Reading and Writing

Papers
(The H4-Index of Reading and Writing is 16. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-08-01 to 2025-08-01.)
ArticleCitations
Spelling morphology in Hebrew: Comparing monolingual and bilingual children50
The role of teacher–child relationships in kindergarten on children’s motivation and reading skills in grade 137
Teachers’ goals for teaching writing to economically disadvantaged students: relations with beliefs and writing instruction34
Mathematics-writing synthesis: Kindergarten through Grade 12 mathematics-writing outcomes and instructional methods29
Do changes in perceived teacher behaviour predict changes in intrinsic reading motivation? A five-wave analysis in German lower secondary school students26
Prosody and developmental dyslexia: a meta-analysis24
Identification of main ideas in expository texts: selection versus deletion24
Between-word processing and text-level skills contributing to fluent reading of (non)word lists and text22
Phonological decoding does not affect incidental Chinese novel word learning in Uyghur readers: evidence from eye movements21
Longitudinal relations between literacy instruction and early reading achievement: findings from classroom observations in Grades 1–321
The effect of student-directed writing goals on writing outcomes for adolescent developing writers19
Inhibitory control and dissociation for Chinese real words and pseudowords in the orthographic neighborhood size effect18
Examining teachers’ early writing knowledge and practices17
The word and character frequency effect in Chinese natural reading16
The longitudinal interplay of mothers’ and fathers’ literacy teaching and Chinese preschool children’s literacy interest and word reading abilities16
Effects of writing instruction on the reading outcomes of students with literacy difficulties in pre-kindergarten to fifth grade: a meta-analysis16
0.10436701774597