Conservation Letters

Papers
(The H4-Index of Conservation Letters is 26. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-01-01 to 2026-01-01.)
ArticleCitations
Issue Information173
Land‐cover and land‐use change trajectory hopping facilitates estate‐crop expansion into protected forests in Indonesia125
Correspondence: Challender et al. (2021) misinterpret the recommendations regarding an IUCN‐CITES interface in Frank and Wilcove (2019) and advocate poor policy108
Collaborative fisheries research reveals reserve size and age determine efficacy across a network of marine protected areas94
65
Simulating Demography, Monitoring, and Management Decisions to Evaluate Adaptive Management Strategies for Endangered Species56
Political Will Has Been Critical for Protecting Forests in the Brazilian Amazon and Indonesia55
Concrete Habitat Severely Decreases the Reproductive Output of Two Urban Birds48
Climate change and energy crisis drive an unprecedented EU environmental law regression47
European Habitats Directive has fostered monitoring but not prevented species declines45
First Evidence of Individual Sharks Involved in Multiple Predatory Bites on People38
37
Issue Information37
Rewilding and Indigenous‐Led Land Care Are Not Compatible Ideas34
Naming It Is Not Enough: An Orienting Map for Understanding Conservation's Entanglement With Power33
Nature and equity32
Phylogenetic relationships of invasive plants are useful criteria for weed risk assessments31
Bycatch in drift gillnet fisheries: A sink for Indian Ocean cetaceans31
Integrated systematic planning and adaptive stakeholder process support a 10‐fold increase in South Africa's Marine Protected Area estate31
30
Conservation and human rights: The public commitments of international conservation organizations30
29
Languages of Life: A Global Perspective on Linguistic Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation28
Applying the Key Biodiversity Area Standard to Important Sites for Sharks27
Remote seamounts are key conservation priorities for pelagic wildlife27
Co‐benefits for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem services available from contrasting land protection policies in the contiguous United States27
Risky business: Protecting nature, protecting wealth?26
0.12084293365479