Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Papers
(The TQCC of Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education is 10. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-07-01 to 2025-07-01.)
ArticleCitations
Improvement in the quality of feedback as an indication of the development of evaluative judgement98
Feedback engagement as a multidimensional construct: a validation study84
Students’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback: implications for student feedback literacy in the context of generative artificial intelligence66
Processes and outcomes in a curriculum-level student self-assessment intervention: a case study53
Disclosing own reasoning while appraising the students’ reasoning: implications for developments in formative assessment in science-engineering education51
Development and evaluation of two interventions to improve students’ reflection on feedback50
Feedback literacy-as-event: relationality, space and temporality in feedback encounters49
A dual-cycle peer evaluation model to enhance student feedback literacy: a three-round empirical educational study46
The reliability of student evaluations of teaching45
Empowering agency through learner-orchestrated self-generated feedback45
Exploring the practical feasibility of adaptive comparative judgment as a summative assessment method40
Enhancing the structure of feedback forms increases trustworthiness and usefulness of peer feedback38
Supporting peer evaluation of student-generated content: a study of three approaches37
Alternative grading systems and student outcomes: a comparative analysis of motivation, enjoyment, engagement, stress, and perceptions of final grades36
How vulnerable are UK universities to cheating with new GenAI tools? A pragmatic risk assessment33
The effects of gender and training on peer feedback characteristics32
The final examination of the UK PhD: fit for purpose?31
‘I don’t know if people realize the impact of their words’: how does feedback during internship impact nursing student learning?28
A strategic framework for delivering ongoing feedback at scale28
Learner-generated podcasts: an authentic and enjoyable assessment for students working in pairs28
Interventions and facilitators of oral assessment performance in higher education: a systematic review27
The focus, function and framing of feedback information: linguistic and content analysis of in-text feedback comments26
Learning as a peer assessor: evaluating peer-assessment strategies26
Perceptions of graduate attribute development and application in PhD graduates from US and NZ universities25
Towards an ecological understanding of student emotions in feedback: a scoping review25
Evolution of feedback ecology: reshaping students’ conceptions and practices in feedback literacy25
Designing assessment in a digital world: an organising framework24
Interacting with ChatGPT for internal feedback and factors affecting feedback quality24
Approaches to feedback on examination performance: research, policy, and practice23
Enabling feedback seeking, agency and uptake through dialogic screencast feedback23
The Impact of Timely Formative Feedback on University Student Motivation23
Is continuous assessment inclusive? An analysis of factors influencing student grades22
Developing assessment literacy among trainee translators: scaffolding self and peer assessment as an intervention21
Enhancing feedback practices within PhD supervision: a qualitative framework synthesis of the literature21
Noncognitive skills and critical thinking predict undergraduate academic performance21
How does motivation influence students’ feedback seeking processes?20
Exploring students’ feedback seeking behavior in the context of programmatic assessment20
Assessment purposes and theoretical foundations in university mathematics assessment practices: a comprehensive scoping review20
Effect of regulation scripts for dialogic peer assessment on feedback quality, critical thinking and climate of trust19
Cheating as a prosocial act? Helping others with academic cheating is related to social goals and cooperative norms19
Reciprocity in college teaching: a big data study based on online student evaluation of 919,750 professors18
The end of the line? A quantitative analysis of two decades of competitive assessment and research funding in UK higher education18
Approaches to written assignments -how students write, and instructors read18
Physiotherapy student perceptions of the feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of continuous adaptive assessment17
Faculty’s perception of peer observation of teaching: the case of a higher education institution in Malta17
Student partnership in assessment in higher education: a systematic review16
‘This form could give me the courage to address otherwise undiscussed topics’: student reasons for (not) impacting their feedback environment16
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. On the limited use of regression discontinuity analysis in higher education16
Are men and women really different? The effects of gender and training on peer scoring and perceptions of peer assessment16
What makes students contribute more peer feedback? The role of within-course experience with peer feedback16
How to close the learning circle? Students’ perspectives on how programmatic assessment influences self-regulated learning in a global online programme16
Two sides of the same coin: a taxonomy of academic integrity and impropriety using intellectual virtues and vices16
The Westerveld framework for interprofessional feedback dialogues in health professions education15
The language of assessment: identifying challenging terminology for students and exploring implications for practice15
Rubrics in higher education: an exploration of undergraduate students’ understanding and perspectives15
Procedures, criteria and decision-making in doctoral admissions: the case of China’s leading research universities15
In search of learning-focused feedback practices: a linguistic analysis of higher education feedback policy15
Developing a college student feedback literacy scale for the GenAI context14
Cultivating learners’ technology-mediated dialogue of feedback in writing: processes, potentials and limitations14
A mixed blessing: student engagement in emergency online learning during COVID-19 in China14
A systematic review on peer assessment: intrapersonal and interpersonal factors13
Design review dialogues: a study of reviewer-student verbal interaction in a signature feedback method13
Unpacking teacher beliefs on feedback: shaping multifaceted teacher feedback literacy13
Developing and validating a student feedback literacy scale13
Feedback format preferences of international post-graduate students in Australia: an exploratory mixed methods study13
Addressing the shortcomings of the closed-door viva for PhD and doctoral candidates in the UK: a voice for academic examiners12
Playing the SET game: how teachers view the impact of student evaluation on the experience of teaching and learning12
Humanising feedback encounters: a qualitative study of relational literacies for teachers engaging in technology-enhanced feedback12
Discrimination against academics and career implications of student evaluations: university policy versus legal compliance12
Connecting teacher and student assessment literacy with self-evaluation and peer feedback12
Student perspectives on assessment: connections between self and society12
Authentic assessment: from panacea to criticality11
Re-conceptualising learner feedback agency: a situational, deliberative and entangled perspective11
Understanding the place and value of GenAI feedback: a recognition-based framework11
Cross-border higher education in Europe and the role of quality assurance agencies11
Masked ball for all: how anonymity affects students’ perceived comfort levels in peer feedback11
Developing the relational in teacher feedback literacy: exploring feedback talk11
An empirical study of peer feedback in translation didactics: quality, response and student perceptions11
Towards a framework for designing and evaluating online assessments in business education11
Assessment cultures in higher education: reducing barriers and enabling change11
Using concept maps as an assessment task for international taught postgraduate students: Is it a ‘helpful bridge’ or ‘blunt instrument’?10
Collaboration, collusion, and barter-cheating: an analysis of academic help-seeking behaviors10
Flexible assessment: some benefits and costs for students and instructors10
More enjoyable to give or to receive? Exploring students’ emotional status in their peer feedback of academic writing10
A critical review of the quality of research on quality culture in higher education 110
Generative AI vs. instructor vs. peer assessments: a comparison of grading and feedback in higher education10
0.043159961700439