Philosophical Explorations

Papers
(The TQCC of Philosophical Explorations is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-01-01 to 2026-01-01.)
ArticleCitations
Perceptual metaphysics: the case for composites37
Unsettledness and the intentionality of practical decisions20
Learning to walk and talk (again): what developmental psychology can teach us about online intersubjectivity11
Empathy as a means to understand people10
Inner speech: from self-knowledge to the second-person10
Psychiatric fictionalism and narratives of responsibility10
Simulation trouble and gender trouble9
On the self-ascription of deafferented bodily action8
What do my problems say about me?7
Are emotions necessary and sufficient for moral judgement (and what would it tell us)?7
Comment on ‘What’s special about “not feeling like oneself”?’7
Empathising in online spaces6
Collective moral agency and self-induced moral incapacity6
Self-illness ambiguity and anorexia nervosa6
Revisiting McKay and Johnson's counterexample to (β)6
Self-alienation through the loss of heteronomy: the case of bereavement5
Authoritatively avowing your imaginings by self-ascriptively expressing them5
Should groups become self-interpreting agents?5
My Illness, My Self, and I: when self-narratives and illness-narratives clash5
The problem of fitting blame in addiction4
Grief, self and narrative4
What is the relationship between grief and narrative?4
Solving the self-illness ambiguity: the case for construction over discovery3
‘It was the illness talking’: self-illness ambiguity and metaphors’ functions in mental health narrative3
Journey planning: a cartography of practical reasoning3
Why are people often rational? Saving the causal theory of action3
The norm of reasoning3
Consciousness science and constitutive a priori principles: on the fundamental identity of integrated information theory3
Naïve realism, sensory colors, and the argument from phenomenological constancies3
0.11210298538208