International Studies in the Philosophy of Science

Papers
(The TQCC of International Studies in the Philosophy of Science is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-08-01 to 2025-08-01.)
ArticleCitations
Ernest Nagel's Model of Reduction and Theory Change9
Is There a Reproducibility Crisis? On the Need for Evidence-based Approaches5
Darwinian-Selectionist Explanation, Radical Theory Change, and the Observable-Unobservable Dichotomy4
Shaping Social Phenomena3
From Quantum Holism to the Disunity of Science and Social Activism: The Cat-Feyerabend Correspondence3
Incorrigible Science and Doctrinal Pseudoscience3
In Memoriam Elena Mamchur 8 July, 1935–14 December, 20233
Relational Primitivism About the Direction of Time2
Travelling Around Kuhn’s Worlds2
Navigating Massimi’s Perspectival Garden with Inferential Forking Paths2
The Uses of Truth: Is There Room for Reconciliation of Factivist and Non-Factivist Accounts of Scientific Understanding?2
Problem-Feeding as a Model for Interdisciplinary Research2
Searching for Features with Artificial Neural Networks in Science: The Problem of Non-Uniqueness2
Kuhn's ‘The Natures of Conceptual Change’: the Search for a Theory of Meaning and the Birth of Taxonomies (1980–1994)2
Linguistic Discrimination in Science: Can English Disfluency Help Debias Scientific Research?2
Beyond Structure: New Frontiers of the Philosophy of Thomas Kuhn2
Defending a Realist Stance2
Race and Gender: Toward a Proper Pattern of Knowledge and Ignorance in Research1
Mathematical SETIbacks: Open Texture in Mathematics as a New Challenge for Messaging Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence1
Realism with Quantum Faces: The Leggett–Garg Inequalities as a Case Study for Feyerabend's Views1
Schlick and Popper on Causality and Quantum Physics: Origins and Perspectives of the Debate1
Feyerabend and the Philosophy of Physics, Part II1
Popper and Lakatos on what is distinctive about empirical science1
Reviewers AcknowledgementWe would like to acknowledge the great help we have received from our reviewers whose service to the profession and scholarship is invaluable. Their comments, suggestions, and1
Introduction1
Proportionality Contextualised1
The Paradox of Irrelevant Conjunction and a Bayesian Analysis of Pursuit Worthy Confirmation1
On the Elusive Formalisation of the Risky Condition for Hypothesis Testing1
The Curious Incident of Indistinguishable Selves A Reply to Nešić1
0.036547899246216