Ethics and Information Technology

Papers
(The TQCC of Ethics and Information Technology is 12. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-05-01 to 2026-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
An Ellulian analysis of propaganda in the context of generative AI306
AI responsibility gap: not new, inevitable, unproblematic91
ChatGPT is incredible (at being average)85
Correction: Beyond transparency and explainability: on the need for adequate and contextualized user guidelines for LLM use62
Military robots should not look like a humans61
Socially Disruptive Technologies and Conceptual Engineering59
Gamification and the virtue of perspective48
Autonomous weapon systems impact on incidence of armed conflict: rejecting the ‘lower threshold for war argument’47
Closing the responsibility gap: allocating responsibility according to prerequisite control and expectations for personal benefits47
Navigating the social dilemma of autonomous systems: normative and applied arguments41
Why converging technologies need converging international regulation39
Disembodied friendship: virtual friends and the tendencies of technologically mediated friendship37
The Right to Break the Law? Perfect Enforcement of the Law Using Technology Impedes the Development of Legal Systems35
Correction: ChatGPT is bullshit34
Conceptualizing understanding in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): an abilities-based approach31
Responsible guidelines for authorship attribution tasks in NLP30
Life after privacy: reclaiming democracy in a surveillance society30
Legal reviews of in situ learning in autonomous weapons29
Technology and moral change: the transformation of truth and trust28
Engineering responsibility28
Contextual negation by moral opposition: rethinking the ethics of (Rape) simulations27
A data-centric approach for ethical and trustworthy AI in journalism27
Virtual reality and agential moral enhancement27
Tracing app technology: an ethical review in the COVID-19 era and directions for post-COVID-1925
Legal and ethical implications of autonomous cyber capabilities: a call for retaining human control in cyberspace25
Socially disruptive technologies and epistemic injustice24
Establishing human responsibility and accountability at early stages of the lifecycle for AI-based defence systems24
The global diplomacy of governing military artificial intelligence24
Correction to: Ensuring the exercise of human agency in AI-based military systems: concerns across the lifecycle22
Humans, Neanderthals, robots and rights22
Design culture for Sustainable urban artificial intelligence: Bruno Latour and the search for a different AI urbanism22
Calibrating machine behavior: a challenge for AI alignment21
Of machines and men: Attributions of moral responsibility in AI-assisted warfare21
The irresponsibility of not using AI in the military20
Technologically mediated encounters with ‘nature’19
Legitimacy and automated decisions: the moral limits of algocracy18
Algorithmic representation in virtual realities: ethical challenges and regulatory opportunities18
The need for and nature of a normative, cultural psychology of weaponized AI (artificial intelligence)18
Mechanic citizenship: Boston Mayor’s Office of New Urban Mechanics and the constitution of digital citizens17
Reasons underdetermination in meaningful human control17
Use case cards: a use case reporting framework inspired by the European AI Act17
Disruptive technologies, engineered concepts, and normative guidance16
Smart cities as a testbed for experimenting with humans? - Applying psychological ethical guidelines to smart city interventions16
Should we speak of machine agency? A case against conceptual extension16
Enabling Fairness in Healthcare Through Machine Learning16
Autonomous Military Systems: collective responsibility and distributed burdens16
When work becomes a game: the moral costs of gamified labor16
AWS compliance with the ethical principle of proportionality: three possible solutions16
Urban Digital Twins and metaverses towards city multiplicities: uniting or dividing urban experiences?15
A phenomenology and epistemology of large language models: transparency, trust, and trustworthiness15
Wide reflective equilibrium in LLM alignment: bridging moral epistemology and AI safety15
ChatGPT is bullshit15
The rationality and morality of connecting quantum computers14
The landscape of data and AI documentation approaches in the European policy context14
Negotiating becoming: a Nietzschean critique of large language models14
The Ethics of AI in Human Resources13
Big data and the risk of misguided responsibilization13
A values-based approach to designing military autonomous systems13
Is moral status done with words?13
All ‘Dark patterns’ Are ‘Hostile patterns’: A Hostility Framework for Understanding Problematic Digital Interfaces13
Generative AI models should include detection mechanisms as a condition for public release13
Digital temperance: adapting an ancient virtue for a technological age12
Vicarious liability: a solution to a problem of AI responsibility?12
Correction: The repugnant resolution: has Coghlan & Cox resolved the Gamer’s Dilemma?12
Introduction to the topical collection on AI and responsibility12
Public health measures and the rise of incidental surveillance: Considerations about private informational power and accountability12
What responsibility gaps are and what they should be12
0.026490926742554