OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The median citation count of Informal Logic is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-01-01 to 2026-01-01.)

Article	Citations
A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation	12
Argumentative Hyperbole as Fallacy	9
In Memoriam	8
Identifying Linked and Convergent Argument Structures	7
Sincere and Insincere Arguing	7
Virtues Suffice for Argument Evaluation	7
Logics for “Non-Logical” Argumentation	6
Intellectual Virtue in Critical Thinking and Its Instruction	6
Case Study of Contextual and Emotional Modulation of Source-case Selection in Analogical Arguments	5
Two-Tier Fallacy Theory	5
Introducing Susan Stebbing as a Forerunner of Informal Logic	5
A Pragmatic Account of Rephrase in Argumentation	4
Books Received 09-27-2024	4
The Argument Scheme-based Approach to Argument Structure	4
Defeasible Reasoning in Islamic Legal Theory	4
Gilbert as Disrupter	3
Sequencing Critical Moves for Ethical Argumentation Practice: Munāẓara and the Interdependence of Procedure and Agent	3
Mind The Gap	2
Reflections on the Physical or Visceral Mode of Argumentation in Michael Gilbert’s Theory of Multi-Modal Argumentation and its Relation to Gesture Studies and The Embodied Mind	2
Navigating Argumentation	2
Books Received 45(1)	2
Deeper into Argumentative Bullshit	2
Towards a Taxonomy of Bullshit Illocutionary Acts	2
Arguing About Arguing with Arguments	1
Frustrated and Aware	1

Arabic Argumentation	1
From the Editors	1
A Moderate Defense for Visual Arguments	1
Paley’s Principle:	1
Argumentation by Analogy and Weighing of Reasons	1
Sound Tactics	1
In Memoriam	1
Books Received	1
Rational Force of Analogy/Qiyās in Law	1
AILACT Essay Prize CFP 2025	1
How do Explanations Justify?	1
Books Received 45(4)	1
Rational Thinking and Intellectually Virtuous Thinking: Identical, Extensionally Equivalent, or Substantively Different?	1
In Memoriam Michael Scriven	1
Introduction to the special issue on selected papers from the 2nd International Conference on Debate & Dialogue (ICDD2) 2025	1
The Distinctiveness Problem of Analogical Arguments	1
What Makes an Argument Strong?	1
Appeals to “Normality” and “Common Sense” in the Face of Global Uncertainty	1
Small but Significant Errata/Typos in the Paper “The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism”	1
Argumentation, Cooperation, and Disagreement	1
Books Recieved 44(4)	1
On Numerical Arguments in Policymaking	1
Introduction to the Special Issue	1
On the Kisceral Mode of Argumentation	0
Books Received	0
As Syllable from Sound	0
The Broad Reach of Multivariable Thinking	0
On the Virtue-theoretic Approach to Argument Appraisal	0
Munazara and (non-)Authoritarian Argumentation	0
Whataboutisms: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly	0
Virtuous Argumentation and Unendorsed Claims	0
Bad Arguments and Objectively Bad Arguments	0
The Relevance of Moral Emotional Appeals in Environmental Political Debates	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Review of How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell-Copleston Debate	0
That Obscure Object of (Philosophical) Desire	0
Characterizing Reflective Diary Writing as an Argumentative Activity Type	0
You Cannot Judge an Argument by its Closure	0
Generative AI and Argument Creativity	0
Reply to Yu and Zenker	0
Does argumentation change minds?	0
Amenable Argumentation Approach	0
Books Recieved	0
Fact and Opinion	0
Something Called the ‘False Dilemma Fallacy’ (FDF): A Return to Formalization Just This Time	0
Generalizations in Analogical Argument	0
Books Received	0
Books Received 45 (3) (2025)	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Are Fallacies Frequent ?	0

Is False Dilemma Really a Formal Fallacy?	0
Do We Really Not Know What Toulmin’s Analytic Arguments Are?	0
Is Every Definition Persuasive?	0
Burdens of Proposing	0
Argument Evaluation: If your Snark be a Boojum…	0
Kisceral Argumentation in Law	0
An Experimental Study on the Evaluation of Metaphorical Ad Hominem Arguments	0
Notice of Books Received	0
The Basic Components of Agreement	0
Books Received	0
A Network of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions	0
Educating for Good Thinking: Virtues, Skills, or Both?	0
What are Deep Disagreements?	0
An Epistemological Appraisal of Walton’s Argument Schemes	0
A Reaction to Critique from the Epistemological Sidelines	0
On the Ethics of Real-Life Examples of Argument	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Arguing with Arguments	0
Arguments from Fairness and Extensive Interpretation in Greek Judicial Rhetoric	0
Multi-Modal 2020	0
Justifying the Epistemological Theory of Argumentation	0
Notice of Books Received	0
It’s A Two-Way Street	0
From the Editors	0
John Hayden Woods 1937-2024	0
In Memoriam J. Anthony Blair	0
Systemic Means of Persuasion and Argument Evaluation	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Douglas Walton’s Contributions in Education	0
When Meaning Becomes Controversial	0
International Law and Argumentation: Navigating Constraints and Seeking New Orientations	0
Meta-Arguments, Para-Arguments, and Intentionally Bad Arguments	0
Particularism About Arguments	0
Argumentation Profiles	0
Review of Review Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue By Marcin Lewiński and Mark Aakhus	0
Civility: One or Many?	0
Group Identity in Public Deliberation	0