Public Understanding of Science

Papers
(The median citation count of Public Understanding of Science is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-08-01 to 2025-08-01.)
ArticleCitations
“It shouldn’t look aggressive”: How conceptions about publics shape the development of mining exploration technologies46
Poly-truth, or the limits of pluralism: Popular debates on conspiracy theories in a post-truth era35
Going beyond political ideology: A computational analysis of civic trust in science30
A four-level model of political polarization over science: Evidence from 10 European countries29
A triangulated approach for understanding scientists’ perceptions of public engagement with science29
Who is at risk of bias? Examining dispositional differences in motivated science reception29
Contested science communication: Representations of scientists and their science in newspaper articles and the associated comment sections28
Tensions in the public communication by scientists and scientific institutions: Sources, dimensions, and ways forward28
Public support for government use of network surveillance: An empirical assessment of public understanding of ethics in science administration27
‘It’s just a Band-Aid!’: Public engagement with geoengineering and the politics of the climate crisis26
Communicating trust and trustworthiness through scientists’ biographies: Benevolence beliefs25
The plurivocal university: Typologizing the diverse voices of a research university on social media23
Online politicizations of science: Contestation versus denialism at the convergence between COVID-19 and climate science on Twitter21
The effect of scientific conspiracy theories on scepticism towards biotechnologies20
Imagining the model citizen: A comparison between public understanding of science, public engagement in science, and citizen science20
More engagement but less participation: China’s alternative approach to public communication of science and technology19
Bruce Lewenstein: ‘Our work is critical for the issues of the day . . . we must engage’18
On the verge between the scientific and the alternative: Swedish women’s claims about systemic side effects of the copper intrauterine device18
How does the French press handle a controversial biotechnology? A psychosocial study of media coverage of human genome editing17
Communicating uncertainties regarding COVID-19 vaccination: Moderating roles of trust in science, government, and society16
Explainable AI and trust: How news media shapes public support for AI-powered autonomous passenger drones16
‘Poetry under siege by rockets’: A case study of the creative and critical coverage by the New York Times of the 1969 Apollo 11 moonwalk16
Narrativization of human population genetics: Two cases in Iceland and Russia15
The role of motivated science reception and numeracy in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic15
Partisanship and anti-elite worldviews as correlates of science and health beliefs in the multi-party system of Spain15
Scientism, trust, value alignment, views of nature, and U.S. public opinion about gene drive mosquitos14
Counteracting climate denial: A systematic review14
The role of journalistic voice in communicating climate scepticism14
The politics of politicization: Climate change debates in Canadian print media14
Book Review: Diarmid A. Finnegan, The Voice of Science: British Scientists on the Lecture Circuit in Gilded Age America14
The divide so wide: Public perspectives on the role of human genome editing in the US healthcare system13
The legitimacy of science and the populist backlash: Cross-national and longitudinal trends and determinants of attitudes toward science13
1992: The first issue of Public Understanding of Science12
Children’s perceptions of scientists and their work: The ‘Draw a Scientist’ Test in the United Arab Emirates12
Book Review: Kristin Demetrious, Public Relations and Neoliberalism: The Language Practices of Knowledge Formation DemetriousKristinPublic Relations and Neoliberalism: The Language Practices of Knowle11
Examining science communication on Reddit: From an “Assembled” to a “Disassembling” approach11
Moral expression of “experts” and public engagement: Communicating COVID-19 vaccines on Facebook public pages in Chinese11
Book review: Myrna Perez Criticizing Science: Stephen Jay Gould and the Struggle for American Democracy PerezMyrnaCriticizing Science: Stephen Jay Gould and the Struggle11
The effects of self-disclosure and gender on a climate scientist’s credibility and likability on social media11
Public acceptance of evolution in the United States, 1985–202011
Comparing the influence of intellectual humility, religiosity, and political conservatism on vaccine attitudes in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom11
Book review: Felicity Mellor (ed.), Insights on Science Journalism11
Characterizing the semantic features of climate change misinformation on Chinese social media11
Follow the metrics? How does social media affect the journalistic practices of digital science communication start-ups?11
Delineating between scientism and science enthusiasm: Challenges in measuring scientism and the development of novel scale11
Lay metrology and metroscoping: Towards the study of lay units10
Injecting fun? Humour, conspiracy theory and (anti)vaccination discourse in popular media10
Book Review: Maya Goldenberg, Vaccine Hesitancy: Public Trust, Expertise, and the War on Science Alex de Waal, New Pandemics, Old Politics: Two Hundred Years of War on Disease and Its Alternatives10
What are we talking about when we are talking about the audience? Exploring the concept of audience in science communication research and education10
Thank you reviewers10
In science we trust? Public trust in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projections and accepting anthropogenic climate change10
A different image? Images of scientists in Chinese films10
Climate and nature emergency: From scientists’ warnings to sufficient action10
Quality in science communication with communicative artificial intelligence: A principle-based framework9
Examining a conceptual framework of aggressive and humorous styles in science YouTube videos about climate change and vaccination9
Gene editing in animals: What does the public want to know and what information do stakeholder organizations provide?9
Democratising science in deliberative systems: Mobilising lay expertise against industry waste dumping in Taiwan9
Book review: John C. Besley and Anthony Dudo, Strategic Science Communication – A Guide to Setting the Right Objectives for more Effective Public Engagement9
Are we bad winners? Public understandings of the United Nations’ World Happiness Report among Finnish digital media and their readers9
Thank you reviewers9
Threatening experts: Correlates of viewing scientists as a social threat8
“We think this way as a society!”: Community-level science literacy among ultra-Orthodox Jews8
From Big Farms to Big Pharma? Problematizing science-related populism8
The journalistic understanding of science as process and social system: A qualitative exploration in the German science journalism community8
I am a scientist . . . Ask Me Anything: Examining differences between male and female scientists participating in a Reddit AMA session8
Reporting preprints in the media during the COVID-19 pandemic8
Climate change contrarian think tanks in Europe: A network analysis8
Public perceptions of climate tipping points8
1796 – An Introduction to Botany : The critical role of women in eighteenth-century science popularisation and the early promotion of science for young girls in Britain8
Guidance in the chaos: Effects of science communication by virologists during the COVID-19 crisis in Germany and the role of parasocial phenomena7
Greenpeace and the online genetically modified food debate in the UK: The role of science and scientific evidence in ‘environmental representation’7
The perception and use of generative AI for science-related information search: Insights from a cross-national study7
The health and environmental risks and rewards of modernity that shape scientific optimism7
Are science communication audiences becoming more critical? Reconstructing migration between audience segments based on Swiss panel data7
1999: The BBC simulates prehistoric wildlife7
Why we need a Public Understanding of Social Science7
Brain-computer interfaces, disability, and the stigma of refusal: A factorial vignette study7
Sociotechnical imaginaries of gene editing in food and agriculture: A comparative content analysis of mass media in the United States, New Zealand, Japan, the Netherlands, and Canada7
How do you argue with a science denial meme? Memed responses may be counter-productive for responding to science denial online7
Book review: Pascal Hohaus (ed.), Science Communication in Times of Crisis7
Book Review: Rebecca Wragg Sykes, Kindred: Neanderthal Life, Love, Death and Art6
Positions on science and religious beliefs across societies: Development of a research instrument and testing of its validity among high school students6
Public perception of new plant breeding techniques and the psychosocial determinants of acceptance: A systematic review6
Richard S. Ellis, When Galaxies Were Born: The Quest for Cosmic Dawn6
Audience segmentation analysis of public intentions to get a COVID-19 vaccine in Australia6
Book Review: Suzanne Simard, Finding the Mother Tree: Uncovering the Wisdom and Intelligence of the Forest6
Seduction, caution, fight: Media framing of research-based expertise in Norwegian print media coverage of low energy buildings (2005–2012)6
Book review: John L. Rudolph Why We Teach Science (and Why We Should) RudolphJohn L.Why We Teach Science (and Why We Should). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023, 224 6
Advocacy – defending science or destroying it? Interviews with 47 climate scientists about their fundamental concerns6
Deliberating enhanced weathering: Public frames, iconic ecosystems and the governance of carbon removal at scale6
Fiction references as framing devices in extended reality news discourse6
Belief updating when confronted with scientific evidence: Examining the role of trust in science6
David S. Caudill, Expertise in Crisis: The Ideological Contours of Public Scientific Controversies6
Academic excellence and community relevance: Can we have it all?6
The positive association of education with the trust in science and scientists is weaker in highly corrupt countries6
Perceptions of policy problems and solutions: Climate change and structural racism6
Martin W. Bauer: ‘“Truth-value” is not the only criterion of validity, there is also the felicity of performative knowledge claims . . .’6
The translator versus the critic: A flawed dichotomy in the age of misinformation6
Book Review: Sina Farzin, Susan M. Gaines and Roslynn D. Haynes (eds) Under the Literary Microscope: Science and Society in the Contemporary Novel6
Credibility of misinformation source moderates the effectiveness of corrective messages on social media6
The invisible frontline of the COVID-19 pandemic: Examining sourcing and the underrepresentation of female expertise in pandemic news coverage5
The acceptance of evolution: A developmental view of Generation X in the United States5
Fuelling the climate and science ‘denial machine’ on social media: A case study of the Great Barrier Reef’s 2021 ‘in danger’ recommendation on Twitter, YouTube and Facebook5
Predictors of young people’s anti-vaccine attitudes in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic5
Selected by expertise? Scientific experts in German news coverage of COVID-19 compared to other pandemics5
Public understanding of science and technology in the Internet era5
Effects of epistemic beliefs, science populism, and social media use on climate change misperceptions5
Open science and public trust in science: Results from two studies5
Contesting state expertise after COVID-195
The effect of misinformation and inoculation: Replication of an experiment on the effect of false experts in the context of climate change communication5
Mindful mindfulness reporting: Media portrayals of scientific evidence for meditation mobile apps5
Tragic Flaws and Practical Wisdom: Public reasoning behind preferences for different genetic technologies5
Christianity-science compatibility beliefs increase nonreligious individuals’ perceptions of Christians’ intelligence and scientific ability4
Why do experts disagree? The development of a taxonomy4
Work and the public understanding of science4
Dealing with dissent from the medical ranks: Public health authorities and COVID-19 communication4
Public communication at research universities: Moving towards (de)centralised communication of science?4
Believing in science: Linking religious beliefs and identity with vaccination intentions and trust in science during the COVID-19 pandemic4
Imagined futures for livestock gene editing: Public engagement in the Netherlands4
A 30-nation investigation of lay heritability beliefs4
Narratives of hope and concern? Examining the impact of climate scientists’ communication on credibility and engagement4
Autonomy and bioethics in fan responses to Orphan Black4
Between data providers and concerned citizens: Exploring participation in precision public health in Switzerland4
What if some people just do not like science? How personality traits relate to attitudes toward science and technology4
Breeding by intervening: Exploring the role of associations and deliberation in consumer acceptance of different breeding techniques4
‘Ugly and smelly or useful insect hunters?’ Perceptions of and attitudes towards bats in the turn of the twentieth-century public sphere in Barcelona4
Science as the raison d’etat: Nehruvian scientism and the Indian science museum4
Book review: Jean Paul Bertemes, Serge Haan and Dirk Hans (eds), 50 Essentials on Science Communication (co-created by the University of Luxembourg and the Luxembourg National Research Fund)4
Are plain language summaries more readable than scientific abstracts? Evidence from six biomedical and life sciences journals4
How generative artificial intelligence portrays science: Interviewing ChatGPT from the perspective of different audience segments3
European journalists and the sea: Contexts, motivations, and difficulties3
Associations of locus of control, information processing style and anti-reflexivity with climate change scepticism in an Australian sample3
Public understanding of preprints: How audiences make sense of unreviewed research in the news3
Feminist retroviruses to white Sharia: Gender “science fan fiction” on 4Chan3
The public you want, the public you get: Exploring the relationship between the public and science in the debate on xenotransplantation3
STS and science communication: Reflecting on a relationship3
Stereotypes and social evaluations of scientists are related to different antecedents and outcomes3
Thirty years of science–society interfaces: What’s next?3
Mapping pathways to public understanding of climate science3
Science-related populism declining during the COVID-19 pandemic: A panel survey of the Swiss population before and after the Coronavirus outbreak3
Can scientists use simple infographics to convince? Effects of the “flatten the curve” charts on perceptions of and behavioral intentions toward social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic3
Book Review: Andrew Hoffmann, The Engaged Scholar – Expanding the Impact of Academic Research in Today’s World3
“That was not the discussion we wanted to have”: Engagement of civil society organizations with synthetic biology3
Science on the mind: Examining question ordering effects when asking about science on large-scale surveys3
Establishing an everyday scientific reasoning scale to learn how non-scientists reason with science3
Children’s conceptions of coronavirus3
Looking back and looking ahead3
Book review essay: Digging deep into stories in science communication3
Learning about climate politics during COP 21: Explaining a diminishing knowledge gap2
Book Review: Massimiano Bucchi and Brian Trench (eds), Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology2
Book review: Geoff Mulgan, When Science Meets Power2
The four “R”s: Strategies for tailoring science for religious publics and their prices2
Climate change by any other name: Social representations and language practices of coastal inhabitants on Mayotte Island in the Indian Ocean2
Who makes AI? Gender and portrayals of AI scientists in popular film, 1920–20202
Thank you reviewers2
A matter of right or wrong: Divisive attributes of moralized science and technology attitudes2
Can homeopathy cure all diseases? Subgroups of homeopathy users based on beliefs about whether and how homeopathy should be used to treat serious conditions2
Universities claim to value community-engaged scholarship: So why do they discourage it?2
Who is responsible? US Public perceptions of AI governance through the lenses of trust and ethics2
Community laboratories in the United States: BioMakerspaces for life science learning2
What are you assessing when you measure “trust” in scientists with a direct measure?2
Indicators of trustworthiness in lay-friendly research summaries: Scientificness surpasses easiness2
Book Review: The Many Voices of Modern Physics: Written Communication Practices of Key Discoveries2
How pandemic-related changes in global attitudes toward the scientific community shape “post-pandemic” environmental opinion2
Science communication on Twitter: Measuring indicators of engagement and their links to user interaction in communication scholars’ Tweet content2
Does China have a public debate on genetically modified organisms? A discourse network analysis of public debate on Weibo2
Book Review: Brandon R. Brown Sharing Our Science: How to Write and Speak STEM BrownBrandon R.Sharing Our Science: How to Write and Speak STEM, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA,2
Book review: Angela Potochnik, Science and the Public2
Thinking, not talking, predicts knowledge level: Effects of media attention and reflective integration on public knowledge of nuclear energy2
Science museum educators’ views on object-based learning: The perceived importance of authenticity and touch2
Science capital: Results from a Finnish population survey2
0.022815942764282