Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and P

Papers
(The TQCC of Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and P is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-01-01 to 2026-01-01.)
ArticleCitations
Not all “small business” is the same, and I-O has shoulders to stand on – CORRIGENDUM80
Embedding moral reframing in organizational policies for lasting DEI impact41
A pragmatic framing perspective on DEI training26
Revisiting the paradox of replication: Is the solution to the paradox big data style research or something else?26
Presidential memorandum on return to in-person work: Implications for the federal workforce23
Curiosity is the key to the future of learning and development22
Activism or science? Navigating the tension between objectivity and advocacy in DEI research21
Personality and rater bias: How personality traits influence rater bias and training proficiency20
Leveraging quiet: The power of choosing your workspace20
Increasing the saliency of ethical decision making for SIOP members19
Work can be good; not all work is good—let’s make it better19
How abduction can help produce timelier technology research19
The importance of representativeness as well as timeliness in studying technology: Three additional suggestions19
Anti-work offers many opportunities for I-O psychologists16
Organizational research on weight stigma must center targets’ perspectives15
Moving from opposition to taking ownership of open science to make discoveries that matter13
(Conditionally) Supporting polycultural organizations through bidirectional allyship13
How we can bring I-O psychology science and evidence-based practices to the public12
The impact of recent executive orders on diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility in research and graduate training in industrial-organizational psychology12
POSH, plus nonvisible disabilities11
The unequal burden of DEI bans11
Understanding intervention effects using a desirability and foreseeability typology11
“404 error—interdisciplinarity not found”: Removing barriers to technology research in I-O psychology11
It takes a [helpful] village: Recognizing and minimizing unhelpful help to better support female caregivers in academia9
Interpreting the magnitude of predictor effect sizes: It is time for more sensible benchmarks9
Breaking the sound barrier: Quiet spaces may also foster inclusivity for the neurodiverse community9
Minding the gap: Mindful inclusion of opposing perspectives to protect DEI initiatives9
Cybervetting: Facebook is dead, long live LinkedIn?9
Beyond organizational size: Recommendations for addressing the scientist–practitioner gap8
Enjoy the silence: Providing space for introverted employees to thrive8
Too early to call: What we do (not) know about the validity of cybervetting7
Optimizing an online I-O program: Tips and lessons learned from launching an online master’s program7
Bridging the academic–practice gap through big team science initiatives7
Depoliticizing DEI: Path to fulfillment of its core values and effective implementation7
Addressing labor gaps with the science of workplace learning6
The importance of reflective practices for decision makers: A possible part of the solution for helping the field6
IOP volume 15 issue 4 Cover and Front matter6
Igniting progress: SIOP’s role in advocating DEI policy change5
Beyond learning outcomes: Creating equitable learning environments in online I-O graduate education5
Was Keynes thwarted by consumerism? Insatiable needs, voluntary simplicity, and the pursuit of leisure5
Antiwork or antimaster? Reframing the antiwork movement through a racial lens5
Twinks, jocks, and bears—oh my! The stereotype content model extended to gay men and weight at work5
The dual role of faculty and motherhood: Enabling resources for successful coping5
Sensibility over urgency: Applying a prudent researcher standard to timelier technology research4
Future-proofing I-O psychology: The need for updated graduate curriculum4
Addressing antiwork concerns through nonwork identity: Beyond an emphasis on meaningful work4
Don’t get bogged down by the backlash4
Industrial and organizational psychology stakeholders and collaborators must include economists, political scientists, and policy makers4
The weight of beauty in psychological research4
In analyses of the gender pay gap, job analysis, and O*NET don’t get a lot of respect, but they should3
Cybervetting is the latest symptom of a deeper problem – ERRATUM3
Finding balance: Silence and nature in employee restoration3
Embracing silence: Creating inclusive spaces for autistic employees3
How can work from home support neurodiversity and inclusion?3
Making the invisible visible: Recrafting the discourse surrounding women caregivers in academia3
What does online I-O education really need? Perspectives of online program affiliates3
Gender differences in tenure-track faculty time spent on childcare3
Becoming and acting as an ally against weight-based discrimination3
Parental leave is just a wolf in sheep’s clothing: A call for gender-aware policies in academia3
Misaligned incentives undermine the promise of engaged scholarship3
Body-worn camera technologies can promote positive policing3
Catching up in two races: Applying technology design approaches to design technology research3
How engaged scholarship is helping combat the wildfire crisis3
Workplace learning and the future of work3
Economic inequality drives longer work hours3
The future of work and learning hinges on social and relational processes3
Shaping the future of industrial-organizational psychology: The transformative potential of research collaborations3
Academic freedom under siege: How state legislatures are reshaping higher education3
Strategic responses to anti-DEI legislation: The promise of culturally responsive assessments3
Bringing polycultural organizations to life: A network analytic strategy2
Alter your approach: Implement strategic interventions with a proven track record until DEI backlash subsides2
Any slice is predictive? On the consistency of impressions from the beginning, middle, and end of assessment center exercises and their relation to performance2
Advancing ethical decision making in industrial-organizational psychology2
The right time, the right place: Collectively aligning I-O research with small business needs2
“Helping us by helping you”: Pro bono consulting and graduate student training2
Avatar: The new employee? Creating online employment personas may benefit stigmatized employees2
AI monopoly and why it backfires on talent management2
The impacts of further abortion restrictions on work: The role of I-O psychology2
From antiwork to disorganizational psychology2
Best practices, pro bono: Volunteering for early career I-O psychologists2
Is it also time to revisit situational specificity?2
The role of work psychologists in the development of antiwork sentiments2
The scientist–practitioner gap: A call to end the debate2
Bringing our humanness to the workplace: Fostering reflection and reflexivity via mindful relating2
Acknowledging the ramifications of weight-based stereotype threat in the workplace2
Counteracting threats to DEI with good trouble and innovation2
Enhancing graduate student education through meaningful volunteer efforts2
An urgent call for I-O psychologists to produce timelier technology research2
Moving the boundaries of I-O, or of work itself?2
Better together: It’s time to unify, centralize, and market our competitive advantage2
0.2156229019165