Planning Theory

Papers
(The TQCC of Planning Theory is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-04-01 to 2025-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Peri-urban planning: A landscape perspective33
Knowledge coproduction at the periphery of the urban and academia: Insights from Acapulco’s metropolitan area23
The making of good public plans Phronesis, Phronetic Planning Research and Assemblage Thinking17
Is the pandemic a hope for planning? Two doubts16
Book Review: McFarlane – Fragments of the City: Making and Remaking Urban Worlds15
‘¡Eso no se dice’!: Exploring the value of communication distortions in participatory planning15
Finding common ground on the threshold: An experiment in critical urban learning14
Alliances, allyship and activism: The value of international partnerships for co-producing just cities11
Co-producing knowledge in action: Reflecting from the Main Bhi Dilli campaign for equitable planning in Delhi10
Land fictions: The commodification of land in city and country10
Problematising use conformity in spatial regulation: Religious diversity and mosques out of place in Northeast Italy9
Model-theory interaction in urban planning: A critical review8
On the researcher as parasite8
Collaborative research for transitioning to Climate-Neutral Cities – contouring a prospective framework for integrated planning7
Activist Co-production for the Right to Occupy, Hold Ground, and Upgrade6
The problem of “power” in planning theory6
Race, Faith and Planning in Britain6
Beyond the blinders: Disclosing the episteme of land ownership to re-frame legal and economic values in planning5
Territorial healing: A spatial spiral weaving transformative reparation5
Power dynamics and self-organizing urbanism. A comment5
The online conversion framework: Understanding antagonism, planning theory, and social media4
Revisiting the distinction between the natural and the artificial. Towards a properly urban ontology4
Do planning concepts matter? A Lacanian interpretation of the urban village in a British context4
Are radical and insurgent planning (truly) at odds with a nonviolent conception of liberal planning?3
The temporal governance of planning in England: Planning reform, Uchronia and ‘proper time’3
After Hardin3
Planning as an instituting process. Overcoming Agamben’s despair using Esposito’s political ontology3
Beyond a liberal reading of insurgent in transformative planning practices3
The empire of the narrative: Plan making through the prism of classical and postclassical narratologies3
Conversions: The emerging informalisation of housing in the Global North3
Response to E.R. Alexander’s Comment on “Actors, arenas and aims: A conceptual framework for public participation”3
Book Review: Political change through social innovation3
Book Review: Planners in Politics: Do they Make a Difference?3
Understanding is what planners do – Towards a hermeneutic perspective on planning practice and research3
0.028176069259644