feedback literacy through formative assessments6
Online learning and assessment during the Covid-19 pandemic: exploring the impact on undergraduate student well-being6
Bounded innovation or agency drift? Developments in European higher education quality assurance6
Learner experience in artificial intelligence-scaffolded argumentation5
Measuring what learners do in feedback: the feedback literacy behaviour scale5
Exploring students’ strategy-related beliefs and their mediation on strategies to act on feedback in L2 writing5
Mathematics self-concept and response pattern in higher education examinations: differences between genders5
Self-Positions in student teachers’ perceptions of assessment5
Faculty assessment choices in higher education: drivers, strategies, and decision‑making styles for fair and inclusive practice5
A community of practice approach to understanding how students develop feedback literacy enabling the processing and enactment of feedback5
Collusion is still a tricky topic: student perspectives of academic integrity using assessment-specific examples in a science subject5
A review of the changes in higher education assessment and grading policy during covid-195
Feedback literacy matters: unlocking the potential of learning analytics-based feedback5
Ten years of editing Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education5
Feedback providers’ contributions of and benefits from engaging in online peer micro-teaching feedback practices5
Assessing engineering students’ perspectives of entrepreneurship education within higher education: a comparative study in Hong Kong5
How much is too much? Medical students’ perceptions of evaluation and research requests, and suggestions for practice5
Higher education quality assurance in Central Europe – Beyond accreditation towards divergence5
A practical approach to overcoming biases in comparing student performance in higher education5
Are satisfied students simply happy people in the first place? The role of trait affect in student satisfaction5
Rubric co-creation to promote quality, interactivity and uptake of peer feedback5
Navigating success in higher education: engagement as a mediator between learning strategies and performance in mathematics5
Behind the grades: co-constructing fairness to reach agreement in evaluative judgement4
Same grade for different reasons, different grades for the same reason?4
‘What you mean versus what you say’ – exploring the role of language and culture in European students’ interpretation of feedback4
A systematic review on the learning outcomes in entrepreneurship education within higher education settings4
Soft skills unveiled: a comprehensive exploration of employer preferences and employability essentials4
Summarise, elaborate, try again: exploring the effect of feedback literacy on AI-enhanced essay writing4
Animated process-transparency in student evaluation of teaching: effects on the quality and quantity of student feedback4
Designing assessment for inclusion: an exploration of diverse students’ assessment experiences4
Are students barking up the wrong tree? A causal model of factors driving effective student–faculty interactions4
Factors associated with online examination cheating4
Measurement of higher education students’ and teachers’ experiences in learning management systems: a scoping review4
‘Where’s the line? It’s an absurd line’: towards a framework for acceptable uses of AI in assessment4
Setting out SET: a situational mapping of student evaluation of teaching in Australian higher education4
Purposes and tensions in organising knowledge: trajectories of student evaluations in two research universities4
Improving study admission through entry diagnostics using a validated subject-specific test4
‘Who knows what will come next to interrupt our assessments’: the adaptability of assessments across face-to-face and online instructional environments4
From authentic assessment to authenticity in assessment: broadening perspectives4
What does it take to provide effective peer feedback?4
0.11403799057007