International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Papers
(The TQCC of International Journal of Selection and Assessment is 5. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-06-01 to 2026-06-01.)
ArticleCitations
The Validity of Single‐Response Situational Judgment Tests: A Nomological Network Meta‐Analysis35
Tell Me More! Examining the Benefits of Adding Structured Probing in Asynchronous Video Interviews28
Linking Strengths‐Based Supervisor Feedback to Job Crafting: The Moderating Role of Self‐Efficacy25
Psychometric properties of the Cultural Intelligence Scale based on item response theory24
Are Games Always Fun and Fair? A Comparison of Reactions to Different Game‐Based Assessments23
Transparency and Trust in Simple Algorithmic Hiring Procedures20
Candidate Generative AI Use in Pre‐Hire Employment Assessments: Self‐Reported Incidence and the Impact of Warnings20
A Quantitative Analysis of 21st Century Skills: A Case of Semantic and Psychometric Overlap18
Do situational characteristics affect the validity of personality situational judgment items?18
Selection in the Operational Domain Requires More Than Grades: High School Marks do not Identify High‐Flyers17
WEIRDness abounds! Sample characteristics, restricted variance, and why they matter for international selection and assessment research16
What Draws Potential Applicants Towards an Organization? The Importance of Employer Brand Process Attributes and Applicants' Job Search Metacognitive Activities15
Train driver selection: The impact of cognitive ability on train driving performance15
Subclinical Versus Clinical Assessment in the Workplace: Evidence Against Equating Performance Risks With Abnormal Personality15
Utilizing Big Data Technologies in Employee Selection: A Systematic Literature Review13
A Consideration of Immediate and Long‐Term Consequences of Generative AI Usage in Selection13
Issue Information13
Can ChatGPT Outperform Humans in Faking a Personality Assessment While Avoiding Detection?12
All Your Base Are Belong to Us: The Urgent Reality of Unproctored Testing in the Age of LLMs12
Validation of the Croatian version of the short form of the Burnout Assessment Tool: Findings from a nationally representative sample12
Thou Shalt not Lie! Exploring and testing countermeasures against faking intentions and faking in selection interviews11
11
Faking good and bad on self‐reports versus informant‐reports of Dark Triad personality11
The role of intent to harm in workplace aggression11
Does It Matter Which Subtests We Use to Measure General Cognitive Ability? Group Differences Across Test Composites10
Response to a crisis and applicant attraction: Signaling employer brand personality and organizational trust through warm and competent COVID‐19 responses10
Equivalence between direct and indirect measures of psychological capital10
Analyzing Noise Data From a Noise Audit: A Guide for Industrial‐Organizational Practitioners9
It's just (family) business: The impact of familial work experience on perceived qualification and hireability during the selection process9
9
Comparing Autistic and Neurotypical Responses to Conventional and Modified Questions in Algorithmically Scored Asynchronous Video Interviews: A Textual Analysis9
Political advantage? Considering the Political Skill of raters9
Understanding dark side personality at work: Distinguishing and reviewing nonlinear, interactive, differential, and reciprocal effects9
Scoring the Big Five for longitudinally assessed academic achievement predictiveness: Manifest, correlated‐factors model, and bifactor modeling across multiple contexts9
Reviewer List9
Should we extend the currency of cognitive ability test scores? Considerations from construct, equity, and psychometric perspectives in medical selection8
A Bridge Too Far: Signalling Effects of Artificial Intelligence Evaluation of Job Interviews8
Getting interested in interests for employee selection: Key concerns and areas for future research8
Development of a Competency Model for Autistic Employment8
Attention To Detail and Cyber Skill: Associated Beyond General Intelligence in Cyber‐Soldier Conscripts8
From Forbid to Reimagine: Employer Strategies for Responding to Candidate GenAI Use in Assessment8
Rating accuracy, leniency, and rater perceptions when using the RPM and BARS7
Cross‐cultural differences in the use of the “?” Response category of the Job Descriptive Index: An application of the item response tree model7
Playful personnel selection: The use of traditional versus game‐related personnel selection methods and their perception from the recruiters’ and applicants’ perspectives7
It's All Relative: Degree, Causes, and Impact of Ipsativity on Forced‐Choice Personality Tests7
Relations of personality factors and suitability ratings to Swedish military pilot education completion7
Why Personnel Selection Should Target Job Performance AND Well‐Being7
High Expectations, Higher Stakes? Changes in Organizational Attractiveness After Receiving a Rejection Letter7
Job seekers' attitudes toward cybervetting in China: Platform comparisons and relationships with social media posting habits and individual differences7
Issue Information7
Knowing How Personnel Selection Algorithms Compare With Human Recruiters Influences Their Perceived Trustworthiness6
Issue Information6
Issue Information6
Automatic scoring of speeded interpersonal assessment center exercises via machine learning: Initial psychometric evidence and practical guidelines5
Situation Descriptions in Situational Judgment Tests: A Matter of Including Trait‐Relevant Situational Cues?5
Evaluating the Impact of Faking on the Criterion‐Related Validity of Personality Assessments5
Reactions of applicants with disabilities to technology‐enabled recruitment and selection: A research agenda5
Scene, not heard: Exploring the influence of socioeconomic status background cues in asynchronous video interviews5
Multiple, speeded assessments: Initial evidence on subgroup differences and applicant perceptions5
Ethnic‐based score differences and differential prediction of various cognitive and noncognitive admissions instruments in higher education5
Issues in Contrasting Conservative and Considered Estimation: A Reply to Bobko et al. (2024)5
Cyber‐Vetted Behind the Smokescreen: The Evaluations of Cigarette and Cannabis Smokers in Hiring5
Feeling safe at work: Development and validation of the Psychological Safety Inventory5
Moderators of sex‐ and race‐based subgroup differences in assessment center ratings: A meta‐analysis5
Gendered competencies and gender composition: A human versus algorithm evaluator comparison5
How to deal with negative online employer reviews: An application of image repair theory5
0.050487041473389