Research Synthesis Methods

Papers
(The median citation count of Research Synthesis Methods is 2. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-06-01 to 2025-06-01.)
ArticleCitations
Reported methodological quality of medical systematic reviews: Development of an assessment tool (ReMarQ) and meta-research study283
An investigation of the impact of using contrast- and arm-synthesis models for network meta-analysis241
Facilitating open science practices for research syntheses: PreregRS guides preregistration147
Accuracy of conversion formula for effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation115
A mapping exercise using automated techniques to develop a search strategy to identify systematic review tools113
Towards the automatic risk of bias assessment on randomized controlled trials: A comparison of RobotReviewer and humans90
Including non‐English language articles in systematic reviews: A reflection on processes for identifying low‐cost sources of translation support68
The age of abundant scholarly information and its synthesis– A time when ‘just google it’ is no longer enough68
Meta‐analyses of partial correlations are biased: Detection and solutions56
Assessment of key characteristics, methodology, and effect size measures used in meta‐analysis of human‐health‐related animal studies56
What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies55
Advice for improving the reproducibility of data extraction in meta‐analysis49
Issue Information47
40
39
Synthesis of depression outcomes reported on different scales: A comparison of methods for modelling mean differences35
CausalMetaR: An R package for performing causally interpretable meta-analyses31
Bias propagation in network meta‐analysis models30
Fast‐and‐frugal decision tree for the rapid critical appraisal of systematic reviews30
Bayesian meta‐analysis usingSAS PROC BGLIMM27
Retrieving Cochrane reviews is sometimes challenging and their reporting is not always optimal26
Capturing causal claims: A fine-tuned text mining model for extracting causal sentences from social science papers24
Correct standard errors can bias meta‐analysis23
Methods for population adjustment with limited access to individual patient data: A review and simulation study23
Reporting of Cochrane systematic review protocols with network meta‐analyses—A scoping review22
Network meta analysis to predict the efficacy of an approved treatment in a new indication22
A comprehensive systematic review dataset is a rich resource for training and evaluation of AI systems for title and abstract screening22
Data extraction for evidence synthesis using a large language model: A proof‐of‐concept study22
Cumulative meta‐analysis: What works20
Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine prognostic factor effects for a binary outcome20
Selecting a specialized education database for literature reviews and evidence synthesis projects20
How to plan and manage an individual participant data meta‐analysis. An illustrative toolkit19
Regarding approaches to simulating random‐effects19
Issue Information18
Sensitivity analysis for reporting bias on the time-dependent summary receiver operating characteristics curve in meta-analysis of prognosis studies with time-to-event outcomes18
Graphical tools for visualizing the results of network meta‐analysis of multicomponent interventions17
Issue Information17
Validation of large language models (Llama 3 and ChatGPT-4o mini) for title and abstract screening in biomedical systematic reviews17
Bayesian Federated Inference for regression models based on non-shared medical center data17
17
Impact of trial attrition rates on treatment effect estimates in chronic inflammatory diseases: A meta‐epidemiological study16
Inclusive critical appraisal of qualitative and quantitative findings in evidence synthesis16
Six ways to handle dependent effect sizes in meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Is there a gold standard?16
Parametric G‐computation for compatible indirect treatment comparisons with limited individual patient data15
Evaluation of statistical methods used to meta‐analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A simulation study15
Population adjusted‐indirect comparisons in health technology assessment: A methodological systematic review15
Missingness mechanism messiness in meta‐analysis: A response to “The importance of plausible data‐generating mechanisms in simulation studies”15
Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments15
Double arcsine transform not appropriate for meta‐analysis15
Bibliometric study of ‘overviews of systematic reviews’ of health interventions: Evaluation of prevalence, citation and journal impact factor15
Critical appraisal tools used in systematic reviews of in vitro cell culture studies: A methodological study15
Using qualitative comparative analysis as a mixed methods synthesis in systematic mixed studies reviews: Guidance and a worked example15
A practical guide to evaluating sensitivity of literature search strings for systematic reviews using relative recall14
A semiparametric approach for meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with multiple cut‐offs14
Enhanced access to recommendations from the Cochrane Handbook for improving authors' judgments about risk of bias: A randomized controlled trial14
Causally interpretable meta‐analysis: Clearly defined causal effects and two case studies14
Issue Information13
13
13
RIMeta: An R shiny tool for estimating the reference interval from a meta‐analysis13
Issue Information13
A re‐analysis of about 60,000 sparse data meta‐analyses suggests that using an adequate method for pooling matters12
Development of a search filter to retrieve reports of interrupted time series studies from MEDLINE and PubMed12
Pitfalls in choosing data examples for methodological work: Bayesian approaches to a fixed effects meta‐analysis of zinc lozenges for the common cold12
Response to Gusenbauer M, Haddaway NR “What every researcher should know about searching – Clarified concepts, search advice, and an agenda to improve finding in academia”11
Appropriateness of conducting and reporting random‐effects meta‐analysis in oncology11
Reduce, reuse, recycle: Introducing MetaPipeX, a framework for analyses of multi‐lab data11
Crowdsourcing the identification of studies for COVID‐19‐related Cochrane Rapid Reviews11
10
Accuracy and precision of fixed and random effects in meta‐analyses of randomized control trials for continuous outcomes10
Commercial funding and estimated intervention effects in randomized clinical trials: Systematic review of meta‐epidemiological studies10
Combining meta‐analysis with multiple imputation for one‐step, privacy‐protecting estimation of causal treatment effects in multi‐site studies10
Using systems perspectives in evidence synthesis: A methodological mapping review10
Issue Information10
Rare events meta‐analysis using the Bayesian beta‐binomial model10
An evaluation of the performance of stopping rules in AI‐aided screening for psychological meta‐analytical research10
Methodological considerations for novel approaches to covariate‐adjusted indirect treatment comparisons9
Network meta‐analysis: Looping back9
Rapid evidence synthesis approach for limits on the search date: How rapid could it be?9
9
How should we handle predatory journals in evidence synthesis? A descriptive survey‐based cross‐sectional study of evidence synthesis experts9
Meta‐analyses of phase I dose‐finding studies: Application for the development of protein kinase inhibitors in oncology9
Exploring methodological approaches used in network meta‐analysis of psychological interventions: A scoping review8
Methods for using Bing's AI‐powered search engine for data extraction for a systematic review8
Estimating interactions and subgroup‐specific treatment effects in meta‐analysis without aggregation bias: A within‐trial framework8
A novel robust meta-analysis model using the t distribution for outlier accommodation and detection8
Reverse‐Bayes methods for evidence assessment and research synthesis8
Searchsmart.org: Guiding researchers to the best databases and search systems for systematic reviews and beyond8
Graphical Representation of Overlap for OVErviews: GROOVE tool8
Adjusting for misclassification of an exposure in an individual participant data meta‐analysis8
8
8
Treatment recommendations based on network meta-analysis: Rules for risk-averse decision-makers7
Meta‐regression methods to characterize evidence strength using meaningful‐effect percentages conditional on study characteristics7
A critical reflection on computing the sampling variance of the partial correlation coefficient7
Exact inference for fixed‐effects meta‐analysis of proportions7
Network meta-analysis made simple: A composite likelihood approach7
Response to: Briscoe “Exploring the relevance of the effect of geographical location when searching for studies using Google Search”7
Meta‐analytic structural equation modeling made easy: A tutorial and web application for one‐stageMASEM7
Sample size calculation for clinical trials analyzed with the meta‐analytic‐predictive approach7
Consensus on the definition and assessment of external validity of randomized controlled trials: A Delphi study7
Machine learning for identifying randomised controlled trials when conducting systematic reviews: Development and evaluation of its impact on practice7
Identifying evidence for five realist reviews in primary health care: A comparison of search methods6
On the bias of complete‐ and shifting‐case meta‐regressions with missing covariates6
Robust variance estimation in small meta‐analysis with the standardized mean difference6
Issue Information6
metamedian: An R package for meta‐analyzing studies reporting medians6
Subsequent full publication of qualitative studies presented at United Kingdom Royal College of Nursing Research Conference 2015 and 2016: A follow‐up study6
Development and validation of a geographic search filter for MEDLINE (PubMed) to identify studies about Germany6
ccaR: A package for assessing primary study overlap across systematic reviews in overviews6
Meta‐analysis of dichotomous and ordinal tests with an imperfect gold standard6
Scoping review search practices in the social sciences: A scoping review6
When conducting a systematic review, can one trade search efficiency for potential publication bias?6
A tutorial on aggregating evidence from conceptual replication studies using the product Bayes factor5
Improved methods to construct prediction intervals for network meta‐analysis5
Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching5
Advancing unanchored simulated treatment comparisons: A novel implementation and simulation study5
Issue Information5
On ratio measures of heterogeneity for meta‐analyses5
Footprint of publication selection bias on meta‐analyses in medicine, environmental sciences, psychology, and economics5
5
Correction to “Network Meta‐Interpolation: Effect modification adjustment in network meta‐analysis using subgroup analyses”5
The importance of plausible data‐generating mechanisms in simulation studies: A response to ‘Comparing methods for handling missing covariates in meta‐regression’ by Lee and Beretvas (doi: 10.1002/jrs4
Assessment of temporal instability in the applied ecology and conservation evidence base4
‘Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments’: A health technology assessment perspective4
Combining estimators in interlaboratory studies and meta‐analyses4
Two decades of network meta‐analysis: Roadmap to their applications and challenges4
Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis of randomised trials to examine a treatment‐covariate interaction with a time‐to‐event outcome4
Visualization toolkits for enriching meta-analyses through evidence maps, bibliometrics, and alternative impact metrics4
Making the case for librarian expertise to support evidence synthesis for the sustainable development goals4
Evolving use of the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool in biomedical systematic reviews4
Issue Information4
Evaluation of the interim Cochrane rapid review methods guidance—A mixed‐methods study on the understanding of and adherence to the guidance4
Avoiding common mistakes in meta‐analysis: Understanding the distinct roles of Q, I‐squared, tau‐squared, and the prediction interval in reporting heterogeneity4
3
Developing prediction models when there are systematically missing predictors in individual patient data meta‐analysis3
In‐depth evaluation of machine learning methods for semi‐automating article screening in a systematic review of mechanistic literature3
Uncertain about uncertainty in matching‐adjusted indirect comparisons? A simulation study to compare methods for variance estimation3
3
Comparing methods for handling missing covariates in meta‐regression3
A comparison of two models for detecting inconsistency in network meta‐analysis3
The use of fixed study main effects in arm‐based network meta‐analysis3
3
Synthesizing evidence from the earliest studies to support decision‐making: To what extent could the evidence be reliable?3
Paperfetcher: A tool to automate handsearching and citation searching for systematic reviews3
metaConvert: an automatic suite for estimation of 11 different effect size measures and flexible conversion across them3
Estimation of heterogeneity variance based on a generalized Q statistic in meta‐analysis of log‐odds‐ratio3
A comprehensive review and shiny application on the matching‐adjusted indirect comparison3
A framework to characterise the reproducibility of meta‐analysis results with its application to direct oral anticoagulants in the acute treatment of venous thromboembolism3
Risk of bias assessment in preclinical literature using natural language processing3
Investigation of bias due to selective inclusion of study effect estimates in meta‐analyses of nutrition research3
Bayesian random‐effects meta‐analysis with empirical heterogeneity priors for application in health technology assessment with very few studies3
Translating systematic searches in the APA PsycInfo database from Ovid to EBSCOhost: A tutorial based on a filter translation3
Retrospective median power, false positive meta‐analysis and large‐scale replication3
3
Feasibility and desirability of screening search results from Google Search exhaustively for systematic reviews: A cross‐case analysis3
Response to: ‘Additional considerations and response to Graphical Representation of Overlap for OVErviews (GROOVE tool)”3
Meta‐analysis of prevalence: I2 statistic and how to deal with heterogeneity3
Response to Hemilä and Chalker's “Pitfalls in choosing data examples for methodological work: Bayesian approaches to a fixed effects meta‐analysis of zinc lozenges for the common cold”3
3
Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects3
Meta-analysis with Jeffreys priors: Empirical frequentist properties3
Why do researchers co‐author evidence syntheses with librarians? A mixed‐methods study3
Key concepts and reporting recommendations for mapping reviews: A scoping review of 68 guidance and methodological studies3
Issue Information3
A new taxonomy was developed for overlap across 'overviews of systematic reviews': A meta‐research study of research waste3
How trace plots help interpret meta‐analysis results2
Limits in the search date for rapid reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies2
Estimating pairwise overlap in umbrella reviews: Considerations for using the corrected covered area (CCA) index methodology2
Inconsistent results for Peto odds ratios in multi‐arm studies, network meta‐analysis and indirect comparisons2
A REML method for the evidence‐splitting model in network meta‐analysis2
ZIBGLMM: Zero-inflated bivariate generalized linear mixed model for meta-analysis with double-zero-event studies2
An open competition involving thousands of competitors failed to construct useful abstract classifiers for new diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews2
Meta‐analyzing partial correlation coefficients using Fisher's z transformation2
Language inclusion in ecological systematic reviews and maps: Barriers and perspectives2
Generalizable and scalable multistage biomedical concept normalization leveraging large language models2
Automated citation searching in systematic review production: A simulation study2
Data sharing—trialists' plans at registration, attitudes, barriers and facilitators: A cohort study and cross‐sectional survey2
A non‐parametric approach for jointly combining evidence on progression free and overall survival time in network meta‐analysis2
2
Bayesian pairwise meta‐analysis of time‐to‐event outcomes in the presence of non‐proportional hazards: A simulation study of flexible parametric, piecewise exponential and fractional polynomial models2
TheCONSENSYSapproach: An instrument to supportCONtextual SENsitivityinSYStematicreviews2
Examining how meta‐analytic methods perform in the presence of bias: A simulation study2
metaCOVID: A web‐application for living meta‐analyses of COVID‐19 trials2
Adapting how to use Google Search to identify studies for systematic reviews in view of a recent change to how search results are displayed2
Development of the individual participant data integrity tool for assessing the integrity of randomised trials using individual participant data2
Examining how meta‐analytic methods perform2
Zero‐ and few‐shot prompting of generative large language models provides weak assessment of risk of bias in clinical trials2
Bayesian approaches to fixed effects meta‐analysis2
Robust Bayesian meta‐analysis: Model‐averaging across complementary publication bias adjustment methods2
Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis2
Evaluation of the comprehensiveness, accuracy and currency of the Cochrane COVID‐19 Study Register for supporting rapid evidence synthesis production2
Predatory journals and their practices present a conundrum for systematic reviewers and evidence synthesisers of health research: A qualitative descriptive study2
Using clinical trial registries to inform Copas selection model for publication bias in meta‐analysis2
Effect modification and non-collapsibility together may lead to conflicting treatment decisions: A review of marginal and conditional estimands and recommendations for decision-making2
Identifying unreported links between ClinicalTrials.gov trial registrations and their published results2
0.16768789291382