Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Papers
(The TQCC of Journal of Clinical Epidemiology is 9. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-04-01 to 2025-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Incomplete reporting of adverse events in duloxetine trials: a meta-research survey of randomized controlled trials vs placebo1563
A simulation study showed that linear regression and Mann-Whitney test can be used to analyze the days alive and at home by day 30 outcome in a randomized controlled trial1452
How to use likelihood ratios to interpret evidence from randomized trials211
Avoiding searching for outcomes called for additional search strategies: a study of Cochrane review searches176
Measuring the environmental impact of health interventions in randomised controlled trials – a scoping review164
Visualizing the value of diagnostic tests and prediction models, part II. Net benefit graphs: net benefit as a function of the exchange rate156
Visualizing the value of diagnostic tests and prediction models, part III. Numerical example with discrete risk groups and miscalibration148
Real-time adaptive randomization of clinical trials137
Corrigendum to ‘Avoiding searching for outcomes called for additional search strategies: a study of cochrane review searches’ [Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 149 (2022) 83-88]130
Editing companies have the responsibility of ensuring their declared use of generative artificial intelligence126
GRADE Notes 4: how to use GRADE when there is “no” evidence? A case study of using unpublished registry data124
A systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials in high impact journals: assessing the design, rationale, and analysis119
Editorial Board103
Using Embase as a supplement to PubMed in Cochrane reviews differed across fields95
Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation concept article 5: addressing intransitivity in a network meta-analysis92
We extended the 2-week systematic review (2weekSR) methodology to larger, more complex systematic reviews: A case series91
Evaluation of adherence to STARD for abstracts in a diverse sample of diagnostic accuracy abstracts published in 2012 and 2019 reveals suboptimal reporting practices83
Variable selection methods were poorly reported but rarely misused in major medical journals: Literature review82
Handling missing data in clinical research80
Clinical trial data-sharing policies among journals, funding agencies, foundations, and other professional organizations: a scoping review80
RETRACTED: Part II: a step-by-step guide to latent class analysis79
Interrater reliability of ROB2 – an alternative measure and way of categorization78
Retracted papers originating from paper mills: a cross-sectional analysis of references and citations75
Leading pharmaceutical companies lacked transparency on clinical trials’ informed consent forms74
Causal analyses with target trial emulation for real-world evidence removed large self-inflicted biases: systematic bias assessment of ovarian cancer treatment effectiveness72
JBI series paper 3: The importance of people, process, evidence, and technology in pragmatic, healthcare provider-led evidence implementation69
Systematic metareview of prediction studies demonstrates stable trends in bias and low PROBAST inter-rater agreement69
Types and associated methodologies of overviews of reviews in health care: a methodological study with published examples68
Letter to the editor: Does the origami plot really improve the radar plot? Authors’ further response to Boers67
GRADE concept paper 2: Concepts for judging certainty on the calibration of prognostic models in a body of validation studies67
Editorial Board67
Substantial delays in clinical data published by the European Medicines Agency – a cross sectional study67
Minimal important change thresholds change over time after knee and hip arthroplasty66
Assessing conflict of interest reporting and quality of clinical trials on infant formula: a systematic review66
Observational studies of antidepressant use and suicide risk are selectively published in psychiatric journals64
Randomized COVID-19 vaccination rollout can offer direct real-world evidence64
Editorial Board63
Many thanks to our reviewers63
Increased interaction and procedural flexibility favoured participation: Study across European cohorts of preterm born individuals60
Table of Contents58
Reporting of funding and conflicts of interest improved from preprints to peer-reviewed publications of biomedical research58
Table of Contents57
Editors’ choice: June 202256
Applying calculations to clinical medicine requires nuance: response to Uy55
Development and validation of a prediction model for self-reported mobility decline in community-dwelling older adults55
Understanding how deferred consent affects patient characteristics and outcomes: an exploratory analysis of a clinical trial of prone positioning for COVID-1953
Practical guide to the typical analysis of prognostic factors and biomarkers without the use of P-values52
Table of Contents52
Quality of surgical patient-reported outcome measure validation studies is often deficient: a systematic review50
Editorial Board50
Empirical evaluation of the methods used in systematic reviews including observational studies and randomized trials50
Imputing missing laboratory results may return erroneous values because they are not missing at random48
Strong and high-quality evidence synthesis needs Cochrane: a statement of support by the GRADE Guidance Group47
Published registry-based pharmacoepidemiologic associations show limited concordance with agnostic medication-wide analyses46
Editorial Board45
Quality assessment practice in systematic reviews of mediation studies: results from an overview of systematic reviews45
Reporting transparency and completeness in trials: Paper 3 – trials conducted using administrative databases do not adequately report elements related to use of databases44
The inclusion of outcomes in search strategies for Cochrane Reviews: authors’ reply43
Editorial Board42
Evidence-based social sciences in China Paper 1 : Introduction. Howard White42
The construct of certainty of evidence has not been disseminated to systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines; response to ‘The GRADE Working Group’ et al41
Further advantages of publishing comprehensive directed acyclic graphs41
The use of the GRADE dose–response gradient domain in nutrition evidence syntheses varies considerably41
Assessing long-term effects after stem cell transplantation: design of the MOSA study39
A scoping review reveals candidate quality indicators of knowledge translation and implementation science practice tools38
The currency and completeness of specialized databases of COVID-19 publications38
Editorial Board38
Further reduction in statistical power for responder analysis of patient-reported outcomes with measurement error37
Table of Contents35
Table of Contents35
Introducing article numbering to Journal of Clinical Epidemiology35
Registered trials address questions already answered with high-certainty evidence: A sample of current redundant research34
Reply to Kelly Farrah and David Kaunelis regarding our study “Validation of five search filters for retrieval of clinical practice guidelines produced low precision”34
Measuring vaccine protection when the population is mostly vaccinated33
Coronavirus disease 2019 scenarios for a long-term strategy under fundamental uncertainty33
International application of PROMIS computerized adaptive tests: US versus country-specific item parameters can be consequential for individual patient scores33
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation to Spanish of the PANELVIEW instrument to evaluate the health guidelines development process32
Systematic Review Reveals Lack of Causal Methodology Applied to Pooled Longitudinal Observational Infectious Disease Studies32
A cross-sectional study assessing visual abstracts of randomized trials revealed inadequate reporting and high prevalence of spin32
Heterogeneous methodology in the development of patient versions of clinical practice guidelines: a scoping review32
Stakeholder-informed positivity thresholds for disease markers and risk scores: a methodological framework and an application in obstructive lung disease32
Table of Contents32
Corrigendum to ‘Pilot and feasibility trials in surgery are incompletely reported according to the CONSORT checklist: a meta-research study’ [Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 170 (2024)]31
Heterogeneity across outcomes in clinical trials on sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in chronic heart failure: a cross-sectional study31
Simultaneous evaluation of the imprecision and inconsistency domains of GRADE can be performed using prediction intervals31
Meta-analysis of individual participant data and informed consent: a small step, but important and neglected31
Pilot and feasibility trials in surgery are incompletely reported according to the CONSORT checklist: a meta-research study31
European non-commercial sponsors showed substantial variation in results reporting to the EU trial registry31
Using preprints in evidence synthesis: Commentary on experience during the COVID-19 pandemic30
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is not a successful surrogate endpoint: comment on Christensen et al.30
Editors’ choice: April 202430
Challenges and solutions in prognostic prediction models in spinal disorders29
Visual transformation for guidelines presentation of the strength of recommendations and the certainty of evidence29
Beyond statistical significance: nuanced interpretations of statistically nonsignificant results were rare in Cochrane reviews – a metaepidemiological study29
Noncollapsibility, confounding, and sparse-data bias. Part 1: The oddities of odds29
A structured approach to information retrieval improved identification of funding and researchers’ conflicts of interest in trials included in Cochrane reviews28
JBI series paper 2: tailored evidence synthesis approaches are required to answer diverse questions: a pragmatic evidence synthesis toolkit from JBI28
Limited online training opportunities exist for scholarly peer reviewers28
The walking man approach to interpreting the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve27
Paper 5: a methodological overview of methods and interventions27
The smallest worthwhile effect is superior to the MCID for estimating acceptable benefits of knee arthroplasty27
Quasi-experiments are a valuable source of evidence about effects of interventions, programs and policies: commentary from the Campbell Collaboration Study Design and Bias Assessment Working Group26
Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey26
Poor compliance of clinical trial registration among trials included in systematic reviews: a cohort study26
A systematic survey identified methodological issues in studies estimating anchor-based minimal important differences in patient-reported outcomes26
Guidance reconciliation and practice question prioritization for a World Health Organization's Ebola and Marburg Disease guideline25
Why clinical context and relevant protocols matter: response to Impellizzeri et al.25
Conceptualizing, operationalizing, and utilizing equity, diversity, and inclusion in clinical trials: a scoping review25
Open science failed to penetrate academic hiring practices: a cross-sectional study25
Predicting COVID-19 prognosis in the ICU remained challenging: external validation in a multinational regional cohort25
Update of the agency for healthcare research and quality guidance on using nonrandomized studies in evidence syntheses25
Trial sequential analysis involving same-year studies requires careful temporal ordering25
Editorial Board25
Editors’ Choice March 202525
Empirical estimation of disutilities and decision thresholds for composite endpoints25
Developing reporting checklist items from systematic review findings: a roadmap and lessons to be learned from ACCORD24
Values and preferences in COVID-19 public health guidelines: a systematic review24
More than two-dozen prescription drug-based risk scores are available for risk adjustment: A systematic review24
Required knowledge for guideline panel members to develop healthcare related testing recommendations: a developmental study24
Analysis of risk of bias assessments in a sample of intervention systematic reviews, Part II: focus on risk of bias tools reveals few meet current appraisal standards24
Screening colonoscopy similarly prevented distal and proximal colorectal cancer: a prospective study among 55–69-year-olds24
Screening for diseases versus screening for health status24
What should journals do to prevent the publication of methodologically flawed systematic reviews?24
A methodological framework allows the identification of personomic markers to consider when designing personalized interventions24
Analyses of academician cohorts generate biased pandemic excess death estimates23
Urban RCT participants were healthier than non-participants or rural women23
Overviews of reviews in the cardiovascular field underreported critical methodological and transparency characteristics: a methodological study based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of 23
Almost one in five physiotherapy trials excluded people due to lack of language proficiency: A meta-epidemiological study23
Recruitment and implementation challenges were common in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a methodological review22
Internal-external cross-validation helped to evaluate the generalizability of prediction models in large clustered datasets22
Focus groups and interviews with the public led to the development of a template for a GRADE Plain Language Recommendation (PLR)22
Unrestricted weighted least squares represent medical research better than random effects in 67,308 Cochrane meta-analyses22
Recording harms in randomized controlled trials of behavior change interventions: a scoping review and map of the evidence21
Supplementary strategies identified additional eligible studies in qualitative systematic reviews21
The difference between evidence-based medicine, evidence-based (clinical) practice, and evidence-based health care21
Regression-based prognostic models for functional independence after postacute brain injury rehabilitation are not transportable: a systematic review21
Multimorbidity, activity limitation and self-reported health all predict mortality risk, but better measures were required21
Use of GRADE in evidence syntheses published in high-impact-factor nutrition journals: A methodological survey21
Librarian involvement in systematic reviews was associated with higher quality of reported search methods: a cross-sectional survey21
In clinical trials, efficacy vs. effectiveness language is confusing21
Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 2: Promoting GRADE at the national level: The experience from China20
A new method for synthesizing test accuracy data outperformed the bivariate method20
Antidepressant prescriptions have not fully reflected evolving evidence from cumulative network meta-analyses and guideline recommendations20
Cluster randomized trials of individual-level interventions were at high risk of bias20
Allocation of scarce resources in a pandemic: rapid systematic review update of strategies for policymakers20
Methodological review showed that time-to-event outcomes are often inadequately handled in cluster randomized trials20
Metabolomics data complemented drug use information in epidemiological databases: pilot study of potential kidney donors20
An international core outcome set for evaluating interventions to improve informed consent to clinical trials: The ELICIT Study20
Results dissemination from completed clinical trials conducted at German university medical centers remained delayed and incomplete. The 2014 –2017 cohort19
Secondary analysis of data from a core outcome set for burns demonstrated the need for involvement of lower income countries19
Estimating power for clinical trials with Patient Reported Outcomes - using Item Response Theory19
Review of pragmatic trials found that multiple primary outcomes are common but so too are discrepancies between protocols and final reports19
ADL-dependent older adults were identified in medico-administrative databases18
Imputing intracluster correlation coefficients from a posterior predictive distribution is a feasible method of dealing with unit of analysis errors in a meta-analysis of cluster RCTs18
ADAPTE with modified Delphi supported developing a National Clinical Guideline: stratification of clinical risk in pregnancy18
Reply to Hausner et al. Re: use of text mining tools in the development of search strategies—comparison of different approaches18
Minimal important changes in standard deviation units are highly variable and no universally applicable value can be determined18
Regression discontinuity analysis for pharmacovigilance: statin example reflected trial findings showing little evidence of harm18
A review identified challenges distinguishing primary reports of randomized trials for meta-research: A proposal for improved reporting17
A cause should not be automatically taken as an effect modifier of other causes: author's reply17
Substantial heterogeneity found in reporting mortality in Cochrane systematic reviews and Core Outcome Sets in COMET database17
Reporting and methodological quality of acupuncture network meta-analyses could be improved: an evidence mapping17
A general explanation of the counterfactual definition of confounding17
Three out of four published systematic reviews on COVID-19 treatments were not registered and one-third of those registered were published: a meta-research study17
Awareness, value and use of the Australian living guidelines for the clinical care of people with COVID-19: an impact evaluation17
Peering into the dark corners of knowledge synthesis to understand the influence of predatory journals on systematic reviews17
Boys with overweight status lagged behind girls with overweight status in reading: evidence from mendelian randomization16
Transportability of two heart failure trials to a disease registry using individual patient data16
Validity of prognostic models of critical COVID-19 is variable. A systematic review with external validation16
COVID-19 trials were not more likely to report intent to share individual data than non-COVID-19 trials in ClinicalTrials.gov16
A Bayesian-adaptive decision-theoretic approach can reduce the sample sizes for multiarm exercise oncology trials16
Large scoping reviews: managing volume and potential chaos in a pool of evidence sources16
Methods used to conceptualize dimensions of health equity impacts of public health interventions in systematic reviews16
How traditional informed consent impairs inclusivity in a learning healthcare system: lessons learned from the Utrecht Cardiovascular Cohort16
Investigators' sense of failure thwarted transparency in clinical trials discontinued for poor recruitment16
Statistical techniques to assess publication integrity in groups of randomized trials: a narrative review16
Understanding variation in the results of real-world evidence studies that seem to address the same question16
Persistent gender disparity in leading dental publications across 4 decades: an observational study15
Advances in methodologies of negative controls: a scoping review15
A systematic survey of adaptive trials shows substantial improvement in methods is needed15
Paper 6: engaging racially and ethnically diverse interest holders in evidence syntheses15
Reporting guidelines for traditional Chinese medicine could be improved: a cross-sectional study15
Introducing the LATITUDES network: a library of assessment tools and training to improve transparency, utility and dissemination in evidence synthesis15
GRADE guidance 23: considering cost-effectiveness evidence in moving from evidence to health-related recommendations15
Substantial discrepancies exist between registered protocol and published manuscript in trials on exercise interventions for chronic low back pain: a metaresearch study15
Risk of bias assessments in individual participant data meta-analyses of test accuracy and prediction models: a review shows improvements are needed15
The complexity of the relationship between ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes: author's reply15
Validation of case-ascertainment algorithms using health administrative data to identify people who inject drugs in Ontario, Canada15
Harms were detected but not reported in six clinical trials of gabapentin15
Questionnaires assessing knowledge and beliefs about musculoskeletal conditions are potentially suitable for use, but further research is needed: a systematic review15
The GRADE Working Group and CINeMA approaches provided inconsistent certainty of evidence ratings for a network meta-analysis of opioids for chronic noncancer pain14
Pharmacovigilance studies without a priori hypothesis: systematic review highlights inappropriate multiple testing correction procedures14
GRADE Concept 7: Issues and Insights Linking Guideline Recommendations to Trustworthy Essential Medicine Lists14
Language restrictions in systematic reviews should not be imposed in the search strategy but in the eligibility criteria if necessary14
Double-zero-event studies matter: A re-evaluation of physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection for preventing person-to-person transmission of COVID-19 and its policy impact14
A Cross-sectional literature survey showed the reporting quality of multicenter randomized controlled trials should be improved14
Statistical analysis of self-reported health conditions in cohort studies: handling of missing onset age14
Design, methods, and reporting of impact studies of cardiovascular clinical prediction rules are suboptimal: a systematic review14
Editors’ Choice: February 202514
Reporting transparency and completeness in trials: Paper 1: Introduction - Better reporting for disruptive clinical trials using routinely collected data14
A taxonomy and framework for identifying and developing actionable statements in guidelines suggests avoiding informal recommendations14
Resource use and costs of investigator-sponsored randomized clinical trials in Switzerland, Germany, and the United Kingdom: a metaresearch study14
Corrigendum to ‘Identifying type 1 and 2 diabetes in research datasets where classification biomarkers are unavailable: assessing the accuracy of published approaches’ [Journal of Clinical Epidemiolog14
Indirect effects in mediation analyses should not be tested for statistical significance14
Indicators of questionable research practices were identified in 163,129 randomized controlled trials14
Key concepts in clinical epidemiology: collider-conditioning bias14
Minimal important difference estimates for patient-reported outcomes: A systematic survey13
GRADE guidance 39: using GRADE-ADOLOPMENT to adopt, adapt or create contextualized recommendations from source guidelines and evidence syntheses13
Identification of retracted publications and completeness of retraction notices in public health13
Systematic review finds “spin” practices and poor reporting standards in studies on machine learning-based prediction models13
Psychometric evaluation of a new drug-resistant tuberculosis stigma scale13
No evidence of important difference in summary treatment effects between COVID-19 preprints and peer-reviewed publications: a meta-epidemiological study13
Controversy and Debate: Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: Paper 1: A call for change to practice13
Large-scale validation of the prediction model risk of bias assessment Tool (PROBAST) using a short form: high risk of bias models show poorer discrimination13
Cochrane's risk of bias tool for non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) is frequently misapplied: A methodological systematic review13
A systematic review finds a lack of consensus in methodological approaches in health inequality/inequity focused reviews13
Equating and linking Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-item questionnaire and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey domains using Rasch modeling13
Complete case logistic regression with a dichotomised continuous outcome led to biased estimates13
External validation of six COVID-19 prognostic models for predicting mortality risk in older populations in a hospital, primary care, and nursing home setting13
Benchmarking Human–AI collaboration for common evidence appraisal tools13
CONSORT Harms 2022 statement, explanation, and elaboration: updated guideline for the reporting of harms in randomized trials13
International alliance and AGREE-ment of 71 clinical practice guidelines on the management of critical care patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review13
Prospective registration of trials: where we are, why, and how we could get better13
Methods for depicting overlap in overviews of systematic reviews: An introduction to static tabular and graphical displays13
Research Integrity definitions and challenges13
Text-mining in electronic healthcare records can be used as efficient tool for screening and data collection in cardiovascular trials: a multicenter validation study13
Vital signs-based deterioration prediction model assumptions can lead to losses in prediction performance13
Bridging disconnected networks of first and second lines of biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis with registry data: bayesian evidence synthesis with target trial emulation13
Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 2: Methods used to assess harms are neglected in systematic reviews of gabapentin13
The patient engagement evaluation tool was valid for clinical practice guideline development13
Searching two or more databases decreased the risk of missing relevant studies: a metaresearch study13
External validation of clinical prediction models: simulation-based sample size calculations were more reliable than rules-of-thumb13
Heterogeneity across outcomes reported in clinical trials for older adults with depression: a systematic survey12
A conversation on health research collaborations and career with Dr. Gordon Guyatt: A commentary12
Should We Formalise the Assessment of Clinical Heterogeneity /Diversity In Systematic Reviews12
Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 1: Evidence-based medicine in China: An oral history study12
Operationalizing the GRADE-equity criterion to inform guideline recommendations: application to a medical cannabis guideline12
Editors’ Choice: May 2312
Mapping review could be seen as a subtype of scoping review and differentiating between the action of mapping evidence and presentation of evidence as maps may be helpful: response to Khalil et al12
Table of Contents12
Pearls on science, collaboration, and mentorship in health research: A masterclass conversation with Dr. John Ioannidis12
Origami plot: a novel multivariate data visualization tool that improves radar chart12
Social deprivation reduced registration for kidney transplantation through markers of nephrological care: a mediation analysis12
Informing the GRADE evidence to decision process with health equity considerations: demonstration from the Canadian rheumatoid arthritis care context12
Cross-classified multilevel models improved standard error estimates of covariates in clinical outcomes – a simulation study12
Editorial Board12
Assessment highlights need for improvement in standards of development of core outcome sets for rare genetic diseases12
Statistical robustness of randomized controlled trials in high-impact journals has improved but was low across medical specialties12
The GIN-McMaster guideline tool extension for the integration of quality improvement and quality assurance in guidelines: a description of the methods for its development12
The DetectDeviatingCells algorithm was a useful addition to the toolkit for cellwise error detection in observational data12
0.082604169845581