OOIR: Observatory of International Research

Papers

(The TQCC of Argumentation is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-08-01 to 2026-08-01.)

Article	Citations
Is Natural Selection in Trouble? When Emotions Run High in a Philosophical Debate	20
Cross-Cultural Comparison of Argument Structures Among English Learners: Argument Proficiency, Patterns, and Communication Styles	19
(Mis)representing the Opposition and Rhetorical Success: Experimental Evidence on Faithful and Inaccurate Reformulations	18
Stance-Dependent Fallacy Judgments and Rhetorical Structure: A Computationally Assisted Case Study of Tolstoy’s What Is Art?	17
Frans H. A. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse in Context	15
Consolation Through Argumentation? Prototypical and Stereotypical Argumentative Patterns in Secular Eulogies	9
The Correlations Between Parliamentary Debate Participation, Communication Competence, Communication Apprehension, Argumentativeness, and Willingness to Communicate in a Japanese Context	8
Representing the Structure of a Debate	6
Exploring TED Speakers’ Narrative Positioning from a Strategic Maneuvering Perspective: A Single Case Study from Winch’s (2014) TED Talk	6
Argumentation and Identity: A Normative Evaluation of the Arguments of Delegates to the COP26 UN Climate Change Conference	6
Bad Arguments, Bad Science, and Bad Consequences: A Response to an Anti-Trans Keynote	6
The Recursive Argument Structure Reconsidered	5
Bramhall Versus Hobbes: The Rhetoric of Religion vs. the Rhetoric of Philosophy	5
From Reasonableness to Responsiveness: A Pragmatic-Cognitive Device for Argumentation in Mediation	5
Orientations toward Interpersonal Arguing in Ukraine, Across Three War Conditions	5
Teaching the Fallacies	5
Metaphors and Linguistic Intimacy in Ad Populum Arguments	4
A Normative Pragmatic Inquiry into the Volatility of Norms in Argumentation	4
“argument as war”: A Synergy of Metadiscourse and Pragma-dialectics in Exploring Qur’anic Argumentation	4
When Images Speak Louder than Logic: An Experimental Study Comparing Statistical Charts and Emotional Photographs as Persuasive Visual Evidence in Argumentation	4
Studying Controversies: A Path for Expansion of Argumentation Theory	4
Individual Differences in Argument Strength Discrimination	4
Textbook Treatments of Fallacies	4
Argumentation and Language in Identity Construction: A Discourse-Historical Analysis of Polarisation in the 2024 Trump-Harris Debate	3
Apples Ergo Oranges: The Argumentative Use of Comparisons	3

Two Logical Senses of ‘Argument’	3
Selective Dispute Avoidance, Deep Disagreements, and Pragmatic Meta-Arguments for Engagement	3
‘Argumentative Disobedience’ as a Strategy to Confront Hate Speech	3
Why Argumentation Theory? Realizing the Practical Objectives of Argumentation Theory as the Study of Effectiveness Through Reasonableness	3
Argumentation in Philosophical Controversies	3
Negotiation as Practical Argumentation	2
Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Moral Foundations in Argumentation	2
Do You Want to Build a Straw Man?	2
Teachers’ Perceptions of Argumentation in Citizenship Education: Psychometric Validation of the AASES Instrument and Mediation Analysis of Sociodemographic Variables Using SEM	2
Fallacies and Their Place in the Foundations of Science	2
Fernando Leal and Hubert Marraud: How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell−Copleston Debate	2
Is a Contradiction Between Arguments Less Likely to be Noticed When They are Implicit? An Experimental Case Study	2
Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias	2
Presuppositional Fallacies	2
Authority Argument Schemes, Types, and Critical Questions	2
Logic Diagrams as Argument Maps in Eristic Dialectics	2
Questions as Elements of Argumentation in Political Debates	2
Info-arguments: Dialogical Ambiguity, Argument Interpretation, and the Problem of Meaning in Argumentation	2