OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The median citation count of Informal Logic is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-04-01 to 2025-04-01.)

Article	Citations
Notice of Books Received	8
In Memoriam	6
Appeals to “Normality” and “Common Sense” in the Face of Global Uncertainty	5
Argumentative Bullshit	5
A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation	4
Argumentative Hyperbole as Fallacy	4
Virtues Suffice for Argument Evaluation	3
John Hayden Woods 1937-2024	3
Books Received	3
Identifying Linked and Convergent Argument Structures	3
Books Received	3
Review of How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell-Copleston Debate	3
The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism	2
Sincere and Insincere Arguing	2
Is Every Definition Persuasive?	2
Something Called the ‘False Dilemma Fallacy’ (FDF): A Return to Formalization Just This Time	2
Douglas Walton’s Contributions in Education	2
An Experimental Study on the Evaluation of Metaphorical Ad Hominem Arguments	2
Logics for “Non-Logical” Argumentation	1
In Memoriam	1
Intellectual Virtue in Critical Thinking and Its Instruction	1
How do Explanations Justify?	1
Speech Act Pluralism in Argumentative Polylogues	1
Hermeneutic Priority of Which Question?	1
Introduction to the Special Issue	1

You Cannot Judge an Argument by its Closure	1
Multi-Modal 2020	1
Small but Significant Errata/Typos in the Paper “The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism”	1
Educating for Good Thinking: Virtues, Skills, or Both?	1
Notice of Books Received	1
From the Editors	1
Argumentation Ab Homine in Philosophy	1
Illocutionary Performance and Objective Assessment in the Speech Act of Arguing	1
Particularism About Arguments	1
On Appeals to Non-existent Authorities as Arguments from Analogy	1
Whataboutisms: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Books Recieved 44(4)	0
Argument Evaluation: If your Snark be a Boojum…	0
A Pragmatic Account of Rephrase in Argumentation	0
Introduction to the Special Issue	0
Reflections on the Physical or Visceral Mode of Argumentation in Michael Gilbert’s Theory of Multi-Modal Argumentation and its Relation to Gesture Studies and The Embodied Mind	0
Defeasible Reasoning in Islamic Legal Theory	0
Burdens of Proposing	0
Group Identity in Public Deliberation	0
On the Ethics of Real-Life Examples of Argument	0
A Network of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Books Recieved	0
Arguing with Arguments	0
The Broad Reach of Multivariable Thinking	0
Characterizing Reflective Diary Writing as an Argumentative Activity Type	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Deeper into Argumentative Bullshit	0
An Epistemological Appraisal of Walton’s Argument Schemes	0
Kisceral Argumentation in Law	0
Do We Really Not Know What Toulmin’s Analytic Arguments Are?	0
Does argumentation change minds?	0
Bad Arguments and Objectively Bad Arguments	0
When Meaning Becomes Controversial	0
Are Fallacies Frequent ?	0
On Numerical Arguments in Policymaking	0
Arguing About Arguing with Arguments	0
Systemic Means of Persuasion and Argument Evaluation	0
Argumentation by Analogy and Weighing of Reasons	0
From the Editors	0
In Memoriam	0
Reflections on Minimal Adversariality	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Credible as Evidence? Multilayered Audience Reception of Narrative Arguments	0
Is False Dilemma Really a Formal Fallacy?	0
What Makes an Argument Strong?	0
In Memoriam Michael Scriven	0
A Reaction to Critique from the Epistemological Sidelines	0
Books Received	0

Argumentation and Persistent Disagreement	0
As Syllable from Sound	0
Metaphilosophy and Argument: The Case of the Justification of Abduction	0
The Basic Components of Agreement	0
Amenable Argumentation Approach	0
Justifying the Epistemological Theory of Argumentation	0
The Distinctiveness Problem of Analogical Arguments	0
Case Study of Contextual and Emotional Modulation of Source-case Selection in Analogical Arguments	0
Sequencing Critical Moves for Ethical Argumentation Practice: Munāẓara and the Interdependence of Procedure and Agent	0
What are Deep Disagreements?	0
Generative AI and Argument Creativity	0
Act or Object	0
Decoupling Representations and the Chain of Arguments	0
Arguments from Fairness and Extensive Interpretation in Greek Judicial Rhetoric	0
On the Kisceral Mode of Argumentation	0
Books Received 09-27-2024	0
That Obscure Object of (Philosophical) Desire	0
Inference Claims as Assertions	0
Reply to Yu and Zenker	0
Notice of Books Received	0
Fact and Opinion	0
Notice of Books Received	0
On the Virtue-theoretic Approach to Argument Appraisal	0
A Simple Theory of Argument Schemes	0
Gilbert as Disrupter	0
Discovering Warrants in Political Argumentation	0
In Memoriam J. Anthony Blair	0
Metaphorical Argumentation	0
Argumentation Profiles	0
Rational Thinking and Intellectually Virtuous Thinking: Identical, Extensionally Equivalent, or Substantively Different?	0
Books Received	0