Legal and Criminological Psychology

Papers
(The median citation count of Legal and Criminological Psychology is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-04-01 to 2025-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Consistency amongst pairs: How consistent are child co‐witnesses with one another?32
Alternative explanations for pro‐conviction judicial tendencies: A commentary on Berryessa et al. 202231
Constraining prosecutors and other advocates who become judges: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)19
Issue Information16
Misinformation are people susceptible to blatant error?13
Susceptibility to violent extremism and cognitive rigidity: Registered replication, corroboration and open questions for criminological research and practice12
Issue Information9
Development of a scale measuring online sexual harassment: Examining gender differences and the emotional impact of sexual harassment victimization online9
The effect of offender race/ethnicity on public opinion of appropriate criminal sentences8
Childhood family and neighbourhood socio‐economic status, psychopathy, and adult criminal behaviour7
Probing dual harm and non‐violent misconduct among imprisoned adult men in Northern Ireland6
(Re)Organizing legitimacy theory6
The effectiveness of different model statement variants for eliciting information and cues to deceit5
The narrative language of youth offenders with callous and unemotional traits: A corpus analysis5
Repressed Memory and Dissociative Amnesia: The Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon of Memory Loss5
Practice framework theorizing in correctional rehabilitation: Lessons from constitutive penology5
Reply to Otgaar et al.4
A comment on‚ Dissociative Amnesia: A Valid Construct for Repressed Memories by Hans J. Markowitsch and Angelica Staniloiu4
Comment on H. Otgaar et al. ‘The neuroscience of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory: Premature conclusions and unanswered questions’4
Reply3
Comment on Otgaar et al. ‘The neuroscience of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory: Premature conclusions and unanswered questions’3
The weight of evidence regarding the nature of traumatic memories: A comment on Mazzoni et al.3
Memory distrust and suggestibility: A registered report2
Issue Information2
2
Growth mindset results in reduced trait attribution and more rehabilitative judicial decisions in cases of juvenile delinquency2
2
Using shared experiences to recruit committed human intelligence sources: Exploring the shared attention mechanism and the role of social connection2
Number of participants in multiple perpetrator sexual aggressions2
Urgent issues and prospects at the intersection of culture, memory, and witness interviews: Exploring the challenges for research and practice1
Post‐relationship stalking and intimate partner abuse in a sample of Australian adolescents1
Issue Information1
Diversifying the bench: A commentary on Berryessa, Dror, and McCormack (2022)1
1
Two hits or two misses? A critical comment on a combined psychological and biological origin of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory1
Cyberbullying: Differentiating offenders criminal roles using a narrative‐based approach1
Issue Information1
Correction to “Susceptibility to violent extremism and cognitive rigidity: Registered replication, corroboration and open questions for criminological research and practice”Zmigrod, L. (2022). Suscept1
Editorial acknowledgement1
Are traumatic memories at first extraordinarily bad and then extraordinarily good?1
Exploring the relationships between criminal self‐efficacy factors and recidivism1
Impact of justice‐related dispositions on support for cyber vigilantism: The mediating effect of perceived severity of transgression1
Judges are people too: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)1
Editorial acknowledgement1
Advancing police use of force research and practice: urgent issues and prospects1
Does race matter? An examination of defendant race on legal decision making in the context of actuarial violence risk assessments0
Alternative “truths” of repressed memories: Views of judges of the Israeli supreme court0
Does telling a story in reverse elicit cues to deceit? A replication and extension of Vrij, Leal, Mann and Fisher (2012)0
From imposing cognitive load to exploiting different strategies: A reply to Brimbal et al. (2023)0
Consequences of child maltreatment victimisation in internalising and externalising mental health problems0
The impact of childhood adversity on female‐perpetrated intimate partner violence in young adulthood0
(MIS)measuring cognitive load and arousal in deception: A multitrait–multimethod analysis0
Comment on Nachson: Alternative “truths” of repressed memories: Views of judges of the Israeli supreme court0
0
Swedish police officers' strategies when interviewing suspects who decline to answer questions0
Does blatantly contradictory information reduce the misinformation effect? A Registered Report replication of Loftus (1979)0
On the nature of acquiescence to police authority: A commentary on Hamm et al. (2022)0
On the benefits of sequencing case information to combat bias: A commentary on Oberlader and Verschuere (2025)0
The effect of episodic future thinking ability on subjective cue use when judging credibility0
Comment on Otgaar et al.: The neuroscience of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory: Premature conclusions and unanswered questions0
There is only one truth, the objective truth, in recovered memory cases0
Prosecuting from the bench? Examining sources ofpro‐prosecutionbias in judges0
Does cognitive inflexibility predict violent extremist behaviour intentions? A registered direct replication report of Zmigrod et al., 20190
Multi‐study examination of criminal‐legal professionals' use of risk assessments in pretrial decision‐making0
Pushing past the plateau0
0
Predicting and projecting memory: Error and bias in metacognitive judgements underlying testimony evaluation0
The neuroscience of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory: Premature conclusions and unanswered questions0
Preregistered direct replication of the linguistic frame effect on perceived blame and financial liability0
Importance‐related fillers improve the classification accuracy of the response time concealed information test in a crime scenario0
Possible factors associated with increased risk for false memories but decreased convictions in the British False Memory Society data: A comment on Patihis and Felstead0
The utility and limitations of the concentric diagram of legitimacy: Commentary on Hamm and Colleagues0
Attitudes towards the penal system, ideology and dark traits0
Issue Information0
The delayed impact of informed versus blind interviewing on eyewitness memory0
Examining illicit networks in laboratory experiments with a preliminary focus on communication0
Applicability and validity of the reaction time‐based concealed information test in a prison sample0
Preregistered direct replication of the linguistic frame effect on perceived blame and financial liability0
Can highly arousing traumatic Experiences be repressed?0
Similar rates of denial in NICHD and control interviews with alleged child abuse victims in the Netherlands0
(In)credibly queer? Assessments of asylum claims based on sexual orientation0
Clarion call: A comment on Hamm et al.'s (2022) diagrammatic map for a future research agenda0
Editorial Acknowledgement0
0
Damned if you don't: Public perceptions of polygraph testing and suspect willingness to be tested0
On the use of receiver operating characteristic area under the curve in eyewitness memory research0
Issue Information0
Effect of growth trajectories in communication skills on juvenile recidivism0
Interviewing witnesses in a second language: A comparison of interpreter‐assisted, unaided, and self‐administered interviews0
Exploring common ground in the repressed versus false memories debate0
Response to Marchetti et al.'s and Felstead & Patihis' comments on my paper on “alternative truths”0
The adaptable law enforcement officer: Exploring adaptability in a covert police context0
‘Rapport myopia’ in investigative interviews: Evidence from linguistic and subjective indicators of rapport0
British False Memory Society: Caseload and details by year (1993 onwards)0
Editorial to special issue on direct replications in legal and criminological psychology0
Issue Information0
Perceptions of probation officer procedural justice, low self‐control, and recidivism after release from prison0
The language of high‐stakes truths and lies: Linguistic analysis of true and deceptive statements made during sexual homicide interrogations0
The Debate is still going on: A comment on “British False Memory Society: Caseload and Details by Year (1993 Onwards)” by Lawrence Patihis and Kevin Felstead0
The Post Office Scandal in the United Kingdom: Mental health and social experiences of wrongly convicted and wrongly accused individuals0
Dissociative amnesia – A valid construct for repressed memories0
Does cognitive inflexibility predict violent extremist behaviour intentions? A registered direct replication report of Zmigrod et al., 20190
Growing pains of addressing cognitive bias in legal contexts: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)0
Bias is persistent: Sequencing case information does not protect against contextual bias in criminal risk assessment0
Combined Anchoring: Prosecution and defense claims as sequential anchors in the courtroom0
Urgent issues and prospects on investigative interviews with children and adolescents0
Reflections on British False Memory Society cases, middle ground, and inferring internal mental processes0
0
The perils of methods that detect lies 70% of the time: A reply to Ben‐Shakhar and Verschuere (2024)0
Police officers' perceptions and experiences of promoting honesty in child victims and witnesses0
Investigating dual harm and misconduct in Northern Ireland: A 1‐year follow‐up0
Confirmation bias in simulated CSA interviews: How abuse assumption influences interviewing and decision‐making processes?0
Online radicalization: Profile and risk analysis of individuals convicted of extremist offences0
Urgent issues and prospects in guilty plea research and practice0
Interrogation questions to native and non‐native eyewitnesses: The role of witness credibility0
Stigmatising attitudes of probation, parole and custodial officers towards people with mental health issues: A systematic literature review and meta‐analysis0
Use of global trait cues helps to explain older adults’ decrements in detecting children’s lies0
Comment on G. Mazzoni et al. ‘Taking the middle stance in the debate on the nature of traumatic memories’0
Reply to Nachson0
Relationship between psychopathic traits and moral sensitivity in a university student sample0
Towards reflexivity in police practice and research0
Editorial acknowledgement0
0
Factors influencing recidivism among female inmates in drug‐related cases in Thailand: Self‐compassion, antisocial personality, guilt, and hope0
Perceptions of intimate partner stalking and cyberstalking: Do perpetrator and victim gender and victims' responses to stalking influence perceptions of criminal behaviour and responsibility?0
Urgent issues and prospects in correctional rehabilitation practice and research0
Some lie‐detection may actually be of forensic use: A comment on Brennen and Magnussen, Lie‐detection: What works0
0.028975963592529