Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Papers
(The median citation count of Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-08-01 to 2025-08-01.)
ArticleCitations
Improvement in the quality of feedback as an indication of the development of evaluative judgement105
Feedback engagement as a multidimensional construct: a validation study92
Processes and outcomes in a curriculum-level student self-assessment intervention: a case study74
Students’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback: implications for student feedback literacy in the context of generative artificial intelligence56
Disclosing own reasoning while appraising the students’ reasoning: implications for developments in formative assessment in science-engineering education55
Feedback literacy-as-event: relationality, space and temporality in feedback encounters51
Development and evaluation of two interventions to improve students’ reflection on feedback50
A dual-cycle peer evaluation model to enhance student feedback literacy: a three-round empirical educational study47
The reliability of student evaluations of teaching47
Exploring the practical feasibility of adaptive comparative judgment as a summative assessment method45
Supporting peer evaluation of student-generated content: a study of three approaches44
The final examination of the UK PhD: fit for purpose?43
A strategic framework for delivering ongoing feedback at scale41
‘I don’t know if people realize the impact of their words’: how does feedback during internship impact nursing student learning?37
How vulnerable are UK universities to cheating with new GenAI tools? A pragmatic risk assessment35
Learner-generated podcasts: an authentic and enjoyable assessment for students working in pairs35
The effects of gender and training on peer feedback characteristics32
Empowering agency through learner-orchestrated self-generated feedback32
Enhancing the structure of feedback forms increases trustworthiness and usefulness of peer feedback30
Alternative grading systems and student outcomes: a comparative analysis of motivation, enjoyment, engagement, stress, and perceptions of final grades29
Perceptions of graduate attribute development and application in PhD graduates from US and NZ universities28
The focus, function and framing of feedback information: linguistic and content analysis of in-text feedback comments28
Interventions and facilitators of oral assessment performance in higher education: a systematic review28
Evolution of feedback ecology: reshaping students’ conceptions and practices in feedback literacy26
The Impact of Timely Formative Feedback on University Student Motivation25
Towards an ecological understanding of student emotions in feedback: a scoping review25
Enabling feedback seeking, agency and uptake through dialogic screencast feedback24
Designing assessment in a digital world: an organising framework24
Interacting with ChatGPT for internal feedback and factors affecting feedback quality24
Learning as a peer assessor: evaluating peer-assessment strategies23
Approaches to feedback on examination performance: research, policy, and practice22
Is continuous assessment inclusive? An analysis of factors influencing student grades22
Effect of regulation scripts for dialogic peer assessment on feedback quality, critical thinking and climate of trust21
How does motivation influence students’ feedback seeking processes?21
Exploring students’ feedback seeking behavior in the context of programmatic assessment21
Noncognitive skills and critical thinking predict undergraduate academic performance21
Enhancing feedback practices within PhD supervision: a qualitative framework synthesis of the literature20
Assessment purposes and theoretical foundations in university mathematics assessment practices: a comprehensive scoping review20
Developing assessment literacy among trainee translators: scaffolding self and peer assessment as an intervention20
Cheating as a prosocial act? Helping others with academic cheating is related to social goals and cooperative norms19
Are men and women really different? The effects of gender and training on peer scoring and perceptions of peer assessment19
Reciprocity in college teaching: a big data study based on online student evaluation of 919,750 professors18
Approaches to written assignments -how students write, and instructors read18
Physiotherapy student perceptions of the feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of continuous adaptive assessment17
Faculty’s perception of peer observation of teaching: the case of a higher education institution in Malta17
Two sides of the same coin: a taxonomy of academic integrity and impropriety using intellectual virtues and vices17
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. On the limited use of regression discontinuity analysis in higher education16
Cultivating learners’ technology-mediated dialogue of feedback in writing: processes, potentials and limitations16
‘This form could give me the courage to address otherwise undiscussed topics’: student reasons for (not) impacting their feedback environment16
The Westerveld framework for interprofessional feedback dialogues in health professions education16
The end of the line? A quantitative analysis of two decades of competitive assessment and research funding in UK higher education16
How to close the learning circle? Students’ perspectives on how programmatic assessment influences self-regulated learning in a global online programme15
A mixed blessing: student engagement in emergency online learning during COVID-19 in China15
Rubrics in higher education: an exploration of undergraduate students’ understanding and perspectives15
The language of assessment: identifying challenging terminology for students and exploring implications for practice15
Developing a college student feedback literacy scale for the GenAI context15
In search of learning-focused feedback practices: a linguistic analysis of higher education feedback policy15
What makes students contribute more peer feedback? The role of within-course experience with peer feedback15
A systematic review on peer assessment: intrapersonal and interpersonal factors15
Developing and validating a student feedback literacy scale14
Procedures, criteria and decision-making in doctoral admissions: the case of China’s leading research universities14
Student partnership in assessment in higher education: a systematic review14
Feedback format preferences of international post-graduate students in Australia: an exploratory mixed methods study13
Humanising feedback encounters: a qualitative study of relational literacies for teachers engaging in technology-enhanced feedback13
Discrimination against academics and career implications of student evaluations: university policy versus legal compliance13
Playing the SET game: how teachers view the impact of student evaluation on the experience of teaching and learning13
Design review dialogues: a study of reviewer-student verbal interaction in a signature feedback method13
Connecting teacher and student assessment literacy with self-evaluation and peer feedback13
Towards a framework for designing and evaluating online assessments in business education12
Re-conceptualising learner feedback agency: a situational, deliberative and entangled perspective12
Student perspectives on assessment: connections between self and society12
Masked ball for all: how anonymity affects students’ perceived comfort levels in peer feedback12
Authentic assessment: from panacea to criticality12
Assessment cultures in higher education: reducing barriers and enabling change12
Unpacking teacher beliefs on feedback: shaping multifaceted teacher feedback literacy12
An empirical study of peer feedback in translation didactics: quality, response and student perceptions11
Flexible assessment: some benefits and costs for students and instructors11
Cross-border higher education in Europe and the role of quality assurance agencies11
Using concept maps as an assessment task for international taught postgraduate students: Is it a ‘helpful bridge’ or ‘blunt instrument’?11
Understanding the place and value of GenAI feedback: a recognition-based framework11
Addressing the shortcomings of the closed-door viva for PhD and doctoral candidates in the UK: a voice for academic examiners11
More enjoyable to give or to receive? Exploring students’ emotional status in their peer feedback of academic writing11
Student experiences of the ‘closed-door’ PhD and doctorate level viva voce: a systematic review of the literature10
Balancing pedagogical innovation with psychological safety?10
A critical review of the quality of research on quality culture in higher education 110
More pain, more gain? Extricating the effect of student involvement in rubric co-construction10
Predicting the changing relationship between students’ self-concepts and task perceptions in peer feedback10
Collaboration, collusion, and barter-cheating: an analysis of academic help-seeking behaviors10
Generative AI vs. instructor vs. peer assessments: a comparison of grading and feedback in higher education10
We cannot agree to disagree: ensuring consistency, transparency and fairness across bachelor thesis writing, supervision and evaluation10
The role of language on assessment outcomes: an analysis of calculation and explanation questions in science classrooms9
Self-assessment design in a digital world: centring student agency9
Dialogism in feedback literacies: a critical review9
Addressing cheating in virtual proctored examinations: toward a framework of relevant mitigation strategies9
Engaging in a collaborative space: exploring the substance and impact of peer review conversations8
Can ChatGPT effectively complement teacher assessment of undergraduate students’ academic writing?8
Feedback encounters in doctoral supervision: the role of generative AI chatbots8
Assessing the sequencing of learning objectives in a study program using evidence-based practice8
Playing by the many rules: taught masters and their assessment regulations8
Does perception mean learning? Insights from an online peer feedback setting8
Exploring Chinese EFL undergraduates’ academic emotions in giving and receiving peer feedback on writing8
Quantifying halo effects in students’ evaluation of teaching: a response to Michela8
What do examiners look for in a PhD thesis? Explicit and implicit criteria used by examiners across disciplines8
Assessment planning at the program-level: a higher education policy review in Australia8
Assessment professional development courses for university teachers: a nationwide analysis exploring length, evaluation and content8
Proactive receiver roles in peer feedback dialogue: Facilitating receivers’ self-regulation and co-regulating providers’ learning8
Identifying opportunities and gaps in current evaluation frameworks – the knowns and unknowns in determining effective student engagement activity7
Feedback practices in journal peer-review: a systematic literature review7
Online learning and assessment during the Covid-19 pandemic: exploring the impact on undergraduate student well-being7
Does a classroom-based curriculum offer authentic assessments? A strategy to uncover their prevalence and incorporate opportunities for authenticity7
Does student agency benefit student learning? A systematic review of higher education research7
Understanding students’ perceptions of fairness in group work assessment: key conditions and implications7
Consistency in providing peer feedback: the role of individual and situational factors7
Student contributions to quality assurance in higher education: a systematic literature review7
Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligence7
Bounded innovation or agency drift? Developments in European higher education quality assurance7
Self-assessment is about more than self: the enabling role of feedback literacy7
Recognition of Prior Learning Translation and Transfer (RPLTT): using Actor-Network-Theory to develop a specialised pedagogy7
Effects of teacher, peer and self-feedback on student improvement in online assessment: the role of individuals’ presumptions and feedback literacy7
Switching on the creativity gene: a co-creation assessment initiative in a large first year genetics course7
Are assessment accommodations cheating? A critical policy analysis7
Connecting students’ descriptions of classroom assessment in higher education with wellness7
Using a self-reflective ePortfolio and feedback dialogue to understand and address problematic feedback expectations6
Re-examining our feedback model: strategies for enhancing student learning and cultivating feedback literacy through formative assessments6
Exploring students’ strategy-related beliefs and their mediation on strategies to act on feedback in L2 writing6
Higher education quality assurance in Central Europe – Beyond accreditation towards divergence6
Learner experience in artificial intelligence-scaffolded argumentation6
A four-dimensional framework for teacher assessment literacy in holistic competencies6
The role of digital technology in authentic assessment: perspectives of university educators6
Measuring what learners do in feedback: the feedback literacy behaviour scale6
Developing digital creativity through authentic assessment6
Assessing engineering students’ perspectives of entrepreneurship education within higher education: a comparative study in Hong Kong6
A review of the changes in higher education assessment and grading policy during covid-196
Influence of individual versus collaborative peer assessment on score accuracy and learning outcomes in higher education: an empirical study6
Motivated reasoning and faculty interpretation of student evaluation research6
How can learners practice evaluative judgement using qualitative self-assessment?6
The student feedback literacy instrument (SFLI): multilingual validation and introduction of a short-form version6
How much is too much? Medical students’ perceptions of evaluation and research requests, and suggestions for practice6
A community of practice approach to understanding how students develop feedback literacy enabling the processing and enactment of feedback6
Performing teacher feedback literacy in peer mentoring meetings6
Collusion is still a tricky topic: student perspectives of academic integrity using assessment-specific examples in a science subject6
Navigating success in higher education: engagement as a mediator between learning strategies and performance in mathematics5
Are satisfied students simply happy people in the first place? The role of trait affect in student satisfaction5
‘Who knows what will come next to interrupt our assessments’: the adaptability of assessments across face-to-face and online instructional environments5
A practical approach to overcoming biases in comparing student performance in higher education5
Rubric co-creation to promote quality, interactivity and uptake of peer feedback5
Feedback literacy matters: unlocking the potential of learning analytics-based feedback5
Summarise, elaborate, try again: exploring the effect of feedback literacy on AI-enhanced essay writing5
Faculty assessment choices in higher education: drivers, strategies, and decision‑making styles for fair and inclusive practice5
Mathematics self-concept and response pattern in higher education examinations: differences between genders5
Ten years of editing Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education5
Self-Positions in student teachers’ perceptions of assessment5
Feedback providers’ contributions of and benefits from engaging in online peer micro-teaching feedback practices5
Improving study admission through entry diagnostics using a validated subject-specific test4
Setting out SET: a situational mapping of student evaluation of teaching in Australian higher education4
‘What you mean versus what you say’ – exploring the role of language and culture in European students’ interpretation of feedback4
From authentic assessment to authenticity in assessment: broadening perspectives4
What does it take to provide effective peer feedback?4
A national student survey for the Italian higher education system4
Purposes and tensions in organising knowledge: trajectories of student evaluations in two research universities4
Factors associated with online examination cheating4
Are students barking up the wrong tree? A causal model of factors driving effective student–faculty interactions4
A systematic review on the learning outcomes in entrepreneurship education within higher education settings4
How does grade inflation affect student evaluation of teaching?4
‘Where’s the line? It’s an absurd line’: towards a framework for acceptable uses of AI in assessment4
Behind the grades: co-constructing fairness to reach agreement in evaluative judgement4
Measurement of higher education students’ and teachers’ experiences in learning management systems: a scoping review4
Contract cheating: To legislate or not to legislate - is that the question?4
Soft skills unveiled: a comprehensive exploration of employer preferences and employability essentials4
Supervisory feedback to postgraduate research students: a literature review4
Exploring intercultural dialogic interactions between individuals with diverse feedback literacies4
Animated process-transparency in student evaluation of teaching: effects on the quality and quantity of student feedback4
0.051990032196045