Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance

Papers
(The TQCC of Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance is 6. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-05-01 to 2024-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
An alarming retraction rate for scientific publications on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)90
Using AI to write scholarly publications59
Using ChatGPT to conduct a literature review42
International scientific collaborative activities and barriers to them in eight societies40
Is authorship sufficient for today’s collaborative research? A call for contributor roles36
An “alarming” and “exceptionally high” rate of COVID-19 retractions?31
Citation of retracted publications: A challenging problem30
Letter to editor: NLP systems such as ChatGPT cannot be listed as an author because these cannot fulfill widely adopted authorship criteria26
A bibliometric analysis of academic misconduct research in higher education: Current status and future research opportunities19
Assessing the perceived prevalence of research fraud among faculty at research-intensive universities in the USA17
Scientific misconduct and associated factors: A survey of researchers in three Chinese tertiary hospitals16
What difference might retractions make? An estimate of the potential epistemic cost of retractions on meta-analyses16
Research done wrong: A comprehensive investigation of retracted publications in COVID-1915
Challenges for enforcing editorial policies on AI-generated papers15
A cross-disciplinary and severity-based study of author-related reasons for retraction15
Is academic research and publishing still leaving developing countries behind?15
How prevalent is plagiarism among college students? Anonymity preserving evidence from Austrian undergraduates15
Open science, the replication crisis, and environmental public health14
Motivations for performing scholarly prepublication peer review: A scoping review13
Timeliness and content of retraction notices for publications by a single research group12
Differing perceptions concerning research misconduct between China and Flanders: A qualitative study12
Improving evidence-based practice through preregistration of applied research: Barriers and recommendations12
Requiem for impact factors and high publication charges12
Citation bias, diversity, and ethics11
Civil disobedience in scientific authorship: Resistance and insubordination in science11
Letter to editor: Academic journals should clarify the proportion of NLP-generated content in papers11
Can ChatGPT be trusted to provide reliable estimates?11
Text recycling in STEM: A text-analytic study of recently published research articles11
Superb supervision: A pilot study on training supervisors to convey responsible research practices onto their PhD candidates10
Factors influencing the promotion and implementation of research integrity in research performing and research funding organizations: A scoping review10
Chinese graduate students’ perceptions of plagiarism: A mixed-methods study10
For how long and with what relevance do genetics articles retracted due to research misconduct remain active in the scientific literature9
Correcting the scientific record – A broken system?9
Perceptions of occurrence of research misconduct and related factors among Kenyan investigators engaged in HIV research9
Standards of evidence for institutional review board decision-making9
Why research integrity matters and how it can be improved8
Attitudes towards plagiarism among academics of the faculty of Medicine of Tunis8
Institutional policies on plagiarism management:A comparison of universities in mainland China and Hong Kong8
Authorship and justice: Credit and responsibility8
The effect of peer review on the improvement of rejected manuscripts8
A qualitative study of Equal Co-First Authorship8
Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts8
What criteria are used in the investigation of alleged cases of research misconduct?7
For the “good of the lab”: Insights from three focus groups concerning the ethics of managing a laboratory or research group7
Research integrity during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives of health science researchers at an Academic Health Science Center7
A measure to quantify predatory publishing is urgently needed7
Views on ethical issues in research labs: A university-wide survey7
Perspectives of key stakeholders on essential virtues for good scientific practice in research areas7
Retraction according to gender: A descriptive study7
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding plagiarism of postgraduate students in Myanmar6
Clinical trial registry documents and publication integrity6
Is research in peril in Nepal? Publication trend and research quality from projects funded by the University Grants Commission-Nepal6
Publishing in potentially predatory journals: Do universities adopt university leaders’ dishonest behavior?6
Exploring scientific misconduct in Morocco based on an analysis of plagiarism perception in a cohort of 1,220 researchers and students6
Dissecting the tension of open science standards implementation in management and organization journals6
Nonfinancial conflict of interest in peer-review: Some notes for discussion6
Characteristics of blacklisted journals: Evidence from Chinese-language academic journals6
Contribution based author categorization to calculate author performance index6
Toward global standardization of conducting fair investigations of allegations of research misconduct6
How to embed ethics into laboratory research6
Luxembourg’s approach to research integrity during the COVID-19 pandemic6
Unethical medical treatment and research in US territories6
The letter as a forum to embed ethics into the scientific literature6
Good friend or good student? An interview study of perceived conflicts between personal and academic integrity among students in three European countries6
0.04584002494812