Psychology Public Policy and Law

Papers
(The TQCC of Psychology Public Policy and Law is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-03-01 to 2024-03-01.)
ArticleCitations
COVID-19 and prison policies related to communication with family members.35
Statement of concerned experts on the use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised in capital sentencing to assess risk for institutional violence.34
Are Psychopathy Checklist (PCL) psychopaths dangerous, untreatable, and without conscience? A systematic review of the empirical evidence.27
Reliability and validity of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in the assessment of risk for institutional violence: A cautionary note on DeMatteo et al. (2020).24
The stigma of incarceration experience: A systematic review.23
The adversarial mindset.21
Investigating the effect of emotional stress on adult memory for single and repeated events.18
Identity, legitimacy and cooperation with police: Comparing general-population and street-population samples from London.16
Releasing individuals from incarceration during COVID-19: Pandemic-related challenges and recommendations for promoting successful reentry.14
Observing rapport-based interpersonal techniques to gather information from victims.13
Allegations of family violence in court: How parental alienation affects judicial outcomes.12
Allegation rates and credibility assessment in forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims: Comparing the revised and standard NICHD protocols.12
Intimate partner violence (IPV) and family dispute resolution: A randomized controlled trial comparing shuttle mediation, videoconferencing mediation, and litigation.11
Do structured risk assessments predict violent, any, and sexual offending better than unstructured judgment? An umbrella review.11
Forensic e-mental health: Review, research priorities, and policy directions.11
Making the case for videoconferencing and remote child custody evaluations (RCCEs): The empirical, ethical, and evidentiary arguments for accepting new technology.10
Static-99R: Strengths, limitations, predictive accuracy meta-analysis, and legal admissibility review.10
Adherence to the Revised NICHD Protocol recommendations for conducting repeated supportive interviews is associated with the likelihood that children will allege abuse.10
Assessment of bias in police lineups.9
Child victim empathy mediates the influence of jurors’ sexual abuse experiences on child sexual abuse case judgments: Meta-analyses.9
Evaluating effects on guilty and innocent suspects: An effect taxonomy of interrogation techniques.9
A test of three refresher modalities on child forensic interviewers’ posttraining performance.9
Tele-forensic interviewing to elicit children’s evidence—Benefits, risks, and practical considerations.8
Measuring youths’ perceptions of police: Evidence from the crossroads study.8
Remote forensic evaluations and treatment in the time of COVID-19: An international survey of psychologists and psychiatrists.8
Defining coercion: An application in interrogation and plea negotiation contexts.7
Empirical evidence from state legislators: How, when, and who uses research.7
Teaching child investigative interviewing skills: Long-term retention requires cumulative training.7
Trauma-informed forensic mental health assessment: Practical implications, ethical tensions, and alignment with therapeutic jurisprudence principles.7
Challenges of a “toolbox” approach to investigative interviewing: A critical analysis of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police’s (RCMP) Phased Interview Model.6
Psychosis and mass shootings: A systematic examination using publicly available data.6
Statutes governing juvenile competency to stand trial proceedings: An analysis of consistency with best practice recommendations.6
A meta-analysis of lineup size effects on eyewitness identification.6
Police interviewing behaviors and commercially sexually exploited adolescents’ reluctance.6
Court accommodations for persons with severe communication disabilities: A legal scoping review.6
Exoffender housing stigma and discrimination.6
Diversion as a pathway to improving service utilization among at-risk youth.5
The developmental reform in juvenile justice: Its progress and vulnerability.5
Politics or prejudice? Separating the influence of political affiliation and prejudicial attitudes in determining support for hate crime law.5
The rule out procedure: A signal-detection-informed approach to the collection of eyewitness identification evidence.5
Children who offend: Why are prevention and intervention efforts to reduce persistent criminality so seldom applied?5
Identification and incidence of child maltreatment during the COVID-19 pandemic.5
Underestimating the unrepresented: Cognitive biases disadvantage pro se litigants in family law cases.5
Forensic evaluators’ opinions on the use of videoconferencing technology for competency to stand trial evaluations after the onset of COVID-19.5
The continuing unfairness of death qualification: Changing death penalty attitudes and capital jury selection.4
Flattening the curve in jails and prisons: Factors underlying support for COVID-19 mitigation policies.4
Eyewitness identification: The complex issue of suspect-filler similarity.4
The point of diminishing returns in juvenile probation: Probation requirements and risk of technical probation violations among first-time probation-involved youth.4
The influence of transition prompt wording on response informativeness and rapidity of disclosure in child forensic interviews.4
Using disclosure, common ground, and verification to build rapport and elicit information.4
Coherence-based reasoning and order effects in legal judgments.4
The impact of misdemeanor arrests on forensic mental health services: A state-wide review of Virginia competence to stand trial evaluations.4
The PCL–R and capital sentencing: A commentary on “Death is different” DeMatteo et al. (2020a).4
The association between hate crime laws that enumerate sexual orientation and adolescent suicide attempts.4
Evaluating the claim that high confidence implies high accuracy in eyewitness identification.4
Evaluating selection for sexually violent predator (SVP) commitment: A comparison of those committed, not committed, and nearly committed.4
0.096175909042358