Ethics and Information Technology

Papers
(The median citation count of Ethics and Information Technology is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-08-01 to 2025-08-01.)
ArticleCitations
Military robots should not look like a humans133
An Ellulian analysis of propaganda in the context of generative AI110
Socially Disruptive Technologies and Conceptual Engineering87
Correction: Beyond transparency and explainability: on the need for adequate and contextualized user guidelines for LLM use62
AI responsibility gap: not new, inevitable, unproblematic52
Non-empirical problems in fair machine learning47
Epistemo-ethical constraints on AI-human decision making for diagnostic purposes46
Disembodied friendship: virtual friends and the tendencies of technologically mediated friendship41
The Right to Break the Law? Perfect Enforcement of the Law Using Technology Impedes the Development of Legal Systems40
Correction: ChatGPT is bullshit37
Why converging technologies need converging international regulation33
Legal reviews of in situ learning in autonomous weapons32
Conceptualizing understanding in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): an abilities-based approach32
Engineering responsibility31
Life after privacy: reclaiming democracy in a surveillance society29
Tracing app technology: an ethical review in the COVID-19 era and directions for post-COVID-1926
Deny, dismiss and downplay: developers’ attitudes towards risk and their role in risk creation in the field of healthcare-AI25
Responsible guidelines for authorship attribution tasks in NLP25
Legal and ethical implications of autonomous cyber capabilities: a call for retaining human control in cyberspace25
A data-centric approach for ethical and trustworthy AI in journalism24
Technology and moral change: the transformation of truth and trust24
Calibrating machine behavior: a challenge for AI alignment23
Of machines and men: Attributions of moral responsibility in AI-assisted warfare23
Design culture for Sustainable urban artificial intelligence: Bruno Latour and the search for a different AI urbanism22
Ethical responsibility and computational design: bespoke surgical tools as an instructive case study21
Technologically mediated encounters with ‘nature’21
Humans, Neanderthals, robots and rights20
Socially disruptive technologies and epistemic injustice20
The irresponsibility of not using AI in the military20
Mechanic citizenship: Boston Mayor’s Office of New Urban Mechanics and the constitution of digital citizens19
The need for and nature of a normative, cultural psychology of weaponized AI (artificial intelligence)19
Use case cards: a use case reporting framework inspired by the European AI Act17
Legitimacy and automated decisions: the moral limits of algocracy16
Psychological consequences of legal responsibility misattribution associated with automated vehicles16
Ethical implications of fairness interventions: what might be hidden behind engineering choices?15
Autonomous Military Systems: collective responsibility and distributed burdens15
The video gamer’s dilemmas15
AWS compliance with the ethical principle of proportionality: three possible solutions14
Big data and the risk of misguided responsibilization14
Smart cities as a testbed for experimenting with humans? - Applying psychological ethical guidelines to smart city interventions14
Urban Digital Twins and metaverses towards city multiplicities: uniting or dividing urban experiences?14
ChatGPT is bullshit14
Enabling Fairness in Healthcare Through Machine Learning14
A phenomenology and epistemology of large language models: transparency, trust, and trustworthiness14
Is moral status done with words?13
Negotiating becoming: a Nietzschean critique of large language models13
Algorithmic decision-making employing profiling: will trade secrecy protection render the right to explanation toothless?13
The Ethics of AI in Human Resources12
Rethinking explainability: toward a postphenomenology of black-box artificial intelligence in medicine12
Can the predictive processing model of the mind ameliorate the value-alignment problem?12
The rationality and morality of connecting quantum computers12
The landscape of data and AI documentation approaches in the European policy context12
A values-based approach to designing military autonomous systems11
Generative AI models should include detection mechanisms as a condition for public release11
Enforcing ethical goals over reinforcement-learning policies11
Correction: The repugnant resolution: has Coghlan & Cox resolved the Gamer’s Dilemma?11
Introduction to the topical collection on AI and responsibility11
What responsibility gaps are and what they should be10
Public health measures and the rise of incidental surveillance: Considerations about private informational power and accountability10
Cobots, “co-operation” and the replacement of human skill10
Ethics of sleep tracking: techno-ethical particularities of consumer-led sleep-tracking with a focus on medicalization, vulnerability, and relationality9
Ethics of generative AI and manipulation: a design-oriented research agenda9
Vicarious liability: a solution to a problem of AI responsibility?9
Autonomous weapon systems and responsibility gaps: a taxonomy9
A Capability Approach to worker dignity under Algorithmic Management9
Digital temperance: adapting an ancient virtue for a technological age9
Explainable AI in the military domain9
Explanation and Agency: exploring the normative-epistemic landscape of the “Right to Explanation”9
Deconstructing controversies to design a trustworthy AI future8
Tailoring responsible research and innovation to the translational context: the case of AI-supported exergaming8
Responsible reliance concerning development and use of AI in the military domain8
Cognitive warfare: an ethical analysis8
Correction to: Weapons of moral construction? On the value of fairness in algorithmic decision-making8
Artificial intelligence and responsibility gaps: what is the problem?8
Framing the Gamer’s Dilemma8
Design for values and conceptual engineering8
Automated opioid risk scores: a case for machine learning-induced epistemic injustice in healthcare8
Can we solve the Gamer’s Dilemma by resisting it?7
Role of emotions in responsible military AI7
Correction to: the Ethics of AI in Human Resources7
Between death and suffering: resolving the gamer’s dilemma7
Responsible scaling of artificial intelligence in healthcare: standardization meets customization7
A systematic review of almost three decades of value sensitive design (VSD): what happened to the technical investigations?7
Dirty data labeled dirt cheap: epistemic injustice in machine learning systems7
Ludic resistance: a new solution to the gamer’s paradox7
Easy-read and large language models: on the ethical dimensions of LLM-based text simplification7
Transparency for AI systems: a value-based approach7
Why a treaty on autonomous weapons is necessary and feasible7
Towards a comprehensive framework for ethical and responsible standardisation7
Explanatory pragmatism: a context-sensitive framework for explainable medical AI6
Conceptualizations of user autonomy within the normative evaluation of dark patterns6
AI and the need for justification (to the patient)6
Ethics framework for predictive clinical AI model updating6
Policy advice and best practices on bias and fairness in AI6
Mind the gap: bridging the divide between computer scientists and ethicists in shaping moral machines6
What is conceptual disruption?5
Human digital twins unlocking Society 5.0? Approaches, emerging risks and disruptions5
Robots, institutional roles and joint action: some key ethical issues5
Embracing grief in the age of deathbots: a temporary tool, not a permanent solution5
The value of responsibility gaps in algorithmic decision-making5
Diversity and language technology: how language modeling bias causes epistemic injustice5
Bringing values to standardisation: from policy concepts to a value-based framework for education about standardisation5
Moral autonomy of patients and legal barriers to a possible duty of health related data sharing5
Engineers on responsibility: feminist approaches to who’s responsible for ethical AI5
Helpful, harmless, honest? Sociotechnical limits of AI alignment and safety through Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback5
Empathy training through virtual reality: moral enhancement with the freedom to fall?5
Intended, afforded, and experienced serendipity: overcoming the paradox of artificial serendipity5
A moving target in AI-assisted decision-making: dataset shift, model updating, and the problem of update opacity5
Violent video games: content, attitudes, and norms5
Understanding responsibility in Responsible AI. Dianoetic virtues and the hard problem of context5
Ethics of AI in Africa: Interrogating the role of Ubuntu and AI governance initiatives4
Trust in medical artificial intelligence: a discretionary account4
The contested role of AI ethics boards in smart societies: a step towards improvement based on board composition by sortition4
Human achievement and artificial intelligence4
Fiduciary requirements for virtual assistants4
The ethics of online steering4
Socializing the political: rethinking filter bubbles and social media with Hannah Arendt4
The ethics of hacking. Ross W. Bellaby4
Should we embrace “Big Sister”? Smart speakers as a means to combat intimate partner violence4
Military artificial intelligence as power: consideration for European Union actorness4
Trustworthiness of voting advice applications in Europe4
Artificial intelligence and humanitarian obligations4
Getting it right: the limits of fine-tuning large language models4
Dual-use implications of AI text generation4
The perfect technological storm: artificial intelligence and moral complacency4
Cut the crap: a critical response to “ChatGPT is bullshit”4
Technology and pronouns: disrupting the ‘Natural Attitude about Gender’4
Correction: Framing the Gamer’s Dilemma4
Melting contestation: insurance fairness and machine learning4
0.053885936737061