Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Papers
(The TQCC of Journal of Clinical Epidemiology is 8. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-05-01 to 2026-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
Two-decade health-related quality of life and performance on physical function tests in midaged women: findings from a prospective cohort study300
Visualizing the value of diagnostic tests and prediction models, part III. Numerical example with discrete risk groups and miscalibration239
Potential interactions between digoxin and direct oral anticoagulants: application of cohort & novel case-crossover designs205
Editorial Board191
The construct of certainty of evidence has not been disseminated to systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines; response to ‘The GRADE Working Group’ et al148
A general explanation of the counterfactual definition of confounding131
Recording harms in randomized controlled trials of behavior change interventions: a scoping review and map of the evidence122
Use of artificial intelligence to support the assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews118
Librarian involvement in systematic reviews was associated with higher quality of reported search methods: a cross-sectional survey114
GRADE guidance 39: using GRADE-ADOLOPMENT to adopt, adapt or create contextualized recommendations from source guidelines and evidence syntheses110
Meta-analysis of individual participant data and informed consent: a small step, but important and neglected108
Corrigendum to ‘Identifying type 1 and 2 diabetes in research datasets where classification biomarkers are unavailable: assessing the accuracy of published approaches’ [Journal of Clinical Epidemiolog107
Strong and high-quality evidence synthesis needs Cochrane: a statement of support by the GRADE Guidance Group97
The walking man approach to interpreting the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve93
Searching two or more databases decreased the risk of missing relevant studies: a metaresearch study93
Whole population cohorts versus sampled comparators designs for evaluating health and educational outcomes of children with inborn rare conditions: a simulation study90
External validation, impact assessment and clinical utilization of clinical prediction models: a prospective cohort study89
Justification of Deferral of Consent in the ACT-GLOBAL Adaptive Platform Trial in Stroke89
Handling missing data in clinical research79
Results reporting for clinical trials led by medical universities and university hospitals in the nordic countries was often missing or delayed77
JBI series paper 2: tailored evidence synthesis approaches are required to answer diverse questions: a pragmatic evidence synthesis toolkit from JBI77
Evaluation of tools used to assess adherence to PRISMA 2020 reveals inconsistent methods and poor tool implementability: part I of a systematic review75
Integrating personomics into precision medicine75
Predicting COVID-19 prognosis in the ICU remained challenging: external validation in a multinational regional cohort69
RETRACTED: Part II: a step-by-step guide to latent class analysis64
Screening colonoscopy similarly prevented distal and proximal colorectal cancer: a prospective study among 55–69-year-olds60
External validation of six COVID-19 prognostic models for predicting mortality risk in older populations in a hospital, primary care, and nursing home setting60
A review identified challenges distinguishing primary reports of randomized trials for meta-research: A proposal for improved reporting58
A Bayesian-adaptive decision-theoretic approach can reduce the sample sizes for multiarm exercise oncology trials58
Statistical robustness of randomized controlled trials in high-impact journals has improved but was low across medical specialties57
Guideline organizations’ guidance documents paper 10: developing recommendations about diagnostic tests and strategies55
Empirical evaluation of the methods used in systematic reviews including observational studies and randomized trials54
Harms were detected but not reported in six clinical trials of gabapentin53
Advances in methodologies of negative controls: a scoping review52
Reporting of funding and conflicts of interest improved from preprints to peer-reviewed publications of biomedical research52
Measuring the environmental impact of health interventions in randomized controlled trials – A scoping review49
Table of Contents47
Pharmacovigilance studies without a priori hypothesis: systematic review highlights inappropriate multiple testing correction procedures47
Types and associated methodologies of overviews of reviews in health care: a methodological study with published examples47
Editors’ Choice: October 202446
Editors' Choice September 202446
Many systematic reviews with a single author are indexed in PubMed45
The World Conference on Research Integrity 202444
Consistency of protocol and safety data reporting in clinical trial registrations and corresponding publications of interventions involving MDMA and psilocybin44
Table of Contents43
Promoting responsible scientific research: integrating retractions into the ORCID profile43
Year-to-year variation in attack rates could result in underpowered respiratory syncytial virus vaccine efficacy trials42
Editorial Board41
Editorial Board41
Resourcing and validation of the GRADE ontology: reply to Dedeepya et al.41
Response to “Homeopathy: A null field or effective psychotherapy?”40
Controversy and debate: challenges with the need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis paper 1: two challenges: absence of a clear cut, easily replicable test for the reference standard; unet40
A method was developed for correcting the bias in the usual study weights in meta-analyses39
Prevalence of and factors associated with potentially redundant randomized controlled trials: a cross-sectional study39
Improved reporting of selection processes in clinical database research: author's reply37
Meta-analysis of multi-jurisdictional health administrative data from distributed networks approximated individual-level multivariable regression37
Table of Contents37
Improving grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation evidence tables part 4: a three-arm noninferiority randomized trial demonstrates improved understanding of content in summa37
Avoiding overadjustment bias in social epidemiology through appropriate covariate selection: a primer36
Item response theory may account for unequal item weighting and individual-level measurement error in trials that use PROMs: a psychometric sensitivity analysis of the TOPKAT trial36
Incorporating postmenopausal women's perspectives into osteoporosis clinical guidelines: a systematic review35
Maternal early warning scores shown to be methodologically weak and at high risk of bias34
Heterogeneity across outcomes reported in clinical trials for older adults with depression: a systematic survey34
Methodological quality assessment tools for diagnosis and prognosis research: overview and guidance34
Predictors of citation rates and the problem of citation bias: a scoping review33
Is it time for a common peer review format for biomedical journals?33
Indirectness (transferability) is critical when considering existing economic evaluations for GRADE clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review33
Priority-setting criteria for clinical practice guideline development on rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders: a Delphi study within the European Reference Network ITHACA32
The performance of three nutritional tools varied in colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective analysis31
A multimethods randomized trial found that plain language versions improved parents’ understanding of health recommendations31
Conflict of interest policies for editors and peer reviewers in medical journals: cross-sectional study30
A population-based recalibration method for updating survival neural networks models for cardiovascular risk prediction in United Kingdom and China30
Editorial Board29
Surrogate endpoint metaregression: useful statistics for regulators and trialists29
Guideline organizations’ guidance documents paper 4: interest-holder engagement29
Editors' Choice - July 202329
Reply: A needed evolution in GRADE to address dissemination (publication) bias29
Including nonrandomized studies of interventions in systematic reviews: principles and practicalities27
Implementing a randomization consent to enable Trials within Cohorts in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study – A mixed-methods study27
Defining decision thresholds for judgments on health benefits and harms using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) evidence to decision (EtD) frameworks: a ra27
Incorporating non-randomized evidence in cochrane intervention reviews: a scoping review27
Part I: A friendly introduction to latent class analysis27
Use of clustering techniques for clinical and epidemiological research: practical tips using an example from rheumatology26
Re: living recommendations do not ‘flip-flop’ - Examining the probability of directional changes to recommendations in living guidelines26
A methodological review of network meta-analyses applied to complex interventions for public health and a typology of the node-making process26
A metaresearch study finds unclear impact of institutional conflicts of interest on conclusions of studies investigating volume–outcome relationships26
Including conference abstracts rarely changed systematic review conclusions: a case study from a living network meta-analysis of COVID-19 treatments26
The impact of climate change on health needs structured evidence assessment and an evidence to action framework to make decisions: a proposal to adopt the GRADE approach26
Editors’ Choice January 202526
Use of participant data and biological samples is insufficiently described in participant information leaflets25
A new taxonomy is proposed for defining the interests of stakeholders’ representatives in health research: the case of guideline development25
Qualitative study of guideline panelists: innovative surveys provided valuable insights regarding patient values and preferences25
A framework for evaluating predictive models24
In a pilot study, automated real-time systematic review updates were feasible, accurate, and work-saving24
Methods for living guidelines: early guidance based on practical experience. Paper 5: decisions on methods for evidence synthesis and recommendation development for living guidelines24
Characteristics and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews of prevalence studies in adult populations: a metaresearch study24
Systematic review of multivariable prognostic models for outcomes at least 30 days after hip fracture finds 18 mortality models but no nonmortality models warranting validation24
Health state utility differed systematically in breast cancer patients between the EORTC QLU-C10D and the PROMIS Preference Score24
Accounting for differential exclusions in the Nordic-European initiative on colorectal cancer trial discloses stronger-than-reported effects of screening colonoscopy24
Validation of the Persistent Somatic Symptom Stigma Scale for Healthcare Professionals24
Assessing the scientific integrity of the collected work of one author or author group23
AMSTAR 2 is only partially applicable to systematic reviews of non-intervention studies: a meta-research study23
Population median imputation was noninferior to complex approaches for imputing missing values in cardiovascular prediction models in clinical practice23
Answers to comments by Jonas Schmidt, Casper Urth Pedersen, and Sisse Helle Njor22
GRADE guidance 36: updates to GRADE's approach to addressing inconsistency22
Editorial, April 202522
Gastrointestinal prophylaxis for COVID-19: an illustration of severe bias arising from inappropriate comparators in observational studies22
Statistical strategies to analyze local control after radiotherapy22
Reply to “Some additional considerations on the evidence for fluoxetine in pediatric depression”22
Author’s reply: “The importance of properly specifying your target trial emulation: commentary on Mésidor et al.”22
Reporting of health equity considerations in vaccine trials for COVID-19: a methodological review22
Pain and physical function are common core domains across 40 core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review22
Adapting World Health Organization COVID-19 living guidelines balancing methodological rigor with efficiency and flexibility: a case study from Argentina22
New research questions identified for Cochrane reviews: a cross-sectional study of a specialized register: part two: fertility21
Underserved groups remain underserved as eligibility criteria routinely exclude them from breast cancer trials21
No short-term mortality from benzodiazepine use post-acute ischemic stroke after accounting for bias21
The use of guidelines in multimorbidity-related practice: an exploratory questionnaire survey21
Gynecological trials frequently exclude people based on their symptoms rather than their condition: a systematic review of Cochrane reviews and their component trials21
Decision-making given surrogate outcomes21
Joint modeling of endpoints can be used to answer various research questions in randomized clinical trials20
13-Year colorectal cancer risk after lower-quality, higher-quality and no screening colonoscopy: a cohort study20
Flexible approaches to clinical trials20
Patient-reported outcomes and measures are under-utilised in advanced therapy medicinal products trials for orphan conditions20
Acquired HIV drug resistance mutations on first-line antiretroviral therapy in Southern Africa: Systematic review and Bayesian evidence synthesis20
Toward an observatory of the evolution of clinical trials through phylomemy reconstruction: the COVID-19 vaccines example20
Prevalence of patient partner authorship and acknowledgment in child health research publications: an umbrella review20
Peer review reports of randomized controlled trials in oncology can be short and superficial20
Developing and externally validating multinomial prediction models for methotrexate treatment outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from an international collaboration20
Generative artificial intelligence and academic writing: friend or foe?20
Psychometric properties and reference values for the instrumented timed-up and go test in adults20
Mapping intersectional sociodemographic inequalities in measurement and prevalence of depressive symptoms: a intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy 20
Validation and impact of algorithms for identifying variables in observational studies of routinely collected data20
Implementation of a dynamic model updating pipeline provides a systematic process for maintaining performance of prediction models20
AI-enabled exploitation of open science: a response to Zil-E-Ali on safeguarding data research integrity20
Broadening the scope of meta-research: from methodologists to interest-holders20
Ratios are misleading exposure variables that compromise a regression model unless fundamental scaling assumptions are satisfied: a comment on Valente et al20
Psychometric properties and domains covered by patient-reported outcome measures used in trials assessing interventions for chronic pain20
A multistakeholder development process to prioritize and translate COVID-19 health recommendations for patients, caregivers and the public. A case study of the COVID-19 recommendation map19
The methods adopted by Autier et al do not support their conclusions19
Informed consent for national registration of COVID-19 vaccination caused information bias of vaccine effectiveness estimates mostly in older adults: a bias correction study19
Presentation approaches for enhancing interpretability of patient-reported outcomes in meta-analyses: a systematic survey of Cochrane reviews19
A scoping review of the assessment reports of genetic or genomic tests reveals inconsistent consideration of key dimensions of clinical utility19
Editorial Board19
The role of scoping reviews in guideline development19
Weekly updating of guideline recommendations was feasible: the Australian National COVID-19 clinical evidence Taskforce18
Challenges with need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis: paper 2: real-world case examples from GRADE for when a reference standard is not clearly defined/ easily replicable or when it is 18
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of clinical prediction models: a scoping review18
Response rates in email vs. mail surveys for urologists: a randomized controlled trial18
2,109 randomized oncology trials map continuous, meager improvements in progression-free and overall survival over 50 years18
Table of Contents18
Table of Contents18
Methodological systematic review recommends improvements to conduct and reporting when meta-analyzing interrupted time series studies18
Table of Contents18
Informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions: cross-cultural translation of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation plain langua18
The influence of the dynamic context of the pandemic on the predictive performance of mortality predictions over time in older patients hospitalized for COVID-1918
Editorial Board17
Exploring the use and usefulness of living guidelines for consumers: international online survey of patients' and carers' views17
Development of a refined harmonization approach for longitudinal cognitive data in people with HIV17
Behavior of prediction performance metrics with rare events17
An umbrella review reveals that control variables are rarely considered as a source of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of observational studies17
Considerations for the use of biochemical laboratory registry data in clinical and public health research17
Strength of statistical evidence for the efficacy of cancer drugs: a Bayesian reanalysis of randomized trials supporting Food and Drug Administration approval17
Inconsistency in publishers' responses to integrity concerns about published research. Evidence and suggested improvements17
Cox regression using a calendar time scale was unbiased in simulations of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness & safety17
Editorial Board17
Sponsorship bias in oncology cost effectiveness analysis17
Beyond the binary: integrating “real-world evidence” with randomized trials in contemporary health care17
There is a need to address uptake of core outcome sets in research and guidelines16
Associations of hypothetical early intensive in-hospital rehabilitation with activities of daily living after hip fracture surgery in patients with and without dementia: emulating a randomized control16
Assessment of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) 2015 guideline adherence in medical imaging diagnostic accuracy studies published in 202316
Differentiating between mapping reviews and evidence gap maps16
Calculating follow-up completeness: a comparison of multiple methods under different simulated scenarios and a use case16
Comments, suggestions, and criticisms of the Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2 design tool: a citation analysis16
Methodological challenges in pilot trials of herbal medicine: barriers to evidence-based practice16
David Sackett Young Investigator Award 202116
Reporting of withdrawn participants in randomized controlled trials assessing targeted therapies in immune-mediated skin diseases: a cross-sectional study of trials from systematic reviews16
Content validity: judging the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of an outcome measurement instrument – a COSMIN perspective16
Inclusion of harm outcomes in core outcome sets requires careful consideration16
A multifaceted graphical display, including treatment ranking, was developed to aid interpretation of network meta-analysis16
Estimates of sensitivity and specificity of serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies using a Bayesian latent class model approach15
The value of international collaboration15
Meta-research studies should improve and evaluate their own data sharing practices15
Empirical studies of balance do not justify a requirement for 1,000 patients per trial15
The importance of reporting computed tomography scan intervals in real-world oncology studies: a simulation analysis of afatinib in advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer15
High certainty evidence is stable and trustworthy, whereas evidence of moderate or lower certainty may be equally prone to being unstable15
Most systematic reviews that used the term “update” in title/abstract were not an updated version15
Decision criteria for selecting essential medicines and their connection to guidelines: an interpretive descriptive qualitative interview study15
Large responses to antidepressants or methodological artifacts? A secondary analysis of STAR∗D, a single-arm, open-label, nonindustry antidepressant trial15
Table of Contents14
Equity issues rarely addressed in the development of COVID-19 formal recommendations and good practice statements: a cross-sectional study14
Paper 2: themes from semistructured interviews14
Comparative effectiveness research considered methodological insights from simulation studies in physician's prescribing preference14
Researcher-patient partnership generated actionable recommendations, using quantitative evaluation and deliberative dialogue, to improve meaningful engagement14
Increased endorsement of TRIPOD and other reporting guidelines by high impact factor journals: survey of instructions to authors14
Critical elements of synthesis questions are incompletely reported: survey of systematic reviews of intervention effects14
Methods for developing diagnostic criteria for conditions without objective tests, biomarkers, or reference standards: a scoping review14
Funding matters: time to update preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses?14
A review of health equity considerations in Cochrane reviews of lifestyle interventions for cardiovascular health in adults14
Paper 4: a systematic review on the use of logic models and frameworks for methodological conduct of evidence synthesis14
Persistent ethnic disparities in authorship within top European and North American medical journals: a serial cross-sectional analysis14
Editorial Board13
Individual patient data meta-analysis estimates the minimal detectable change of the Geriatric Depression Scale-1513
Variation observed in consensus judgments between pairs of reviewers when assessing the risk of bias due to missing evidence in a sample of published meta-analyses of nutrition research13
Retracted randomized controlled trials were cited and not corrected in systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines13
Minimal important change was on the lower spectrum of previous estimates and responsiveness was sufficient for core outcomes in chronic low back pain13
The complexity of the relationship between ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes: author's reply13
Quality of surgical patient-reported outcome measure validation studies is often deficient: a systematic review13
Data quality assessment of interventional trials in public trial databases13
Prospective registration was associated with a reduced risk of bias for randomized controlled trials: a meta-research study13
Large variation existed in standardized mean difference estimates using different calculation methods in clinical trials13
Editors’ Choice May 2022: Evidence-Based-Research, Surrogate Outcomes and Exclusion of Old Systematic Reviews in Meta-analyses13
Methods for living guidelines: early guidance based on practical experience. Paper 3: selecting and prioritizing questions for living guidelines13
Introducing article numbering to Journal of Clinical Epidemiology13
The use of the E-value for sensitivity analysis13
Geriatric impairments were directly and indirectly associated with mortality in older patients with cancer: a structural equation analysis13
Methodological approaches for developing, reporting, and assessing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: a systematic survey13
Statistical model assessment in published dose-response meta-analyses is suboptimal: evidence from a methodological review and reanalysis of 242 datasets13
Comparison between risk of bias-1 and risk of bias-2 tool and impact on network meta-analysis results—A case study from a living Cochrane review on psoriasis13
“How-to”: scoping review?13
The smallest worthwhile effect is superior to the MCID for estimating acceptable benefits of knee arthroplasty12
Patient preference trials in oncology: a scoping review and recommendations on reporting12
What should journals do to prevent the publication of methodologically flawed systematic reviews?12
Complete case logistic regression with a dichotomised continuous outcome led to biased estimates12
Assessing conflict of interest reporting and quality of clinical trials on infant formula: a systematic review12
Guideline organizations' guidance documents paper 2: priority setting12
Prevalence of patient and public involvement in child health randomized controlled trials and impact on research quality, loss to follow-up, and dissemination12
Published registry-based pharmacoepidemiologic associations show limited concordance with agnostic medication-wide analyses12
Persistent gender disparity in leading dental publications across 4 decades: an observational study12
Substantial heterogeneity found in reporting mortality in Cochrane systematic reviews and Core Outcome Sets in COMET database12
Paper 6: engaging racially and ethnically diverse interest holders in evidence syntheses12
Editors’ Choice January 202612
Recruitment and implementation challenges were common in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a methodological review12
Indirect effects in mediation analyses should not be tested for statistical significance12
Applying calculations to clinical medicine requires nuance: response to Uy12
The challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence and their impact on the journal12
Beyond statistical significance: nuanced interpretations of statistically nonsignificant results were rare in Cochrane reviews – a metaepidemiological study12
Systematic Review Reveals Lack of Causal Methodology Applied to Pooled Longitudinal Observational Infectious Disease Studies12
Planning retention strategies in clinical trials—a qualitative interview study with members of trial teams12
Reusing clinical trial data to consolidate and advance medical knowledge11
Existing research guidelines for inclusive trials methodology. Working toward the integration of qualitative research, equity, diversity, and inclusion and trials methodology: a focused mapping review11
Identification of retracted publications and completeness of retraction notices in public health11
Supplementary strategies identified additional eligible studies in qualitative systematic reviews11
Update of the agency for healthcare research and quality guidance on using nonrandomized studies in evidence syntheses11
Large scoping reviews: managing volume and potential chaos in a pool of evidence sources11
Conceptualizing, operationalizing, and utilizing equity, diversity, and inclusion in clinical trials: a scoping review11
Sequential sample size calculations and learning curves safeguard the robust development of a clinical prediction model for individuals11
We extended the 2-week systematic review (2weekSR) methodology to larger, more complex systematic reviews: A case series11
Key considerations for planning adaptive platform trials: part 111
Top 20 research priorities on methods of co-production in evidence synthesis11
Reverse fragility index shows high fragility in Cochrane meta-analyses with P values between 0.05 and 0.20: A meta-epidemiological study11
0.29018211364746