Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Papers
(The TQCC of Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education is 10. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-11-01 to 2025-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Development and evaluation of two interventions to improve students’ reflection on feedback122
Students’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback: implications for student feedback literacy in the context of generative artificial intelligence113
Processes and outcomes in a curriculum-level student self-assessment intervention: a case study100
Feedback literacy-as-event: relationality, space and temporality in feedback encounters66
Disclosing own reasoning while appraising the students’ reasoning: implications for developments in formative assessment in science-engineering education64
Improvement in the quality of feedback as an indication of the development of evaluative judgement58
Feedback engagement as a multidimensional construct: a validation study56
Supporting peer evaluation of student-generated content: a study of three approaches56
Exploring the practical feasibility of adaptive comparative judgment as a summative assessment method51
Enhancing the structure of feedback forms increases trustworthiness and usefulness of peer feedback50
A dual-cycle peer evaluation model to enhance student feedback literacy: a three-round empirical educational study46
Empowering agency through learner-orchestrated self-generated feedback45
The final examination of the UK PhD: fit for purpose?44
Alternative grading systems and student outcomes: a comparative analysis of motivation, enjoyment, engagement, stress, and perceptions of final grades44
Learner-generated podcasts: an authentic and enjoyable assessment for students working in pairs44
The effects of gender and training on peer feedback characteristics39
‘I don’t know if people realize the impact of their words’: how does feedback during internship impact nursing student learning?36
The reliability of student evaluations of teaching34
How vulnerable are UK universities to cheating with new GenAI tools? A pragmatic risk assessment34
Rethinking bias in student evaluations: a multivariate analysis of observable instructional behaviors32
The Impact of Timely Formative Feedback on University Student Motivation31
Perceptions of graduate attribute development and application in PhD graduates from US and NZ universities30
Learning as a peer assessor: evaluating peer-assessment strategies29
Evolution of feedback ecology: reshaping students’ conceptions and practices in feedback literacy28
Designing assessment in a digital world: an organising framework27
Enabling feedback seeking, agency and uptake through dialogic screencast feedback27
Towards an ecological understanding of student emotions in feedback: a scoping review27
Interventions and facilitators of oral assessment performance in higher education: a systematic review26
Approaches to feedback on examination performance: research, policy, and practice25
Interacting with ChatGPT for internal feedback and factors affecting feedback quality25
Enhancing feedback practices within PhD supervision: a qualitative framework synthesis of the literature25
Noncognitive skills and critical thinking predict undergraduate academic performance24
Is continuous assessment inclusive? An analysis of factors influencing student grades23
Effect of regulation scripts for dialogic peer assessment on feedback quality, critical thinking and climate of trust23
How does motivation influence students’ feedback seeking processes?22
Assessment purposes and theoretical foundations in university mathematics assessment practices: a comprehensive scoping review22
Exploring students’ feedback seeking behavior in the context of programmatic assessment22
Physiotherapy student perceptions of the feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of continuous adaptive assessment21
Developing assessment literacy among trainee translators: scaffolding self and peer assessment as an intervention21
Approaches to written assignments -how students write, and instructors read21
Faculty’s perception of peer observation of teaching: the case of a higher education institution in Malta20
Reciprocity in college teaching: a big data study based on online student evaluation of 919,750 professors20
Using AI to generate formative feedback in doctoral education19
Promoting learner self-regulation: is it better to give students exemplars before or after producing work?19
Are men and women really different? The effects of gender and training on peer scoring and perceptions of peer assessment18
Programmatic assessment: a literature review of challenges, opportunities and useful tools to support student transition to the workplace18
Assessing engagement with Indigenous perspectives via virtual reality and concepts of ungrading18
Two sides of the same coin: a taxonomy of academic integrity and impropriety using intellectual virtues and vices17
The end of the line? A quantitative analysis of two decades of competitive assessment and research funding in UK higher education16
‘This form could give me the courage to address otherwise undiscussed topics’: student reasons for (not) impacting their feedback environment16
What to assess when assessing collaborative assignments: the practitioner perspective16
Cheating as a prosocial act? Helping others with academic cheating is related to social goals and cooperative norms16
Student partnership in assessment in higher education: a systematic review15
Rubrics in higher education: an exploration of undergraduate students’ understanding and perspectives15
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. On the limited use of regression discontinuity analysis in higher education15
Developing a college student feedback literacy scale for the GenAI context15
Interplay between student and teacher feedback literacies within pre-service teachers: a mixed-methods study15
The language of assessment: identifying challenging terminology for students and exploring implications for practice15
How to close the learning circle? Students’ perspectives on how programmatic assessment influences self-regulated learning in a global online programme14
A mixed blessing: student engagement in emergency online learning during COVID-19 in China14
In search of learning-focused feedback practices: a linguistic analysis of higher education feedback policy14
Procedures, criteria and decision-making in doctoral admissions: the case of China’s leading research universities14
From collaboration to contract cheating: exploring staff and student perceptions of the grey areas of academic outsourcing13
Humanising feedback encounters: a qualitative study of relational literacies for teachers engaging in technology-enhanced feedback13
Feedback format preferences of international post-graduate students in Australia: an exploratory mixed methods study13
A systematic review on peer assessment: intrapersonal and interpersonal factors13
Design review dialogues: a study of reviewer-student verbal interaction in a signature feedback method13
Discrimination against academics and career implications of student evaluations: university policy versus legal compliance13
Developing and validating a student feedback literacy scale13
Beyond penalties: a proactive approach to developing student understanding of academic integrity13
Playing the SET game: how teachers view the impact of student evaluation on the experience of teaching and learning13
Cross-border higher education in Europe and the role of quality assurance agencies12
Addressing the shortcomings of the closed-door viva for PhD and doctoral candidates in the UK: a voice for academic examiners12
Re-conceptualising learner feedback agency: a situational, deliberative and entangled perspective12
Understanding the place and value of GenAI feedback: a recognition-based framework12
Unpacking teacher beliefs on feedback: shaping multifaceted teacher feedback literacy12
Masked ball for all: how anonymity affects students’ perceived comfort levels in peer feedback12
Towards a framework for designing and evaluating online assessments in business education12
A critical review of the quality of research on quality culture in higher education 111
Authentic assessment: from panacea to criticality11
An empirical study of peer feedback in translation didactics: quality, response and student perceptions11
Who cares about grade inflation? The role of institutional policy in regulating course grades in higher education11
Generative AI vs. instructor vs. peer assessments: a comparison of grading and feedback in higher education10
Student experiences of the ‘closed-door’ PhD and doctorate level viva voce: a systematic review of the literature10
Collaboration, collusion, and barter-cheating: an analysis of academic help-seeking behaviors10
More pain, more gain? Extricating the effect of student involvement in rubric co-construction10
More enjoyable to give or to receive? Exploring students’ emotional status in their peer feedback of academic writing10
Using concept maps as an assessment task for international taught postgraduate students: Is it a ‘helpful bridge’ or ‘blunt instrument’?10
Self-assessment design in a digital world: centring student agency10
Flexible assessment: some benefits and costs for students and instructors10
0.026496887207031