Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance

Papers
(The H4-Index of Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance is 15. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-11-01 to 2025-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Mitigating global climate change and its environmental impact is a key social responsibility of scientists and should be part of research ethics policies and guidelines162
Ethical committee frameworks and processes used to evaluate humanities research require reform: Findings from a UK-wide network consultation94
The case for affiliation contribution statements42
Challenges for enforcing editorial policies on AI-generated papers41
Exploring scientific misconduct in Morocco based on an analysis of plagiarism perception in a cohort of 1,220 researchers and students38
Misinterpretation of statistical nonsignificance as a sign of potential bias: Hydroxychloroquine as a case study30
Taking it back: A pilot study of a rubric measuring retraction notice quality28
On the epistemological and methodological implications of AI co-authorship27
Addressing serious and continuing research noncompliance and integrity violations through action plans: Interviews with institutional officials27
Inclusive, engaged, and accountable institutional review boards23
Correction21
Fake no more: The redemption of ChatGPT in literature reviews21
Reducing tensions and expediting manuscript submission via an authorship agreement for early-career researchers: A pilot study19
A comprehensive ethics and data governance framework for data-intensive health research: Lessons from an Italian cancer research institute16
Manifestations of research ethics and integrity leadership in national surveys – cases of Estonia, Finland, Norway, France and the Netherlands16
How (not) to be held accountable in research: A reply to my critics15
Comparing the performance of Retraction Watch Database, PubMed, and Web of Science in identifying retracted publications in medicine15
Analysis of scientific paper retractions due to data problems: Revealing challenges and countermeasures in data management15
Characteristics of blacklisted journals: Evidence from Chinese-language academic journals15
0.11710405349731