Science and Engineering Ethics

Papers
(The TQCC of Science and Engineering Ethics is 12. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-07-01 to 2025-07-01.)
ArticleCitations
The Ethics of Supernumerary Robotic Limbs. An Enactivist Approach87
SAF: Stakeholders’ Agreement on Fairness in the Practice of Machine Learning Development80
Gender and Age Stereotypes in Robotics for Eldercare: Ethical Implications of Stakeholder Perspectives from Technology Development, Industry, and Nursing60
Dual-Use and Trustworthy? A Mixed Methods Analysis of AI Diffusion Between Civilian and Defense R&D53
Why the Epistemic Objection Against Using Sentience as Criterion of Moral Status is Flawed45
Developing an Online Data Ethics Module Informed by an Ecology of Data Perspective43
Parity and the Resolution of Value Conflicts in Design42
Meaningful Lives in an Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Reply to Danaher38
“In Our Own Little World”: Invisibility of the Social and Ethical Dimension of Engineering Among Undergraduate Students35
Measures of Ethics and Social Responsibility Among Undergraduate Engineering Students: Findings from a Longitudinal Study31
Correction to: Does Proof of Concept Trump All? RRI Dilemmas in Research Practices30
Stakeholders’ Experiences of Research Integrity Support in Universities: A Qualitative Study in Three European Countries30
Correction to: Medical Students’ Acquaintance with Core Concepts, Institutions and Guidelines on Good Scientific Practice: A Pre- and Post-questionnaire Survey29
RESPONSE_ABILITY A Card-Based Engagement Method to Support Researchers’ Ability to Respond to Integrity Issues24
A Survey Study on Knowledge and Attitude Toward the Ethics Committee and Research Ethical Practices Among Researchers From Kuwait23
How Do Scientists Perceive the Relationship Between Ethics and Science? A Pilot Study of Scientists’ Appeals to Values23
Biobanks and Individual Health Related Findings: from an Obstacle to an Incentive23
The Development of a Literacy-Based Research Integrity Assessment Framework for Graduate Students in Taiwan23
The Problem is Not Monsters: The FRANKENCON Panel on Science and Ethics23
Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Delphi Consensus Study21
Perceptions of Scientific Authorship Revisited: Country Differences and the Impact of Perceived Publication Pressure19
The Rule of Virtue: A Confucian Response to the Ethical Challenges of Technocracy19
Towards a Design Toolkit of Informed Consent Models Across Fields: A Systematic Review18
Interdisciplinary Confusion and Resolution in the Context of Moral Machines17
Ethical, Legal and Social Issues of Digital Phenotyping as a Future Solution for Present-Day Challenges: A Scoping Review17
The Autonomy of Science as a Civilian Casualty of Economic Warfare: Inadvertent Censorship of Science Resulting from Unilateral Economic Sanctions17
Correction: Domain Experts on Dementia-Care Technologies: Mitigating Risk in Design and Implementation16
The Societal Readiness Thinking Tool: A Practical Resource for Maturing the Societal Readiness of Research Projects14
Repentance as Rebuke: Betrayal and Moral Injury in Safety Engineering14
Machine Ethics: Do Androids Dream of Being Good People?14
Modeling Ethics: Approaches to Data Creep in Higher Education13
Technological Answerability and the Severance Problem: Staying Connected by Demanding Answers13
Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions13
A Multi-level Review of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards a Socio-technical Orientation of Engineering Education for Ethics13
The Value-Free Ideal of Science: A Useful Fiction? A Review of Non-epistemic Reasons for the Research Integrity Community13
Professional and Organizational Leadership Role in Ethics Management: Avoiding Reliance on Ethical Codification and Nurturing Ethical Culture12
Correction: Equity in AgeTech for Ageing Well in Technology-Driven Places: The Role of Social Determinants in Designing AI-based Assistive Technologies12
Ethics of Autonomous Collective Decision-Making: The Caesar Framework12
0.032327175140381