Historiographia Linguistica

Papers
(The TQCC of Historiographia Linguistica is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-01-01 to 2026-01-01.)
ArticleCitations
Kritik über McElvenny (2023): The Limits of Structuralism. Forgotten Texts in the History of Modern Linguistics2
The Linguistic Situation in the Parish of Aaby, Aarhus County2
Interwoven processes in linguistic historiography2
Review of Turton (2024): Before the Word was Queer: Sexuality and the English Dictionary, 1600–19302
Misquoting the ancients2
Anachronistic bias in the study of Arabic grammatical tradition1
The Beginning of Quantitative Sociolinguistics in the Nineteenth Century1
Les études basques comme sujet d’enquête1
The Bocabulario de la Lengua Sangleya por las Letraz de el A.B.C. (Manila, ca. 1617)1
Jacques van Ginneken and Significs0
Continu et Discontinu0
José Monteiro's Vera, et unica praxis: A seventeenth-century Jesuit primer for the learning of Mandarin Chinese and a later version0
The distributed invention of enunciation theory0
Review of Hutton (2025): The People That Never Were: Linguistic Scholarship and the Invention of the Aryans0
Critique de Neveu & Roig (2022): L’œuvre de Lucien Tesnière. Lectures contemporaines0
The case of rén 仁 in early Chinese-European dictionaries0
Review of Rundle (2022): The Routledge Handbook of Translation History0
Review of Wolff (2019): A history of African linguistics0
0
0
The Adaptation of Western and Chinese Categories to the Description of Manchu0
Who Copied Whom?0
L’arabe algérien parmi les pères blancs0
Compte rendu de Bronckart & Bronckart (2022): Ferdinand de Saussure. Une science du langage pour une science de l’humain0
Compte rendu de Larcher (2021): L’invention de la luġa al-fuṣḥā: une histoire de l’arabe par les textes0
Compte rendu de Priscien (2023): Grammaire Livre VIII. Le verbe 1: Caractères généraux0
Kritik über Jäger & Kablitz (2023): Saussure et l’épistémè structuraliste. / Saussure und die strukturalistische Episteme0
Review of McElvenny (2024): A History of Modern Linguistics: From the beginnings to World War II0
Jan Ignacy Necisław Baudouin de Courtenay (1845–1929)0
Review of Lambert & Bonnet (2021): Apollonius Dyscole et Priscien: Transmettre, traduire, interpréter. Éléments d’une histoire problématique0
Compte rendu de Riemer (2021): L’emprise de la grammaire. Propositions épistémologiques pour une linguistique mineure0
Review of Kilarski (2021): A History of the Study of the Indigenous Languages of North America0
The Dictionary of American Regional English and the idea of dialect0
Kritik über Walker (2022): Wilhelm von Humboldt and Transcultural Communication in a Multicultural World: Translating Humanity0
Review of Schöntag (2022): Das Verständnis von Vulgärlatein in der Frühen Neuzeit vor dem Hintergrund der questione della lingua. Eine Untersuchung zur Begriffsgeschichte im Rahmen der so0
The Place of Jakób Handel (1888–c.1942) in the History of Language Study in Poland0
Editors’ notes0
Mapping the world through lexicography0
Review of Cinato, Lahaussois & Whitman (2023): Glossing Practice: Comparative Perspectives0
Strukturalismus und kein Ende?*0
The metalinguistic development of the term ‘periphrasis’ in the western grammatical tradition from Antiquity to the Enlightenment0
Adelung’s English-German dictionary (1783, 1796)0
The Pronunciation of German ch as Velar or Palatal from 1784 to 18410
Germanic affixoids in Jacob Grimm0
Aux origines du Cercle linguistique de New York0
Missionary linguistics in the East Indies in the seventeenth century0
Compte rendu de Denecker, Desmet, Jooken, Lauwers, van Hal & van Rooy (2022): The Architecture of Grammar. Studies in Linguistic Historiography in Honor of Pierre Swiggers0
Review of Sartori & Binaghi (2022): The foundations of Arab linguistics V. Kitāb Sībawayhi, The Critical Theory.0
The history of Chinese linguistics in East and West0
Wilhelm von Humboldt, linguist0
Compte rendu de Rey (2023): Léonard de Vinci, génie des langues0
The didactic features of James Summers’s (1828–1891) research on Chinese0
Three Cases of Plagiarism?0
Exploring Chinese compound words in the anonymous Breve compendio del vocabulario de compuestos en lengua mandarina and other Western missionary dictionaries0
The connection between the Thesaurus rarissimus (Marsh 111) and the Dictionnaire Chinois & François (1670), the first printed Chinese dictionary in Europe0
0
Review of Bergounioux (2024): Les origines de la sémantique de Franz Bopp à Michel Bréal0
Review of Aarssen, Genis & van der Veken (2018–2020)0
Review of Hirschkop (2019): Linguistic Turns, 1890–1950: Writing on language as social theory0
Review of Householder, Saporta & Adams (2022): Problems in Lexicography0
From Mandarin to Cantonese Lexicography0
Review of De Palo & Gensini (2022): With Saussure, beyond Saussure. Between linguistics and philosophy of language0
“Este diccionario es su uso para leer libros”0
L’architecture des études de linguistique romane au XVIe siècle*0
Review of Van Rooy, Van Hecke & Van Hal (2022): Trilingual Learning: The Study of Greek and Hebrew in a Latin World (1000–1700)0
The History of Chinese Linguistics in East and West0
The Περὶ ἀντιστοίχων in MS. Barocci 10 and MS. Barocci 480
The many lives of a dictionary0
0
Review of Considine (2022): Sixteenth-Century English Dictionaries0
Linguistic description between Kleinstaaterei and the Word of God0
The prehistory of generative grammar and Chomsky’s debt to Emil Post0
New tools for understanding Hjelmslev0
The Arte Sangley in the archives of the University of Santo Tomás in Manila0
0
The conjunction between coordination and subordination in missionary grammars of Aymara and Quechua0
Kritik über Hübner & Simon (2021): Fremdsprachenlehrwerke in der Frühen Neuzeit. Perspektiven – Potentiale – Herausforderungen0
The encounter of English and Chinese lexicographical traditions0
Lapsus et apposition de rectification de l’arabe0
Review of Schöntag (2022): Das Verständnis von Vulgärlatein in der Frühen Neuzeit vor dem Hintergrund der questione della lingua. Eine Untersuchung zur Begriffsgeschichte im Rahmen der sozio- und var0
Editors’ notes0
0.080638885498047