Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Papers
(The median citation count of Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-04-01 to 2025-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Unpacking teacher beliefs on feedback: shaping multifaceted teacher feedback literacy92
Students’ evaluations of native and non-native teachers in higher education80
Students’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback: implications for student feedback literacy in the context of generative artificial intelligence71
‘Where’s the line? It’s an absurd line’: towards a framework for acceptable uses of AI in assessment58
What does it take to provide effective peer feedback?58
Building and examining research capability in Australian health students: a mixed methods study49
Humanising feedback encounters: a qualitative study of relational literacies for teachers engaging in technology-enhanced feedback47
Factors associated with online examination cheating42
Democratising assessment rubrics for international students41
Are students barking up the wrong tree? A causal model of factors driving effective student–faculty interactions41
Conceptualisation of teaching excellence: an analysis of teaching excellence schemes41
An empirical study of student action from ipsative design of feedback processes41
Measurement of higher education students’ and teachers’ experiences in learning management systems: a scoping review41
Student agency in a sustainability-oriented assessment process: exploring expansive learning in student-led rubric co-design39
Connecting students’ descriptions of classroom assessment in higher education with wellness39
Design review dialogues: a study of reviewer-student verbal interaction in a signature feedback method38
Stimulating higher education students to use online formative assessments: the case of two mid-term take-home tests36
Improving study admission through entry diagnostics using a validated subject-specific test35
Setting out SET: a situational mapping of student evaluation of teaching in Australian higher education34
Discrimination against academics and career implications of student evaluations: university policy versus legal compliance33
Beyond open book versus closed book: a taxonomy of restrictions in online examinations30
Inculcating curiosity: pilot results of an online module to enhance undergraduate intellectual virtue28
Defamiliarizing assessment and feedback: exploring the potential of ‘moments of engagement’ to throw light on the marking of undergraduate assignments27
Recognition of Prior Learning Translation and Transfer (RPLTT): using Actor-Network-Theory to develop a specialised pedagogy26
Exploring internal structure of a performance-based critical thinking assessment for new students in higher education25
Developing interactive oral assessments to foster graduate attributes in higher education24
A national student survey for the Italian higher education system24
Exploring master’s students’ emotions and emotion-regulation in supervisory feedback situations: a vignette-based study24
‘Who knows what will come next to interrupt our assessments’: the adaptability of assessments across face-to-face and online instructional environments23
Feedback engagement as a multidimensional construct: a validation study22
A mixed method approach to exploring feedback literacy through student self-reflection22
Diversity of pedagogical feedback designs: results from a scoping review of feedback research in higher education22
Exploring the experiences of distance learning students being supported to resubmit a final assignment following a fail result21
Contract cheating: To legislate or not to legislate - is that the question?21
Connecting teacher and student assessment literacy with self-evaluation and peer feedback19
Can students’ feedback literacy be improved? A scoping review of interventions19
Processes and outcomes in a curriculum-level student self-assessment intervention: a case study19
Assessment as a dilemmatic space in the GenAI age: mapping and unpacking university teachers’ conflicting priorities in assessment19
The educational integrity enforcement pyramid: a new framework for challenging and responding to student cheating19
Contradicting findings of gender bias in teaching evaluations: evidence from two experiments in Denmark18
Feedback literacy-as-event: relationality, space and temporality in feedback encounters18
Disclosing own reasoning while appraising the students’ reasoning: implications for developments in formative assessment in science-engineering education17
Beyond the grade: the planning, formative and summative (PFS) model of self-assessment for higher education17
Development and evaluation of two interventions to improve students’ reflection on feedback16
‘What you mean versus what you say’ – exploring the role of language and culture in European students’ interpretation of feedback15
Improvement in the quality of feedback as an indication of the development of evaluative judgement15
Playing the SET game: how teachers view the impact of student evaluation on the experience of teaching and learning15
‘Feedbackpacking’ : mapping the journey towards independent L2 student feedback literacy15
Supervisory feedback to postgraduate research students: a literature review15
Using scaffolding strategies to improve formative assessment practice in higher education14
Peer feedback that consistently supports learning to write and read: providing comments on meaning-level issues14
The student evaluation of teaching and likability: what the evaluations actually measure14
From authentic assessment to authenticity in assessment: broadening perspectives14
Soft skills unveiled: a comprehensive exploration of employer preferences and employability essentials14
Bibliometric analysis of assessment and evaluation in higher education: 2012–202314
Identifying opportunities and gaps in current evaluation frameworks – the knowns and unknowns in determining effective student engagement activity13
Kickstarting creative collaboration: placing authentic feedback at the heart of online digital media education13
A systematic review on the learning outcomes in entrepreneurship education within higher education settings13
Learner engagement with written corrective feedback in ESL and EFL contexts: a qualitative research synthesis using a perception-based framework13
Does student agency benefit student learning? A systematic review of higher education research13
Feedback format preferences of international post-graduate students in Australia: an exploratory mixed methods study13
Cross-border higher education in Europe and the role of quality assurance agencies12
Addressing the shortcomings of the closed-door viva for PhD and doctoral candidates in the UK: a voice for academic examiners12
Feedback cultures, histories and literacies: international postgraduate students’ experiences12
The effects of gender and training on peer feedback characteristics12
Feedback-seeking behaviour as a self-regulation strategy in higher education: a pedagogical approach12
What feedback literate teachers do: an empirically-derived competency framework12
Student perspectives on assessment: connections between self and society12
Alternative grading systems and student outcomes: a comparative analysis of motivation, enjoyment, engagement, stress, and perceptions of final grades12
Navigating feedback practices across learning contexts: implications for feedback literacy11
Flipped small group classes and peer marking: incentives, student participation and performance in a quasi-experimental approach11
Feedback practices in journal peer-review: a systematic literature review11
Enhancing the structure of feedback forms increases trustworthiness and usefulness of peer feedback11
The final examination of the UK PhD: fit for purpose?11
Implementing assessment as learning in the L2 writing classroom: a Chinese case11
A strategic framework for delivering ongoing feedback at scale11
Online learning and assessment during the Covid-19 pandemic: exploring the impact on undergraduate student well-being10
Assessment patterns in teacher education programmes: content analysis of course syllabi10
Appearance, insults, allegations, blame and threats: an analysis of anonymous non-constructive student evaluation of teaching in Australia10
What do students and teachers talk about when they talk together about feedback and assessment? Expanding notions of feedback literacy through pedagogical partnership10
Bounded innovation or agency drift? Developments in European higher education quality assurance9
Student voice in assessment and feedback (2011–2022): a systematic review9
Masked ball for all: how anonymity affects students’ perceived comfort levels in peer feedback9
‘I don’t know if people realize the impact of their words’: how does feedback during internship impact nursing student learning?9
Assessment design decisions in practice: Profile identification in approaches to assessment design9
Exploring the process of evaluative judgement: the case of engineering students judging intercultural competence9
Animated process-transparency in student evaluation of teaching: effects on the quality and quantity of student feedback9
Same grade for different reasons, different grades for the same reason?9
An empirical study of peer feedback in translation didactics: quality, response and student perceptions9
Signature feedback practices in the creative arts: integrating feedback within the curriculum9
Developing the relational in teacher feedback literacy: exploring feedback talk9
Student contributions to quality assurance in higher education: a systematic literature review9
Learner-generated podcasts: an authentic and enjoyable assessment for students working in pairs8
Supporting peer evaluation of student-generated content: a study of three approaches8
‘We lose a lot of value’: feedback on English for academic purposes speaking skills in online teaching in a UK-China joint-venture university8
Understanding the place and value of GenAI feedback: a recognition-based framework8
Are assessment accommodations cheating? A critical policy analysis8
Empowering agency through learner-orchestrated self-generated feedback8
Exploring intercultural dialogic interactions between individuals with diverse feedback literacies8
Exploring the notion of teacher feedback literacies through the theory of practice architectures8
Feedback practices in clinical placement: how students come to understand how they are progressing7
Student feedback literacy in L2 disciplinary writing: insights from international graduate students at a UK university7
Students’ online evaluation of teaching and system continuance usage intention: new directions from a multidisciplinary perspective7
The impact of rubrics and scripts on self-regulation, self-efficacy and performance in collaborative problem-solving tasks7
Supporting student and teacher feedback literacy: an instructional model for student feedback processes7
Behind the grades: co-constructing fairness to reach agreement in evaluative judgement7
How does grade inflation affect student evaluation of teaching?7
Re-conceptualising learner feedback agency: a situational, deliberative and entangled perspective7
Perceptions of feedback and engagement with feedback among undergraduates: an educational identities approach7
Purposes and tensions in organising knowledge: trajectories of student evaluations in two research universities7
Making peer feedback work: the contribution of technology-mediated dialogic peer feedback to feedback uptake and literacy7
ChatGPT performance on multiple choice question examinations in higher education. A pragmatic scoping review7
Authentic assessment: from panacea to criticality6
How does assessment drive learning? A focus on students’ development of evaluative judgement6
Towards a framework for designing and evaluating online assessments in business education6
Making internal feedback explicit: harnessing the comparisons students make during two-stage exams6
Supervisors’ untrained postgraduate rubric use for formative and summative purposes6
Switching on the creativity gene: a co-creation assessment initiative in a large first year genetics course6
Assessment cultures in higher education: reducing barriers and enabling change6
When to conduct student evaluation of teaching surveys: before or after the final examination?6
A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: a call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ work6
Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligence6
Insights into how academics reframed their assessment during a pandemic: disciplinary variation and assessment as afterthought6
How can learners practice evaluative judgement using qualitative self-assessment?5
Assessment by engagement: building confidence and autonomy in the first year5
Understanding Chinese English-major students’ intertextual competence and contributing factors5
Enabling feedback seeking, agency and uptake through dialogic screencast feedback5
Interacting with ChatGPT for internal feedback and factors affecting feedback quality5
Measuring what learners do in feedback: the feedback literacy behaviour scale5
Talking during a test?! Embracing mobile instant messaging during assessment5
First-year university students’ authentic experiences with evaluation anxiety and their attitudes toward assessment5
What do college students think of feedback literacy? An ecological interpretation of Hong Kong students’ perspectives5
Students’ use of evaluative judgement in an online peer learning community5
Co-designing assessment tasks with students in tertiary education: a scoping review of the literature5
Perceptions and learning experiences of nursing students receiving peer video and peer verbal feedback: a qualitative study5
Designing assessment for inclusion: an exploration of diverse students’ assessment experiences5
Consideration of student evaluations of teaching (SET) and learning: perspectives of learning and teaching leaders through the ethical lens of “first, do no harm”5
Students’ experience of making and receiving peer assessment: the effect of self-assessed knowledge and trust5
More enjoyable to give or to receive? Exploring students’ emotional status in their peer feedback of academic writing5
The influence of peer feed-back and peer feed-forward on international students’ L2 writing in China’s higher education4
In search of valid non-cognitive student selection criteria4
The student feedback literacy instrument (SFLI): multilingual validation and introduction of a short-form version4
Using concept maps as an assessment task for international taught postgraduate students: Is it a ‘helpful bridge’ or ‘blunt instrument’?4
New frontiers in student evaluations of teaching: university efforts to design and test a new instrument for student feedback4
Unravelling the relationship between student engagement and learning outcomes in emergency online learning: a synthesis of quantitative and qualitative results4
Towards an ecological understanding of student emotions in feedback: a scoping review4
Differential effect of university entrance scores on graduates’ performance: the case of degree completion on time in Portugal4
Evolution of feedback ecology: reshaping students’ conceptions and practices in feedback literacy4
Perceptions of graduate attribute development and application in PhD graduates from US and NZ universities4
Re-examining our feedback model: strategies for enhancing student learning and cultivating feedback literacy through formative assessments4
Motivated reasoning and faculty interpretation of student evaluation research4
Feedforward practices: a systematic review of the literature4
More than a checkpoint: the pedagogic potential of a dialogic approach to doctoral progression assessment4
Harnessing the potential of exemplars to facilitate learning: insights from translation training4
The Impact of Timely Formative Feedback on University Student Motivation4
How to improve the predictive validity of a composite admission score? A case study from Hungary4
Learning as a peer assessor: evaluating peer-assessment strategies4
Using a self-reflective ePortfolio and feedback dialogue to understand and address problematic feedback expectations4
Mark distribution is affected by the type of assignment but not by features of the marking scheme in a biomedical sciences department of a UK university4
Designing the digital in authentic assessment: is it fit for purpose?3
Assessors’ perspectives of an oral assessment within a teaching performance assessment3
Flexible assessment: some benefits and costs for students and instructors3
Designing assessment in a digital world: an organising framework3
Higher education quality assurance in Central Europe – Beyond accreditation towards divergence3
Who are faculty assessment leaders?3
Addressing cheating in virtual proctored examinations: toward a framework of relevant mitigation strategies3
Bifactor modelling of the psychological constructs of learner feedback literacy: conceptions of feedback, feedback trust and self-efficacy3
The relative impact of in-class closed-book versus take-home open-book examination type on academic performance, student knowledge retention and wellbeing3
Developing student feedback literacy through self and peer assessment interventions3
Noncognitive skills and critical thinking predict undergraduate academic performance3
Collaboration, collusion, and barter-cheating: an analysis of academic help-seeking behaviors3
Toward understanding and quantifying halo in students’ evaluation of teaching3
Exploring students’ feedback seeking behavior in the context of programmatic assessment3
Developing assessment literacy among trainee translators: scaffolding self and peer assessment as an intervention3
The impact of disadvantage on higher education engagement during different delivery modes: a pre- versus peri-pandemic comparison of learning analytics data3
The focus, function and framing of feedback information: linguistic and content analysis of in-text feedback comments3
From feedback-as-information to feedback-as-process: a linguistic analysis of the feedback literature3
Does a classroom-based curriculum offer authentic assessments? A strategy to uncover their prevalence and incorporate opportunities for authenticity3
Automated marking of longer computational questions in engineering subjects3
One field too far?3
The tension between impression management and learning: examining the impact of Chinese students’ academic integrity perceptions on self-assessment intentions3
0.14940094947815