Historiographia Linguistica

Papers
(The median citation count of Historiographia Linguistica is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-06-01 to 2025-06-01.)
ArticleCitations
The Linguistic Situation in the Parish of Aaby, Aarhus County2
Interwoven processes in linguistic historiography2
Misquoting the ancients2
Review of Turton (2024): Before the Word was Queer: Sexuality and the English Dictionary, 1600–19302
Kritik über McElvenny (2023): The Limits of Structuralism. Forgotten Texts in the History of Modern Linguistics2
The Arte Sangley in the archives of the University of Santo Tomás in Manila1
Historiographia linguistica Folha de Estilo1
Anachronistic bias in the study of Arabic grammatical tradition1
The Bocabulario de la Lengua Sangleya por las Letraz de el A.B.C. (Manila, ca. 1617)1
Les études basques comme sujet d’enquête1
The Beginning of Quantitative Sociolinguistics in the Nineteenth Century1
Review of Sartori & Binaghi (2022): The foundations of Arab linguistics V. Kitāb Sībawayhi, The Critical Theory.0
Compte rendu de Denecker, Desmet, Jooken, Lauwers, van Hal & van Rooy (2022): The Architecture of Grammar. Studies in Linguistic Historiography in Honor of Pierre Swiggers0
The Place of Jakób Handel (1888–c.1942) in the History of Language Study in Poland0
Mapping the world through lexicography0
The History of Chinese Linguistics in East and West0
The ghost of Vulgar Latin0
The Pronunciation of German ch as Velar or Palatal from 1784 to 18410
Who Copied Whom?0
The encounter of English and Chinese lexicographical traditions0
Compte rendu de Bronckart & Bronckart (2022): Ferdinand de Saussure. Une science du langage pour une science de l’humain0
Jan Ignacy Necisław Baudouin de Courtenay (1845–1929)0
The history of Chinese linguistics in East and West0
Bibliography of writings by E. F. Konrad Koerner0
Compte rendu de Rey (2023): Léonard de Vinci, génie des langues0
Review of Lambert & Bonnet (2021): Apollonius Dyscole et Priscien: Transmettre, traduire, interpréter. Éléments d’une histoire problématique0
Otto Jespersen, one more broken leg in the historical stool of generative linguistics0
The metalinguistic development of the term ‘periphrasis’ in the western grammatical tradition from Antiquity to the Enlightenment0
The Dictionary of American Regional English and the idea of dialect0
Review of Rundle (2022): The Routledge Handbook of Translation History0
Review of Vincent (2020): Ferdinand de Saussure, Le premier cours de linguistique générale: La trilogie achevée0
The Koernerian revolution0
Revisions to the Siraya lexicon based on the original Utrecht Manuscript0
The Περὶ ἀντιστοίχων in MS. Barocci 10 and MS. Barocci 480
0
0
Erminnie A. Smith (1836–1886)0
Critique de Neveu & Roig (2022): L’œuvre de Lucien Tesnière. Lectures contemporaines0
“Este diccionario es su uso para leer libros”0
The Adaptation of Western and Chinese Categories to the Description of Manchu0
0
From Mandarin to Cantonese Lexicography0
Review of Considine (2022): Sixteenth-Century English Dictionaries0
The case of rén 仁 in early Chinese-European dictionaries0
L’architecture des études de linguistique romane au XVIe siècle*0
The distributed invention of enunciation theory0
Review of Kilarski (2021): A History of the Study of the Indigenous Languages of North America0
Kritik über Jäger & Kablitz (2023): Saussure et l’épistémè structuraliste. / Saussure und die strukturalistische Episteme0
The ‘Brazilian Connection’ in the History of American Linguistics0
Exploring Chinese compound words in the anonymous Breve compendio del vocabulario de compuestos en lengua mandarina and other Western missionary dictionaries0
Compte rendu de Priscien (2023): Grammaire Livre VIII. Le verbe 1: Caractères généraux0
Review of Householder, Saporta & Adams (2022): Problems in Lexicography0
0
Kritik über Hübner & Simon (2021): Fremdsprachenlehrwerke in der Frühen Neuzeit. Perspektiven – Potentiale – Herausforderungen0
Review of Schöntag (2022): Das Verständnis von Vulgärlatein in der Frühen Neuzeit vor dem Hintergrund der questione della lingua. Eine Untersuchung zur Begriffsgeschichte im Rahmen der sozio- und var0
Lapsus et apposition de rectification de l’arabe0
Review of Aarssen, Genis & van der Veken (2018–2020)0
Editors’ notes0
Strukturalismus und kein Ende?*0
Review of Schöntag (2022): Das Verständnis von Vulgärlatein in der Frühen Neuzeit vor dem Hintergrund der questione della lingua. Eine Untersuchung zur Begriffsgeschichte im Rahmen der so0
Kritik über Walker (2022): Wilhelm von Humboldt and Transcultural Communication in a Multicultural World: Translating Humanity0
Review of Wolff (2019): A history of African linguistics0
Editors’ notes0
… and the Word was God: Missionary Linguistics and Missionary Grammar. Ed. by Even Hovdhaugen0
0
Three Cases of Plagiarism?0
Adelung’s English-German dictionary (1783, 1796)0
Review of Imrényi & Mazziotta (2020): Chapters of Dependency Grammar. A historical survey from Antiquity to Tesnière0
The connection between the Thesaurus rarissimus (Marsh 111) and the Dictionnaire Chinois & François (1670), the first printed Chinese dictionary in Europe0
Review of Cinato, Lahaussois & Whitman (2023): Glossing Practice: Comparative Perspectives0
L’arabe algérien parmi les pères blancs0
Aux origines du Cercle linguistique de New York0
Review of Hirschkop (2019): Linguistic Turns, 1890–1950: Writing on language as social theory0
Compte rendu de Larcher (2021): L’invention de la luġa al-fuṣḥā: une histoire de l’arabe par les textes0
0
The didactic features of James Summers’s (1828–1891) research on Chinese0
The first biolinguist?0
Compte rendu de Riemer (2021): L’emprise de la grammaire. Propositions épistémologiques pour une linguistique mineure0
New tools for understanding Hjelmslev*0
Review of McElvenny (2024): A History of Modern Linguistics: From the beginnings to World War II0
Innere Sprachform0
Review of Ringmacher, Tintemann, Klimp & Zimmer (2016): Wilhelm von Humboldt: Einleitende und vergleichende amerikanische Arbeiten0
Review of Estienne, Trudeau, Barataud, Colombat & Moreux (2020): La latinité injustement soupçonnée suivi de Dissertation sur la latinité de Plaute0
Review of Bergounioux (2024): Les origines de la sémantique de Franz Bopp à Michel Bréal0
Jacques van Ginneken and Significs0
Editors’ notes0
Review of Van Rooy, Van Hecke & Van Hal (2022): Trilingual Learning: The Study of Greek and Hebrew in a Latin World (1000–1700)0
José Monteiro's Vera, et unica praxis: A seventeenth-century Jesuit primer for the learning of Mandarin Chinese and a later version0
Review of Thomas (2020): Formalism and Functionalism in Linguistics. The Engineer and the Collector0
Karl Tekusch (1890–1977), his concept of Sprachechtheit, and the purism movement in Austria0
On the four grades / four calls of Chinese rime tables0
Review of De Palo & Gensini (2022): With Saussure, beyond Saussure. Between linguistics and philosophy of language0
Missionary linguistics in the East Indies in the seventeenth century0
0.044946193695068