Argumentation

Papers
(The TQCC of Argumentation is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-07-01 to 2025-07-01.)
ArticleCitations
Is Natural Selection in Trouble? When Emotions Run High in a Philosophical Debate14
Arguing with Children: Exploring Problems of Charity and Strawmanning12
Representing the Structure of a Debate11
“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing11
Exploring TED Speakers’ Narrative Positioning from a Strategic Maneuvering Perspective: A Single Case Study from Winch’s (2014) TED Talk10
Frans H. A. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse in Context10
Consolation Through Argumentation? Prototypical and Stereotypical Argumentative Patterns in Secular Eulogies10
Argumentation and Identity: A Normative Evaluation of the Arguments of Delegates to the COP26 UN Climate Change Conference8
The Correlations Between Parliamentary Debate Participation, Communication Competence, Communication Apprehension, Argumentativeness, and Willingness to Communicate in a Japanese Context6
Bramhall Versus Hobbes: The Rhetoric of Religion vs. the Rhetoric of Philosophy5
Textbook Treatments of Fallacies5
Secundum Quid and the Pragmatics of Arguments. The Challenges of the Dialectical Tradition5
Individual Differences in Argument Strength Discrimination4
Teaching the Fallacies4
Why Argumentation Theory? Realizing the Practical Objectives of Argumentation Theory as the Study of Effectiveness Through Reasonableness3
‘Argumentative Disobedience’ as a Strategy to Confront Hate Speech3
When Evaluative Adjectives Prevent Contradiction in a Debate3
Fallacies and Their Place in the Foundations of Science3
Argumentation in Philosophical Controversies3
Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Moral Foundations in Argumentation2
Adversariality in Argumentation: Shortcomings of Minimal Adversariality and A Possible Reconstruction2
Presuppositional Fallacies2
Negotiation as Practical Argumentation2
From Theory of Rhetoric to the Practice of Language Use: The Case of Appeals to Ethos Elements2
Logic Diagrams as Argument Maps in Eristic Dialectics2
Authority Argument Schemes, Types, and Critical Questions2
Fernando Leal and Hubert Marraud: How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell−Copleston Debate2
Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias2
0.27576804161072