Research Synthesis Methods

Papers
(The median citation count of Research Synthesis Methods is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-09-01 to 2025-09-01.)
ArticleCitations
Accuracy of conversion formula for effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation328
An investigation of the impact of using contrast- and arm-synthesis models for network meta-analysis281
Advice for improving the reproducibility of data extraction in meta‐analysis164
Facilitating open science practices for research syntheses: PreregRS guides preregistration131
Reported methodological quality of medical systematic reviews: Development of an assessment tool (ReMarQ) and meta-research study131
A mapping exercise using automated techniques to develop a search strategy to identify systematic review tools108
Towards the automatic risk of bias assessment on randomized controlled trials: A comparison of RobotReviewer and humans98
Assessment of key characteristics, methodology, and effect size measures used in meta‐analysis of human‐health‐related animal studies75
The age of abundant scholarly information and its synthesis– A time when ‘just google it’ is no longer enough70
What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies65
Meta‐analyses of partial correlations are biased: Detection and solutions63
46
42
Fast‐and‐frugal decision tree for the rapid critical appraisal of systematic reviews40
Bias propagation in network meta‐analysis models37
Retrieving Cochrane reviews is sometimes challenging and their reporting is not always optimal34
Authors’ reply: Continuity corrections with Mantel–Haenszel estimators in Cochrane reviews32
Exploring graphical approaches to assess the impact of an additional trial on a decision model via updated meta-analysis31
Correct standard errors can bias meta‐analysis30
Network meta analysis to predict the efficacy of an approved treatment in a new indication29
CausalMetaR: An R package for performing causally interpretable meta-analyses28
Capturing causal claims: A fine-tuned text mining model for extracting causal sentences from social science papers27
Methods for population adjustment with limited access to individual patient data: A review and simulation study27
Evaluation of semi-automated record screening methods for systematic reviews of prognosis studies and intervention studies24
A comprehensive systematic review dataset is a rich resource for training and evaluation of AI systems for title and abstract screening24
Reporting of Cochrane systematic review protocols with network meta‐analyses—A scoping review23
Synthesis of depression outcomes reported on different scales: A comparison of methods for modelling mean differences22
Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine prognostic factor effects for a binary outcome21
Regarding approaches to simulating random‐effects21
Data extraction for evidence synthesis using a large language model: A proof‐of‐concept study21
Bayesian Federated Inference for regression models based on non-shared medical center data21
Selecting a specialized education database for literature reviews and evidence synthesis projects21
Issue Information21
Sensitivity analysis for reporting bias on the time-dependent summary receiver operating characteristics curve in meta-analysis of prognosis studies with time-to-event outcomes20
Graphical tools for visualizing the results of network meta‐analysis of multicomponent interventions20
How to plan and manage an individual participant data meta‐analysis. An illustrative toolkit19
19
Cumulative meta‐analysis: What works19
Issue Information19
Parametric G‐computation for compatible indirect treatment comparisons with limited individual patient data18
Six ways to handle dependent effect sizes in meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Is there a gold standard?18
Population adjusted‐indirect comparisons in health technology assessment: A methodological systematic review18
Evaluation of statistical methods used to meta‐analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A simulation study17
Impact of trial attrition rates on treatment effect estimates in chronic inflammatory diseases: A meta‐epidemiological study17
Missingness mechanism messiness in meta‐analysis: A response to “The importance of plausible data‐generating mechanisms in simulation studies”17
Inclusive critical appraisal of qualitative and quantitative findings in evidence synthesis17
Validation of large language models (Llama 3 and ChatGPT-4o mini) for title and abstract screening in biomedical systematic reviews16
Using qualitative comparative analysis as a mixed methods synthesis in systematic mixed studies reviews: Guidance and a worked example16
Critical appraisal tools used in systematic reviews of in vitro cell culture studies: A methodological study16
Combining search filters for randomized controlled trials with the Cochrane RCT Classifier in Covidence: a methodological validation study16
Bibliometric study of ‘overviews of systematic reviews’ of health interventions: Evaluation of prevalence, citation and journal impact factor15
Double arcsine transform not appropriate for meta‐analysis15
Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments15
Causally interpretable meta‐analysis: Clearly defined causal effects and two case studies14
A semiparametric approach for meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with multiple cut‐offs14
13
RIMeta: An R shiny tool for estimating the reference interval from a meta‐analysis13
Issue Information13
A practical guide to evaluating sensitivity of literature search strings for systematic reviews using relative recall13
12
Issue Information12
Reduce, reuse, recycle: Introducing MetaPipeX, a framework for analyses of multi‐lab data11
Pitfalls in choosing data examples for methodological work: Bayesian approaches to a fixed effects meta‐analysis of zinc lozenges for the common cold11
Appropriateness of conducting and reporting random‐effects meta‐analysis in oncology11
Continuity corrections with Mantel–Haenszel estimators in Cochrane reviews11
Crowdsourcing the identification of studies for COVID‐19‐related Cochrane Rapid Reviews11
Response to Gusenbauer M, Haddaway NR “What every researcher should know about searching – Clarified concepts, search advice, and an agenda to improve finding in academia”10
A re‐analysis of about 60,000 sparse data meta‐analyses suggests that using an adequate method for pooling matters10
Combining meta‐analysis with multiple imputation for one‐step, privacy‐protecting estimation of causal treatment effects in multi‐site studies10
Using systems perspectives in evidence synthesis: A methodological mapping review10
Tipping point analysis in network meta-analysis10
Assessing risk of bias of cohort studies with large language models10
Development of a search filter to retrieve reports of interrupted time series studies from MEDLINE and PubMed10
An evaluation of the performance of stopping rules in AI‐aided screening for psychological meta‐analytical research10
Commercial funding and estimated intervention effects in randomized clinical trials: Systematic review of meta‐epidemiological studies10
Rare events meta‐analysis using the Bayesian beta‐binomial model9
Accuracy and precision of fixed and random effects in meta‐analyses of randomized control trials for continuous outcomes9
9
8
How should we handle predatory journals in evidence synthesis? A descriptive survey‐based cross‐sectional study of evidence synthesis experts8
Exploring methodological approaches used in network meta‐analysis of psychological interventions: A scoping review8
Reverse‐Bayes methods for evidence assessment and research synthesis8
Issue Information8
A novel robust meta-analysis model using the t distribution for outlier accommodation and detection8
Treatment recommendations based on network meta-analysis: Rules for risk-averse decision-makers7
Sample size calculation for clinical trials analyzed with the meta‐analytic‐predictive approach7
Estimating interactions and subgroup‐specific treatment effects in meta‐analysis without aggregation bias: A within‐trial framework7
Meta‐analyses of phase I dose‐finding studies: Application for the development of protein kinase inhibitors in oncology7
Network meta‐analysis: Looping back7
Exact inference for fixed‐effects meta‐analysis of proportions7
Methods for using Bing's AI‐powered search engine for data extraction for a systematic review7
Graphical Representation of Overlap for OVErviews: GROOVE tool7
Adjusting for misclassification of an exposure in an individual participant data meta‐analysis7
7
Network meta-analysis made simple: A composite likelihood approach7
Methodological considerations for novel approaches to covariate‐adjusted indirect treatment comparisons7
Searchsmart.org: Guiding researchers to the best databases and search systems for systematic reviews and beyond7
Rapid evidence synthesis approach for limits on the search date: How rapid could it be?7
A critical reflection on computing the sampling variance of the partial correlation coefficient6
When conducting a systematic review, can one trade search efficiency for potential publication bias?6
Development and validation of a geographic search filter for MEDLINE (PubMed) to identify studies about Germany6
Robust variance estimation in small meta‐analysis with the standardized mean difference6
Machine learning for identifying randomised controlled trials when conducting systematic reviews: Development and evaluation of its impact on practice6
Meta‐analysis of dichotomous and ordinal tests with an imperfect gold standard6
Scoping review search practices in the social sciences: A scoping review6
Issue Information6
Consensus on the definition and assessment of external validity of randomized controlled trials: A Delphi study6
On the bias of complete‐ and shifting‐case meta‐regressions with missing covariates6
Subsequent full publication of qualitative studies presented at United Kingdom Royal College of Nursing Research Conference 2015 and 2016: A follow‐up study6
Identifying evidence for five realist reviews in primary health care: A comparison of search methods6
ccaR: A package for assessing primary study overlap across systematic reviews in overviews5
Issue Information5
Improved methods to construct prediction intervals for network meta‐analysis5
metamedian: An R package for meta‐analyzing studies reporting medians5
Advancing unanchored simulated treatment comparisons: A novel implementation and simulation study5
Correction to “Network Meta‐Interpolation: Effect modification adjustment in network meta‐analysis using subgroup analyses”5
5
Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching5
Ten practices for successful study coding in research syntheses: Developing coding manuals and coding forms5
Combining estimators in interlaboratory studies and meta‐analyses4
A tutorial on aggregating evidence from conceptual replication studies using the product Bayes factor4
Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis of randomised trials to examine a treatment‐covariate interaction with a time‐to‐event outcome4
‘Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments’: A health technology assessment perspective4
Visualization toolkits for enriching meta-analyses through evidence maps, bibliometrics, and alternative impact metrics4
Issue Information4
Two decades of network meta‐analysis: Roadmap to their applications and challenges4
The importance of plausible data‐generating mechanisms in simulation studies: A response to ‘Comparing methods for handling missing covariates in meta‐regression’ by Lee and Beretvas (doi: 10.1002/jrs4
Making the case for librarian expertise to support evidence synthesis for the sustainable development goals4
A framework to characterise the reproducibility of meta‐analysis results with its application to direct oral anticoagulants in the acute treatment of venous thromboembolism4
Evolving use of the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool in biomedical systematic reviews4
Assessment of temporal instability in the applied ecology and conservation evidence base4
Footprint of publication selection bias on meta‐analyses in medicine, environmental sciences, psychology, and economics4
Avoiding common mistakes in meta‐analysis: Understanding the distinct roles of Q, I‐squared, tau‐squared, and the prediction interval in reporting heterogeneity4
Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects3
Estimation of heterogeneity variance based on a generalized Q statistic in meta‐analysis of log‐odds‐ratio3
Evaluation of the interim Cochrane rapid review methods guidance—A mixed‐methods study on the understanding of and adherence to the guidance3
3
Synthesizing evidence from the earliest studies to support decision‐making: To what extent could the evidence be reliable?3
Response to: ‘Additional considerations and response to Graphical Representation of Overlap for OVErviews (GROOVE tool)”3
Why do researchers co‐author evidence syntheses with librarians? A mixed‐methods study3
Meta‐analysis of prevalence: I2 statistic and how to deal with heterogeneity3
A comprehensive review and shiny application on the matching‐adjusted indirect comparison3
3
Risk of bias assessment in preclinical literature using natural language processing3
Uncertain about uncertainty in matching‐adjusted indirect comparisons? A simulation study to compare methods for variance estimation3
Retrospective median power, false positive meta‐analysis and large‐scale replication3
Issue Information3
A new taxonomy was developed for overlap across 'overviews of systematic reviews': A meta‐research study of research waste3
3
Feasibility and desirability of screening search results from Google Search exhaustively for systematic reviews: A cross‐case analysis3
Meta-analysis with Jeffreys priors: Empirical frequentist properties3
Response to Hemilä and Chalker's “Pitfalls in choosing data examples for methodological work: Bayesian approaches to a fixed effects meta‐analysis of zinc lozenges for the common cold”3
3
Comparing methods for handling missing covariates in meta‐regression3
Investigation of bias due to selective inclusion of study effect estimates in meta‐analyses of nutrition research3
A comparison of two models for detecting inconsistency in network meta‐analysis3
Paperfetcher: A tool to automate handsearching and citation searching for systematic reviews3
Bayesian random‐effects meta‐analysis with empirical heterogeneity priors for application in health technology assessment with very few studies3
metaConvert: an automatic suite for estimation of 11 different effect size measures and flexible conversion across them3
In‐depth evaluation of machine learning methods for semi‐automating article screening in a systematic review of mechanistic literature3
Developing prediction models when there are systematically missing predictors in individual patient data meta‐analysis3
Translating systematic searches in the APA PsycInfo database from Ovid to EBSCOhost: A tutorial based on a filter translation2
ZIBGLMM: Zero-inflated bivariate generalized linear mixed model for meta-analysis with double-zero-event studies2
metaCOVID: A web‐application for living meta‐analyses of COVID‐19 trials2
Combining endpoint and change data did not affect the summary standardised mean difference in pairwise and network meta‐analyses: An empirical study in depression2
Key concepts and reporting recommendations for mapping reviews: A scoping review of 68 guidance and methodological studies2
Zero‐ and few‐shot prompting of generative large language models provides weak assessment of risk of bias in clinical trials2
Language inclusion in ecological systematic reviews and maps: Barriers and perspectives2
Limits in the search date for rapid reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies2
Development of the individual participant data integrity tool for assessing the integrity of randomised trials using individual participant data2
Identifying unreported links between ClinicalTrials.gov trial registrations and their published results2
Estimating pairwise overlap in umbrella reviews: Considerations for using the corrected covered area (CCA) index methodology2
Predatory journals and their practices present a conundrum for systematic reviewers and evidence synthesisers of health research: A qualitative descriptive study2
Examining how meta‐analytic methods perform2
Robust Bayesian meta‐analysis: Model‐averaging across complementary publication bias adjustment methods2
How trace plots help interpret meta‐analysis results2
The use of fixed study main effects in arm‐based network meta‐analysis2
Automated citation searching in systematic review production: A simulation study2
2
2
Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis2
TheCONSENSYSapproach: An instrument to supportCONtextual SENsitivityinSYStematicreviews2
An open competition involving thousands of competitors failed to construct useful abstract classifiers for new diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews2
Trials and triangles: Network meta-analysis of multi-arm trials with correlated arms2
Generalizable and scalable multistage biomedical concept normalization leveraging large language models2
A REML method for the evidence‐splitting model in network meta‐analysis2
Bayesian pairwise meta‐analysis of time‐to‐event outcomes in the presence of non‐proportional hazards: A simulation study of flexible parametric, piecewise exponential and fractional polynomial models2
Bayesian approaches to fixed effects meta‐analysis2
Effect modification and non-collapsibility together may lead to conflicting treatment decisions: A review of marginal and conditional estimands and recommendations for decision-making2
A non‐parametric approach for jointly combining evidence on progression free and overall survival time in network meta‐analysis2
Meta‐analyzing partial correlation coefficients using Fisher's z transformation2
0.07354998588562