Applied Measurement in Education

Papers
(The TQCC of Applied Measurement in Education is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-12-01 to 2025-12-01.)
ArticleCitations
Impact of Violating Unidimensionality on Rasch Calibration for Mixed-Format Tests19
Shifting Educational Measurement from an Agent of Systemic Racism to an Anti-Racist Endeavor11
Detecting Item Parameter Drift in Small Sample Rasch Equating10
TheStandardsWill Never Be Enough: A Racial Justice Extension9
Computer-Based Listening Test with Full Video, Visual-Limited Video, and Audio: A Comparative Analysis Based on Difficulty, Discrimination Power, and Response Time7
IRT Characteristic Curve Linking Methods Weighted by Information for Mixed-Format Tests7
Comparing Drift Detection Methods for Accurate Rasch Equating in Different Sample Sizes7
Not-reached Items: An Issue of Time and of test-taking Disengagement? the Case of PISA 2015 Reading Data6
Comparing Examinee-Based and Response-Based Motivation Filtering Methods in Remote Low-Stakes Testing6
Applying a Culturally Responsive Pedagogical Framework to Design and Evaluate Classroom Performance-Based Assessments in Hawai‘i5
New Tests of Rater Drift in Trend Scoring5
Modeling Dimensions Converging at the Upper Anchor in Learning Progressions: An Example of Micro-Evolution5
Analyzing Student Response Processes to Evaluate Success on a Technology-Based Problem-Solving Task5
The Impact of Non-Effortful Responding on Item and Person Parameters in Item-Pool Scaling Linking5
Don’t Test After Lunch: The Relationship Between Disengagement and the Time of Day That Low-Stakes Testing Occurs4
Response Demands of Reading Comprehension Test Items: A Review of Item Difficulty Modeling Studies4
Automated Scoring of Short-Answer Questions: A Progress Report4
Measurement Invariance in Relation to First Language: An Evaluation of German Reading and Spelling Tests4
Efficient Assessment of Students’ Proportional Reasoning3
Change in Engagement During Test Events: An Argument for Weighted Scoring?3
Does the Response Options Placement Provide Clues to the Correct Answers in Multiple-choice Tests? A Systematic Review3
Identifying Careless Responses in Computer-Adaptive Affective Surveys Using Person Fit Analysis3
Are Online and Paper Tests Comparable? Evidence from Statewide K-12 Tests3
Gauging Misclassification in Rapid Guessing Identification in a Fast-Paced Vocabulary Test3
Enacting a Process for Developing Culturally Relevant Classroom Assessments3
Dissecting Knowledge, Guessing, and Blunder in Multiple Choice Assessments3
0.067122936248779