Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

Papers
(The TQCC of Interdisciplinary Science Reviews is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-04-01 to 2025-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Introduction20
Response to ‘A New View on Biology and Some Philosophical Perspectives’ by Emil Toescu and Daniel Bardos16
A tyrannical societal something: Drawing lessons for twenty-first-century ‘privacy-protecting’ technology from long nineteenth-century literature12
1990s dinomania: Public and popular cultures of palaeontology from Jurassic Park to Friends9
Emotions in scientific practice8
The importance of values for science7
Wide horizons: science and epic in Mina Loy’s ‘Anglo-Mongrels and the Rose’ and C. Day Lewis’s From Feathers to Iron7
What AI researchers read: the role of literature in artificial intelligence research7
Mathematics, the mathematical sciences, and historical contingency: Some thoughts on reading Netz6
Artificial agency and the game of semantic extension6
Can I believe what I see? Data visualization and trust in the humanities6
Scientism and scientific fundamentalism: what science can learn from mainstream religion5
The linguocultural concept based on word frequency: correlation, differentiation, and cross-cultural comparison4
Dimensions of well-being4
Queerness in science and literature: towards a ‘naturalization’ of the queer in the crossroads of physics, biology, and literary theory4
Introduction: Conceptualising heterodox palaeoscience4
From brainwaves and ripples to Helen of Troy and Orlan: the depiction and significance of salience4
The problems of exceptionality: The case of Archimedes and the Greeks4
The metamorphosis of the Megatherium: Examples of Goethe's heterodox palaeontology4
Insider or outsider? Exploring some digital challenges in ethnomusicology3
Ageing brain and geopolitical leadership: a bio-psycho-sociological approach to the fall of Sharif of Mecca Husayn bin Ali, 1908–19243
J. R. R. Tolkien's Legendarium as Heterodox Palaeoscience3
Past Celebratory, Future Subjunctive3
Book Review: The Cambridge companion to theatre and science3
Chinese folk music and its effect on human mathematical thinking skills2
Seeing germs, selling germs: translating Anglo-American bacteriology2
Critical Doses: Nurturing Diversity in Psychedelic Studies2
Emphasizing uncertainty, celebrating community and valuing values: science communication remedies for the COVID-19 era and beyond2
Archimedes for the rest of us: Thinking commentary with Guidobaldo dal Monte2
Editorial2
Computing in this world2
Thinking again: enaction as a resource for ‘practice as research’ in theatre and performance2
Navigating the sea of histories of mathematics2
The most important thing about science is values2
Coming down from the American trip Review of ‘American Trip. Set, Setting, and the Psychedelic Experience in the Twentieth Century’ , by Hartogsohn, Ido, Cambridge, MA, 1
Immortal codes: genetics, ghosts, and Shakespeare’s sonnets1
Is gendered power irrelevant in higher educational institutions? Understanding the persistence of gender inequality1
Science communication and public trust in science1
Game-based learning for engaging citizens in biopollution control1
‘Everybody’s creating it along the way’: ethical tensions among globalized ayahuasca shamanisms and therapeutic integration practices1
Re-imagining the virus1
Winning the modernity lottery: Commentary on Reviel Netz, ‘The place of Archimedes in world history’1
From cryptids to kaijū: Exploring heterodox palaeoscience with Godzilla1
From researching to making futures: a design mindset for transdisciplinary collaboration1
Afterword1
Non-Archimedean modernities1
The variety of readings of Archimedes in the scientific revolution: Leibniz vs. Newton1
Editorial1
Critical perspectives on science: Arguments for a richer discussion on the scientific enterprise1
Putting scientific realism into perspective1
Can fiction lead to prosocial behaviour? Exclusion, violence, empathy, and literature in early modernity1
Same and Different: How Models Contribute to Knowing. A review of Modelwork1
0.056001901626587