Medical Law Review

Papers
(The TQCC of Medical Law Review is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-09-01 to 2025-09-01.)
ArticleCitations
The Voluntary Sterilisation Act: Best Interests, Caregivers, and Disability Rights21
Editorial: Reproductive health, choice, and justice11
Post-trial access to investigational drugs in India: addressing challenges in the regulatory framework9
James Cameron, Critically Ill Children and the Law: Medical Decision-Making and the Best Interests Principle9
Jennings v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2022] EWHC 1619 (Fam): confirming the paradigm of inferred consent for posthumous conception8
Sue Westwood, Regulating the End of Life—Death Rights7
When is the processing of data from medical implants lawful? The legal grounds for processing health-related personal data from ICT implantable medical devices for treatment purposes under EU data pro7
Intellectual property protection for traditional medical knowledge in China’s context: a round peg in a square hole?6
Jo Samanta and Ash Samanta (eds), Clinical Guidelines and the Law of Medical Negligence—Multidisciplinary and International Perspectives6
Professional regulation and attitudinal issues: constructing the ‘good doctor’ and the ‘bad apple’ through the device of insight6
The social determinants of health, law, and urban development: using human rights to address structural health inequalities in our cities5
Julia Duffy, Mental Capacity, Dignity and the Power of International Human Rights4
The role of the right to life in respect of deaths caused by negligence in the healthcare context4
The Delicate Balance Struck by the Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Scotland) Act 20244
DNACPR Decisions: Aligning Law, Guidance, and Practice3
Towards a rights-based approach for disabled women’s access to abortion2
Patents over ‘technologies’ related to how we treat, use, and modify the human body: An urgent need for greater bioethics scrutiny2
Donor conception, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, choices, and procedural justice: an argument for reform of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 19902
Legal horizons and new challenges2
Anna Nilsson, Compulsory Mental Health Interventions and the CRPD: Minding Equality2
WHERE DOES RESPONSIBILITY LIE? ANALYSING LEGAL AND REGULATORY RESPONSES TO FLAWED CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS WHEN PATIENTS SUFFER HARM2
Judicial Discomfort over ‘Innovative’ Treatment for Adolescents with Gender Dysphoria2
Looking back to look forward—the history of VAD laws in Australia and future law reform in the Australian territories2
Carolyn Adams, Judy Allen, and Felicity Flack, Sharing Linked Data for Health Research: Toward Better Decision Making2
Should states restrict recipient choice amongst relevant and available COVID-19 vaccines?2
B v University of Aberdeen [2020] CSIH 62: Where there’s a will, there’s a way2
Mary Donnelly, Rosie Harding and Ezgi Taşcıoğlu, Supporting Legal Capacity in Socio-Legal Context2
0.08869481086731