Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and P

Papers
(The TQCC of Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and P is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-08-01 to 2026-08-01.)
ArticleCitations
Not all “small business” is the same, and I-O has shoulders to stand on – CORRIGENDUM120
Green from the ground up: An expanded call for research on nature contact to achieve environmental sustainability44
Revisiting the paradox of replication: Is the solution to the paradox big data style research or something else?40
Curiosity is the key to the future of learning and development34
Activism or science? Navigating the tension between objectivity and advocacy in DEI research31
Embedding moral reframing in organizational policies for lasting DEI impact30
A pragmatic framing perspective on DEI training30
Presidential memorandum on return to in-person work: Implications for the federal workforce29
Is the problem developmental review, or the development of peer review?29
Personality and rater bias: How personality traits influence rater bias and training proficiency26
The importance of representativeness as well as timeliness in studying technology: Three additional suggestions21
Work can be good; not all work is good—let’s make it better18
(Conditionally) Supporting polycultural organizations through bidirectional allyship17
The impact of recent executive orders on diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility in research and graduate training in industrial-organizational psychology17
Organizational research on weight stigma must center targets’ perspectives16
Moving from opposition to taking ownership of open science to make discoveries that matter16
Anti-work offers many opportunities for I-O psychologists15
How abduction can help produce timelier technology research14
POSH, plus nonvisible disabilities13
Leveraging quiet: The power of choosing your workspace13
The unequal burden of DEI bans13
Cybervetting: Facebook is dead, long live LinkedIn?12
It takes a [helpful] village: Recognizing and minimizing unhelpful help to better support female caregivers in academia12
Breaking the sound barrier: Quiet spaces may also foster inclusivity for the neurodiverse community12
“404 error—interdisciplinarity not found”: Removing barriers to technology research in I-O psychology12
Minding the gap: Mindful inclusion of opposing perspectives to protect DEI initiatives11
Beyond organizational size: Recommendations for addressing the scientist–practitioner gap10
Depoliticizing DEI: Path to fulfillment of its core values and effective implementation10
Enjoy the silence: Providing space for introverted employees to thrive10
Interpreting the magnitude of predictor effect sizes: It is time for more sensible benchmarks10
Bridging the academic–practice gap through big team science initiatives10
Was Keynes thwarted by consumerism? Insatiable needs, voluntary simplicity, and the pursuit of leisure9
IOP volume 15 issue 4 Cover and Front matter9
Antiwork or antimaster? Reframing the antiwork movement through a racial lens9
Too early to call: What we do (not) know about the validity of cybervetting9
The importance of reflective practices for decision makers: A possible part of the solution for helping the field9
Addressing labor gaps with the science of workplace learning9
Twinks, jocks, and bears—oh my! The stereotype content model extended to gay men and weight at work8
The dual role of faculty and motherhood: Enabling resources for successful coping8
Igniting progress: SIOP’s role in advocating DEI policy change8
Including followers in the leadership “equation” may help limit leader narcissism8
Economic inequality drives longer work hours7
Future-proofing I-O psychology: The need for updated graduate curriculum7
The weight of beauty in psychological research6
Empowered followers: An antidote to leader narcissism6
Don’t get bogged down by the backlash6
Industrial and organizational psychology stakeholders and collaborators must include economists, political scientists, and policy makers6
Addressing antiwork concerns through nonwork identity: Beyond an emphasis on meaningful work6
Developing reviewer competence across the career span6
Sensibility over urgency: Applying a prudent researcher standard to timelier technology research6
Becoming and acting as an ally against weight-based discrimination6
Scientific journals and the academic publishing industry facilitate construct proliferation in industrial and organizational psychology6
Parental leave is just a wolf in sheep’s clothing: A call for gender-aware policies in academia5
Cybervetting is the latest symptom of a deeper problem – ERRATUM5
Embracing silence: Creating inclusive spaces for autistic employees5
Workplace learning and the future of work5
Gender differences in tenure-track faculty time spent on childcare5
Finding balance: Silence and nature in employee restoration5
How engaged scholarship is helping combat the wildfire crisis4
Catching up in two races: Applying technology design approaches to design technology research4
Body-worn camera technologies can promote positive policing4
Animals as more than just workers: Considering the role of pets as facilitators of nonwork–work processes4
The future of work and learning hinges on social and relational processes4
Bringing our humanness to the workplace: Fostering reflection and reflexivity via mindful relating4
Academic freedom under siege: How state legislatures are reshaping higher education4
The impacts of further abortion restrictions on work: The role of I-O psychology4
Moving the boundaries of I-O, or of work itself?3
The heavy crown, shared throne: How coleadership tempers ego and sustains leader well-being3
Strategic responses to anti-DEI legislation: The promise of culturally responsive assessments3
Animals laboring for humans: Integrating animal dignity into I-O psychology3
Best practices, pro bono: Volunteering for early career I-O psychologists3
Where is my theoretical framework? When developmental reviewing turns into theorizing after results are known (TARKing)3
An urgent call for I-O psychologists to produce timelier technology research3
“Helping us by helping you”: Pro bono consulting and graduate student training3
How can work from home support neurodiversity and inclusion?3
Misaligned incentives undermine the promise of engaged scholarship3
Any slice is predictive? On the consistency of impressions from the beginning, middle, and end of assessment center exercises and their relation to performance3
Bringing polycultural organizations to life: A network analytic strategy3
From antiwork to disorganizational psychology3
AI monopoly and why it backfires on talent management3
Counteracting threats to DEI with good trouble and innovation3
Viewing unions through a public health model lens3
Enhancing graduate student education through meaningful volunteer efforts3
Making the invisible visible: Recrafting the discourse surrounding women caregivers in academia3
Alter your approach: Implement strategic interventions with a proven track record until DEI backlash subsides3
The scientist–practitioner gap: A call to end the debate3
Avatar: The new employee? Creating online employment personas may benefit stigmatized employees3
Shaping the future of industrial-organizational psychology: The transformative potential of research collaborations3
The peril of requesting additional studies3
Acknowledging the ramifications of weight-based stereotype threat in the workplace3
2.3313629627228