Science Communication

Papers
(The median citation count of Science Communication is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-11-01 to 2025-11-01.)
ArticleCitations
Researchers’ Public Engagement in the Context of Interdisciplinary Research Programs: Learning and Reflection from Boundary Crossing52
PubCasts: Putting Voice in Scholarly Work and Science Communication52
Ecologists Prioritize Listening to Community Perspectives When They See the Benefit: Norms and Self-Efficacy Beliefs Appear to Have Little Impact52
Television News, Political Comedy, Party, and Political Knowledge in Global Warming Belief: Evidence From a Large-Scale Panel Survey32
Tipping the Scales of Psychological Reactance: A Closer Look at Imperative Language and the Role of Epistemic Certainty31
Examining Muslims’ Opinions Toward Cultured Meat in Singapore: The Influence of Presumed Media Influence and Halal Consciousness29
Science, Not Scientists: Reflections on Science, Culture, and Their Mediators28
Are Productive Scientists More Willing to Engage With the Public?25
The Efficacy of Social Media Communication in Engaging Citizen Scientists: Insights From the Jozi Bee Hotel Project24
Shifting Narratives: The Role of Science Slams in Climate Mobility Communication21
Media Use, Interpersonal Communication, and Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence19
Does Scientific Evidence Sell? Combining Manual and Automated Content Analysis to Investigate Scientists’ and Laypeople’s Evidence Practices on Social Media19
From Participation to Trust? Understanding Trust Dynamics in Participatory Science Communication18
Familiarity Matters: Examining the Effects of AI-Generated Images on Science Information Credibility18
“Glorified Minute Takers”: Journalists’ (Mis)handling of Scientific Uncertainty During the COVID-19 Pandemic16
The Public Trust in Science Scale: A Multilevel and Multidimensional Approach16
Video-Based Group-Values Affirmation Reduces Defensive Responses to Risk Messages16
“Looking at the Big Picture”: A Qualitative Study of Ethics in Science Communication and Engagement15
Linking Psychometric Paradigm of Risk and Issue Attention Cycle: Risk Information in News Coverage of Avian and Swine Influenza Global Outbreaks14
The Effects of Climate Change Meta-Knowledge on Selective Exposure, Selective Elaboration, and Behavioral Intentions12
Communicating Republicans’ Level of Support for Climate Policy Briefly Increases Personal Support in the United States12
Varieties of Awe in Science Communication: Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Practitioners’ Experiences and Uses of This Emotion12
Crafting Persuasive Stories: How Uncertainty and Sidedness Influence Narrative Efficacy in Promoting Updated COVID-19 Vaccination11
The Paradox of Belief in Science: A Proposal for Reconciliation11
Literate and Critical? Characterizing Users of Alternative Scientific Media10
Detecting Social Media Rumor Debunking Effectiveness During Public Health Emergencies: An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach10
Measuring Science Literacy in a Digital World: Development and Validation of a Multi-Dimensional Survey Scale9
Psychological Distance, Construal Level, and Parental Vaccine Hesitancy for COVID-19, HPV, and Monkey Pox Vaccines8
Bettering Biotech Foods’ Foul Flavor: An Experiment on Correcting Citizens’ Misconceptions About Genetic Modification8
Establishing Trust in Experts During a Crisis: Expert Trustworthiness and Media Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic8
“Listening” to Science: Science Podcasters’ View and Practice in Strategic Science Communication8
Who Is Skeptical About Scientific Innovation? Examining Worldview Predictors of Artificial Intelligence, Nanotechnology, and Human Gene Editing Attitudes8
Talking About Gene Drive in Uganda: The Need for Science Communication to Underpin Engagement8
Reimagining the Role of Communication in Medical Consensus to Address Medical Mistrust and Disinformation7
Indigenous Biologists and Culture Frames: Effects on Stereotype Perceptions and Conservation Policy Support in Environmental News7
Creating Successful Science Poems: Craft Elements of Poems With Clear Science Content7
Risk Communication and Community Engagement During the Migrant Worker COVID-19 Outbreak in Singapore7
Bridging the Knowledge Gap in Artificial Intelligence: The Roles of Social Media Exposure and Information Elaboration7
Exploring the Potential of Comics for Science Communication: A Study on Conveying COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Information to Black Americans6
Communicating Pollutants That Threaten Tribal Identities: PFAS Contamination in Local Fish and Shellfish6
When Scientists Share Their Struggles: How Scientists’ Self-Presentation on Social Media Influences Public Perceptions, Support for Science, and Information-Seeking Intentions6
Missing the Bigger Picture: The Need for More Research on Visual Health Misinformation6
Testing the Durability of Persuasion From Moral Appeals About Renewable Energy5
Sharon Dunwoody’s Legacy: Three Timely Lessons for Us5
Minoritized Scientists in the United States: An Identity Perspective to Science Communication5
Forcing a Deterministic Frame on Probabilistic Phenomena: A Communication Blind Spot in Media Coverage of the “Replication Crisis”5
An Application of the Risk Information Seeking and Processing Model in Understanding College Students’ COVID-19 Vaccination Information Seeking and Behavior5
Exposure to Different Motives of Scientists Moderates Responses to Scientific Consensus: The Case of Cultured Meat5
Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation5
How the Public Makes Sense of Artificial Intelligence: The Interplay Between Communication and Discrete Emotions5
Introduction to This Theme Issue on Processing COVID Information5
Striking an Emotional Chord: Effects of Emotional Appeals and Chatbot Anthropomorphism on Persuasive Science Communication4
Conversational Polarization: Eight Key Considerations for Communication Scientists4
A State of Emergency or Business as Usual in Climate Science Communication? A Three-Dimensional Perspective on the Role Perceptions of Climate Scientists, Climate Journalists, and Citizens4
A Meta-Analysis Synthesizing the Effects of Three Uncertainty Types in Science Communication4
Of Note: Recent Books4
Explaining Polarized Trust in Scientists: A Political Stereotype-Approach4
The Purity Myth: Why Stigmatizing GAI in Academic Writing Is Harmful4
Polarization or Mainstreaming? How COVID-19 News Exposure Affects Perceived Seriousness of the Pandemic and the Susceptibility to COVID-19 Misinformation?4
Response to Health Crises in Africa: Insight From Executing a 2-Year Project in Nigeria4
No Laughing Matter: Exploring the Effects of Scientists’ Humor Use on Twitter and the Moderating Role of Superiority3
Stories of Astrobiology, SETI, and UAPs: Science and the Search for Extraterrestrial Life in German News Media From 2009 to 20223
The Influence of Flooding Imagery and Party Cues on Perceived Threat, Collective Efficacy, and Intentions for Political Action to Address Climate Change3
On Becoming a Boffinhack: The Research-Based Reporting (ReBaR) Framework for Concurrent Scientific and Journalistic Investigation3
Narrative Versus Statistical Evidence in Environmental Persuasion: A Meta-Analysis Study3
A Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Case Insight: The Convergence of Social Media and Epidemiology3
Erratum to “Translation at Work in Climate Change Communication”3
To Vaccinate or Not? The Role Played by Uncertainty Communication on Public Understanding and Behavior Regarding COVID-193
Contested Certainty and Credibility: The Effect of Personal Stories and Scientific Evidence in User Comments on News Story Evaluation and Relevance3
Science Communication Spaces as “Pockets of Belonging”: Inviting in a Plurality of Science Identities for Scientists-in-Training3
Storytelling in Science Film: Narrative Engagement Relates to Greater Knowledge, Interest, and Identification With Science3
A New Journalism for a New Climate: Is Solutions Journalism the Solution?3
Book Review: Queering Science Communication: Representations, Theory, and Practice2
Investigating the Heterogeneity of Misperceptions: A Latent Profile Analysis of COVID-19 Beliefs and Their Consequences for Information-Seeking2
Translation at Work in Climate Change Communication2
Using Light Art Installation in Urban Nightscapes to Raise Public Awareness of Carbon Neutrality2
Generative AI in Science Communication: Fostering Scientists’ Good Working Habits for Ethical and Effective Use2
Can Communication Theory Advance Research When Environmental Issues Become Wicked? The Case of Microplastics2
Strategic Interactions in Science Communication: A Complex Adaptive Systems Framework2
“What Might Happen With Generative AI?” Examining the Role of Prefactual Thinking in the Cognitive Mediation Model in the Context of Emerging Technologies2
Surprise of Serious COVID-19 Vaccination Messages on TikTok: The Effect of Expectancy Violation on Message Effectiveness2
How Values Guide Trust: The Multiple Roles of Science-Related Value Predispositions in Shaping Trustworthiness and Trust in Scientific Authorities2
Going the Distance for COVID-19: Relationships Among News Use, Psychological Distance, Risk Perceptions, and Behavioral Intentions2
Introduction2
Humor Can Increase Perceived Communicator Effectiveness Regardless of Race, Gender, and Expertise—If You are Funny Enough2
A Mixed-Methods Study of Public Understanding of Scientific Uncertainty2
Linking Online Vaccine Information Seeking to Vaccination Intention in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic2
Unveiling Climate Adaptation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Agenda-Setting Dynamics in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands2
But Is That Mediator Really the Cause? An Experiment Manipulating Persuasion Knowledge as a Mediator for How Adaptive Frames Create Positive Responses to Climate Change News2
Quantum in the Media: A Content Analysis of Dutch Newspapers2
Why Science Should Have a Female Face: Female Experts Increase Liking, Competence, and Trust in Science2
0.041229009628296