Journal of Memory and Language

Papers
(The TQCC of Journal of Memory and Language is 6. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-04-01 to 2025-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Informativity enhances memory robustness against interference in sentence comprehension78
Sample size and its justification in the Journal of Memory and Language32
Working memory capacity limit is dependent on encoding granularity: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese29
Does high variability training improve the learning of non-native phoneme contrasts over low variability training? A replication28
How permeable are native and non-native syntactic processing to crosslinguistic influence?24
Pragmatic effects on semantic learnability: Insights from evidentiality23
The pictures who shall not be named: Empirical support for benefits of preview in the Visual World Paradigm23
Flexible utilization of spatial representation formats in working Memory: Evidence from both small-scale and large-scale environments22
The acquisition of subordinate nouns as pragmatic inference21
Prediction involves two stages: Evidence from visual-world eye-tracking21
Visual context benefits spoken sentence comprehension across the lifespan20
Eye-movements during reading and noisy-channel inference making19
A model of the production effect over the short-term: The cost of relative distinctiveness16
Word length and frequency effects on text reading are highly similar in 12 alphabetic languages16
When time shifts the boundaries: Isolating the role of forgetting in children’s changing category representations13
Minding the load or loading the mind: The effect of manipulating working memory on coherence monitoring13
What causes lingering misinterpretations of garden-path sentences: Incorrect syntactic representations or fallible memory processes?13
What could have been said? Alternatives and variability in pragmatic inferences13
Production increases both true and false recognition13
Modality and stimulus effects on distributional statistical learning: Sound vs. sight, time vs. space13
An embedded computational framework of memory: Accounting for the influence of semantic information in verbal short-term memory13
Editorial Board12
Mouse Tracking for Reading (MoTR): A new naturalistic incremental processing measurement tool12
The effect of animacy on structural Priming: A replication of Bock, Loebell and Morey (1992)12
Editorial Board12
Language concatenates perceptual features into representations during comprehension12
Editorial Board11
Do readers here what they sea?: Effects of lexicality, predictability, and individual differences on the phonological preview benefit11
Higher order factors of sound symbolism11
Understanding the complexity of computational models through optimization and sloppy parameter analyses: The case of the Connectionist Dual-Process Model11
Referencing context in sentence processing: A failure to replicate the strong interactive mental models hypothesis11
Editorial Board11
Reading compound words in Finnish and Chinese: An eye-tracking study11
Statistical and explicit learning of graphotactic patterns with no phonological counterpart: Evidence from an artificial lexicon study with 6–7-year-olds and adults11
Using GAMMs to model trial-by-trial fluctuations in experimental data: More risks but hardly any benefit11
Children and adults use pragmatic principles to interpret non-linguistic symbols10
Reducing retrieval time modulates the production effect: Empirical evidence and computational accounts10
Editorial Board10
Contrast coding choices in a decade of mixed models10
Arbitrary but predictive cues support attention to overlooked features9
Spoken and written production of inflectional morphology among L1 Mandarin speakers of English9
The head constituent plays a key role in the lexical boost in syntactic priming9
Corrigendum to “Parallels between self-monitoring for speech errors and identification of the misspoken segments” [J. Mem. Lang. 69(3) (2013) 417-428]9
Agents’ goals affect construal of event endpoints9
Editorial Board9
Apples and oranges: How does learning context affect novel word learning?8
Individual differences in the reactivity effect of judgments of learning: Cognitive factors8
Understanding with the body? Testing the role of verb relative embodiment across tasks at the interface of language and memory8
Processing agreement in Hindi: When agreement feeds attraction8
Maintenance of subcategorical information during speech perception: Revisiting misunderstood limitations8
Retrieval-induced semantic interference7
Retracing the garden-path: Nonselective rereading and no reanalysis7
Sources and goals in memory and language: Fragility and robustness in event representation7
Larger lexicons enable representation of fine-grained phonological similarity structure: Evidence from English L2 speakers’ sound similarity judgments of word pairs7
Using known words to learn more words: A distributional model of child vocabulary acquisition7
Understanding words in context: A naturalistic EEG study of children’s lexical processing7
The influence of prior knowledge on the formation of detailed and durable memories7
How reliable are standard reading time analyses? Hierarchical bootstrap reveals substantial power over-optimism and scale-dependent Type I error inflation6
The separability of early vocabulary and grammar knowledge6
Are two words recalled or recognised as one? How age-of-acquisition affects memory for compound words6
The role of visual feedback in detecting and correcting typing errors: A signal detection approach6
Inference strength predicts the probability of conditionals better than conditional probability does6
Influences of learned verbal labels and sleep on temporal event memory6
Elaborative strategies contribute to the long-term benefits of time in working memory6
Bidialectal language representation and processing: Evidence from Norwegian ERPs6
Language modality and temporal structure impact processing: Sign and speech have different windows of integration6
Editorial Board6
0.075498104095459