Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance

Article	Citations
Fabrication in a study about honesty: A lost episode of columbo illustrating how forensic statistics is performed	117
Statement from the outgoing Editor in-Chief to our authors and readers	76
Correction	40
An overview of studies assessing predatory journals within the biomedical sciences	36
OHSU Employees’ Opinions of Receipt of Clinical Care and Participation in Clinical Research at Place of Employment	26
Is academic research and publishing still leaving developing countries behind?	26
Recalibrated responses needed to a global research landscape in flux	25
Evidence-based literature review, not the meta-analysis: A rejoinder	24
COI works both ways: Investigation of misconduct by an independent research integrity organization is the way to go	22
Misinterpretation of statistical nonsignificance as a sign of potential bias: Hydroxychloroquine as a case study	22
Exploring scientific misconduct in Morocco based on an analysis of plagiarism perception in a cohort of 1,220 researchers and students	21
Industry effects on evidence: a case study of long-acting injectable antipsychotics	21
Challenges for enforcing editorial policies on AI-generated papers	20
Perceptions on the role of research integrity officers in French medical schools	19
Retraction (mal)practices of elite marketing and social psychology journals in the Dirk Smeesters’ research misconduct case	17
Correlation between journal metrics-based academic evaluation and researchers’ ethics	16
Bad apples or systematic problem? Is Italy struggling with maintaining high level of research integrity?	16
Responding to research misconduct allegations brought against top university officials	15
Are highly ranked dental journals at risk of editorial bias? An examination of information on the reporting of peer-review practices	15
What is the sensitivity and specificity of the peer review process?	14
Transform DOI system into a science hub	12
The case for affiliation contribution statements	12
Ethical committee frameworks and processes used to evaluate humanities research require reform: Findings from a UK-wide network consultation	12
Is AI my co-author? The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific publishing	11
Training undergraduate students in HIPAA compliance	10

The PubPeer conundrum: Administrative challenges in research misconduct proceedings	10
Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values	9
How do researchers perceive research misbehaviors? A case study of Indian researchers	9
Factors related to the severity of research misconduct administrative actions: An analysis of office of research integrity case summaries from 1993 to 2023	9
Taking it back: A pilot study of a rubric measuring retraction notice quality	9
Research anomalies in criminology: How serious? How extensive over time? And who was responsible?	9
Harness editors’ networks of communication to fight publication fraud	8
Scholarship, not politics	8
Inclusive, engaged, and accountable institutional review boards	8
Mitigating global climate change and its environmental impact is a key social responsibility of scientists and should be part of research ethics policies and guidelines	8
Replication and trustworthiness	8
Knowledge, attitude, opinion, perspective, and agreement of Palestinian medical students on strategies/recommendations to curb plagiarism: A multicenter cross-sectional study	8
Research integrity guidelines and safeguards in Brazil	8
On the epistemological and methodological implications of AI co-authorship	8
Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts	7
Modernizing authorship criteria and transparency practices to facilitate open and equitable team science	7
How often are replication attempts questioned?	7
Not so fast with fast funding	7
Superb supervision: A pilot study on training supervisors to convey responsible research practices onto their PhD candidates	7
How can research institutions support responsible supervision and leadership?	7
In Defense of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity: Response to Radder	7
Correction	6
Defining “recklessness” in research misconduct proceedings	6
Formalistic data and code availability policy in high-profile medical journals and pervasive policy-practice gaps in published articles: A meta-research study	6
Do authors need an Ombudsperson to resolve peer-review issues?	6
Addressing serious and continuing research noncompliance and integrity violations through action plans: Interviews with institutional officials	6
Using ChatGPT to conduct a literature review	6
Reducing tensions and expediting manuscript submission via an authorship agreement for early-career researchers: A pilot study	6
Seeking help as a strategy for ethical and professional decision-making in research: Perspectives of researchers from East Asia and the United States	6
The present situation of and challenges in research ethics and integrity promotion: Experiences in East Asia	6
Mapping nine decades of research integrity studies (1935–2024): A scientometric analysis	6
Teaching research integrity as discussed in research integrity codes: A systematic literature review	5
Research funders play an important role in fostering research integrity and responsible internationalization in a multipolar world	5
Cancer researchers’ experiences with and perceptions of research data sharing: Results of a cross-sectional survey	5
Perceptions of publication pressure among Hungarian researchers: Differences across career stage, gender, and scientific field	5
Scientific misconduct: A cross-sectional study of the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of Spanish researchers	5
Transparency in research: An analysis of ChatGPT usage acknowledgment by authors across disciplines and geographies	5
Deploying an ethics needs assessment to inform a navigational tool for research compliance pathways at a provincial Canadian health authority	5
Jumping with a parachute – is promoting research integrity meaningful?	5
Retraction according to gender: A descriptive study	5
ChatGPT as an “author”: Bibliometric analysis to assess the validity of authorship	5
Chore or desire? Students’ response to online lessons in scientific integrity	5
The consistency of peer-reviewers and the process of commensuration: a comment on Bolek et al. (2022)	5
Research integrity and the regulatory-industrial complex	4
On the (ab)use of special issues in scholarly journals	4
How to combine rules and commitment in fostering research integrity?	4
Research integrity during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives of health science researchers at an Academic Health Science Center	4
Fake no more: The redemption of ChatGPT in literature reviews	4
Crossing disciplinary boundaries: An ethnographic exploration of academic publishing invitations	4
The letter as a forum to embed ethics into the scientific literature	4

Disclosing artificial intelligence use in scientific research and publication: When should disclosure be mandatory, optional, or unnecessary?	4
Scientific priorities and relational dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study	4
Development of consensus on essential virtues for ethics and research integrity training using a modified Delphi approach	4
Is requiring Research Integrity Advisors a useful policy for improving research integrity? A census of advisors in Australia	4
‘I don’t believe in the neutrality of research. OK?’ Mapping researchers’ attitudes toward values in science	4
Transferring rejected manuscripts to other journals: A good practice?	4
Views on ethical issues in research labs: A university-wide survey	4
Can research integrity prevail in the market? Lessons from commissioned research organizations	4
Evolution of retracted publications in the medical sciences: Citations analysis, bibliometrics, and altmetrics trends	3
Requiem for impact factors and high publication charges	3
De-naturalizing the “predatory”: A study of “bogus” publications at public sector universities in Pakistan	3
Mismatch in perceptions of the quality of supervision and research data management as an area of concern: Results from a university-wide survey of the research integrity culture at a Belgian universit	3
‘Special issue-ization’ as a growth and revenue strategy: Reproduction by the “big five” and the risks for research integrity	3
How (not) to be held accountable in research: A reply to my critics	3
Editorial	3
Keeping the health of our home planet in mind as we do research	3
The association of gender, experience, and academic rank in peer-reviewed manuscript evaluation	3
Are the lists of questionable journals reasonable: A case study of early warning journal lists	3
The definition of research misconduct should be stated in the abstract when reporting research on research misconduct	3
Training, networking, and support infrastructure for ombudspersons for good research practice: A survey of the status quo in the Berlin research area	3
Opening up a discussion on the native speaker myth in science	3
Virtue ethics-based research integrity training intervention to change medical students’ attitudes and perceptions of organizational ethical climate: A randomized controlled trial	3
Reflections on the 2024 Final Rule on Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct	2
New term for ethnoracial discrimination in science	2
Is my project research? Determining which projects require review by a research ethics committee	2
Research data mismanagement – from questionable research practice to research misconduct	2
Authorship climate: A new tool for studying ethical issues in authorship	2
Unethical medical treatment and research in US territories	2
Postprints-to-preprints linkage to enhance access to scientific literature	2
The impact of affiliation naming proximity on the retrieval efficiency of Chinese universities-affiliated retractions in the Retraction Watch Database	2
Impact of mentoring on the implementation of the quality management system in clinical laboratories in Burkina Faso, West Africa	2
Improving evidence-based practice through preregistration of applied research: Barriers and recommendations	2
Inverted U-Shaped relationship between team size and citation impact: Mediating role of responsibility diffusion	2
Reviewer acknowledgment lists as data: Low-hanging fruit for analysis	2
Incorporating replication in higher education: Supervisors’ perspectives and institutional pressures	2
Characteristics of blacklisted journals: Evidence from Chinese-language academic journals	2
Further thoughts on Bolek’s analysis of peer review reports	2
A tale of two formats: Graduate students’ perceptions and preferences of interactivity in Responsible conduct of research education	2
The “Monsanto papers” and the nature of ghostwriting and related practices in contemporary peer review scientific literature	1
Evolution and characterization of health sciences paper retractions in Brazil and Portugal	1
Polarization in research: What is it, why is it problematic, and how can it be addressed?	1
New collaborative statement by bioethics journal editors on generative AI use	1
AI, reviewer incentives, and questions raised by García et al.	1
A comprehensive overview of studies that assessed article retractions within the biomedical sciences	1
An analysis of availability and implications of unlabeled retracted articles on Sci-Hub	1
In Memoriam Dr. Sheldon Krimsky	1
Publishing important work that lacks validity or reproducibility – pushing frontiers or corrupting science?	1
Publishing in potentially predatory journals: Do universities adopt university leaders’ dishonest behavior?	1
Assessing the acceptability of individual studies that use deception: A systematic review of normative guidance documents	1
The landscape of the characteristics, citations, scientific, technological, and altmetrics impacts of retracted papers in hematology	1
Ethical decision-making and role conflict in managing a scientific laboratory	1
Should informed consent and information related to patient recruitment in clinical trials be available to the reader of scientific articles? A case study in dentistry	1
Are there accurate and legitimate ways to machine-quantify predatoriness, or an urgent need for an automated online tool?	1
Better guidance is needed for editorial expressions of concern	1
Why do some academics so often publish (letters) outside their field?	1
No study is ever flawless: A scoping review of common errors in biomedical manuscripts	1
Extent of publishing in predatory journals by academics in higher education institutions in Zimbabwe: A case study of a university	1
Nonfinancial conflict of interest in peer-review: Some notes for discussion	1
An active aigiarism declaration for manuscript submission	1
Assessing database accuracy for article retractions: A preliminary study comparing Retraction Watch Database, PubMed, and Web of Science	1
Misconduct in research administration: What is it? How widespread is it? And what should we do about it?	1
Manifestations of research ethics and integrity leadership in national surveys – cases of Estonia, Finland, Norway, France and the Netherlands	1
A dramatized method for teaching undergraduate students responsible research conduct	1
Status bias in Chinese scholarly publishing: an exploratory study based on mixed methods	1
Maintaining ethics, Integrity, and accountability: Best practices for reporting a meta-analysis	1
Institutional policies on plagiarism management:A comparison of universities in mainland China and Hong Kong	1
Procrastination and inconsistency: Expressions of concern for publications with compromised integrity	1
The consistency of peer-reviewers: Assessment of separate parts of the manuscripts vs final recommendations	1
Research misconduct and questionable research practices form a continuum	1
Promoting research integrity in funding: Co-creating guidelines for research funding organizations	1
Are there 34,000 human emotions? Deconstructing patterns of scientific misinformation	1
Timing and monitoring of financial disclosures in publications: A cross-institutional assessment of financial conflict of interest reports	1
Web archives for data collection: An ethics case study	1
Open science, the replication crisis, and environmental public health	1
How (not) to be held accountable in research: The case of the Dutch integrity code	1
The research literature is an unsafe workplace	1
Identifying the factors influencing plagiarism in higher education: An evidence-based review of the literature	1
The case for compensating peer reviewers: A response to Moher and Vieira Armond	1
Current status of approaches of Universities in fostering research ethics in Thailand	1
Comparing the performance of Retraction Watch Database, PubMed, and Web of Science in identifying retracted publications in medicine	1

Family without kinship – the pluralism of European regulatory research integrity systems and its implications	1
Incorporating implicit bias into research integrity education: Response to ‘Why and how to incorporate issues of race/ethnicity and gender in research integrity education’	1
A comprehensive ethics and data governance framework for data-intensive health research: Lessons from an Italian cancer research institute	1