Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

Papers
(The median citation count of Journal of Empirical Legal Studies is 0. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-09-01 to 2025-09-01.)
ArticleCitations
The Canada Trademarks Dataset17
Does the 1L curriculum make a difference?13
Plugging the pipe? Evaluating the (null) effects of leaks on Supreme Court legitimacy13
The distribution of in‐person public K‐12 education in the time ofCOVID: An empirical perspective11
Market versus policy responses to novel occupational risks10
Can you trust your lawyer's call? Legal advisers exhibit myside bias resistant to debiasing interventions8
Does the Bar Exam Protect the Public?8
8
Physician Licensing and Discipline: Lessons From Indiana8
8
Issue Information7
Transnational Litigation in U.S. Courts: A Theoretical and Empirical Reassessment7
7
Judging fast or slow: The effects of reduced caseloads on gender‐ and ethnic‐based disparities in case outcomes6
Issue Information6
Secured credit and bankruptcy resolution5
5
5
Constitutional accountability for police shootings5
Private security and public police5
Stay at home if you can: COVID‐19 stay‐at‐home guidelines and local crime4
Issue Information4
U.S. Copyright Termination Notices 1977–2020: Introducing New Datasets4
Charging sex traffickers under federal law: What dispositions should we expect when applying theories on prosecutorial decision‐making?4
Privacy decision‐making and the effects of privacy choice architecture: Experiments toward the design of behaviorally‐aware privacy regulation4
Patents Used in Patent Office Rejections as Indicators of Value4
Issue Information4
3
Law, Justice and Reason‐Giving3
A study of pandemic and stigma effects in removal proceedings3
The Diffusion of Deal Innovations in Complex Contractual Networks3
Hiding Lawyer Misconduct: Evidence From Florida3
Revisiting the Business of State Supreme Courts in the 21st Century3
Asymmetric review of qualified immunity appeals3
Issue Information3
3
One judge to rule them all: Single‐member courts as an answer to delays in criminal trials3
The role of cable news hosts in public support for Supreme Court decisions2
Issue Information2
The role of character‐based personal mitigation in sentencing judgments2
Can moral framing drive insurance enrollment in the United States?2
Assessing the Conservative Nature of the Supreme Court of Japan via Ideal Point Estimation of Justices2
Chain novel, or Markov chain? Estimating the authority of U.S. Supreme Court case law2
The Dogma Within? Examining Religious Bias in Private Title VII Claims2
Assessing the Influence of Amici on Supreme Court Decision Making2
Foreword2
Lucky you: Your case is heard by a seasoned panel—Panel effects in the German Constitutional Court2
Market Response to Court Rejection of California's Board Diversity Laws2
The effects of price transparency and debt collection policies on intentions to consume recommended health care: A randomized vignette experiment2
Correction to “Paying for Performance? Attorneys' Fees in Fraud Class Actions”2
Measuring the Perceived (In)accessibility of Courts and Lawyers1
Introducing a New Corpus of Definitive M&A Agreements, 2000–20201
Appellate court assignments as a natural experiment: Gender panel effects in sex discrimination cases1
Does greater police funding help catch more murderers?1
The effect of judges' gender on decisions regarding intimate‐partner violence1
Consumption Tax Reform and the Real Economy: Evidence From India's Adoption of a Value‐Added Tax1
Prosecution or Persecution? Extraneous Events and Prosecutorial Decisions1
In the Eye of the Beholder: How Lawyers Perceive Legal Ethical Problems1
Do data breach notification laws reduce medical identity theft? Evidence from consumer complaints data1
Sudden lockdown repeals, social mobility, and COVID‐19: Evidence from a judicial natural experiment1
JD‐Next: A valid and reliable tool to predict diverse students' success in law school1
Framing negligence1
“They don't let us speak”: Gender, collegiality, and interruptions in deliberations in the Brazilian Supreme Court1
Who donates and how? New evidence on the tax incentives in the canton of Geneva, Switzerland1
Building a better lawyer: Experimental evidence that artificial intelligence can increase legal work efficiency1
The impact of legal representation in Israeli traffic courts: Addressing selection bias and generalizability problems1
Death Penalty Statutes and Murder Rates: Evidence From Synthetic Controls1
Issue Information1
Racial bias as a multi‐stage, multi‐actor problem: An analysis of pretrial detention1
Molecular Diagnostic Patenting After Mayo v. Prometheus: An Empirical Analysis1
Quantifying disparate questioning of Black and White jurors in capital jury selection0
The influence of the race of defendant and the race of victim on capital charging and sentencing in California0
Killing as Capital: Perverse Effects of Truce Negotiations on Gang Violence in El Salvador0
0
Paid medical malpractice claims: How strongly does the past predict the future?0
0
Racial diversity and group decision‐making in a mock jury experiment0
Ideological bias in constitutional judgments: Experimental analysis and potential solutions0
Does an initial public offering (IPO) issuer's Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee calculation method predict pricing revisions and IPO underpricing?0
The impact of paid sick leave laws on consumer and business bankruptcies0
The Impact of Employers' Liability on 19th‐Century U.K. Coalmining Fatalities0
Dispute Resolution in the Signaling Model: A Comparison of Arbitration Mechanisms0
How accurate are rebuttable presumptions of pretrial dangerousness? A natural experiment from New Mexico0
The readability of contracts: Big data analysis0
Effect of financial incentives onhospital‐cardiologistintegration and cardiac test location0
Biases in legal decision‐making: Comparing prosecutors, defense attorneys, law students, and laypersons0
Issue Information0
Property rights and market behavior in thelow‐incomehousing sector: Evidence from Chile0
Self‐nudging contracts and the positive effects of autonomy—Analyzing the prospect of behavioral self‐management0
Issue Information0
Intensified support for juvenile offenders on probation: Evidence from Germany0
Foreword to JELS special issue0
Racial diversity and group decision‐making in a mock jury experiment0
Automating Abercrombie: Machine‐learning trademark distinctiveness0
Foreword0
Strategic subdelegation0
The Effectiveness of Certificates of Relief: A Correspondence Audit of Hiring Outcomes0
Examining the effects of antidiscrimination laws on children in the foster care and adoption systems0
A Faustian bargain? Rethinking the role of debt in law students' career choices0
0
Leases as Forms0
The company they keep: When and why Chinese judges engage in collegiality0
0
Lawyers' legal aid participation: A qualitative and quantitative analysis0
0
Issue Information0
Issue Information0
Should patients use online reviews to pick their doctors and hospitals?0
Rankings without U.S. News: A revealed preference approach to evaluating law schools0
The market for general counsel0
The Federal Enforcement Threat: The Effect of Overfiling Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act0
0
Emotional bargaining after litigation: An experimental study of the Coase theorem0
0
Settlement schemas: How laypeople understand civil settlement0
Hallucination‐Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Tools0
The value of legal recourse in sovereign bond markets: Evidence from Argentina0
Citations to Interest Groups and Acceptance of Supreme Court Decisions0
A statistical approach to law school citation rankings0
Issue Information0
Do Firearm Markets Comply with Firearm Restrictions? How the Massachusetts Assault Weapons Ban Enforcement Notice Changed Registered Firearm Sales0
Bargaining power in the market for intellectual property: Evidence from licensing contract terms0
The Impact of Judicial Leadership on Consensus Formation: Evidence From the Supreme Court of Norway0
The limits of diplomacy by treaty: Evidence from China's bilateral investment treaty program0
Does Group Familiarity Improve Deliberations in Judicial Teams? Evidence from the German Federal Court of Justice0
Gender gaps in legal education: The impact of class participation assessments0
Issue Information0
Issue Information0
Does judicial foreclosure procedure help delinquent subprime mortgage borrowers?0
Understanding the Decline in Drinking and Driving During “The Other Great Moderation”0
Perception Pending: What Do Patents Signal to Consumers?0
Beyond republicans and the disapproval of regulations: A new empirical approach to the Congressional Review Act0
The Distance Factor in Remedies0
Issue Information0
Introducing twin corpora of decisions for the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ)0
Issue Information0
0
Network analysis of lawyer referral markets: Evidence from Indiana0
Do doctors prescribe antibiotics out of fear of malpractice?0
Managerial litigation risk and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from universal demand laws0
An empirical analysis of sentencing of “Access to Information” computer crimes0
Consent searches: Evaluating the usefulness of a common and highly discretionary police practice0
Powerful CEOs and Corporate Governance0
The usage and utility of body‐worn camera footage in courts: A survey analysis of state prosecutors0
Plea Bargaining Procedures Worldwide: Drivers of Introduction and Use0
Paying for performance? Attorneys' fees in fraud class actions0
Issue Information0
Gender, race, and job satisfaction of law graduates: Intersectional evidence from the National Survey of College Graduates0
Ideology, Disadvantage, and Federal District Court Inmate Civil Rights Filings: The Troubling Effects of Pro Se Status0
Measuring law's normative force0
Consent searches and underestimation of compliance: Robustness to type of search, consequences of search, and demographic sample0
0
Litigation with negative expected value suits: An experimental analysis0
0
0.060370206832886