Research Synthesis Methods

Papers
(The median citation count of Research Synthesis Methods is 3. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2022-05-01 to 2026-05-01.)
ArticleCitations
Reported methodological quality of medical systematic reviews: Development of an assessment tool (ReMarQ) and meta-research study418
Advice for improving the reproducibility of data extraction in meta‐analysis185
Lord’s Paradox and two network meta-analysis models152
How to conduct an individual participant data meta-analysis in response to an emerging pathogen: Lessons learned from Zika and COVID-19138
Meta‐analyses of partial correlations are biased: Detection and solutions121
Assessment of key characteristics, methodology, and effect size measures used in meta‐analysis of human‐health‐related animal studies103
What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies93
Transforming evidence synthesis: A systematic review of the evolution of automated meta-analysis in the age of AI81
An investigation of the impact of using contrast- and arm-synthesis models for network meta-analysis72
A mapping exercise using automated techniques to develop a search strategy to identify systematic review tools70
Bayesian workflow for bias-adjustment model in meta-analysis58
Meta-analytic-predictive priors based on a single study58
52
Towards the automatic risk of bias assessment on randomized controlled trials: A comparison of RobotReviewer and humans52
Synthesis of depression outcomes reported on different scales: A comparison of methods for modelling mean differences44
Authors’ reply: Continuity corrections with Mantel–Haenszel estimators in Cochrane reviews43
Network meta analysis to predict the efficacy of an approved treatment in a new indication39
Exploring graphical approaches to assess the impact of an additional trial on a decision model via updated meta-analysis38
Exploring the methodological quality and risk of bias in 200 systematic reviews: A comparative study of ROBIS and AMSTAR-2 tools37
Capturing causal claims: A fine-tuned text mining model for extracting causal sentences from social science papers34
Retrieving Cochrane reviews is sometimes challenging and their reporting is not always optimal32
Fast‐and‐frugal decision tree for the rapid critical appraisal of systematic reviews32
CausalMetaR: An R package for performing causally interpretable meta-analyses32
A comprehensive systematic review dataset is a rich resource for training and evaluation of AI systems for title and abstract screening31
Evaluation of semi-automated record screening methods for systematic reviews of prognosis studies and intervention studies30
Evaluation of the replicability of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of the effects of health interventions29
Incorporating the possibility of cure into network meta-analyses: A case study from resected Stage III/IV melanoma28
Bias propagation in network meta‐analysis models27
Estimands and their implications for evidence synthesis for oncology: A simulation study of treatment switching in meta-analysis27
Correct standard errors can bias meta‐analysis26
Sensitivity analysis for reporting bias on the time-dependent summary receiver operating characteristics curve in meta-analysis of prognosis studies with time-to-event outcomes26
Data extraction for evidence synthesis using a large language model: A proof‐of‐concept study26
Bayesian Federated Inference for regression models based on non-shared medical center data25
Selecting a specialized education database for literature reviews and evidence synthesis projects25
Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine prognostic factor effects for a binary outcome23
How to plan and manage an individual participant data meta‐analysis. An illustrative toolkit23
Graphical tools for visualizing the results of network meta‐analysis of multicomponent interventions22
20
Issue Information20
Six ways to handle dependent effect sizes in meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Is there a gold standard?18
Missingness mechanism messiness in meta‐analysis: A response to “The importance of plausible data‐generating mechanisms in simulation studies”18
Inclusive critical appraisal of qualitative and quantitative findings in evidence synthesis18
Impact of trial attrition rates on treatment effect estimates in chronic inflammatory diseases: A meta‐epidemiological study17
Evaluation of statistical methods used to meta‐analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A simulation study17
Population adjusted‐indirect comparisons in health technology assessment: A methodological systematic review17
Double arcsine transform not appropriate for meta‐analysis16
Parametric G‐computation for compatible indirect treatment comparisons with limited individual patient data16
Using qualitative comparative analysis as a mixed methods synthesis in systematic mixed studies reviews: Guidance and a worked example14
Validation of large language models (Llama 3 and ChatGPT-4o mini) for title and abstract screening in biomedical systematic reviews14
Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments14
Combining search filters for randomized controlled trials with the Cochrane RCT Classifier in Covidence: a methodological validation study14
A semiparametric approach for meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with multiple cut‐offs13
A causal meta-analysis framework for clinical trials with unequal randomization ratios13
Critical appraisal tools used in systematic reviews of in vitro cell culture studies: A methodological study13
Causally interpretable meta‐analysis: Clearly defined causal effects and two case studies13
RIMeta: An R shiny tool for estimating the reference interval from a meta‐analysis12
12
A practical guide to evaluating sensitivity of literature search strings for systematic reviews using relative recall12
Issue Information12
Pitfalls in choosing data examples for methodological work: Bayesian approaches to a fixed effects meta‐analysis of zinc lozenges for the common cold12
Development of a search filter to retrieve reports of interrupted time series studies from MEDLINE and PubMed11
Issue Information11
Continuity corrections with Mantel–Haenszel estimators in Cochrane reviews11
Reduce, reuse, recycle: Introducing MetaPipeX, a framework for analyses of multi‐lab data11
Commercial funding and estimated intervention effects in randomized clinical trials: Systematic review of meta‐epidemiological studies11
Tipping point analysis in network meta-analysis11
Assessing risk of bias of cohort studies with large language models10
Rare events meta‐analysis using the Bayesian beta‐binomial model10
Using systems perspectives in evidence synthesis: A methodological mapping review10
A re‐analysis of about 60,000 sparse data meta‐analyses suggests that using an adequate method for pooling matters10
Combining meta‐analysis with multiple imputation for one‐step, privacy‐protecting estimation of causal treatment effects in multi‐site studies10
An evaluation of the performance of stopping rules in AI‐aided screening for psychological meta‐analytical research10
Accuracy and precision of fixed and random effects in meta‐analyses of randomized control trials for continuous outcomes10
Appropriateness of conducting and reporting random‐effects meta‐analysis in oncology10
StudyTypeTeller—Large language models to automatically classify research study types for systematic reviews9
Adjusting for misclassification of an exposure in an individual participant data meta‐analysis9
9
Meta‐analyses of phase I dose‐finding studies: Application for the development of protein kinase inhibitors in oncology9
Methods for using Bing's AI‐powered search engine for data extraction for a systematic review9
Issue Information9
Estimating interactions and subgroup‐specific treatment effects in meta‐analysis without aggregation bias: A within‐trial framework9
Meta-analytic pooling of intraclass correlation coefficient estimates8
How should we handle predatory journals in evidence synthesis? A descriptive survey‐based cross‐sectional study of evidence synthesis experts8
A critical reflection on computing the sampling variance of the partial correlation coefficient8
Network meta-analysis made simple: A composite likelihood approach8
Development and validation of a geographic search filter for MEDLINE (PubMed) to identify studies about Germany8
8
Network meta‐analysis: Looping back8
Searchsmart.org: Guiding researchers to the best databases and search systems for systematic reviews and beyond8
Sample size calculation for clinical trials analyzed with the meta‐analytic‐predictive approach8
Consensus on the definition and assessment of external validity of randomized controlled trials: A Delphi study8
Machine learning for identifying randomised controlled trials when conducting systematic reviews: Development and evaluation of its impact on practice8
Exploring methodological approaches used in network meta‐analysis of psychological interventions: A scoping review8
A novel robust meta-analysis model using the t distribution for outlier accommodation and detection8
Treatment recommendations based on network meta-analysis: Rules for risk-averse decision-makers8
Issue Information8
When conducting a systematic review, can one trade search efficiency for potential publication bias?8
Methodological considerations for novel approaches to covariate‐adjusted indirect treatment comparisons8
Bayes factor hypothesis testing in meta-analyses: Practical advantages and methodological considerations7
Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching7
Meta‐analysis of dichotomous and ordinal tests with an imperfect gold standard7
Scoping review search practices in the social sciences: A scoping review7
7
Robust variance estimation in small meta‐analysis with the standardized mean difference7
metamedian: An R package for meta‐analyzing studies reporting medians7
ccaR: A package for assessing primary study overlap across systematic reviews in overviews7
The importance of plausible data‐generating mechanisms in simulation studies: A response to ‘Comparing methods for handling missing covariates in meta‐regression’ by Lee and Beretvas (doi: 10.1002/jrs6
Diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis based on an exact within-study variance calculation method6
Assessment of temporal instability in the applied ecology and conservation evidence base6
Two decades of network meta‐analysis: Roadmap to their applications and challenges6
The hazards of using hazard ratios from proportional hazard models in indirect treatment comparisons6
Improved methods to construct prediction intervals for network meta‐analysis6
Evolving use of the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool in biomedical systematic reviews6
A tutorial on aggregating evidence from conceptual replication studies using the product Bayes factor6
Advancing unanchored simulated treatment comparisons: A novel implementation and simulation study6
Issue Information6
Shiny-MAGEC: A Bayesian R shiny application for meta-analysis of censored adverse events6
Correction to “Network Meta‐Interpolation: Effect modification adjustment in network meta‐analysis using subgroup analyses”6
Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis of randomised trials to examine a treatment‐covariate interaction with a time‐to‐event outcome6
Ten practices for successful study coding in research syntheses: Developing coding manuals and coding forms6
Combining estimators in interlaboratory studies and meta‐analyses5
Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects5
BibliZap: An exploratory evaluation of an automated multi-level citation searching tool for systematic and rapid reviews5
Avoiding common mistakes in meta‐analysis: Understanding the distinct roles of Q, I‐squared, tau‐squared, and the prediction interval in reporting heterogeneity5
A framework to characterise the reproducibility of meta‐analysis results with its application to direct oral anticoagulants in the acute treatment of venous thromboembolism5
Evaluation of the interim Cochrane rapid review methods guidance—A mixed‐methods study on the understanding of and adherence to the guidance5
‘Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments’: A health technology assessment perspective5
Visualization toolkits for enriching meta-analyses through evidence maps, bibliometrics, and alternative impact metrics5
Footprint of publication selection bias on meta‐analyses in medicine, environmental sciences, psychology, and economics5
Strategizing AI utilization for psychological literature screening: A comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms and key factors to consider5
Comparing methods for handling missing covariates in meta‐regression5
What level of automation is “good enough”? A benchmark of large language models for meta-analysis data extraction5
Making sense of conducting a critical interpretive synthesis: A scoping review5
Uncertain about uncertainty in matching‐adjusted indirect comparisons? A simulation study to compare methods for variance estimation4
Reverse chronology quota record screening for realist synthesis: Fostering causally rich extrapolations with a diverse and contemporaneous sample of literature4
Response to Hemilä and Chalker's “Pitfalls in choosing data examples for methodological work: Bayesian approaches to a fixed effects meta‐analysis of zinc lozenges for the common cold”4
4
Investigation of bias due to selective inclusion of study effect estimates in meta‐analyses of nutrition research4
4
Bayesian random‐effects meta‐analysis with empirical heterogeneity priors for application in health technology assessment with very few studies4
Estimation of heterogeneity variance based on a generalized Q statistic in meta‐analysis of log‐odds‐ratio4
A comprehensive review and shiny application on the matching‐adjusted indirect comparison4
Developing prediction models when there are systematically missing predictors in individual patient data meta‐analysis4
Meta-analysis with Jeffreys priors: Empirical frequentist properties4
Methods of multi-indication meta-analysis for health technology assessment: A simulation study4
Synthesizing evidence from the earliest studies to support decision‐making: To what extent could the evidence be reliable?4
Response to: ‘Additional considerations and response to Graphical Representation of Overlap for OVErviews (GROOVE tool)”4
Paperfetcher: A tool to automate handsearching and citation searching for systematic reviews4
4
Why do researchers co‐author evidence syntheses with librarians? A mixed‐methods study4
In‐depth evaluation of machine learning methods for semi‐automating article screening in a systematic review of mechanistic literature4
4
A comparison of two models for detecting inconsistency in network meta‐analysis4
metaConvert: an automatic suite for estimation of 11 different effect size measures and flexible conversion across them4
Aggregating and analysing clinical trials data from multiple public registers using R package ctrdata4
Feasibility and desirability of screening search results from Google Search exhaustively for systematic reviews: A cross‐case analysis4
Simple imputation method for meta-analysis of survival rates when precision information is missing4
Translating systematic searches in the APA PsycInfo database from Ovid to EBSCOhost: A tutorial based on a filter translation4
Limits in the search date for rapid reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies3
Bayesian approaches to fixed effects meta‐analysis3
Automating the data extraction process for systematic reviews using GPT-4o and o33
Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis3
3
3
What can we learn from 1,000 meta-analyses across 10 different disciplines?3
Key concepts and reporting recommendations for mapping reviews: A scoping review of 68 guidance and methodological studies3
Beyond human gold standards: A multimodel framework for automated abstract classification and information extraction3
metaCOVID: A web‐application for living meta‐analyses of COVID‐19 trials3
Generalizable and scalable multistage biomedical concept normalization leveraging large language models3
Robust Bayesian meta‐analysis: Model‐averaging across complementary publication bias adjustment methods3
The application of ROBINS-I guidance in systematic reviews of non-randomised studies: A descriptive study3
Language inclusion in ecological systematic reviews and maps: Barriers and perspectives3
The use of fixed study main effects in arm‐based network meta‐analysis3
TheCONSENSYSapproach: An instrument to supportCONtextual SENsitivityinSYStematicreviews3
ZIBGLMM: Zero-inflated bivariate generalized linear mixed model for meta-analysis with double-zero-event studies3
Estimating pairwise overlap in umbrella reviews: Considerations for using the corrected covered area (CCA) index methodology3
An open competition involving thousands of competitors failed to construct useful abstract classifiers for new diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews3
Predatory journals and their practices present a conundrum for systematic reviewers and evidence synthesisers of health research: A qualitative descriptive study3
Automated citation searching in systematic review production: A simulation study3
1.1737651824951