Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability

Papers
(The TQCC of Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability is 4. The table below lists those papers that are above that threshold based on CrossRef citation counts [max. 250 papers]. The publications cover those that have been published in the past four years, i.e., from 2021-04-01 to 2025-04-01.)
ArticleCitations
Enhancing feedback practices and formative assessment in education: insights and challenges from diverse contexts41
Data-driven approaches to education governance and their implications31
Possible biases in observation systems when applied across contexts: conceptualizing, operationalizing, and sequencing instructional quality14
Correction to: Accountability in the evaluation of teacher effectiveness: views of teachers and administrators11
Characteristics of effective feedback in teacher evaluation11
Gender differences in item nonresponse in the PISA 2018 student questionnaire11
Factors associated with Chinese undergraduates’ perceptions of the ethical issues in classroom assessment practices—a mixed methods study10
Predictors of children’s achievement: analysis of the Australian National Numeracy Assessment Program10
Bias risks in ILSA related to non-participation: evidence from a longitudinal large-scale survey in Germany (PISA Plus)10
Key stakeholder voices: Investigating student perceptions of teachers’ use of assessment for learning9
Is more child-initiated always better? Exploring relations between child-initiated instruction and preschoolers’ school readiness9
Teachers’ professional knowledge for teaching early literacy: conceptualization, measurement, and validation8
Navigating data, evaluation, and incentives to improve teaching and instructional quality8
Exclusion rates from international large-scale assessments: an analysis of 20 years of IEA data8
Longitudinal evidence on the predictive validity of the International Development and Early Learning Assessment (IDELA)8
Soft accountability: do national assessments without sanctions make a difference? The case of the school inspection in Chile6
England’s qualifications system: the politics of resilience6
Enhanced conceptual understanding through formative assessment: results of a randomized controlled intervention study in physics classes6
A multidimensional adapted process model of teaching6
A Florida Teacher Wrongfully Terminated? Alleged (Mis)Uses of Value-Added Model (VAM) Estimates for High-Stakes Teacher Evaluation Decisions5
Empathy as a selection criterion for medical students: is a valid assessment possible during personal interviews? A mixed-methods study5
Principals’ attitudes towards on-site school evaluations: contribution to sustained school reform5
Factors influencing the accuracy of Canada’s large-scale assessment data: Policies and practices of exclusion, absenteeism, and social promotion4
Uses and consequences in the theory of action of high-stakes teacher evaluation in Chile4
Swedish students’ everyday school life and teachers’ assessment dilemmas: peer strategies for ameliorating schoolwork for assessment4
Correction to: An application of importance-performance analysis to students’ evaluation of teaching4
One size does not fit all: a concurrent analysis of the framework for teaching and the Classroom Strategies Assessment System4
Science teachers’ interactions with resources for formative assessment purposes4
Understanding the academic achievement of the first- and second-generation immigrant students: a multi-level analysis of PISA 2018 data4
Theorising a contextual framework for moderation of internal assessment: development and opportunities4
0.081650018692017