Artificial Intelligence and Law

Papers
(The TQCC of Artificial Intelligence and Law is 7. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-01-01 to 2026-01-01.)
ArticleCitations
Bridging the divide: technical research and application on legal judgment prediction62
Using GPT-4o as a factor extractor for Brazilian consumer law judgments*51
Integrating legal event and context information for Chinese similar case analysis45
Attentive deep neural networks for legal document retrieval40
How to justify a backing’s eligibility for a warrant: the justification of a legal interpretation in a hard case39
Effectiveness in retrieving legal precedents: exploring text summarization and cutting-edge language models toward a cost-efficient approach30
Graph contrastive learning networks with augmentation for legal judgment prediction30
Joining metadata and textual features to advise administrative courts decisions: a cascading classifier approach28
Building from scratch: a multi-agent framework with human-in-the-loop for multilingual legal terminology mapping28
System for the anonymization of Romanian jurisprudence27
The winter, the summer and the summer dream of artificial intelligence in law26
The potential of an artificial intelligence (AI) application for the tax administration system’s modernization: the case of Indonesia21
Policing based on automatic facial recognition20
Understanding unnecessary stops and police use of force in NYPD Stop, Question, and Frisk with machine learning techniques20
Topic classification of case law using a large language model and a new taxonomy for UK law: AI insights into summary judgment19
Analogical lightweight ontology of EU criminal procedural rights in judicial cooperation19
A formalization of the Protagoras court paradox in a temporal logic of epistemic and normative reasons19
The black box problem revisited. Real and imaginary challenges for automated legal decision making19
MARRO: multi-headed attention for rhetorical role labeling in legal documents19
Towards a simple mathematical model for the legal concept of balancing of interests18
Overcoming sentencing inconsistency - a proposal for algorithmic guidelines and juridical misalignment index17
Self-training improves few-shot learning in legal artificial intelligence tasks16
Investigating legal question generation using large language models16
Exploring explainable AI in the tax domain15
Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the first decade14
Combining prompt-based language models and weak supervision for labeling named entity recognition on legal documents14
Correction: Using attention methods to predict judicial outcomes13
Automated legal reasoning with discretion to act using s(LAW)12
A sentence is known by the company it keeps: Improving Legal Document Summarization Using Deep Clustering11
Judicial knowledge-enhanced magnitude-aware reasoning for numerical legal judgment prediction11
A support system for the detection of abusive clauses in B2C contracts11
Agents preserving privacy on intelligent transportation systems according to EU law10
Comprehensive research on semantic understanding, applicability, and impact analysis of legal provisions based on deep learning and natural language processing10
Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the second decade9
Identifying open-texture in regulations using LLMs9
A collaboration between judge and machine to reduce legal uncertainty in disputes concerning ex aequo et bono compensations9
Challenges and Opportunities for Visual Analytics in Jurisprudence9
Patterns for legal compliance checking in a decidable framework of linked open data8
A large scale benchmark for session-based recommendations on the legal domain8
Enhancing legal judgment summarization with integrated semantic and structural information8
Reasoning with inconsistent precedents7
Catala: Moving towards the future of legal expert systems7
The digital transformation of jurisprudence: an evaluation of ChatGPT-4’s applicability to solve cases in business law7
LegItBART: a summarization model for Italian legal documents7
Law Smells7
Correction to: Code is law: how COMPAS affects the way the judiciary handles the risk of recidivism7
0.056429862976074