Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

Papers
(The TQCC of Journal of Behavioral Decision Making is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-11-01 to 2025-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
20
The Categorization of Continuous Attributes15
Do We Really Believe That “More Is Better”? Mapping Implicit and Explicit Associations Between Quantity and Quality15
Future–present relationship insensitivity: A new perspective on psychological myopia and psychological hyperopia15
The Relative Importance of the Contrast and Assimilation Effects in Decisions Under Risk11
Episodic Future Thinking Only Reduces Delay Discounting When Future Events Involve the Self11
Preference for quicker offers: The critical roles of temporal reference points and evaluation mode9
Ambiguity Preference in Waiting Time: Investigating the Desirability Effect and the Interplay of Temporal Description, Outcome Category, and Evaluation Mode9
Culture versus other sources of variance in risk and benefit perceptions: A comparison of Japan and the United States8
Consulting Multiple Advisors: When It Hurts and When It Does Not Hurt the Advisor–Advisee Relationship?8
Correction to “The Categorization of Continuous Attributes”8
Emotion and intergroup cooperation: How verbal expressions of guilt, shame, and pride influence behavior in a social dilemma7
Equivalence Framing and the Construction of Advocacy Messages7
Impact of choice set complexity on decoy effects7
An Exploration of How Motivations and Perceived Ability Influence an Advisor's Willingness to Give Advice7
Resource Constraints Lead to Biased Attention but Decrease Unethical Behavior6
6
Issue Information6
Proud to Be Dishonest: Emotional Consequences of Altruistic Versus Egoistic Dishonesty6
Correction to “Determinants of Economic Risk Preferences Across Adolescence”6
Issue Information5
Measurement invariance of the Domain‐Specific Risk‐Taking (DOSPERT) scale5
The “Why Me?” Model: Explaining Moral Judgments in the Eyes of Single Versus Several Victims5
Framing the Default Option Right5
How the anchor moves: Measuring and comparing the anchoring bias in autistic and neurotypical individuals5
Noisy Retrieval of Experienced Probabilities Underlies Rational Judgment of Uncertain Multiple Events5
A longitudinal approach for understanding algorithm use5
Mixed‐effects regression weights for advice taking and related phenomena of information sampling and utilization5
When and Why “Consoling” Marginal Underperformers With a Small Versus Zero Reward Hurts Fairness (Without Consolation)5
Issue Information5
How false feedback influences decision‐makers' risk preferences5
Cover Image5
Framing Biases in Plea Bargaining Decisions: Fairness Under the Law5
Issue Information5
Comparison‐specific preferences: The attentional dilution effect for delay and risk4
Helping a Boy or a Girl? The Effect of Recipient's Gender and Donor's Culture on Donation Decisions4
Demand for information about potential wins and losses: Does it matter if information matters?4
Dynamics of Reliance on Algorithmic Advice4
Guessing, math, or something else? Lay people's processes for valuing annuities4
Choosing Versus Rejecting: The Effect of Decision Mode on Subsequent Preferential Choices4
When Half Is at Least 50%: Effect of “Framing” and Probability Level on Frequency Estimates4
From Preparation to Performance: Conscientiousness Predicts Negotiation Planning and Value Claiming4
Issue Information4
4
The effect of state and trait power on financial risk taking: The mediating and moderating roles of focus on rewards versus threats3
Does IQ predict engagement with skill‐based gambling? Large‐scale evidence from horserace betting3
Mementos and the endowment effect3
Choice Bolstering Changes Attribute Importance and Affects Future Choices3
Interplay between benefit appeal and valence framing in reducing smoking behavior: Evidence from a field experience3
3
Emotions and financial risk‐taking in the lab: A meta‐analysis3
Going with the crowd in volatile times: Exposure to environmental variability increases people's preference for popular options3
Predicting a win by a small margin: The effect of graphic scaling in published polls on voters' predictions3
Issue Information3
3
Does Time Pressure Alter the Affect Gap in Risky Choice?3
Learning Processes in the Judge–Advisor System: A Neglected Advantage of Advice Taking3
Decision‐making styles and goal striving3
Issue Information3
Measurement effects in decision‐making3
Predicting Emotional and Behavioral Reactions to Collective Wrongdoing: Effects of Imagined Versus Experienced Collective Guilt on Moral Behavior3
People imitate others' dishonesty but do not intentionally search information about it3
A dark side of hope: Understanding why investors cling onto losing stocks3
0.077759981155396