OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The median citation count of Informal Logic is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-08-01 to 2026-08-01.)

Article	Citations
Virtues Suffice for Argument Evaluation	12
Sincere and Insincere Arguing	12
Logics for “Non-Logical” Argumentation	11
Intellectual Virtue in Critical Thinking and Its Instruction	9
Protest as Argument	8
Two-Tier Fallacy Theory	8
Introducing Susan Stebbing as a Forerunner of Informal Logic	7
Case Study of Contextual and Emotional Modulation of Source-case Selection in Analogical Arguments	6
Books Received 09-27-2024	6
Review of Authoritarianism on the Front Page: Multimodal Discourse and Argumentation in Times of Multiple Crises in Greece	4
The Argument Scheme-based Approach to Argument Structure	4
Defeasible Reasoning in Islamic Legal Theory	4
Navigating Argumentation	3
Sequencing Critical Moves for Ethical Argumentation Practice: Munāẓara and the Interdependence of Procedure and Agent	3
Books Received 45(1)	3
Gilbert as Disrupter	3
Mind The Gap	3
Towards a Taxonomy of Bullshit Illocutionary Acts	2
Sound Tactics	2
On Numerical Arguments in Policymaking	2
Review of The Logic of Legal Argumentation: Multi-Modal Perspectives	2
In Memoriam	2
An Invitation to Transformation	2
In Memoriam Michael Scriven	2
Reflections on the Physical or Visceral Mode of Argumentation in Michael Gilbert’s Theory of Multi-Modal Argumentation and its Relation to Gesture Studies and The Embodied Mind	2

Books Received	2
The Distinctiveness Problem of Analogical Arguments	2
Introduction to the special issue on selected papers from the 2nd International Conference on Debate & Dialogue (ICDD2) 2025	2
The Effect of Intensifications Through Rephrasing on Argument Persuasiveness	1
From the Editors	1
What Makes an Argument Strong?	1
AILACT Essay Prize CFP 2025	1
Arguing About Arguing with Arguments	1
Small but Significant Errata/Typos in the Paper “The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism”	1
Characterizing Reflective Diary Writing as an Argumentative Activity Type	1
A Moderate Defense for Visual Arguments	1
Books Received 45(4)	1
Argumentation by Analogy and Weighing of Reasons	1
Paley’s Principle:	1
Arabic Argumentation	1
Appeals to “Normality” and “Common Sense” in the Face of Global Uncertainty	1
How do Explanations Justify?	1
Kisceral Argumentation in Law	1
The Basic Components of Agreement	1
Calling Out Displays and Disclaimers of Aggression	1
International Law and Argumentation: Navigating Constraints and Seeking New Orientations	1
Books Recieved 44(4)	1
Frustrated and Aware	1
Rational Force of Analogy/Qiyās in Law	1
Rational Thinking and Intellectually Virtuous Thinking: Identical, Extensionally Equivalent, or Substantively Different?	1
Critical Thinking, Metacognition, and Dual-Process Theory	1
Bad Arguments and Objectively Bad Arguments	1
Argumentation, Cooperation, and Disagreement	1
Arguments from Ignorance, Coverage, and Bubbles	1
On the Virtue-theoretic Approach to Argument Appraisal	0
Educating for Good Thinking: Virtues, Skills, or Both?	0
On the Kisceral Mode of Argumentation	0
Someone it is Good to Argue With	0
Notice of Books Received	0
John Hayden Woods 1937-2024	0
Munazara and (non-)Authoritarian Argumentation	0
Argument Evaluation: If your Snark be a Boojum…	0
Group Identity in Public Deliberation	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Books Received	0
As Syllable from Sound	0
A Network of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions	0
Generalizations in Analogical Argument	0
Books Recieved	0
From the Editors	0
Civility: One or Many?	0
Review of How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell-Copleston Debate	0
You Cannot Judge an Argument by its Closure	0
Amenable Argumentation Approach	0
Fact and Opinion	0

Something Called the ‘False Dilemma Fallacy’ (FDF): A Return to Formalization Just This Time	0
Does argumentation change minds?	0
When Meaning Becomes Controversial	0
Virtuous Argumentation and Unendorsed Claims	0
Do We Really Not Know What Toulmin’s Analytic Arguments Are?	0
Systemic Means of Persuasion and Argument Evaluation	0
Review of Review Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue By Marcin Lewiński and Mark Aakhus	0
That Obscure Object of (Philosophical) Desire	0
Arguing with Arguments	0
Generative AI and Argument Creativity	0
Justifying the Epistemological Theory of Argumentation	0
Arguments from Fairness and Extensive Interpretation in Greek Judicial Rhetoric	0
What are Deep Disagreements?	0
Multi-Modal 2020	0
A Reaction to Critique from the Epistemological Sidelines	0
The Relevance of Moral Emotional Appeals in Environmental Political Debates	0
An Experimental Study on the Evaluation of Metaphorical Ad Hominem Arguments	0
“Look at This Great Alice in Wonderland Dress I Found!”	0
Argumentative Role Ethics in Islamic Dialogue Theory	0
In Memoriam J. Anthony Blair	0
The Curative Fallacy	0
Is False Dilemma Really a Formal Fallacy?	0
Whataboutisms: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly	0
It’s A Two-Way Street	0
A Pragmatist View for Disagreeing Deeply	0
Notice of Books Received	0
On the Ethics of Real-Life Examples of Argument	0
Are Fallacies Frequent ?	0
Books Received	0
Introduction to the Special Issue on the Work of Catherine E. Hundleby	0
Meta-Arguments, Para-Arguments, and Intentionally Bad Arguments	0
Books Received 45 (3) (2025)	0
Reply to Yu and Zenker	0
The Broad Reach of Multivariable Thinking	0
Particularism About Arguments	0
Books Received	0
Unpacking Appeals to Emotion	0