Informal Logic

Papers
(The TQCC of Informal Logic is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-06-01 to 2025-06-01.)
ArticleCitations
In Memoriam11
Identifying Linked and Convergent Argument Structures8
Sincere and Insincere Arguing5
A Modal Criterion for Epistemic Argumentation5
The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism5
Argumentative Hyperbole as Fallacy5
Intellectual Virtue in Critical Thinking and Its Instruction4
Logics for “Non-Logical” Argumentation4
Speech Act Pluralism in Argumentative Polylogues4
Virtues Suffice for Argument Evaluation4
Books Received 09-27-20243
Defeasible Reasoning in Islamic Legal Theory3
Deeper into Argumentative Bullshit3
Illocutionary Performance and Objective Assessment in the Speech Act of Arguing3
Books Received 45(1)3
The Argument Scheme-based Approach to Argument Structure3
Case Study of Contextual and Emotional Modulation of Source-case Selection in Analogical Arguments3
A Pragmatic Account of Rephrase in Argumentation3
Metaphilosophy and Argument: The Case of the Justification of Abduction2
Books Received2
Sequencing Critical Moves for Ethical Argumentation Practice: Munāẓara and the Interdependence of Procedure and Agent2
Notice of Books Received2
Navigating Argumentation2
Gilbert as Disrupter2
Reflections on the Physical or Visceral Mode of Argumentation in Michael Gilbert’s Theory of Multi-Modal Argumentation and its Relation to Gesture Studies and The Embodied Mind2
A Moderate Defense for Visual Arguments1
Books Recieved 44(4)1
In Memoriam Michael Scriven1
Introduction to the Special Issue1
A Simple Theory of Argument Schemes1
What Makes an Argument Strong?1
Small but Significant Errata/Typos in the Paper “The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism”1
Frustrated and Aware1
Rational Thinking and Intellectually Virtuous Thinking: Identical, Extensionally Equivalent, or Substantively Different?1
Argumentation by Analogy and Weighing of Reasons1
Introduction to the Special Issue1
The Distinctiveness Problem of Analogical Arguments1
Decoupling Representations and the Chain of Arguments1
Appeals to “Normality” and “Common Sense” in the Face of Global Uncertainty1
How do Explanations Justify?1
On Numerical Arguments in Policymaking1
Argumentative Bullshit1
In Memoriam1
Arguing About Arguing with Arguments1
Metaphorical Argumentation1
From the Editors1
0.089813947677612