Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance

Article	Citations
Mitigating global climate change and its environmental impact is a key social responsibility of scientists and should be part of research ethics policies and guidelines	131
Addressing serious and continuing research noncompliance and integrity violations through action plans: Interviews with institutional officials	84
On the epistemological and methodological implications of AI co-authorship	41
OHSU Employees’ Opinions of Receipt of Clinical Care and Participation in Clinical Research at Place of Employment	38
Taking it back: A pilot study of a rubric measuring retraction notice quality	32
Replication and trustworthiness	27
The case for affiliation contribution statements	27
Inclusive, engaged, and accountable institutional review boards	25
Ethical committee frameworks and processes used to evaluate humanities research require reform: Findings from a UK-wide network consultation	24
Exploring scientific misconduct in Morocco based on an analysis of plagiarism perception in a cohort of 1,220 researchers and students	21
Misinterpretation of statistical nonsignificance as a sign of potential bias: Hydroxychloroquine as a case study	21
Correction	19
Challenges for enforcing editorial policies on AI-generated papers	19
Reducing tensions and expediting manuscript submission via an authorship agreement for early-career researchers: A pilot study	18
Retraction according to gender: A descriptive study	17
Fake no more: The redemption of ChatGPT in literature reviews	17
Inverted U-Shaped relationship between team size and citation impact: Mediating role of responsibility diffusion	13
How (not) to be held accountable in research: A reply to my critics	13
Manifestations of research ethics and integrity leadership in national surveys – cases of Estonia, Finland, Norway, France and the Netherlands	13
Characteristics of blacklisted journals: Evidence from Chinese-language academic journals	13
Procrastination and inconsistency: Expressions of concern for publications with compromised integrity	12
Perceptions of network-level ethics in an engineering research center: Analysis of ethical issues & practices reported by scientific & engineering participants	12
Comparing the performance of Retraction Watch Database, PubMed, and Web of Science in identifying retracted publications in medicine	12
A comprehensive ethics and data governance framework for data-intensive health research: Lessons from an Italian cancer research institute	12
For the “good of the lab”: Insights from three focus groups concerning the ethics of managing a laboratory or research group	12

A comprehensive overview of studies that assessed article retractions within the biomedical sciences	11
Does YouTube promote research ethics and conduct? A content analysis of Youtube Videos and analysis of sentiments through viewers comments	10
How to write a good embedded ethics letter	10
Typology of conflict of commitment (COC) in the era of inappropriate foreign influence in research	10
Status bias in Chinese scholarly publishing: an exploratory study based on mixed methods	10
The author expression ​of concern (AEOC): A proposed formal mechanism to allow authors’ legitimate concerns to be heard, and their rights and voices to be respected	10
In defense of the ICMJE authorship guideline, a rejoinder to Curzer	10
Institutional policies on plagiarism management:A comparison of universities in mainland China and Hong Kong	10
How to embed ethics into laboratory research	10
Creating research ethics and integrity country report cards: Case study from Europe	10
A structural equation model for cyber academic dishonesty in higher education: Evidence from Taiwan	9
A cross-disciplinary and severity-based study of author-related reasons for retraction	9
Leadership, management, and team practices in research labs: Development and validation of two new measures	9
Transform DOI system into a science hub	9
Rethinking the author name ambiguity problem and beyond: The case of the Chinese context	9
COI works both ways: Investigation of misconduct by an independent research integrity organization is the way to go	8
Teaching research integrity as discussed in research integrity codes: A systematic literature review	8
Industry effects on evidence: a case study of long-acting injectable antipsychotics	8
Fabrication in a study about honesty: A lost episode of columbo illustrating how forensic statistics is performed	8
Retraction (mal)practices of elite marketing and social psychology journals in the Dirk Smeesters’ research misconduct case	8
Superb supervision: A pilot study on training supervisors to convey responsible research practices onto their PhD candidates	8
Scientific priorities and relational dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study	8
How do researchers perceive research misbehaviors? A case study of Indian researchers	8
Are the lists of questionable journals reasonable: A case study of early warning journal lists	7
‘I don’t believe in the neutrality of research. OK?’ Mapping researchers’ attitudes toward values in science	7
‘Special issue-ization’ as a growth and revenue strategy: Reproduction by the “big five” and the risks for research integrity	7
Mapping nine decades of research integrity studies (1935–2024): A scientometric analysis	7
Disclosing artificial intelligence use in scientific research and publication: When should disclosure be mandatory, optional, or unnecessary?	7
The consistency of peer-reviewers and the process of commensuration: a comment on Bolek et al. (2022)	7
Reflections on the 2024 Final Rule on Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct	6
The case for compensating peer reviewers: A response to Moher and Vieira Armond	6
The research literature is an unsafe workplace	6
Evolution and characterization of health sciences paper retractions in Brazil and Portugal	6
Publishing in potentially predatory journals: Do universities adopt university leaders’ dishonest behavior?	6
Reviewer acknowledgment lists as data: Low-hanging fruit for analysis	6
Incorporating replication in higher education: Supervisors’ perspectives and institutional pressures	6
Editorial	6
Keeping the health of our home planet in mind as we do research	6
AI, reviewer incentives, and questions raised by García et al.	6
Nonfinancial conflict of interest in peer-review: Some notes for discussion	5
Spin in randomized controlled trials of pharmacology in COVID-19: A systematic review	5
“Dear Editor, may I speak with you?“	5
It takes two flints to start a fire: A focus group study into PhD supervision for responsible research	5
The use of text-matching software’s similarity scores	5
Using AI to write scholarly publications	5
Limits of ethical non-human subjects research in an applied setting	5
Timing and monitoring of financial disclosures in publications: A cross-institutional assessment of financial conflict of interest reports	5
Self-plagiarism: A retrospective study of its prevalence and patterns across scientific disciplines	5
Student views on the culture of STEM research laboratories: Results from an interview study	5
Can ChatGPT be trusted to provide reliable estimates?	4

Responding to research misconduct allegations brought against top university officials	4
The case for universal artificial intelligence declaration on the precedent of conflict of interest	4
Time-based changes in authorship trend in research-intensive universities in Malaysia	4
More ethics in the laboratory, please! Scientists’ perspectives on ethics in the preclinical phase	4
Bad apples or systematic problem? Is Italy struggling with maintaining high level of research integrity?	4
The PubPeer conundrum: Administrative challenges in research misconduct proceedings	4
Group authorship, an excellent opportunity laced with ethical, legal and technical challenges	4
What difference might retractions make? An estimate of the potential epistemic cost of retractions on meta-analyses	4
What is the sensitivity and specificity of the peer review process?	4
In Defense of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity: Response to Radder	4
The trinity of good research: Distinguishing between research integrity, ethics, and governance	4
The punishment intensity for research misconduct and its related factors: An exploratory study on hospitals in Mainland China	4
On “intent” in research misconduct	4
Harness editors’ networks of communication to fight publication fraud	4
The justified limits of transparency in research misconduct reports	3
Maintaining ethics, Integrity, and accountability: Best practices for reporting a meta-analysis	3
Cancer researchers’ experiences with and perceptions of research data sharing: Results of a cross-sectional survey	3
In Memoriam Dr. Sheldon Krimsky	3
A policy toolkit for authorship and dissemination policies may benefit NIH research consortia	3
Importance of considering historical contexts when selecting terminology for questionable journal list names	3
Evolution of retracted publications in the medical sciences: Citations analysis, bibliometrics, and altmetrics trends	3
Research integrity in Spain: Great expectations, mediocre results	3
Development of consensus on essential virtues for ethics and research integrity training using a modified Delphi approach	3
The definition of research misconduct should be stated in the abstract when reporting research on research misconduct	3
Using co-creation methods for research integrity guideline development – how, what, why and when?	3
Research data mismanagement – from questionable research practice to research misconduct	3
Perceptions of publication pressure among Hungarian researchers: Differences across career stage, gender, and scientific field	3
Is requiring Research Integrity Advisors a useful policy for improving research integrity? A census of advisors in Australia	3
Is AI my co-author? The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific publishing	3
The consistency of peer-reviewers: Assessment of separate parts of the manuscripts vs final recommendations	3
Are there accurate and legitimate ways to machine-quantify predatoriness, or an urgent need for an automated online tool?	3
A practitioner-centered policy roadmap for ethical computational social science in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland	3
Why research integrity matters and how it can be improved	2
How can research institutions support responsible supervision and leadership?	2
Self-retraction as redemption: Forgiveness for repentant authors	2
Status of animal experimentation in nutrition and dietetic research: Policies of 100 leading journals and new approach methodologies	2
Citation bias, diversity, and ethics	2
Assessment of the knowledge and attitudes of the Iranian medical faculty toward plagiarism	2
Open science, the replication crisis, and environmental public health	2
How (not) to be held accountable in research: The case of the Dutch integrity code	2
Why and how to incorporate issues of race/ethnicity and gender in research integrity education	2
AI vs academia: Experimental study on AI text detectors’ accuracy in behavioral health academic writing	2
Perception of organizational climate by university staff and students in medicine and humanities: A qualitative study	2
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding plagiarism of postgraduate students in Myanmar	2
Appropriate inclusion of adult research participants with intellectual disability: an in-depth review of guidelines and policy statements	2
The common sense behind clinical trial names: An empirical study of trial acronyms	2
Why do master’s students of humanities and social sciences publish papers in Chinese-language predatory journals? A qualitative study based on Grounded Theory	2
Peer review experiences of academic chemists in Ph.D. granting institutions in the United States	2
Peer reviewer fatigue, or peer reviewer refusal?	2
Correction	2
Open minds, tied hands: Awareness, behavior, and reasoning on open science and irresponsible research behavior	2
Perspectives on non-financial conflicts of interest in health-related journals: A scoping review	2
The core epistemic responsibilities of universities: Results from a Delphi study	2
Assessment criteria for research misconduct: Taiwanese researchers’ perceptions	2
Extent of publishing in predatory journals by academics in higher education institutions in Zimbabwe: A case study of a university	2
Developing faculty research mentors: Influence of experience with diverse mentees, gender, and mentorship training	1
The landscape of the characteristics, citations, scientific, technological, and altmetrics impacts of retracted papers in hematology	1
Modernizing authorship criteria and transparency practices to facilitate open and equitable team science	1
Misconduct in research administration: What is it? How widespread is it? And what should we do about it?	1
A bibliometric investigation of the journals that were repeatedly suppressed from Clarivate’s Journal Citation Reports	1
Mismatch in perceptions of the quality of supervision and research data management as an area of concern: Results from a university-wide survey of the research integrity culture at a Belgian universit	1
Scholarship, not politics	1
A tale of two formats: Graduate students’ perceptions and preferences of interactivity in Responsible conduct of research education	1
ChatGPT isn’t an author, but a contribution taxonomy is needed	1
Seeking help as a strategy for ethical and professional decision-making in research: Perspectives of researchers from East Asia and the United States	1
Seniority, authorship order, and severity of punishment in research misconduct – shared/honorary authorships as explanations for an apparent paradox	1
How to combine rules and commitment in fostering research integrity?	1
Safeguarding scientific integrity: A case study in examining manipulation in the peer review process	1
Evidence-based literature review, not the meta-analysis: A rejoinder	1
Correction	1
No study is ever flawless: A scoping review of common errors in biomedical manuscripts	1
Correlation between journal metrics-based academic evaluation and researchers’ ethics	1
Perceptions on the role of research integrity officers in French medical schools	1
Unraveling retraction dynamics in COVID-19 research: Patterns, reasons, and implications	1
The impact of affiliation naming proximity on the retrieval efficiency of Chinese universities-affiliated retractions in the Retraction Watch Database	1
Perceptions of Arab researchers regarding publishing scientific research: A cross-sectional study	1
De-naturalizing the “predatory”: A study of “bogus” publications at public sector universities in Pakistan	1
Outcomes of faculty training aimed at improving how allegations of research misconduct are handled	1
Research integrity during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives of health science researchers at an Academic Health Science Center	1
A measure to quantify predatory publishing is urgently needed	1

Not so fast with fast funding	1
Truthfulness as the basis for ethical safeguards in deceptive research: An interview study with researchers	1
Transferring rejected manuscripts to other journals: A good practice?	1
Fairness and COVID: Conducting research during the crisis	1
Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values	1
Publishing important work that lacks validity or reproducibility – pushing frontiers or corrupting science?	1
Training undergraduate students in HIPAA compliance	1
Knowledge, attitude, opinion, perspective, and agreement of Palestinian medical students on strategies/recommendations to curb plagiarism: A multicenter cross-sectional study	1
Factors related to the severity of research misconduct administrative actions: An analysis of office of research integrity case summaries from 1993 to 2023	1
Points of departure and developing good practices for responsible internationalization in a rapidly changing world	1
Training, networking, and support infrastructure for ombudspersons for good research practice: A survey of the status quo in the Berlin research area	1
Retraction handling by potential predatory journals	1
The association of gender, experience, and academic rank in peer-reviewed manuscript evaluation	1
Not me-search, you-search: Ethical considerations for research involving marginalized outgroups	1
Scientific misconduct: A cross-sectional study of the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of Spanish researchers	1
Perceptions of plagiarism among PhDs across the sciences, engineering, humanities, and arts: Results from a national survey in Brazil	1
A study on ethical review processes of local ethics committees for animal experimentation in Türkiye*	1
Write your paper on the motherland?	1
Polarization in research: What is it, why is it problematic, and how can it be addressed?	1
On the (ab)use of special issues in scholarly journals	1
Research anomalies in criminology: How serious? How extensive over time? And who was responsible?	1
Do authors need an Ombudsperson to resolve peer-review issues?	1