Legal and Criminological Psychology

Papers
(The TQCC of Legal and Criminological Psychology is 1. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-04-01 to 2025-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Consistency amongst pairs: How consistent are child co‐witnesses with one another?32
Alternative explanations for pro‐conviction judicial tendencies: A commentary on Berryessa et al. 202231
Constraining prosecutors and other advocates who become judges: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)19
Issue Information16
Misinformation are people susceptible to blatant error?13
Susceptibility to violent extremism and cognitive rigidity: Registered replication, corroboration and open questions for criminological research and practice12
Issue Information9
Development of a scale measuring online sexual harassment: Examining gender differences and the emotional impact of sexual harassment victimization online9
The effect of offender race/ethnicity on public opinion of appropriate criminal sentences8
Childhood family and neighbourhood socio‐economic status, psychopathy, and adult criminal behaviour7
Probing dual harm and non‐violent misconduct among imprisoned adult men in Northern Ireland6
(Re)Organizing legitimacy theory6
The effectiveness of different model statement variants for eliciting information and cues to deceit5
The narrative language of youth offenders with callous and unemotional traits: A corpus analysis5
Repressed Memory and Dissociative Amnesia: The Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon of Memory Loss5
Practice framework theorizing in correctional rehabilitation: Lessons from constitutive penology5
Reply to Otgaar et al.4
A comment on‚ Dissociative Amnesia: A Valid Construct for Repressed Memories by Hans J. Markowitsch and Angelica Staniloiu4
Comment on H. Otgaar et al. ‘The neuroscience of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory: Premature conclusions and unanswered questions’4
Reply3
Comment on Otgaar et al. ‘The neuroscience of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory: Premature conclusions and unanswered questions’3
The weight of evidence regarding the nature of traumatic memories: A comment on Mazzoni et al.3
Memory distrust and suggestibility: A registered report2
Issue Information2
2
Growth mindset results in reduced trait attribution and more rehabilitative judicial decisions in cases of juvenile delinquency2
2
Using shared experiences to recruit committed human intelligence sources: Exploring the shared attention mechanism and the role of social connection2
Number of participants in multiple perpetrator sexual aggressions2
Urgent issues and prospects at the intersection of culture, memory, and witness interviews: Exploring the challenges for research and practice1
Post‐relationship stalking and intimate partner abuse in a sample of Australian adolescents1
Issue Information1
Diversifying the bench: A commentary on Berryessa, Dror, and McCormack (2022)1
1
Two hits or two misses? A critical comment on a combined psychological and biological origin of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory1
Cyberbullying: Differentiating offenders criminal roles using a narrative‐based approach1
Issue Information1
Correction to “Susceptibility to violent extremism and cognitive rigidity: Registered replication, corroboration and open questions for criminological research and practice”Zmigrod, L. (2022). Suscept1
Editorial acknowledgement1
Are traumatic memories at first extraordinarily bad and then extraordinarily good?1
Exploring the relationships between criminal self‐efficacy factors and recidivism1
Impact of justice‐related dispositions on support for cyber vigilantism: The mediating effect of perceived severity of transgression1
Judges are people too: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)1
Editorial acknowledgement1
Advancing police use of force research and practice: urgent issues and prospects1
0.93797707557678