Political Analysis

Papers
(The TQCC of Political Analysis is 6. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-04-01 to 2025-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Getting Time Right: Using Cox Models and Probabilities to Interpret Binary Panel Data178
Acquiescence Bias Inflates Estimates of Conspiratorial Beliefs and Political Misperceptions - CORRIGENDUM129
Adding Regularized Horseshoes to the Dynamics of Latent Variable Models47
A Partisan Solution to Partisan Gerrymandering: The Define–Combine Procedure42
Topics, Concepts, and Measurement: A Crowdsourced Procedure for Validating Topics as Measures37
Contents35
PAN volume 31 issue 1 Cover and Back matter31
Measuring Distances in High Dimensional Spaces Why Average Group Vector Comparisons Exhibit Bias, And What to Do about it31
The Essential Role of Statistical Inference in Evaluating Electoral Systems: A Response to DeFord et al.30
PAN volume 31 issue 2 Cover and Front matter29
Flexible Estimation of Policy Preferences for Witnesses in Committee Hearings27
Positioning Political Texts with Large Language Models by Asking and Averaging - CORRIGENDUM24
Racing the Clock: Using Response Time as a Proxy for Attentiveness on Self-Administered Surveys24
PopBERT. Detecting Populism and Its Host Ideologies in the German Bundestag22
The Role of Majority Status in Close Election Studies22
Return to the Scene of the Crime: Revisiting Process Tracing, Bayesianism, and Murder22
Topic Classification for Political Texts with Pretrained Language Models16
Nonrandom Tweet Mortality and Data Access Restrictions: Compromising the Replication of Sensitive Twitter Studies16
The Misreporting Trade-Off Between List Experiments and Direct Questions in Practice: Partition Validation Evidence from Two Countries15
Listwise Deletion in High Dimensions14
Generative Dynamics of Supreme Court Citations: Analysis with a New Statistical Network Model13
Integrating Data Across Misaligned Spatial Units13
Polls, Context, and Time: A Dynamic Hierarchical Bayesian Forecasting Model for US Senate Elections13
A Bayesian Alternative to Synthetic Control for Comparative Case Studies12
Creating and Comparing Dictionary, Word Embedding, and Transformer-Based Models to Measure Discrete Emotions in German Political Text11
Acquiescence Bias Inflates Estimates of Conspiratorial Beliefs and Political Misperceptions11
Does Conjoint Analysis Mitigate Social Desirability Bias?11
Ordered Beta Regression: A Parsimonious, Well-Fitting Model for Continuous Data with Lower and Upper Bounds11
Less Annotating, More Classifying: Addressing the Data Scarcity Issue of Supervised Machine Learning with Deep Transfer Learning and BERT-NLI10
News Sharing on Social Media: Mapping the Ideology of News Media, Politicians, and the Mass Public10
Introduction to the Special Issue: Innovations and Current Challenges in Experimental Methods9
Explaining Recruitment to Extremism: A Bayesian Hierarchical Case–Control Approach8
PAN volume 30 issue 3 Cover and Front matter8
PAN volume 30 issue 1 Cover and Back matter8
Crowdsourced Adaptive Surveys7
A Text-As-Data Approach for Using Open-Ended Responses as Manipulation Checks7
Synthetically generated text for supervised text analysis7
A Bias-Corrected Estimator for the Crosswise Model with Inattentive Respondents7
When Correlation Is Not Enough: Validating Populism Scores from Supervised Machine-Learning Models7
When Can We Trust Regression Discontinuity Design Estimates from Close Elections? Evidence from Experimental Benchmarks7
Sensitivity Analysis for Survey Weights7
Ends Against the Middle: Measuring Latent Traits when Opposites Respond the Same Way for Antithetical Reasons6
Implementation Matters: Evaluating the Proportional Hazard Test’s Performance6
Measuring Closeness in Proportional Representation Systems6
Estimating the Ideology of Political YouTube Videos6
Parameterizing Spatial Weight Matrices in Spatial Econometric Models6
Making a Difference: The Consequences of Electoral Experiments6
0.057310104370117