Artificial Intelligence and Law

Papers
(The H4-Index of Artificial Intelligence and Law is 19. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-01-01 to 2026-01-01.)
ArticleCitations
Bridging the divide: technical research and application on legal judgment prediction62
Using GPT-4o as a factor extractor for Brazilian consumer law judgments*51
Integrating legal event and context information for Chinese similar case analysis45
Attentive deep neural networks for legal document retrieval40
How to justify a backing’s eligibility for a warrant: the justification of a legal interpretation in a hard case39
Effectiveness in retrieving legal precedents: exploring text summarization and cutting-edge language models toward a cost-efficient approach30
Graph contrastive learning networks with augmentation for legal judgment prediction30
Building from scratch: a multi-agent framework with human-in-the-loop for multilingual legal terminology mapping28
Joining metadata and textual features to advise administrative courts decisions: a cascading classifier approach28
System for the anonymization of Romanian jurisprudence27
The winter, the summer and the summer dream of artificial intelligence in law26
The potential of an artificial intelligence (AI) application for the tax administration system’s modernization: the case of Indonesia21
Policing based on automatic facial recognition20
Understanding unnecessary stops and police use of force in NYPD Stop, Question, and Frisk with machine learning techniques20
The black box problem revisited. Real and imaginary challenges for automated legal decision making19
MARRO: multi-headed attention for rhetorical role labeling in legal documents19
Topic classification of case law using a large language model and a new taxonomy for UK law: AI insights into summary judgment19
Analogical lightweight ontology of EU criminal procedural rights in judicial cooperation19
A formalization of the Protagoras court paradox in a temporal logic of epistemic and normative reasons19
0.11261892318726