Journal of Empirical Legal Studies

Papers
(The TQCC of Journal of Empirical Legal Studies is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2020-03-01 to 2024-03-01.)
ArticleCitations
Patent Similarity Data and Innovation Metrics26
A Nationalist Backlash to International Refugee Law: Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Turkey19
Is “Not Guilty” the Same as “Innocent”? Evidence from SEC Financial Fraud Investigations18
Manna from Heaven for Judges: Judges’ Reaction to a Quasi‐Random Reduction in Caseload17
The Problem of Data Bias in the Pool of Published U.S. Appellate Court Opinions13
Comparing Conventional and Machine‐Learning Approaches to Risk Assessment in Domestic Abuse Cases11
Subsidizing Liquidity with Wider Ticks: Evidence from the Tick Size Pilot Study10
Factoring the Role of Eyewitness Evidence in the Courtroom8
Medical Malpractice and Physician Discipline: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly8
Managerial litigation risk and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from universal demand laws7
Leases as Forms7
Mapping the Iceberg: The Impact of Data Sources on the Study of District Courts7
The Effectiveness of Certificates of Relief: A Correspondence Audit of Hiring Outcomes6
Estimating Judicial Ideal Points in Bi‐Dimensional Courts: Evidence from Catalonia6
Developing High‐Quality Data Infrastructure for Legal Analytics: Introducing the Israeli Supreme Court Database6
ALL‐CAPS6
Working Hard or Making Work? Plaintiffs’ Attorney Fees in Securities Fraud Class Actions6
Does Alice Target Patent Trolls?6
Randomness Pre‐Considered: Recognizing and Accounting for “De‐Randomizing” Events When Utilizing Random Judicial Assignment5
Persistent Effects of Colonial Institutions on Long‐Run Development: Local Evidence from Regression Discontinuity Design in Argentina5
How Would Judges Compose Judicial Panels? Theory and Evidence from the Supreme Court of Israel5
Can Mandating Corporate Social Responsibility Backfire?5
Do data breach notification laws reduce medical identity theft? Evidence from consumer complaints data4
Does Group Familiarity Improve Deliberations in Judicial Teams? Evidence from the German Federal Court of Justice4
Do People Like Mandatory Rules? The Choice Between Disclosures, Defaults, and Mandatory Rules in Supplier‐Customer Relationships4
The usage and utility of body‐worn camera footage in courts: A survey analysis of state prosecutors4
Powerful CEOs and Corporate Governance3
Who Votes Without Identification? Using Individual‐Level Administrative Data to Measure the Burden of Strict Voter Identification Laws3
Improving Scientific Judgments in Law and Government: A Field Experiment of Patent Peer Review3
Judicial Disparity, Deviation, and Departures from Sentencing Guidelines: The Case of Hong Kong3
Does greater police funding help catch more murderers?3
Inputs and Outputs on Appeal: An Empirical Study of Briefs, Big Law, and Case Complexity3
Consumption Tax Reform and the Real Economy: Evidence From India's Adoption of a Value‐Added Tax3
Transnational Litigation in U.S. Courts: A Theoretical and Empirical Reassessment3
Lucky you: Your case is heard by a seasoned panel—Panel effects in the German Constitutional Court2
Ideology, Disadvantage, and Federal District Court Inmate Civil Rights Filings: The Troubling Effects of Pro Se Status2
Ideological bias in constitutional judgments: Experimental analysis and potential solutions2
Economic Gender Equality and the Decline of Alimony in Switzerland2
Should patients use online reviews to pick their doctors and hospitals?2
The Effect of Board Structure on Firm Disclosure and Behavior: A Case Study of Korea and a Comparison of Research Designs2
2
Does the Bar Exam Protect the Public?2
The distribution of in‐person public K‐12 education in the time of COVID: An empirical perspective2
0.074450969696045