Science and Engineering Ethics

Papers
(The TQCC of Science and Engineering Ethics is 12. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-08-01 to 2025-08-01.)
ArticleCitations
SAF: Stakeholders’ Agreement on Fairness in the Practice of Machine Learning Development82
Dual-Use and Trustworthy? A Mixed Methods Analysis of AI Diffusion Between Civilian and Defense R&D60
Gender and Age Stereotypes in Robotics for Eldercare: Ethical Implications of Stakeholder Perspectives from Technology Development, Industry, and Nursing55
Why the Epistemic Objection Against Using Sentience as Criterion of Moral Status is Flawed48
The Ethics of Supernumerary Robotic Limbs. An Enactivist Approach45
Developing an Online Data Ethics Module Informed by an Ecology of Data Perspective44
Parity and the Resolution of Value Conflicts in Design42
Meaningful Lives in an Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Reply to Danaher39
Measures of Ethics and Social Responsibility Among Undergraduate Engineering Students: Findings from a Longitudinal Study34
“In Our Own Little World”: Invisibility of the Social and Ethical Dimension of Engineering Among Undergraduate Students34
Stakeholders’ Experiences of Research Integrity Support in Universities: A Qualitative Study in Three European Countries30
Correction to: Does Proof of Concept Trump All? RRI Dilemmas in Research Practices30
Correction to: Medical Students’ Acquaintance with Core Concepts, Institutions and Guidelines on Good Scientific Practice: A Pre- and Post-questionnaire Survey26
Biobanks and Individual Health Related Findings: from an Obstacle to an Incentive24
How Do Scientists Perceive the Relationship Between Ethics and Science? A Pilot Study of Scientists’ Appeals to Values23
The Problem is Not Monsters: The FRANKENCON Panel on Science and Ethics23
A Survey Study on Knowledge and Attitude Toward the Ethics Committee and Research Ethical Practices Among Researchers From Kuwait21
RESPONSE_ABILITY A Card-Based Engagement Method to Support Researchers’ Ability to Respond to Integrity Issues20
The Development of a Literacy-Based Research Integrity Assessment Framework for Graduate Students in Taiwan19
Perceptions of Scientific Authorship Revisited: Country Differences and the Impact of Perceived Publication Pressure18
The Rule of Virtue: A Confucian Response to the Ethical Challenges of Technocracy18
Towards a Design Toolkit of Informed Consent Models Across Fields: A Systematic Review17
Ethical, Legal and Social Issues of Digital Phenotyping as a Future Solution for Present-Day Challenges: A Scoping Review17
Repentance as Rebuke: Betrayal and Moral Injury in Safety Engineering16
Correction: Domain Experts on Dementia-Care Technologies: Mitigating Risk in Design and Implementation16
Machine Ethics: Do Androids Dream of Being Good People?15
The Societal Readiness Thinking Tool: A Practical Resource for Maturing the Societal Readiness of Research Projects14
Interdisciplinary Confusion and Resolution in the Context of Moral Machines14
A Multi-level Review of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards a Socio-technical Orientation of Engineering Education for Ethics14
The Value-Free Ideal of Science: A Useful Fiction? A Review of Non-epistemic Reasons for the Research Integrity Community13
Technological Answerability and the Severance Problem: Staying Connected by Demanding Answers13
Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions13
Professional and Organizational Leadership Role in Ethics Management: Avoiding Reliance on Ethical Codification and Nurturing Ethical Culture12
Modeling Ethics: Approaches to Data Creep in Higher Education12
Ethics of Autonomous Collective Decision-Making: The Caesar Framework12
Correction: Equity in AgeTech for Ageing Well in Technology-Driven Places: The Role of Social Determinants in Designing AI-based Assistive Technologies12
0.041045904159546