Biotechnology Law Report

Papers
(The median citation count of Biotechnology Law Report is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-06-01 to 2025-06-01.)
ArticleCitations
CareDx, Inc. v. Natera, Inc. United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, 2022 40 F.4th 137116
Patents Cannot Be Blamed for Inequitable Access to COVID-19 Vaccines4
The Localization of Drug Patent Linkage System in China: Where Should It Go?4
Trade Secret Protection on a Publicly Sold, Patented Spinal Implant Device: Life Spine, Inc. v. Aegis Spine, Inc.3
Legal Governance of Human Gene Editing Technology: From Single Governance to Multiple Governance3
To What Extent Does Mayo v. Prometheus Allow for the Patenting of Diagnostic Methods?3
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry2
Supplementary Protection Certificates in Europe: Clarity at Last?2
Amgen v. Sanofi: The Supreme Court Takes up the Enablement Requirement in the Context of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies2
Biotechnology and Intellectual Property Law: Theoretical and Practical Reflections on Albanian National Law and Jurisprudence in Comparison with EU Acquis and ECJ Case Law1
Allgenesis Biotherapeutics Inc. v. Cloudbreak Therapeutics, LLC1
Moo-re Gene-edited Animals Get Regulatory Clearance: U.S. FDA Approves Genetically Engineered Cattle for Human Consumption1
China's Challenges in Implementing Compulsory Drug Patent Licenses and its Response in the Context of COVID-191
Tris Pharma, Inc. v. Actavis Lab'ys FL, Inc.1
Sanho Corp. v. Kaijet Tech. Int’l Ltd., Inc1
An Innovation Principle in Gene Technology Law?1
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry1
Observation on China's Performance in the Global Supply Chain of COVID-19 Medicine1
Natera, Inc. v. NeoGenomics Lab’ys, Inc1
Univ. of S. Fla. Bd. of Trustees v. United States1
Recent Developments in FDA Regulatory Exclusivities1
14-Day Limit of Human Embryo Research: Moral Issues in the Patent Law in China1
ModernaTx, Inc. v. Arbutus Biopharma Corp.1
Pac. Biosciences of California, Inc. v. Pers. Genomics Taiwan, Inc1
Hologic, Inc. v. Minerva Surgical, Inc.1
Research on the Latest Progress of “Mechanism for Early Resolution of Patent Disputes” for Biological Products in China1
Astellas Pharma, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. USA, Inc.1
United Therapeutics Corp. v. Liquidia Techs., Inc.1
Mylan Pharms. Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, 2022 50 F.4th 1471
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry1
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry1
Generic Drugs and Innovative Drug Incentives: Early Dispute Resolution Mechanism in China1
AstraZeneca AB v. Mylan Pharms. Inc.1
Salix Pharms., Ltd. v. Norwich Pharms. Inc.1
ChromaDex, Inc. v. Elysium Health, Inc. United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, 2023 59 F.4th 12801
A 12th Year 101 Update—Diagnostic and DNA Claims Are Patent Eligible, but Pre-Mayo Patents May Continue to Fall1
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry1
Bio-Rad Lab'ys, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n1
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry1
A Review of Patent Regimes on Health Biotechnology Innovation in India1
Federal Circuit Reiterates That Drug Safety and Efficacy Are Issues for the FDA, Not the Patent Laws1
Legal and Ethical Challenges in the Construction of China's Biobanks1
Dilemma and Solution of Intellectual Property Protection of Biological Genetic Resources1
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry1
Nippon Shinyaku Co. v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.1
In re Entresto1
Univ. of Massachusetts v. L'Oreal S.A.1
Incyte Corp. v. Sun Pharm. Indus., Ltd.1
Landscape of Genome Editing Technology Patents in the European Patent Office with a Focus on CRISPR-Related Opposition Proceedings1
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry1
ImmunoGen, Inc. v. Stewart1
The Redemption of Drug Patent Linkage System: The Dilemma and Improvement in the Qualification System of Market Exclusivity Period for China’s First Generic Drug1
Taiwan's Efforts to Recreate Remdesivir0
Navigating Procedural Challenges in Biotechnological Patenting: A Path Forward for India’s Innovation Landscape0
Regulation of Biomedical Research: Global and Indian Perspective0
Regulatory Landscape for Generic Drugs in India: Assessing Quality, Safety, and Efficacy Standards0
Research on Intellectual Property Right Protection of Genetic Resources in China Under Benefit-Sharing0
A Review of Judicial Opinions Interpreting the Novelty Provisions of the America Invents Act0
Bayer Healthcare LLC v. Baxalta Inc. United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, 2021 989 F.3d 9640
The Legislative Paradigm of China's Biosafety Law and Its Positive Significance for the SARS-CoV-2 Prevention and Control0
Medytox, Inc. v. Galderma S.A.0
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry0
Takeda Pharm. Co. Ltd. v. Torrent Pharm. Ltd. United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, 2021 No. 2020-1552, 2021 WL 560763 (nonprecedential)0
Unproven Stem Cell Industry in the U.S.: Regulatory Challenges and Enforcement Issues0
Japanese CRISPR Patent and Biotech Developments in the Early Reiwa Era0
Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc.0
Janssen Pharms., Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc0
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry0
Genentech, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.0
Arbutus Biopharma Corp. v. ModernaTX, Inc. United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, 2023 65 F.4th 6560
Univ. of S. Fla. Bd. of Trustees v. United States and the Federal Government’s Nonexclusive License under the Bayh-Dole Act0
Jazz Pharms., Inc. v. Avadel CNS Pharms., LLC United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, 2023 No. 2023-1186, 2023 WL 21986400
Trustees of Columbia Univ. in City of New York v. Illumina, Inc. United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, 2021 No. 2019-2302, 2021 WL 317661 (nonprecedential)0
Legal Perspective of Genetically Modified Crops and Drowsy Stance of International Actors0
A Look at the Current Status of the CRISPR Patent Interferences Involving Broad Institute, University of California and University of Vienna, ToolGen, and Sigma-Aldrich0
Gilead Scis., Inc. v. United States0
China Releases Document on Ethics Review of Life Sciences: Comments and Compliance Guidelines0
Ethical Boundary of the Development of Human Gene Editing Technology0
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v. Mylan Pharms. Inc.0
In Minerva v. Hologic, the U.S. Supreme Court Reins in the Equitable Doctrine of Assignor Estoppel0
Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, 2023 59 F.4th 13710
Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. Hikma Pharms. USA, Inc.0
Celanese Int’l Corp. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n0
Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc.0
Cornell Rsch. Found., Inc. v. Vidal0
The Fate of FTC v. Actavis, Inc. in the Biosimilar Context—Does and Should the FTC v. Actavis Decision Apply to Reverse Patent Settlements Between Brand Drug and Biosimilar Manufacturers0
Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Collegium Pharm., Inc0
The EPO Guidelines They Are a-Changin’0
Juno Therapeutics, Inc. v. Kite Pharma, Inc. United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, 202110 F.4th 13300
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC0
The Legal Protection of Gene Private Rights0
Allergan USA, Inc. v. MSN Lab’ys Priv. Ltd0
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry0
A 2023 Review of Legislation Aimed at Increasing Generic and Biosimilar Competition0
Innovate, Evaluate, Legislate: U.S. Senators Forge a Path to Assess Artificial Intelligence’s Biosecurity Quandary0
Regeneron Pharms., Inc. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc.0
Edwards Lifesciences Corp. v. Meril Life Scis. Pvt. Ltd0
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry0
Is the Chemical Genus Claim Really “Dead” at the Federal Circuit?: Part II0
Galderma Lab’ys, L.P. v. Lupin Inc0
Actelion Pharms. LTD v. Mylan Pharms. Inc.0
In re Huping Hu United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, 2021 No. 2019-2104, 2021 WL 1016437 (non-precedential)0
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry0
Pleading Use of Trade Secrets Concerning a Biological Product by Showing Product-Related Similarities: Allergan, Inc. v. Revance Therapeutics, Inc.0
Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, Aventisub LLC United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, 2021 987 F.3d 10800
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry0
Cytiva BioProcess R&D AB v. JSR Corp.0
Recent Developments in the Listing of Patents in FDA's Orange Book0
In re Huping Hu: Quantum Entanglement, Medical Innovation, and Patentability on the Scientific “Fringe”0
Review of the UK's R&D Tax Reliefs—A Good News Story for the UK's Life Sciences Sector?0
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry0
Correction to: AI (Re)Defining Pharmaceutical Exclusivities, by Jonathan Kimball and Srividhya Ragavan, Biotechnol Law Rep 2022;41(1):23–29; doi: 10.1089/blr.2021.29257.sr0
Navigating Pharmaceutical Patent Term Extension System in China0
Teva v. Amneal: The Federal Circuit Weighs in on the Listing of Patents Relating to Drug-Device Combinations in the Orange Book0
Should the Federal Circuit Lower the Threshold for Article III Standing to Appeal Adverse Decisions in AIA Trial Proceedings?0
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Proposes New Rules Targeting Continuation Practice and Terminal Disclaimers0
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry0
Par Pharm., Inc. v. Eagle Pharms., Inc.0
H. Lundbeck A/S v. Lupin Ltd.0
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Response to Recent Developments in Artificial Intelligence0
Challenges in Patenting Human Stem Cell Inventions: A Comparative Perspective in USA, Europe, and India—Is India Lagging?0
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry0
Regulation of Clinical Trials and Pandemic Research: Upholding Ethical Standards During a COVID-19 Crisis0
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry0
Rosalind Franklin Society Proudly Announces the 2022 Award Recipient for Biotechnology Law Report0
UCB, Inc. v. Actavis Lab'ys UT, Inc.0
In re Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ. United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, 2021 No. 2020-1012, 2021 WL 9227270
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry0
How Science, Technology, and Society Influence Patent Policies: The Choice and Direction of Gene Patent Pathways from the View of Technoscience0
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry0
How a Dosage Regimen Patent for RRMS Treatment May Satisfy the Written Description Requirement—A Lesson from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc.0
A Feasible Pathway for Open Access to Human Embryonic Stem Cell PatentsWith China's Open License for Patent as the Entry Point0
GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, 20217 F.4th 13200
HIPAA, HIPPA, or HIPPO: What Really Is the Heath Insurance Portability and Accountability Act?0
AI (Re)Defining Pharmaceutical Exclusivities0
Pfizer Inc. v. Sanofi Pasteur Inc0
Observation on the R&D Effectiveness and Application of China's Novel Coronavirus Vaccine0
Pac. Biosciences of California, Inc. v. Oxford Nanopore Techs., Inc. United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, 2021 996 F.3d 1340
In re Entresto and the Standard of Review for Compliance with the Written Description Requirement0
GlaxoSmithKline II and Other Recent Developments in Induced and Contributory Patent Infringement0
Balancing Innovation and Biomedical Ethics within National Institutes of Health: Integrative and Regulatory Reforms for Artificial Intelligence-Driven Biotechnology0
Patentability Analysis of “Intelligent” Disease Diagnosis Methods in China in the Era of Smart Health Care0
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry0
Rosalind Franklin Society Proudly Announces the 2023 Award Recipient for Biotechnology Law Report0
The Enablement and Written Description Requirements Through the Lens of the Federal Circuit's Actions (As Opposed to Its Words)0
Oligonucleotide Therapeutics Patenting: Strategies for Success0
Janssen Ortho, LLC v. United States0
Is the Chemical Genus Claim Really “Dead” at the Federal Circuit?: Part I0
The Evolving Grace Period for U.S. Patent Applicants0
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry0
Recent Developments at the Intersection of Pharma, Patents, and Antitrust Law0
Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, 2023 No. 2022-1147, 2023 WL 29941660
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry0
The Drawing-Up of Laws on Research Involving Human Embryos in Australia: Lack of an Islamic Voice0
A Pharmaceutical Formulation as a Claim Term Cannot “Target” a Plasma Concentration-Time Profile Under 35 U.S.C. § 112: A Lesson from Horizon Pharma, Inc. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc.0
In re Couvaras0
ModernaTx, Inc. v. Arbutus Biopharma Corp.0
Selected Developments in Biotechnology Law and the Biotechnology Industry0
Wuhan Healthgen Biotechnology Corp. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n0
In Juno v. Kite the Federal Circuit Strikes Down Patent Directed Towards Pioneering Innovation in CAR T-Cell Therapy0
SawStop Holding LLC v. Vidal United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, 2022 48 F.4th 13550
The Federal Circuit Continues to Grapple with the Question of Patent Eligibility for Diagnostic Methods0
Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc.0
Navigating Cross-Border Challenges In Biobanking: Analysing Eu Legislation, ECJ Case Law, and the Role of Private International Law0
Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc.0
A Crisis on Patenting of “Ready-to-Use” Oral Liquid Formulations: Azurity Pharms., Inc. v. Alkem Lab’ys Ltd0
The Broad Institute Scores Another Victory in Its Battle with the University of California over the Patenting of CRIPSR0
Observation on the Admission Situation of the Anti-Coronavirus Drug “Remdesivir” in China0
0.047743082046509