Medical Law Review

Papers
(The TQCC of Medical Law Review is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-11-01 to 2025-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Editorial: Reproductive health, choice, and justice24
The Voluntary Sterilisation Act: Best Interests, Caregivers, and Disability Rights11
James Cameron, Critically Ill Children and the Law: Medical Decision-Making and the Best Interests Principle9
Editorial: In Honour of Professor Margaret Brazier: Memories of Margot9
Post-trial access to investigational drugs in India: addressing challenges in the regulatory framework8
Jennings v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2022] EWHC 1619 (Fam): confirming the paradigm of inferred consent for posthumous conception7
Sue Westwood, Regulating the End of Life—Death Rights7
When is the processing of data from medical implants lawful? The legal grounds for processing health-related personal data from ICT implantable medical devices for treatment purposes under EU data pro7
Intellectual property protection for traditional medical knowledge in China’s context: a round peg in a square hole?6
Is the categorical denial of pentobarbital for assisted suicide a violation of the constitutional right to a self-determined death in Germany?6
Jo Samanta and Ash Samanta (eds), Clinical Guidelines and the Law of Medical Negligence—Multidisciplinary and International Perspectives6
Interrogating the limits of precedent autonomy: the anomalous exclusion of basic care from the ambit of advance decisions6
Professional regulation and attitudinal issues: constructing the ‘good doctor’ and the ‘bad apple’ through the device of insight6
The role of the right to life in respect of deaths caused by negligence in the healthcare context4
The social determinants of health, law, and urban development: using human rights to address structural health inequalities in our cities4
Julia Duffy, Mental Capacity, Dignity and the Power of International Human Rights4
Judicial Discomfort over ‘Innovative’ Treatment for Adolescents with Gender Dysphoria3
The Delicate Balance Struck by the Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Scotland) Act 20243
B v University of Aberdeen [2020] CSIH 62: Where there’s a will, there’s a way2
Towards a rights-based approach for disabled women’s access to abortion2
Carolyn Adams, Judy Allen, and Felicity Flack, Sharing Linked Data for Health Research: Toward Better Decision Making2
Let’s talk about AIDS, baby! Critiquing the HIV and AIDS Act, 2017 in India through a reproductive justice framework2
Legal horizons and new challenges2
Patents over ‘technologies’ related to how we treat, use, and modify the human body: An urgent need for greater bioethics scrutiny2
Anna Nilsson, Compulsory Mental Health Interventions and the CRPD: Minding Equality2
Donor conception, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, choices, and procedural justice: an argument for reform of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 19902
WHERE DOES RESPONSIBILITY LIE? ANALYSING LEGAL AND REGULATORY RESPONSES TO FLAWED CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS WHEN PATIENTS SUFFER HARM2
Should states restrict recipient choice amongst relevant and available COVID-19 vaccines?2
DNACPR Decisions: Aligning Law, Guidance, and Practice2
Mary Donnelly, Rosie Harding and Ezgi Taşcıoğlu, Supporting Legal Capacity in Socio-Legal Context2
0.055778026580811