Learned Publishing

Papers
(The median citation count of Learned Publishing is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-05-01 to 2026-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
Anonymous editorials in biomedical research journals: Few in number but potentially problematic106
De Gruyter name change policy: Case study for learned publishing82
The past, present and future of publishing: Observations to celebrate ALPSP's 50th year80
Beyond borders: Examining the role of national learned societies in the social sciences and humanities75
Obvious artificial intelligence‐generated anomalies in published journal articles: A call for enhanced editorial diligence75
Evolution and adoption of contributor role ontologies and taxonomies50
Recycling Research Without (Self‐)Plagiarism: The Importance of Context and the Case of Conference Contributions46
35
On building community in scholarly publishing: Modern ambitions and actions inspired by ancient wisdoms30
Scaling up open access publishing through transformative agreements: Results from 2019 to 202229
‘Death of the Journal’: An editor's view28
Multilingual Scholarly Journal Publishing in Iran26
The stock characters in the editorial boards of journals run by predatory publishers25
Using online machine translation in international scholarly writing and publishing: A longitudinal case of a Chinese engineering scholar23
Tips for writing plain language summaries of medical journal publications22
Where are the carrots? A proposal to start crediting peer reviewers for their contribution to science21
Assessing the Societal Impact of Academic Research With Artificial Intelligence ( AI ): A Scoping Review of Business School Scholarship as a ‘Force f19
Systematic examination of post‐ and pre‐citation of Indian‐authored retracted papers19
Issue Information18
Editorial actions taken to reduce publishing references from predatory sources: A case study17
Collaborating for growth: Insights from Publisherspeak UK 2024, a scholarly publishing community gathering – part 117
Why Not Use the Power of Artificial Intelligence to Encourage the Reading of Scientific Articles?16
Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review16
Issue Information14
Chinese humanities scholars' reading of academic E‐books: A survey on reading strategies and tasks13
Issue Information13
Beyond PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR 2: Further Actions Are Needed to Deal With Problematic Meta‐Analyses12
Investigation of potential gender bias in the peer review system at Reproduction12
Implementing a diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility strategy: Lessons learned at five scholarly communications organizations12
A technology‐based, financially sustainable, quality improvement intervention in a medical journal for bilingualism from submission to publication12
Where predatory and mainstream journals differ: A study of language and linguistics journals11
Perceptions regarding open science appraised by editors of scholarly publications published in Spain11
Issue Information11
11
Clinical Evidence Behind a Paywall: An Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials Included in Cochrane Reviews11
Scholarly Publications: Criteria, Types, and Recognition From the Researchers' Perspective10
Small Is Sexy: Rethinking Article Length in the Age of AI10
Perceptions on the prevalence and impact of predatory academic journals and conferences: A global survey of researchers10
Towards a DOI ‐First Referencing Model: Opportunities, Limitations and Implications for Scholarly Publishing9
9
Family Medicine editors collaborate towards antiracist publishing9
Do you still need to make that trip?8
University presses and societal challenges: Practical steps for change8
Correction to “ DeepGreen —A Data Hub for the Distribution of Scholarly Articles From Publishers to Open Access Repositories in Germany”8
The ‘long and winding road’ for digital accessibility8
Lessons learned from an evolving DEI programme within a global publisher8
Unravelling Citation Rules: A Comparative Analysis of Referencing Instruction Patterns in Scopus‐Indexed Journals8
The rise of a mega‐journal in public health publishing8
From being disrupted to being a disruptor: How university presses are helping to drive positive change8
Moving Open Repositories out of the Blind Spot of Initiatives to Correct the Scholarly Record8
Issue Information8
Alternatives to English only in scholarly publishing: Emerging trends of language policies among non‐Anglophone journals?7
Beyond the Map: Considering Reporting Quality to Strengthen Scoping Reviews7
Lessons learned from ORCID DE—A project‐driven initiative to promote author identification in Germany7
7
7
Creating Onomastic Social Network Maps of Books Using Their Indexes. Case Study: ‘Papyrus: The Invention of Books in the Ancient World’7
Nurturing an ‘ethic of collaboration’: Dispatches from a case study on Jindal Global Law Review7
An analysis of publishing studies journals: An insight into the structure of the field based on publications7
Issue Information7
Analysing overlay journals: The state‐of‐the‐art in 2021 and possible perspectives7
Promotion and caution in research article abstracts: The use of positive, negative and hedge words across disciplines and rankings7
Initial insight into three modes of data sharing: Prevalence of primary reuse, data integration and dataset release in research articles6
From Connections to Citations: Assessing the Influence of Academic Social Networking ( ASN ) Sites on Scholarly Impact in Bangladesh6
Rates of editor‐authored manuscripts among urology journals using blinded or non‐blinded review6
Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of Scopus articles6
Purchase and publish: Early career researchers and open access publishing costs6
Analysis of predatory emails in early career academia and attempts at prevention6
Editing a journal at the semiperiphery: Ambivalence of juniority and meaningfulness of publishing6
Enhancing Consistency in Peer Review: A Statistical Analysis of Discrepancies and Proposals for Improvement6
Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT, in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills6
Regional spillover effect of 2022 sanctions against Russia on scholarly publications6
Three recommended inclusive language guidelines for scholarly publishing: Words matter6
Research assistants: Scientific credit and recognized authorship6
‘Cracks’ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers6
BioOne and SPIE: A reflection on the first 3 years of the nonprofit platform partnership6
The Black Market of Publications in Peru: Paper Mills and Authorship for Sale5
Review of the Coalition for Diversity and Inclusion in Scholarly Communications' ‘Toolkits for Equity’5
Toward Science‐Led Publishing5
Publisher–Society partnerships to further image accessibility and global inclusivity in the Humanities and Social Sciences: Comparing top‐down5
Macao's academic book publishing industry: A SWOT and PEST analysis5
Special issues: The roles of special issues in scholarly communication in a changing publishing landscape5
Integrity and Misconduct, Where Does Artificial Intelligence Lead?5
When Feedback Is Missing: Rethinking Transparency in Editorial Decision‐Making5
Three sustainability case studies in the scholarly publishing ecosystem5
Understanding China's construction of an academic integrity system: A grounded theory study on national level policies5
Field‐specific gold open access dynamics in the Chinese mainland: Overviews, disparities, and strategic insights5
Issue Information4
ORCID identifier adoption in Spanish scholarly communication: A macro and micro level perspective4
Correction to Publisher–Society partnerships to further image accessibility and global inclusivity in the Humanities and Social Sciences: Comparing top‐down and bottom‐up approaches4
Peer Review at the Crossroads4
Archiving website‐based references in academic papers: Problems caused by reference rot, potential solutions and limitations4
Academic misconduct, fake authorship letters, cyber fraud: Evidence from the International Political Science Review4
Issue Information4
Making journals more international: Language subject differences and impact performance4
Defining the early career researcher: A study of publication‐based definitions4
Establishing an early indicator for data sharing and reuse4
4
From Policy to Psychology: Analysing Evaluations of Journal Credibility Through Institutional and Cognitive Lenses4
Award4
Are we there yet? The state of accessible publishing in 20224
Award4
Enhancing peer review efficiency: A mixed‐methods analysis of artificial intelligence‐assisted reviewer selection across academic disciplines4
4
3
Empirical analysis of factors influencing delay in article acceptance in accounting journals3
Challenges and Opportunities of Scholarly Publishing Landscape: A Case Study From India3
Editorial bias in top‐tier education journals: Factors influencing publishable scholarship in China3
Can Bilingual Publishing Through Translation Increase International Authorship: An Interrupted Time Series Study of Spain‐Based Journals3
Effects of the coronavirus 2019 pandemic on medical publishing: The sacrifice of quality for quantity?3
Comparison of early career researchers and senior career researchers as peer reviewers: A questionnaire survey in China3
Choosing the ‘right’ journal for publication: Perceptions and practices of pandemic‐era early career researchers3
The promotion and implementation of open science measures among high‐performing journals from Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, and Spain3
Publish‐Review‐Curate Modelling for Data Paper and Dataset: A Collaborative Approach3
Development of Sci‐Tech Journals in China Stimulated by the China Sci‐Tech Journal Excellence Action Plan3
Scientific publishing sanctions in response to the Russo‐Ukrainian war3
Adoption and use of author identifier services: A French national survey3
Scoping Reviews Should Describe—Not Score3
Evaluation and publication delay in Ibero‐American scientific journals3
Adapting peer review for the future: Digital disruptions and trust in peer review3
Let's start talking: A reflective essay on minority students' experiences in academic spaces, publishing, and journal involvement2
Science Behind a Paywall: Restricted Access Limits the Promise of Artificial Intelligence2
2
The motivations and criteria behind China's list of questionable journals2
Characteristics of scholarly journals published in non‐English‐speaking countries: An analysis of Library and Information Science SCOPUS journals2
What Are Journals and Reviewers Concerned About in Data Papers? Evidence From Journal Guidelines and Review Reports2
Plan S and purpose: The future direction for UK learned societies2
Legalize text recycling2
Issue Information2
Outside the library: Early career researchers and use of alternative information sources in pandemic times2
2
The editor: A demanding but underestimated role in scientific publishing2
“I Really Try to Model Good Practices”: Reflecting on Journal Article Publication From Mid‐Career2
2
Issue Information2
AI and language change: The case of the hallucinating spellchecker2
Patient authorship of medical research publications: An evolution, revolution, and solution?2
How do editors use editorials to lead their journals? Insights from the field of human resource management2
Exploring named‐entity recognition techniques for academic books2
Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review2
Co‐authoring with undergraduate students: An emerging process from the semi‐periphery of the world of science2
A perpetual motion machine: The preserved digital scholarly record2
2
Expanding the Paediatric Urology Peer Review Pipeline: A Novel Panel and Facilitated Peer Mentorship Program2
Altmetric.com or PlumX: Does it matter?2
WhatsApp — what’s that?2
The state of scientific PDF accessibility in repositories: A survey in Switzerland2
0.36377000808716