OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The median citation count of Argumentation is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-06-01 to 2025-06-01.)

Article	Citations
Arguing with Children: Exploring Problems of Charity and Strawmanning	14
Is Natural Selection in Trouble? When Emotions Run High in a Philosophical Debate	11
Exploring TED Speakers’ Narrative Positioning from a Strategic Maneuvering Perspective: A Single Case Study from Winch’s (2014) TED Talk	10
Representing the Structure of a Debate	10
Frans H. A. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse in Context	10
“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing	10
Consolation Through Argumentation? Prototypical and Stereotypical Argumentative Patterns in Secular Eulogies	9
Argumentation and Identity: A Normative Evaluation of the Arguments of Delegates to the COP26 UN Climate Change Conference	8
The Correlations Between Parliamentary Debate Participation, Communication Competence, Communication Apprehension, Argumentativeness, and Willingness to Communicate in a Japanese Context	6
Bramhall Versus Hobbes: The Rhetoric of Religion vs. the Rhetoric of Philosophy	5
Textbook Treatments of Fallacies	5
Secundum Quid and the Pragmatics of Arguments. The Challenges of the Dialectical Tradition	5
Teaching the Fallacies	4
‘Argumentative Disobedience’ as a Strategy to Confront Hate Speech	3
Individual Differences in Argument Strength Discrimination	3
Argumentation in Philosophical Controversies	3
Adversariality in Argumentation: Shortcomings of Minimal Adversariality and A Possible Reconstruction	2
Negotiation as Practical Argumentation	2
Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Moral Foundations in Argumentation	2
When Evaluative Adjectives Prevent Contradiction in a Debate	2
Authority Argument Schemes, Types, and Critical Questions	2
Fernando Leal and Hubert Marraud: How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell−Copleston Debate	2
Why Argumentation Theory? Realizing the Practical Objectives of Argumentation Theory as the Study of Effectiveness Through Reasonableness	2
Fallacies and Their Place in the Foundations of Science	2
Logic Diagrams as Argument Maps in Eristic Dialectics	2

In Defense of a Normative Concept of Argument	1
Locke and “ad”	1
Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias	1
Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation	1
Introduction to the Special Issue on Fallacies	1
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Nanon Labrie: argumentation between doctors and patients: understanding clinical argumentative discourse	1
The Fallacy of Misplaced Presumption	1
On Halting Meta-argument with Para-Argument	1
High Costs and Low Benefits: Analysis and Evaluation of the “I’m Not Stupid” Argument	1
Do Arguments for Global Warming Commit a Fallacy of Composition?	1
Frans H. Van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Sara Greco, Ton Van Haaften, Nanon Labrie, Fernando Leal, and Peng Wu. Argumentative Style. A pragma-Dialectical Study of Functional Variety in Argumentative Discou	1
From Theory of Rhetoric to the Practice of Language Use: The Case of Appeals to Ethos Elements	1
Questions, Presuppositions and Fallacies	1
Epidemiology of Fallacies	1
Against the Neutral View of Poisoning the Well	1
“Then why not Show the Evidence?” Concluding Maneuvering by Appealing to Ignorance at China’s Diplomatic Press Conferences	1
Framing to Make an Argument: The Case of the Genocide Hashtag in the Russia-Ukraine war	1
Correction: Individual Differences in Argument Strength Discrimination	1
Presuppositional Fallacies	1
The Effects of Parliamentary Debate as a Pedagogy for Argumentation in L1 and L2 Contexts	1
The Dialectical Principle of Charity: A Procedure for a Critical Discussion	1
The Recursive Argument Structure	1
Disentangling Critical Questions from Argument Schemes	1
It’s not (only) about Getting the Last Word: Rhetorical Norms of Public Argumentation and the Responsibility to Keep the Conversation Going	1
Latest Developments in Asian Argumentation Studies	0
Exploring Visual Argument from Latent Authority in Short Video Advertising	0
Demanding a halt to metadiscussions	0
Reasonable Reconstruction of Socratic Irony in Public Discourse	0
Bothsiderism	0
Charles Arthur Willard (1945–2021): In Memoriam	0
Why We Need Skepticism in Argument: Skeptical Engagement as a Requirement for Epistemic Justice	0
Assessing Classification Reliability of Conditionals in Discourse	0
The Persistent Interlocutor	0
Strategic Manoeuvring in the Depp-Heard Defamation Trial 2022: Dual Dialectical Goals and a Topical Shift	0
Epistemic Norms for Public Political Arguments	0
One Concept of Argument	0
Socratic Irony and Argumentation	0
A Particularist Approach to Arguments by Analogy	0
Arguments and Reason-Giving	0
Twitter Activists’ Argumentation Through Subdiscussions: Theory, Method and Illustration of the Controversy Surrounding Sustainable Fashion	0
Japan’s Strategic Maneuvering in the Fukushima Controversy: The Argumentative Move from the Contaminated Water to the Treated Water	0
Norms and Practices of Public Argumentation	0
The Structure of Arguments from Deontic Authority and How to Successfully Attack Them	0
A Case for a Reasons-Based Theory of Argument	0
Internal Deliberation Defending Climate-Harmful Behavior	0
Free Speech Fallacies as Meta-Argumentative Errors	0
The Fallacy Fallacy: From the Owl of Minerva to the Lark of Arete	0
Pathos in Natural Language Argumentation: Emotional Appeals and Reactions	0
The Making of Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-dialectical View	0
Going Around in Circles	0

Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue Cambridge University Press, 263 pp	0
Analysis of Argumentation in the Discussion Sections of Published Articles in ESP Journal: A Diachronic Corpus-Based Approach	0
Charity Principles in Philosophical Argumentation	0
An Unconscious Universal in the Mind is Like an Immaterial Dinner in the Stomach. A Debate on Logical Generalism (1914–1919)	0
Committing Fallacies and the Appearance Condition	0
Evaluating Reasoning in Natural Arguments: A Procedural Approach	0
Ruth Amossy: In defense of polemics, Springer, Argumentation Library, Volume 42, 2021	0
Two Types of Refutation in Philosophical Argumentation	0
Chinese Argument from Qi 氣 and the Place of Ethos in the Kisceral Mode	0
Multimodal Argument as Dialogue	0
Michel Meyer (1950–2022)	0
Some Benefits and Limitations of Modern Argument Map Representation	0
The Cultural Embeddedness of Arguments Raised as a Part of the Bulgarian Debate About the Ratification of the Istanbul Convention	0
Primatologists and Philosophers Debate on the Question of the Origin of Morality: A Dialectical Analysis of Philosophical Argumentation Strategies and the Pitfalls of Cross-Disciplinary Disagreement	0
Reconceiving Argument Schemes as Descriptive and Practically Normative	0
An Analogy-Based Approach to Argument Evaluation	0
What Do We Mean by ‘That’s a Fallacious Narrative’?	0
Argumentation in Suboptimal Settings	0
Argumentum Ex Divinatione: Divination and Civic Argument in the Ancient World	0
Bootstrapping and Persuasive Argumentation	0
Remembering Tony Blair (1941–2024)	0
Raymond S. Nickerson, Argumentation, The Art of Persuasion	0
Getting Out in Front of the Owl of Minerva Problem	0
Changes in the Editorship of the Journal Argumentation	0
Legal Normativism, Argumentation and Logic	0
A Refined Concept of A Fortiori Arguments for Argumentation Theory	0
Wittgenstein and Toulmin’s Model of Argument: The Riddle Explained Away	0
The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to the Fallacies Revisited	0
Evidentiary Convincing and Evidentiary Fallacies	0