Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

Papers
(The TQCC of Journal of Risk and Uncertainty is 6. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-01-01 to 2026-01-01.)
ArticleCitations
Personalized information and willingness to pay for non-financial risk prevention: An experiment41
Randomization advice and ambiguity aversion32
Estimating risk and time preferences over public lotteries: Findings from the field and stream27
Controlling ambiguity: The illusion of control in choice under risk and ambiguity27
Self-serving dishonesty: The role of confidence in driving dishonesty24
Heuristic assumptions24
Do people have a bias for low deductible insurance?21
The limits of reopening policy to alter economic behavior: New evidence from Texas18
The evolution of risk attitudes: A panel study of the university years13
Biased survival expectations and behaviours: Does domain specific information matter?11
A double-bounded risk-risk trade-off analysis of heatwave-related mortality risk: Evidence from India11
How risky is distracted driving?9
(Dis)satisfaction with risk preferences9
An experiment on outcome uncertainty9
Correction: `Natural disaster and risk-sharing behavior: Evidence from rural Bangladesh' [Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, (2020) 61: 67–99]8
Improving risky choices: The effect of cognitive offloading on risky decisions8
Strength of preference and decisions under risk8
Adapting temporal preference to scarcity: A role for emotion?8
Choice uncertainty and the endowment effect7
Individual characteristics associated with risk and time preferences: A multi country representative survey7
Inequalities under ambiguity7
On the role of monetary incentives in risk preference elicitation experiments7
A systematic review of unique methods for measuring discount rates6
Subjective beliefs, health, and health behaviors6
Effects of e-cigarette minimum legal sales ages on youth tobacco use in the United States6
Learning your own risk preferences6
Dynamic inconsistency under ambiguity: An experiment6
Reference-dependent discounting6
0.057955026626587