Learned Publishing

Papers
(The TQCC of Learned Publishing is 5. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-08-01 to 2026-08-01.)
ArticleCitations
Anonymous editorials in biomedical research journals: Few in number but potentially problematic118
De Gruyter name change policy: Case study for learned publishing90
The past, present and future of publishing: Observations to celebrate ALPSP's 50th year89
Beyond borders: Examining the role of national learned societies in the social sciences and humanities89
Recycling Research Without (Self‐)Plagiarism: The Importance of Context and the Case of Conference Contributions85
Evolution and adoption of contributor role ontologies and taxonomies56
Obvious artificial intelligence‐generated anomalies in published journal articles: A call for enhanced editorial diligence53
38
On building community in scholarly publishing: Modern ambitions and actions inspired by ancient wisdoms31
Scaling up open access publishing through transformative agreements: Results from 2019 to 202231
‘Death of the Journal’: An editor's view29
The stock characters in the editorial boards of journals run by predatory publishers29
Multilingual Scholarly Journal Publishing in Iran27
Systematic examination of post‐ and pre‐citation of Indian‐authored retracted papers23
Using online machine translation in international scholarly writing and publishing: A longitudinal case of a Chinese engineering scholar21
Where are the carrots? A proposal to start crediting peer reviewers for their contribution to science20
Collaborating for growth: Insights from Publisherspeak UK 2024, a scholarly publishing community gathering – part 119
Editorial actions taken to reduce publishing references from predatory sources: A case study18
Tips for writing plain language summaries of medical journal publications16
Assessing the Societal Impact of Academic Research With Artificial Intelligence ( AI ): A Scoping Review of Business School Scholarship as a ‘Force f16
Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review14
Issue Information13
Why Not Use the Power of Artificial Intelligence to Encourage the Reading of Scientific Articles?13
Issue Information12
Implementing a diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility strategy: Lessons learned at five scholarly communications organizations12
Issue Information12
12
Chinese humanities scholars' reading of academic E‐books: A survey on reading strategies and tasks12
A technology‐based, financially sustainable, quality improvement intervention in a medical journal for bilingualism from submission to publication12
Investigation of potential gender bias in the peer review system at Reproduction11
Perceptions regarding open science appraised by editors of scholarly publications published in Spain11
Beyond PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR 2: Further Actions Are Needed to Deal With Problematic Meta‐Analyses11
Issue Information10
Clinical Evidence Behind a Paywall: An Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials Included in Cochrane Reviews10
Correction to “Data Availability Statements in Mega Journals: A Comparative Analysis of Global and Korea‐Affiliated Publications in Health and Medical Research”10
Small Is Sexy: Rethinking Article Length in the Age of AI9
Towards a DOI ‐First Referencing Model: Opportunities, Limitations and Implications for Scholarly Publishing9
Scholarly Publications: Criteria, Types, and Recognition From the Researchers' Perspective9
Family Medicine editors collaborate towards antiracist publishing9
Promotion and caution in research article abstracts: The use of positive, negative and hedge words across disciplines and rankings8
Correction to “ DeepGreen —A Data Hub for the Distribution of Scholarly Articles From Publishers to Open Access Repositories in Germany”8
8
8
Do you still need to make that trip?8
The rise of a mega‐journal in public health publishing8
Unravelling Citation Rules: A Comparative Analysis of Referencing Instruction Patterns in Scopus‐Indexed Journals8
The ‘long and winding road’ for digital accessibility8
Issue Information8
Lessons learned from an evolving DEI programme within a global publisher8
Moving Open Repositories out of the Blind Spot of Initiatives to Correct the Scholarly Record8
Analysing overlay journals: The state‐of‐the‐art in 2021 and possible perspectives8
University presses and societal challenges: Practical steps for change8
Alternatives to English only in scholarly publishing: Emerging trends of language policies among non‐Anglophone journals?7
Lessons learned from ORCID DE—A project‐driven initiative to promote author identification in Germany7
7
Creating Onomastic Social Network Maps of Books Using Their Indexes. Case Study: ‘Papyrus: The Invention of Books in the Ancient World’7
Beyond the Map: Considering Reporting Quality to Strengthen Scoping Reviews7
Regional spillover effect of 2022 sanctions against Russia on scholarly publications7
From being disrupted to being a disruptor: How university presses are helping to drive positive change7
Who Owns the Argument? A Practical Test for Author Responsibility in AI ‐Assisted Scholarly Writing7
Three recommended inclusive language guidelines for scholarly publishing: Words matter7
‘Cracks’ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers6
Do Early Career Researchers Consider AI as an Opportunity or a Threat? A Pathfinding Study6
Purchase and publish: Early career researchers and open access publishing costs6
Rates of editor‐authored manuscripts among urology journals using blinded or non‐blinded review6
COI Declaration Policy in Medical Journals: From Authors to Editors6
Analysis of predatory emails in early career academia and attempts at prevention6
BioOne and SPIE: A reflection on the first 3 years of the nonprofit platform partnership6
From Connections to Citations: Assessing the Influence of Academic Social Networking ( ASN ) Sites on Scholarly Impact in Bangladesh6
Initial insight into three modes of data sharing: Prevalence of primary reuse, data integration and dataset release in research articles6
Special issues: The roles of special issues in scholarly communication in a changing publishing landscape5
What Happens After Rejection? Making Invisible Peer Review Visible5
Macao's academic book publishing industry: A SWOT and PEST analysis5
Toward Science‐Led Publishing5
Review of the Coalition for Diversity and Inclusion in Scholarly Communications' ‘Toolkits for Equity’5
Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT, in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills5
After the Wow: Building Reliability in GenAI ‐Era Scholarly Publishing5
Understanding China's construction of an academic integrity system: A grounded theory study on national level policies5
Integrity and Misconduct, Where Does Artificial Intelligence Lead?5
The Black Market of Publications in Peru: Paper Mills and Authorship for Sale5
Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of Scopus articles5
Enhancing Consistency in Peer Review: A Statistical Analysis of Discrepancies and Proposals for Improvement5
Three sustainability case studies in the scholarly publishing ecosystem5
0.21868395805359