Learned Publishing

Papers
(The TQCC of Learned Publishing is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-06-01 to 2025-06-01.)
ArticleCitations
Beyond borders: Examining the role of national learned societies in the social sciences and humanities48
Obvious artificial intelligence‐generated anomalies in published journal articles: A call for enhanced editorial diligence47
Anonymous editorials in biomedical research journals: Few in number but potentially problematic42
De Gruyter name change policy: Case study for learned publishing39
The past, present and future of publishing: Observations to celebrate ALPSP's 50th year34
Evolution and adoption of contributor role ontologies and taxonomies30
Recycling Research Without (Self‐)Plagiarism: The Importance of Context and the Case of Conference Contributions30
On building community in scholarly publishing: Modern ambitions and actions inspired by ancient wisdoms28
23
The stock characters in the editorial boards of journals run by predatory publishers22
‘Death of the Journal’: An editor's view20
Public access policy in the United States: Impact of the Scholarly Publishing Roundtable19
Scaling up open access publishing through transformative agreements: Results from 2019 to 202219
Tips for writing plain language summaries of medical journal publications18
Systematic examination of post‐ and pre‐citation of Indian‐authored retracted papers18
Collaborating for growth: Insights from Publisherspeak UK 2024, a scholarly publishing community gathering – part 117
Using online machine translation in international scholarly writing and publishing: A longitudinal case of a Chinese engineering scholar17
Editorial actions taken to reduce publishing references from predatory sources: A case study17
Where are the carrots? A proposal to start crediting peer reviewers for their contribution to science17
Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review16
Issue Information16
Issue Information15
Beyond PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR 2: Further Actions Are Needed to Deal With Problematic Meta‐Analyses14
Article processing charge expenditure in Chile: The current situation11
Implementing a diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility strategy: Lessons learned at five scholarly communications organizations11
Perceptions regarding open science appraised by editors of scholarly publications published in Spain11
A technology‐based, financially sustainable, quality improvement intervention in a medical journal for bilingualism from submission to publication11
Scholarly journal publishing in Australia11
Chinese humanities scholars' reading of academic E‐books: A survey on reading strategies and tasks11
Investigation of potential gender bias in the peer review system at Reproduction11
Where predatory and mainstream journals differ: A study of language and linguistics journals11
Small Is Sexy: Rethinking Article Length in the Age of AI10
Issue Information10
Thanking our reviewers 202110
Moving Open Repositories out of the Blind Spot of Initiatives to Correct the Scholarly Record9
Family Medicine editors collaborate towards antiracist publishing9
Unravelling Citation Rules: A Comparative Analysis of Referencing Instruction Patterns in Scopus‐Indexed Journals9
Correction to “DeepGreen—A Data Hub for the Distribution of Scholarly Articles From Publishers to Open Access Repositories in Germany”9
Perceptions on the prevalence and impact of predatory academic journals and conferences: A global survey of researchers9
Issue Information8
8
From being disrupted to being a disruptor: How university presses are helping to drive positive change8
Issue Information8
Lessons learned from ORCID DE—A project‐driven initiative to promote author identification in Germany7
Do you still need to make that trip?7
The ‘long and winding road’ for digital accessibility7
Analysing overlay journals: The state‐of‐the‐art in 2021 and possible perspectives7
Alternatives to English only in scholarly publishing: Emerging trends of language policies among non‐Anglophone journals?7
The rise of a mega‐journal in public health publishing7
Are journal archiving and embargo policies impeding the success of India's open access policy?7
Nurturing an ‘ethic of collaboration’: Dispatches from a case study on Jindal Global Law Review7
Lessons learned from an evolving DEI programme within a global publisher7
University presses and societal challenges: Practical steps for change7
Academic journals' usernames and the threat of fraudulent accounts on social media7
Philosophers' perceptions of pay to publish and open access in Spain: Books versus journals, more than a financial dilemma6
Purchase and publish: Early career researchers and open access publishing costs6
Initial insight into three modes of data sharing: Prevalence of primary reuse, data integration and dataset release in research articles6
Promotion and caution in research article abstracts: The use of positive, negative and hedge words across disciplines and rankings6
Regional spillover effect of 2022 sanctions against Russia on scholarly publications6
Analysis of predatory emails in early career academia and attempts at prevention6
6
Questionnaires mentioned in academic research 1996–2019: Rapid increase but declining citation impact6
Research assistants: Scientific credit and recognized authorship6
Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness5
Editing a journal at the semiperiphery: Ambivalence of juniority and meaningfulness of publishing5
An analysis of publishing studies journals: An insight into the structure of the field based on publications5
BioOne and SPIE: A reflection on the first 3 years of the nonprofit platform partnership5
The importance of effective data sharing and reuse to funders and others supporting research5
Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT, in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills5
Three recommended inclusive language guidelines for scholarly publishing: Words matter5
‘Cracks’ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers5
Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of Scopus articles5
Rates of editor‐authored manuscripts among urology journals using blinded or non‐blinded review5
Journals in Beall's list perform as a group less well than other open access journals indexed in Scopus but reveal large differences among publishers5
Long‐term outcomes of 2‐day training on planning and writing research on publication output of medical professionals: 11‐year cohort study5
Understanding China's construction of an academic integrity system: A grounded theory study on national level policies4
Issue Information4
Research data policies of journals in the Chinese Science Citation Database based on the language, publisher, discipline, access model and metrics4
Publisher–Society partnerships to further image accessibility and global inclusivity in the Humanities and Social Sciences: Comparing top‐down and bottom‐up approaches4
The Black Market of Publications in Peru: Paper Mills and Authorship for Sale4
Integrity and Misconduct, Where Does Artificial Intelligence Lead?4
Macao's academic book publishing industry: A SWOT and PEST analysis4
Field‐specific gold open access dynamics in the Chinese mainland: Overviews, disparities, and strategic insights4
Award4
Special issues: The roles of special issues in scholarly communication in a changing publishing landscape4
4
Review of the Coalition for Diversity and Inclusion in Scholarly Communications' ‘Toolkits for Equity’4
Toward Science‐Led Publishing4
Tracing the footsteps of open research data in China4
Reflection on the Springer Nature initial public offering attempts in an evolving academic publishing market4
Three sustainability case studies in the scholarly publishing ecosystem4
0.087418079376221