Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

Papers
(The median citation count of Journal of Risk and Uncertainty is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-01-01 to 2026-01-01.)
ArticleCitations
Personalized information and willingness to pay for non-financial risk prevention: An experiment41
Randomization advice and ambiguity aversion32
Estimating risk and time preferences over public lotteries: Findings from the field and stream27
Controlling ambiguity: The illusion of control in choice under risk and ambiguity27
Self-serving dishonesty: The role of confidence in driving dishonesty24
Heuristic assumptions24
Do people have a bias for low deductible insurance?21
The limits of reopening policy to alter economic behavior: New evidence from Texas18
The evolution of risk attitudes: A panel study of the university years13
Biased survival expectations and behaviours: Does domain specific information matter?11
A double-bounded risk-risk trade-off analysis of heatwave-related mortality risk: Evidence from India11
How risky is distracted driving?9
(Dis)satisfaction with risk preferences9
An experiment on outcome uncertainty9
Correction: `Natural disaster and risk-sharing behavior: Evidence from rural Bangladesh' [Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, (2020) 61: 67–99]8
Improving risky choices: The effect of cognitive offloading on risky decisions8
Strength of preference and decisions under risk8
Adapting temporal preference to scarcity: A role for emotion?8
Choice uncertainty and the endowment effect7
Individual characteristics associated with risk and time preferences: A multi country representative survey7
Inequalities under ambiguity7
On the role of monetary incentives in risk preference elicitation experiments7
A systematic review of unique methods for measuring discount rates6
Subjective beliefs, health, and health behaviors6
Effects of e-cigarette minimum legal sales ages on youth tobacco use in the United States6
Learning your own risk preferences6
Dynamic inconsistency under ambiguity: An experiment6
Reference-dependent discounting6
Testing source influence on ambiguity reaction: Preference and insensitivity5
Stress discounting5
The gambler’s fallacy prevails in lottery play5
Risk and rationality: The relative importance of probability weighting and choice set dependence5
Information avoidance: An experimental test of anticipated regret5
Linking cognitive biases: The successes of a test case that predicted variations in endowment effect magnitudes4
Risk and time preferences interaction: An experimental measurement4
A meta-analysis of query theory, a psychological process account of framing effects4
Windfall gains and house money: The effects of endowment history and prior outcomes on risky decision–making4
Fast and slow dynamic decision making under ambiguity4
COVID-19 vaccine and risk-taking3
Visual formats in risk preference elicitation: What catches the eye?3
Safe options and gender differences in risk attitudes3
A puzzle of roulette gambling3
Are economic preferences shaped by the family context? The relation of birth order and siblings’ gender composition to economic preferences3
The predictive power of risk elicitation tasks3
Fatalism, beliefs, and behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic3
Artificial intelligence and strategic uncertainty: Can AI play mixed strategies?3
Financial bequests to children3
Pay every subject or pay only some?3
Do workers maximize expected utility when choosing labour contracts under ambiguity?3
How does risk preference change under the stress of COVID-19? Evidence from Japan2
Paying for randomization and indecisiveness2
Do workers undervalue COVID-19 risk? Evidence from wages and death certificate data2
Dash and dine, for tomorrow we dice2
Smoking, selection, and medical care expenditures2
An inquiry into the nature and causes of the Description - Experience gap2
Inequality and risk preference2
The impact of risk aversion and ambiguity aversion on annuity and saving choices2
Does the COVID-19 pandemic change individuals’ risk preference?2
Consciously stochastic in preference reversals2
0.63025689125061